On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:33:18 +0200, Michael Ströder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because the mailing list processor is configured to set the Reply-To
address to the list address. IMHO this should be changed to reduce
such problems with automatic replies (vacation e-mails, virus-scans
etc.).
But
[not setting Reply-To]
But that would make *regular* replies a pain in the ass for list
members.
The amount of such accidents like this one or the vacation mail
disaster that seems to hit this list every few weeks is much more
than on any other high-volume list that I know. I think the
[not setting Reply-To]
But that would make *regular* replies a pain in the ass for list
members.
The amount of such accidents like this one or the vacation mail
disaster that seems to hit this list every few weeks is much more
than on any other high-volume list that I know. I think the
Because the mailing list processor is configured to set the Reply-To
address to the list address. IMHO this should be changed to reduce
such problems with automatic replies (vacation e-mails, virus-scans
etc.).
But that would make *regular* replies a pain in the ass for list
members.
I
-Original Message-
From: Amos Gouaux [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 August 2001 14:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Please reconfigure majordomo to not set Reply-To (was:
Failed to clean virus file Emanuel.exe)
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 05:00:01 -0700,
Caliban Tiresias Darklock
I'm in agreement, there is a reason that most mailers have a Reply-All or
Reply-Group function after all. Don't munge Reply-To!
- Original Message -
From: Steven Reddie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:09 AM
Subject: RE: Please reconfigure
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 01:33:18PM +0200, Michael Ströder wrote:
I just wonder why this program send this info to the list and not
to the person who sent the virus ;-)
Because the mailing list processor is configured to set the Reply-To
address to the list address. IMHO this should be
