> From: William A. Rowe Jr.
>
> On 4/13/2010 4:49 PM, 芦翔 wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >I am trying to add the security flavor to an
> application. To achieve
> > this objective, I wrote the codes to establish a security
> tunnel between
> > the server and the client with VC2008. When I build th
CERT_SYSTEM_STORE_CURRENT_USER is defined in Microsoft's wincrypt.h.
Regards,
jjf
> From: Wolfgang Pupp
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 7:32 PM
>
> I was trying to build openssl-1.0.0-beta5, shared, with MSYS/Mingw
> (under Windows 7, 32 bit), with
> $ perl Configure mingw shared
>
It doesn't make any difference in this case, but you'd be best to get in the
habit of putting the libraries last; for example
gcc cli.c -lssl -lcrypto
A few compilers only search libraries for references which they know about at
the time the library is listed. If you were using that sort of c
From: Jeremy Farrell
From: Chris Copeland
I am building and packaging the following on one machine
(the "build"
ma
From: Chris Copeland
I am building and packaging the following on one machine (the
"build"
machine) and attempting to install and use on other machines
("target"
machines) some of which have different processor
I don't follow your logic. Since OpenSSL doesn't have a library called
libssl3.so, this seems to suggest that FireFox doesn't use OpenSSL ...
> From: Sagar Dixit
>
> Yes,
>
> I ran firefox through strace and saw that for https websites
> it uses libssl3.so
>
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:15 PM
What do you find unclear about the INSTALL file? As it says, if you want
dynamic libraries use ntdll.mak, if you want static libraries use
nt.mak. I can't tell you which you should prefer, that depends on what
you're doing with them.
I don't know about openssl.cfg.
_
There's probably something wrong with your code, but from the
information you've presented it's difficult to be more precise. I don't
see what your question has to do with developing OpenSSL, so I've
dropped openssl-dev from the thread.
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
_
@$(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $(LIBS) $(OBJ) -o $(BIN)
needs to be
@$(CC) $(LDFLAGS) $(OBJ) $(LIBS) -o $(BIN)
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
> [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Marc Kührer
> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 1:32 AM
> To: openssl-u
> From: Eystein Måløy Stenberg
>
> I manage to build OpenSSL beta3 successfully on two mingw
> installations - one on 32 bit WinXP (mingw.org), and one on 64 bit
> Vista (http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/).
> I use "./Configure mingw shared" and "./Configure mingw64 no-asm
> no-shared", r
> From: patfla
> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 12:46 AM
>
> ...
>
> I'm on the latest build of Windows Server 2008 R2 from MSDN.
> Build 7100.
>
> First built using
>
> ./config
>
> which more-or-less worked but didn't produce any DLLs which
> was unsurprising
> given that /.config is the u
The message says that you don't have permission to execute ar. There's
nothing much anyone here can do to help. You need to get permission to
execute ar.
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
[mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Neerav Sin
> From: edam
>
> ...
> I was wondering - where would you guys suggest I go to read
> up on OpenSSL
> programming? I've been reading their manpages online at
> http://www.openssl.org/docs/
> but to be honest, they're fairly complicated when you're new
> to OpenSSL!
> And there are gaps in the
> From: Larry Bugbee
>
> > The source for incremental_send isn't in the book anywhere
> > that I've seen. I'm using the first edition (June 2002).
> > My code does call incremental_send, and the code I'm trying
> > to compile is the example code provided in the book itself
> > (in chapter 6 - se
> From: Jed Mitten
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 4:00 PM
>
> I am trying to statically link into libeay32.lib so that I can
> distribute my application as a single executable instead of packaging
> DLLs along with it. I am not new to programming, but I am new to
> using libraries in C/C++. I
From: Dan Clusin
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 4:24 PM
I have run into a problem similar to one that has been posted here
before, but I did not see any solutions to it.
http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-users@openssl.org/msg40020.html
Are you really intending to have the library as a shared object in this
embedded system? How many different executables will be linked against
it?
A more usual approach if you want to minimize size is to do a static
build of the OpenSSL library and link against that. Your executable will
then only
> From: Friedrich Dominicus
>
> I'm trying to get into openssl programming and run into the
> following "problem". I've found nothing about that neither
> while searching the web nore looking into this lib.
>
> According to threads(3) and also mentioned in "network
> security with OpenSSL" fr
> From: Simon
>
> On 5/23/06, Kyle Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > .pod files are processed by pod2man, which is a standard
> part of perl.
> > Type 'man man' to determine how to show those files -- on some
> > systems it's merely 'man 3 SSL', others require different command
> > lin
101 - 119 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
