Hi all,
Marry Christmas!
Please take a look at my previous question, appreciate every bit of help
I'm stuck.
FYI the guy named ananthaneni saiteja chowdary and myself are same. This
email had a problem subscribing to the mailing list earlier hence the other
name.
Thanks
Saiteja.
--
pebkac.
clean re-DL of Openssl 1.0.2f sources fixes that ; patch applies cleanly.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016, at 06:05 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
>
> > (1) 1.0.2f + cloudflare patch
> > (2) 1.1.0-alpha3
>
> Did CF update their patch to the official version and codepoints? Cool.
>
Apparently. But 1st try has one glitch ...
patch -p1 <
> (1) 1.0.2f + cloudflare patch
> (2) 1.1.0-alpha3
Did CF update their patch to the official version and codepoints? Cool.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016, at 06:00 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > What's current plan status for these ciphers?
> >
> > Not until 1.1.0 release? Or earlier?
>
> Yup, 1.1. It's a new feature so it doesn't go into current releases which
> only get fixes.
Thanks.
> And the code that's in master, which
> What's current plan status for these ciphers?
>
> Not until 1.1.0 release? Or earlier?
Yup, 1.1. It's a new feature so it doesn't go into current releases which only
get fixes.
And the code that's in master, which just released alpha-3, rocks. :)
--
openssl-users mailing list
To
I'm looking for Openssl's Chacha20/Poly1305 cipher support, supported
client-side in Chrome/Chromium-dev, and server-side in Nginx.
Last I was able to find on list
[openssl-users] ChaCha20/Poly1305 in OpenSSL?
Fri Mar 27 05:05:59 UTC 2015
I'm looking for Openssl's Chacha20/Poly1305 cipher support, supported
client-side in Chrome/Chromium-dev, and server-side in Nginx.
Last I was able to find on list
[openssl-users] ChaCha20/Poly1305 in OpenSSL?
Fri Mar 27 05:05:59 UTC 2015
Replying to my own message to add additional information.
When I try it with Firefox, it asks which cert to use from my smart card etc.
and then throws this error dialog.:
Could not establish an encrypted connection because your certificate was
rejected by euukmoappd003n.dev.local. Error Code:
the CA.pl script which
works okay. On this issue, I would like to ask some
follow-up questions:
1. Do I have to move server.key and ca.key to
/etc/ssl/private and ca.crt /etc/ssl/certs directory
respectively?
If you used CA.pl correctly there wont be a 'server.key' file initially. The
private
like to ask some
follow-up questions:
1. Do I have to move server.key and ca.key to
/etc/ssl/private and ca.crt /etc/ssl/certs directory
respectively?
2. Since the command sign.sh server.csr does not work
because the sign.sh script is kind of obsoleted
already, do I have to move newreq.pem
Thanks to everyone for pointing me to PEM_X509_INFO_read
However I've noticed a very strange problem. If I call:
ASN1_d2i_fp(X509_new, d2i_X509, fp, NULL);
before I call PEM_X509_INFO_read(fp, NULL, myPemCallback, NULL), and the
ASN1_d2i_fp call fails, the PEM_X509_INFO_read call _always_
Using Slackware 7.1 or 8.0 doesn't seem to matter. Program is written in
C++ using GNU's g++ compiler.
Same failure with OpenSSL-0.9.6a/b.
Problem:
The web app that I'm coding dies after a few calls to malloc() or C++'s
new in the middle of the call.
No error code is returned. I've took out
I'm not at a location to access the account that receives the subscription
mail today so please CC this account on a reply, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm kind of delving over which way I should implement buffering.
I looked through some of the source code and found in bf_buff.c
#define
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 07:55:13AM -0700, Steven Schaefer wrote:
I'm not at a location to access the account that receives the subscription
mail today so please CC this account on a reply, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm kind of delving over which way I should implement buffering.
I looked through
4, 2001 10:26 PM
Subject: Re: SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL question (follow up)
Hi,
I guess what I was wondering was does this just indicate that the peer has
simply gone away/shutdown? By violation, does this situation actually a
indicate a protocol error? I'm thinking that its not.
Take care,
Cor
I have two identical Dell servers, both exactly the same spec, dual pentium 667 with
512MB ram, Linux6.2. I have successfully
compiled and tested openssl-0.9.6 on one machine
However when I compile it on the second and run
make test
the test also hangs and when I look at top
the %CPU
17 matches
Mail list logo
