In message
on Wed, 5 Dec 2018 19:27:32 +0100, Tim Hudson said:
> The function has been there for a long time (since then beginning) and it is
> all about version
> related information - so both names aren't exactly clearly descriptive.
>
> OpenSSL_version_information() would be a better name.
The function has been there for a long time (since then beginning) and it
is all about version related information - so both names aren't exactly
clearly descriptive.
OpenSSL_version_information() would be a better name.
It would also argue that the "version" program should be renamed "info" as
t
Richard and I are discussing whether OpenSSL_version() should be deprecated or
not in favour of a new function OPENSSL_info() which does more or less the same
thing. See:
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7724#discussion_r239067887
Richard's motivation for doing so is that he finds the old
