Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: openssl/util/ mk1mf.pl

2010-12-04 Thread Richard Levitte
That change makes no sense to me. What is it supposed to fix, and how does it help ignore leading null fields? In message 20101203193135.0fbb31eae...@master.openssl.org on Fri, 3 Dec 2010 20:31:35 +0100 (CET), Dr. Stephen Henson st...@openssl.org said: steve OpenSSL CVS Repository steve

Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: openssl/util/ mk1mf.pl

2010-12-04 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010, Richard Levitte wrote: That change makes no sense to me. What is it supposed to fix, and how does it help ignore leading null fields? Before this change there was an entry (at least on WIN32) for an ENGINE called .dll. The reason it works is mentioned in perlfunc: the

Re: [CVS] OpenSSL: openssl/util/ mk1mf.pl

2010-12-04 Thread Richard Levitte
In message 20101204114849.ga...@openssl.org on Sat, 4 Dec 2010 12:48:49 +0100, Dr. Stephen Henson st...@openssl.org said: steve On Sat, Dec 04, 2010, Richard Levitte wrote: steve steve That change makes no sense to me. What is it supposed to fix, and how steve does it help ignore leading

issues converting the iis.cer to iisx509.cer format

2010-12-04 Thread Sudershan Raj
Hi Folks, I have been using the OpenSSL for more than a year and never had any issues creating ssl certificates. However, I am getting error while converting the iis.cer to iisx509.cer format. Can you please provide me the solution. Below is the error This is the error I am getting while

[openssl.org #2388] out-of-date comment for renegotiation handling

2010-12-04 Thread Vladimir Kotal via RT
t1_lib.c contains this comment in ssl_parse_serverhello_tlsext(): 716 1.18 bodo /* Determine if we need to see RI. Strictly speaking if we want to 717 1.18 bodo * avoid an attack we should *always* see RI even on initial server 718 1.18 bodo