Am 07.03.2018 um 02:20 schrieb Salz, Rich:
>
> I think we should make sure to set aside time to review as many of the
> non-project pull requests as possible. I think it is important to
> show a commitment to the larger community.
>
>
>
> One way to do this is to say that we will extend the
> If you are blocked on review please drop a note (like the one you just
> did) to the group.
> Some of us review the specifically blocked things when such notes are
> sent.
>
I will try hard to complete the documentation for the RAND_DRBG api
until saturday. And I would be happy if #5461 and
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 03:01:03PM +1000, Tim Hudson wrote:
> If you are blocked on review please drop a note (like the one you just did)
> to the group.
> Some of us review the specifically blocked things when such notes are sent.
>
> #3082 is already closed and merged - did you mean another PR?
If you are blocked on review please drop a note (like the one you just did)
to the group.
Some of us review the specifically blocked things when such notes are sent.
#3082 is already closed and merged - did you mean another PR?
#3958 approved (in case Richard doesn't get back to it)
#1130
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 01:20:41AM +, Salz, Rich wrote:
> I think we should make sure to set aside time to review as many of the
> non-project pull requests as possible. I think it is important to show a
> commitment to the larger community.
I agree. I started looking at this last week,
I think we should make sure to set aside time to review as many of the
non-project pull requests as possible. I think it is important to show a
commitment to the larger community.
One way to do this is to say that we will extend the BETA date by a week, and
in that week no new code from the
