Re: DJGPP patches for 0.9.8 and 0.9.7

2005-01-02 Thread Gisle Vanem
Doug Kaufman wrote: The code for watt-32 debugging didn't appear to be implemented correctly. This should only be called when desired; otherwise large files will be created, documenting every byte going through tcp. In addition dbug_init() should be called only once, but was being called multiple

Re: djgpp patches

2002-06-18 Thread Doug Kaufman
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Gisle Vanem wrote: Thanks a lot to Doug Kaufmann for the MSDOS patches for djgpp. But one thing I don't understand. In ./crypto/bn/bn_mul.c: #if defined(OPENSSL_NO_ASM) || !(defined(__i386) || defined(__i386__)) || \ defined(__DJGPP__) /* Assembler implementation

Re: djgpp patches

2002-06-18 Thread Gisle Vanem
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Doug Kaufman wrote: a chance to check this yet. Before doing this routinely for DJGPP, we should probably verify that there are no instructions that won't work on a 386 processor. Otherwise tha code won't be portable to many of the low-powered machines (i.e. 386 and 486