[openssl-users] Architecture-specific headers

Hi all, I'm working on building OpenSSL 1.0.2 for both Windows x86 and AMD64, i.e. the VC-WIN32 and VC-WIN64A platforms. Everything seems to work pretty well, but one thing is worrying -- the opensslconf.h header comes out different between the two builds. I'm assuming this only affects

Re: [openssl-users] Architecture-specific headers

Hi Michael, On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Michael Wojcik wrote: >> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf >> Of Kim Gräsman >> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 04:14 >> >> Everything seems to work pretty well, but one thing is

Re: [openssl-users] Architecture-specific headers

> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf > Of Kim Gräsman > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 07:04 > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Michael Wojcik > wrote: > > > > So, in short: You do in fact have to publish and maintain one

Re: [openssl-users] Architecture-specific headers

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Michael Wojcik wrote: >> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf >> Of Kim Gräsman >> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 07:04 >> >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Michael Wojcik >>

Re: [openssl-users] Architecture-specific headers

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Salz, Rich wrote: > >> Any chance that OpenSSL 1.1 is different in this regard? > > No. > > Except that the install-top is simpler to configure. Thanks, Rich. Yeah, I'm looking forward to the 1.1 build system! - Kim -- openssl-users mailing

Re: [openssl-users] Architecture-specific headers

> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf > Of Kim Gräsman > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 04:14 > > Everything seems to work pretty well, but one thing is worrying -- the > opensslconf.h header comes out different between the two builds. > > I'm assuming this

Re: [openssl-users] Architecture-specific headers

> Any chance that OpenSSL 1.1 is different in this regard? No. Except that the install-top is simpler to configure. -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL 1.0.2.f undefined reference: _Stoul

Ok, I see *how* this is happening, but I don't understand why. In the version of stdlib.h that I am including I see: *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* #if defined(__cplusplus) && !defined(_NO_CPP_INLINES) [snip] #else /* defined(__cplusplus) && !defined(_NO_CPP_INLINES) */ _C_LIB_DECL /*

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL 1.0.2.f undefined reference: _Stoul

> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf > Of craig_we...@trendmicro.com > Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 14:05 > > Ok, I see *how* this is happening, but I don't understand why. In the > version of stdlib.h that I am including I see: > [omitted] > > So, for