On Apr 12, 2014, at 5:40 PM, Michael Tuexen
wrote:
>>
>> "Introduced with intent" vs. "known to the NSA" -- two
>> different things, right?
> My statement was referring to the "Introduced with intend".
Understood. I'm personally quite sure it *wasn't* introduced
with intent, which is why I
On 12 Apr 2014, at 21:43, Michael Smith wrote:
>
> On Apr 12, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Michael Tuexen
> wrote:
>>>
>> I have read the rumor. It is wrong.
>
> "Introduced with intent" vs. "known to the NSA" -- two
> different things, right?
My statement was referring to the "Introduced with inten
El día Saturday, April 12, 2014 a las 03:43:29PM -0400, Michael Smith escribió:
>
> On Apr 12, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Michael Tuexen
> wrote:
> >>
> > I have read the rumor. It is wrong.
>
> "Introduced with intent" vs. "known to the NSA" -- two
> different things, right?
>
> I don't have any
El día Saturday, April 12, 2014 a las 03:43:29PM -0400, Michael Smith escribió:
>
> On Apr 12, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Michael Tuexen
> wrote:
> >>
> > I have read the rumor. It is wrong.
>
> "Introduced with intent" vs. "known to the NSA" -- two
> different things, right?
>
> I don't have any
On 12/04/14 21:30, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>> http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=4817504d069b4c5082161b02a22116ad75f822b1
>
> Thanks for the git diff (and the other statements). Could you please be
> so kind and point to the exact place of the offending statement (or
> missing b
On Apr 12, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Michael Tuexen
wrote:
>>
> I have read the rumor. It is wrong.
"Introduced with intent" vs. "known to the NSA" -- two
different things, right?
I don't have any direct knowledge of what goes on in the
NSA, but if they don't have a whole cubicle farm full
of p
El día Saturday, April 12, 2014 a las 09:30:22PM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió:
> El día Saturday, April 12, 2014 a las 09:08:15PM +0200, Michael Tuexen
> escribió:
>
> > > What is the exact bug, can someone show a svn/git diff of the first
> > > source version having the bug?
> > http://git.op
On 12 Apr 2014, at 21:30, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Saturday, April 12, 2014 a las 09:08:15PM +0200, Michael Tuexen
> escribió:
>
>>> What is the exact bug, can someone show a svn/git diff of the first
>>> source version having the bug?
>> http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=com
El día Saturday, April 12, 2014 a las 09:08:15PM +0200, Michael Tuexen escribió:
> > What is the exact bug, can someone show a svn/git diff of the first
> > source version having the bug?
> http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=4817504d069b4c5082161b02a22116ad75f822b1
> >
Hi,
On 12 Apr 2014, at 17:43, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El dÃa Wednesday, April 09, 2014 a las 01:05:22AM -0700, monloi perez
> escribió:
>
>> True. Thanks for the quick reply.
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 3:33 PM, Alan Buxey
>> wrote:
>>
>> https://www.openssl.org/news/changelog.html
El dÃa Wednesday, April 09, 2014 a las 01:05:22AM -0700, monloi perez
escribió:
> True. Thanks for the quick reply.
>
>
> On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 3:33 PM, Alan Buxey
> wrote:
>
> https://www.openssl.org/news/changelog.html
>
> 1.0.1 introduced the heartbeat support.
>
> 1.0.0 and ea
On 04/12/2014 07:37 AM, Geoffrey Coram wrote:
> On 04/11/2014 23:50, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
>>
>> Teach me to ask a question without reading the entire thread.
>>
>> At what point would the break-even cost make sense to form a
>> non-profit entity?
>>
>> -Kyle H
>
>
> It costs $500-$750 to file f
On 04/11/2014 23:50, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
>
> Teach me to ask a question without reading the entire thread.
>
> At what point would the break-even cost make sense to form a
> non-profit entity?
>
> -Kyle H
It costs $500-$750 to file for tax-exempt status (501c3); then you
have to file a retu
13 matches
Mail list logo
