Carl,
Thanks for your reply. I would love to have a service which I could
call, unfortunately my Windows development skills don't stretch that far
as I am an infrastructure person with some basic VBscripting skills.
Do you (or another member of this list as CC'ed) have something that
Leon:
I suggest that you write a program that uses file descriptors for IO? I'd
write it in C.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 5:51 AM, Funnell, Leon leon.funn...@catlin.comwrote:
We have Windows application which passes data to OpenSSL.exe to encrypt as
a Windows command, then scrapes the encrypted
I would hope that one of us could provide you something given a week or so...
very busy with work currently but I'm sure I could do something in time.
Carl
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] on
behalf of John Zavgren [j...@zavgren.com]
Sent: 14 November
On 11/13/2012 11:24 PM, Pierre DELAAGE wrote:
If we would have to have deep understanding of the various codes we are
using everyday (I am myself a programmer, and openssl WCE contributor),
we would not have enough time to work, to produce anything.
Anyway understanding what the code is
(Top posting to keep this thread consistent)
Hi,
As for encrypting/decrypting a file via stdin/stdout, the openssl.exe
program can already do that (it is almost the default behavior for those
commands that encrypt/decrypt things, you may need to add the -passin
option to indicate if the
Folks,
Have a CA (created by certtool, validates in openssl as self signed just fine)
and a server cert (created with certtool, signed with certool) which des NOT
validate in openssl.
However the signature (when extracted with openssl its asn1parse; openssl its
rsautl and openssl its sha256)
Hi folks,
We have several projects that use openssl in both FIPS-mode and non-FIPS-mode;
one of the projects that we have that does not use FIPS-mode is one that uses
the Boost ASIO library in which we can reach done into the openssl properties
to get properties and operations that aren't
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Nou Dadoun ndad...@teradici.com wrote:
Hi folks,
We have several projects that use openssl in both FIPS-mode and
non-FIPS-mode; one of the projects that we have that does not use FIPS-mode
is one that uses the Boost ASIO library in which we can reach done
On 14 nov. 2012, at 18:42, Dirk-Willem van Gulik di...@webweaving.org wrote:
Have a CA (created by certtool, validates in openssl as self signed just
fine) and a server cert (created with certtool, signed with certool) which
des NOT validate in openssl.
However the signature (when
On 11/14/2012 04:15 AM, Fredrik Jansson wrote:
Hi!
I have compiled the 2.0.2 FIPS module, when I
call FIPS_module_version_text() it returns FIPS 2.0.1 validated test
module 12 Jun 2012.
It seems a bit odd that it says 2.0.1 and test, does this indicate
that I have made a mistake when
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
Folks,
Have a CA (created by certtool, validates in openssl as self signed just
fine) and a server cert (created with certtool, signed with certool) which
des NOT validate in openssl.
However the signature (when extracted with openssl
In addition to Mr Henson answer, your CA certificate doesn't have any
keyUsage extension, depending on the toolkit it may not be considered a
valid CA.
Your countryName AVA is wrong, too. It must be only 2 characters long,
NL in your case.
--
Erwann ABALEA
-
yuppiexpédidétritus: cadavres
On 14 nov. 2012, at 19:58, Dr. Stephen Henson st...@openssl.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
Folks,
Have a CA (created by certtool, validates in openssl as self signed just
fine) and a server cert (created with certtool, signed with certool) which
des NOT
[If this is posted a 2nd time, my apologies, I believe my subscription was
broken]
We are starting our FIPS implementation soon (FIPS OM 2.0 and OpenSSL 1.0.1)
and I'd like to test out this set of assumptions (or maybe they are
'assertions')
- In the context of OpenSSL, FIPS
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:25 PM, mclellan, dave dave.mclel...@emc.com wrote:
...
We are starting our FIPS implementation soon (FIPS OM 2.0 and OpenSSL 1.0.1)
and I’d like to test out this set of assumptions (or maybe they are
‘assertions’)
- In the context of OpenSSL, FIPS
Thanks for that clarification. It's not so cut and dry, I see.
About this: ... and don't even bother to build fipscanister.o... Then on what
grounds could they claim FIPS compliance?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:21 PM, mclellan, dave dave.mclel...@emc.com wrote:
Thanks for that clarification. It's not so cut and dry, I see.
About this: ... and don't even bother to build fipscanister.o... Then on
what grounds could they claim FIPS compliance?
Exactly ;)
And the more
On 11/14/2012 04:21 PM, mclellan, dave wrote:
Thanks for that clarification. It's not so cut and dry, I see.
About this: ... and don't even bother to build fipscanister.o... Then on
what grounds could they claim FIPS compliance?
There is a common confusion between FIPS compliant
18 matches
Mail list logo
