Nicely worded. It doesn’t go as far as I’d like, but it’s a step.
On Fri, 24 May 2019 11:21:18 +0200,
Matthias St. Pierre wrote:
>
> > In considering approvals, the combined approvals must come
> > from individuals who work for separate organisations.
> > This condition does not apply where the organisation is the
> > OSF or OSS.
>
>
>
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 7:34 PM Matt Caswell wrote:
> On 24/05/2019 10:28, SHANE LONTIS wrote:
> > It doesn’t stop us both reviewing a PR. That doesn’t mean we both need
> to approve.
>
> Right...but in Matthias's version if you raise a PR, and then Pauli
> approves it,
> then you only then need
On 24/05/2019 10:28, SHANE LONTIS wrote:
> It doesn’t stop us both reviewing a PR. That doesn’t mean we both need to
> approve.
Right...but in Matthias's version if you raise a PR, and then Pauli approves it,
then you only then need to get a second committer approval. Otherwise you would
need to
It doesn’t stop us both reviewing a PR. That doesn’t mean we both need to
approve.
> On 24 May 2019, at 7:21 pm, Matthias St. Pierre
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > In considering approvals, the combined approvals must come
> > from individuals who work for separate organisations.
> >
> In considering approvals, the combined approvals must come
> from individuals who work for separate organisations.
> This condition does not apply where the organisation is the
> OSF or OSS.
IMHO an important clarification needs to be made: The rule should not be abo
