At 06:34 PM 12/12/02 +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 11
Dec 2002 08:24:47 +, Bertie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bertie In view of the fact that the chil engine code is only
bertie threadsafe if the dynlock callbacks are implemented, and that
bertie
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 13 Dec 2002
08:54:50 +, Bertie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bertie Your changes aren't in the latest snapshot,
bertie openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20021212.tar.gz. Is there some other
bertie way that I can test them ?
You can rsync our repository, and check out
At 10:02 AM 12/13/02 +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 13
Dec 2002 08:54:50 +, Bertie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bertie Your changes aren't in the latest snapshot,
bertie openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20021212.tar.gz. Is there some other
bertie way that
At 12:22 PM 12/13/02 +, Bertie wrote:
At 10:02 AM 12/13/02 +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 13
Dec 2002 08:54:50 +, Bertie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bertie Your changes aren't in the latest snapshot,
bertie
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 13 Dec 2002
12:49:02 +, Bertie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bertie Have rsync'd the latest and eyeballed your changes. They look
bertie fine to me, I like the way you have left the error in if
bertie dynlocks not supported this is visible from e.g. openssl
At 11:29 AM 12/11/02 -0500, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
Hi there,
* Bertie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At 10:00 AM 12/11/02 +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
bertie Yep, this solution works if you are an application developer
bertie wanting to use chil engine. This is not much help if you are
I've been thinking about the whole static vs. dynamic lock situation,
and I must say I have some difficulty seeing a good way out of it.
The two variants serve similar purposes, but have one crucial
difference, and it's that the static ones are pre-initialised.
If everything was converted to use
If everything was converted to use dynamic locks, I wonder where those
locks would be created and initialised? Shall we have yet another
startup function, say OpenSSL_init(), that does this (BTW, we really
should have that anyway, so we have something that does all those
startup things that
bertie BTW: You never replied to the mail with subject Requiring
bertie multithreaded apps to provide dynamic locking upcalls was
bertie this because you agreed with it :-)
Not really. It's more like haven't quite had the time to really read
it, have marked it for later processing... I will
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 11 Dec 2002
08:24:47 +, Bertie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bertie In view of the fact that the chil engine code is only
bertie threadsafe if the dynlock callbacks are implemented, and that
bertie it is unlikely that openssl application developers will get
At 09:36 AM 12/11/02 +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 11
Dec 2002 08:24:47 +, Bertie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bertie In view of the fact that the chil engine code is only
bertie threadsafe if the dynlock callbacks are implemented, and that
bertie
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 11 Dec 2002
08:56:19 +, Bertie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bertie Yep, this solution works if you are an application developer
bertie wanting to use chil engine. This is not much help if you are
bertie say an Apache user who wanted to use an nCipher HSM to
At 10:00 AM 12/11/02 +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 11
Dec 2002 08:56:19 +, Bertie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bertie Yep, this solution works if you are an application developer
bertie wanting to use chil engine. This is not much help if you are
I'll ponder and get back to you later today.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis-- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 10:16 AM 12/11/02 +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
I'll ponder and get back to you later today.
Thanks,
Bertie
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List
Hi there,
* Bertie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At 10:00 AM 12/11/02 +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
bertie Yep, this solution works if you are an application developer
bertie wanting to use chil engine. This is not much help if you are
bertie say an Apache user who wanted to use an
In message 20021211162914.GA1042@debbie on Wed, 11 Dec 2002 11:29:14 -0500, Geoff
Thorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
geoff Just catching up on all this, but something seems a bit strange to me
geoff about the fundamental reliance on OpenSSL-sponsored dynamic locks. The
geoff point is this: ENGINE is
Hi,
* Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The CHIL interface was once meant as some kind of general purpose
library to access certain functions in a cipher box or smart card.
For that reason, it asks for mutex callbacks exactly like OpenSSL
does (and probably for the same
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, 09 Dec 2002
11:17:07 +, Bertie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bertie The patch fixed the CRYPTO_get_new_dynlockid() bug. Maybe
bertie CRYPTO_lock could also be made safer when called with an
bertie invalid lockid, do you think it should assert rather silently
At 01:28 AM 12/7/02 +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 06
Dec 2002 16:51:37 +, Bertie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bertie There is a bug in CRYPTO_get_new_dynlockid(), since the first
bertie time it gets called it returns -2 (not -1 as I expected
Apologies for the previous mail, missed off [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have added dynamic locking support to apache2 and have been testing with
openssl-0.9.7-beta4 and engine chil.
There is a bug in CRYPTO_get_new_dynlockid(), since the first time it gets
called it returns -2 (not -1 as I expected
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 06 Dec 2002
16:51:37 +, Bertie [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
bertie There is a bug in CRYPTO_get_new_dynlockid(), since the first
bertie time it gets called it returns -2 (not -1 as I expected) and
bertie when you call CRYPTO_lock (mode, -2, , ) it silently
22 matches
Mail list logo
