Re: [openssl.org #428] Patch for unused files

2003-01-01 Thread Gisle Vanem
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: levitte Please name it. The reason that I ask you is that the changes you levitte propose are already present in 0.9.7 and 0.9.8-dev. Or is your patch a reverse patch? No, not a reverse patch. The snapshot I diff'ed against was

Re: [openssl.org #428] Patch for unused files

2003-01-01 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message 015701c2b1a4$1dcef310$[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 1 Jan 2003 15:43:14 +0100, Gisle Vanem [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: giva Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: giva giva levitte Please name it. The reason that I ask you is that the changes you giva levitte propose are

Patch for unused files

2002-12-31 Thread Gisle Vanem
The files. ./crypto/dsa/dsagen.c ./crypto/x509v3/v3conf.c seems no longer used (reference from makefiles). But some functions have wrong number of arguments. The files should IMHO be removed or corrected. Here is a patch: - ---

[openssl.org #428] Patch for unused files

2002-12-31 Thread Gisle Vanem via RT
The files. ./crypto/dsa/dsagen.c ./crypto/x509v3/v3conf.c seems no longer used (reference from makefiles). But some functions have wrong number of arguments. The files should IMHO be removed or corrected. Here is a patch: - ---