[openssl.org #388] Building beta 5 on solaris 8 sparcv9
The defect was fixed, and buildling multiple library types out of one tree is not a goal. Marking this resolved. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager majord...@openssl.org
[openssl.org #388] Building beta 5 on solaris 8 sparcv9
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Mon Dec 9 08:57:10 2002]: Hi, there is a bug in the Makefiles, where you write == for comparing $(PLATFORM). Should be = for traditionsl sh. This has already been solved. Thanks for the report. I guess when building shared library on sparcv9 one should have BOTH shared object, in case an application that interfaces the kernel (and hence needs to be -m64) has to use it. As to sizes/times they look comparable (see attached file). As it is right now, we can't very easily accomodate building several variants of the libraries. It might get in there in 0.9.8, however, so I'll mark this with an 0.9.8 milestone. -- Richard Levitte __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[openssl.org #388] Building beta 5 on solaris 8 sparcv9
Hi, there is a bug in the Makefiles, where you write == for comparing $(PLATFORM). Should be = for traditionsl sh. I guess when building shared library on sparcv9 one should have BOTH shared object, in case an application that interfaces the kernel (and hence needs to be -m64) has to use it. As to sizes/times they look comparable (see attached file). Greetings __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
