I'm not currently interested in the given platforms, and while I really hope to
never be interested again, I can't rule it out. It'd be nice to be able to
follow the discussions, without necessarily contributing. But I also understand
I if those involved don't want to include those in my
Hello Reinier,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Reinier Torenbeek
reinier.torenb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The mechanism for implementing ECDSA in my own engine is unclear to me.
Unfortunately, none of the example engines implement ECDSA so it is hard
for me to find answers.
Invoking
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for the response. I suppose I have to do the same thing as well then.
I wonder why the ECDSA_METHOD structure and the associated mechanism to
insert it into an engine is so much different from the DSA_METHOD
struct. The latter seems more straightforward to use and does not
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015, Reinier Torenbeek wrote:
The mechanism for implementing ECDSA in my own engine is unclear to me.
Unfortunately, none of the example engines implement ECDSA so it is hard
for me to find answers.
Invoking ENGINE_set_ECDSA() does not seem to be sufficient: my setup,
Hi,
The mechanism for implementing ECDSA in my own engine is unclear to me.
Unfortunately, none of the example engines implement ECDSA so it is hard
for me to find answers.
Invoking ENGINE_set_ECDSA() does not seem to be sufficient: my setup,
sign and verify methods never get invoked. Stepping
Hello,
has anybody got a reliable source or knowledge about which
mail clients - especially which Thunderbird release - should be capable
of verifying such mails correctly?
this
openssl smime -verify -CAfile trusted.crt -in mail.eml
successfully verifies such an e-Mail;
Thanks,
Walter
--
Hello Reinier,
No, I do not. And may be for your purposes you can use this or that
ECDSA_METHOD setting it into the EC_KEY struct.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Reinier Torenbeek
reinier.torenb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
Thanks for the response. I suppose I have to do the same thing
If you don't know or care what FIPS 140-2 is, a hysterical giggle of
pure delight and whoop of relief before moving on is fully justified.
The SE (Salavge Edition) validation has been approved:
http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/STM/cmvp/documents/140-1/140val-all.htm#2398
This actually appeared on
