RE: engine[ubsec] and ciphers

Hi, In fact, my compagny (NetSecureOne) has developped its own software allowing symmetric offload on a BCM582x based board. You may find some code in the demos/engine/zencod directory of openssl. Regards, Fred -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Prashant Kumar Se

RE: ubsec hw accelerator and DMA Error

Hi, I have no knowledge of VXWorks platform, but we encoutered the same problem when coding a linux driver for BCM chip. We encouter this on slow machine, with slow PCI and around 128 Mb of RAM, when stressing the driver. In fact the driver create all kernel structure and allocate memory faster

RE: AES ( Advanced Encryption Standard)

Oups AES is in 0.9.7... ;)) []$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/ossl-0.9.7e-dev/lib:/usr/local/lib:/usr/lib /usr/local/ossl-0.9.7e-dev/bin/openssl ciphers -v -tls1 DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA SSLv3 Kx=DH Au=RSA Enc=AES(256) Mac=SHA1 DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA SSLv3 Kx=DH Au=DSS Enc=AES(256)

RE: [openssl.org #1041] OpenSSL WIN32 Compiler Bug report for openssl 0.9.7f

Hi This as been discussed in users mailing list. ;) subject: 0.9.7f rc4/asm problem OpenSSL 0.9.7f released (you 'll find an answer oon this thread) nasmw -f win32 -o crypto\rc4\asm\r4_win32.obj .\crypto\rc4\asm\r4_win32.asm .\crypto\rc4\asm\r4_win32.asm:30: error: operation si

RE: AES+OpenSsl+ubsec hardware accelerator

Hi Prashant, With added AES to our ENGINE without any problem for now. We have made tests with AES256-SHA, an AES128-SHA ciphers under openssl 0.9.7d and 0.9.7e. We have not tested the new release for now... Did your ENGINE was working fine in the older release? Regards, Fred PS: the most pa

DH Key Agreement

Hi ! I'd like to know how the "pre master secret" is generated when SSL use DH Key Agreement. I've read that the "shared secret" generated with the DH key agreement is used to produce the "pre master secret" but their size are different, so which bits of the "shared secret" are used ? Thanks in

Re:

  Alex Cosic a écrit :   Hi, My question is on how to connect JSSE (java based client) with openssl based web engine server. I have tried so far and what I have got is that I could not create SSL socket with my opensl server, which works fine with   my openssl client (even when I used JNI approac

Re:

    My question is on how to connect JSSE (java based client) with openssl based web engine server. I have tried so far and what I have got is that I could not create SSL socket with my opensl server, which works fine with   my openssl client (even when I used JNI approach to use C llibrary from

RE: [openssl.org #1173] bug report

Hi, according to: dl error on dlopen /usr/local/ssl/lib/libcrypto.a I think you should add the "shared" option to openssl configure option. If i remember well openssl 0.9.7x are configured to build shared libraries by default whereas openssl 0.9.8 is not. hope ti could help Fred -Orig

Simple 0.9.7x question

Hi all, Is there any plan to add PKCS#1 RSA-PSS padding in openssl 0.9.7x version (just the same way as in openssl 0.9.8)? regards, Fred __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mai

RE: Simple 0.9.7x question

Steve, I have seen the crypto/rsa/rsa_pss.c file in 0.9.8 release (a notes in the NEWS file of 0.9.8). "Major changes between OpenSSL 0.9.7g and OpenSSL 0.9.8: o Added support for the RSA-PSS encryption schem" But i did not have a look at 0.9.7 snapshot (my mistake). In the snapshot director

RE: Dynamic Engine support on OS X

Hi 26743:error:2507006C:DSO support routines:DSO_load:functionality not This says that you do not have the DSO support on! ./Configure dso or something like that. regards Fred -Original Message- From: Christopher P. Masone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 10/4/2005 4:36 AM To

RE: Dynamic Engine support on OS X

Test your config using openssl -a If DSO is on you 'll get something including the following flags: -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H In fact is seems that there is only a "no-dso" options! The DSO support is enable by default (if available). Try to add that flag to the config. ./config shared threads

RE: Please help me to update OpenSSL using CVS

Hi, Maybe haviong a look at OpenSSL web site first: http://www.openssl.org/source/repos.html Fred -Original Message- From: Denis Andreevich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sun 10/16/2005 6:10 PM To: openssl-dev@openssl.org Cc: Subject:Please help me to update OpenSS

RE: BIO_do_connect does not connect (bug?)

Hi all, Any news about that? Nothing seems have changed on the CVS. Regards. -Original Message- From: Claudiu Dragalina-Paraipan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 10/28/2005 3:07 PM To: openssl-dev@openssl.org Cc: Subject:BIO_do_connect does not connect (bug?) Hell

Typo ?

Hi all, I 've already seen some mail about this commit. http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=13190 It sounds to me like a typo, but ... - Comment is "add missing parentheses" - diff is as follow - if (!data->state != BIO_CONN_S_OK) + if (!(data->state != BIO_CONN_S_OK)

RE: [openssl.org #1318] [PATCH] AES-CFB1 and DES-CFB1 mode only encrypts 1/8th of the source

Hey May some explains the following result about AES OFB (sounds like a BUG)? I think that AES-128 block size is at 128 bits even for ECB or OFB mode but openssl output is different. INFO: Settings: alg: aes-128-cbc Algo Name: aes-128-cbc EVP_CIPHER: NID: 01a3, Name: AES-128-CBC, Blk len

RE: [openssl.org #1318] [PATCH] AES-CFB1 and DES-CFB1 mode only encrypts 1/8th of the source

- Block Ciph regards, Fred -Original Message- From: Frédéric Donnat Sent: Thu 5/4/2006 5:04 PM To: openssl-dev@openssl.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org Subject:RE: [openssl.org #1318] [PATCH] AES-CFB1 and DES-CFB1 mode only encrypts 1/8th of the source