Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
According to the FIPS 1.2 Security Policy, Appendix A, Platform 8 cannot
be built as FIPS compliant because 'x84-64 asm' is a non-existent
platform. There is no such thing as x84. It should say 'x86-64 asm'.
Validation, from what I understand, only covers those
Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
According to the FIPS 1.2 Security Policy, Appendix A, Platform 8
cannot be built as FIPS compliant because 'x84-64 asm' is a
non-existent platform. There is no such thing as x84. It should say
'x86-64 asm'. Validation, from what I understand, only covers those
Steve Marquess wrote:
Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
According to the FIPS 1.2 Security Policy, Appendix A, Platform 8
cannot be built as FIPS compliant because 'x84-64 asm' is a
non-existent platform. There is no such thing as x84. It should say
'x86-64 asm'. Validation, from what I understand,
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Marquess
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:24 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: FIPS 1.2 Security Policy issues
Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
According to the FIPS 1.2 Security Policy, Appendix A, Platform 8
cannot be built as FIPS compliant because
According to the FIPS 1.2 Security Policy, Appendix A, Platform 8 cannot
be built as FIPS compliant because 'x84-64 asm' is a non-existent
platform. There is no such thing as x84. It should say 'x86-64 asm'.
Validation, from what I understand, only covers those platforms listed.
