On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Lance Paine wrote:
I'm in agreement, there is a reason that most mailers have a Reply-All or
Reply-Group function after all. Don't munge Reply-To!
Well, if it's *replacing* Reply-to: on incoming mail, that's definitely
broken. However it is perfectly reasonable for a list
On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 05:00:01 -0700,
Caliban Tiresias Darklock [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ctd) writes:
ctd On Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:33:18 +0200, Michael Ströder
ctd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because the mailing list processor is configured to set the Reply-To
address to the list address. IMHO this
