Sandy,
Thanks for bring this up. I think it's an interesting idea and plan
on looking into it when I have some free time.
Thierry,
Seriously? while this anti-Gerrit revolt is being sent on the ML
Can we dial down the drama a bit?It's things like this that will
discourage people from
I propose identifying tokens by their full keystone URI within X-Auth-Token
header. EG: instead of
X-Auth-Token: fa8426a0-8eaf-4d22-8e13-7c1b16a9370c
we would do
X-Auth-Token:
https://keystone.server/tenants/fa8426a0-8eaf-4d22-8e13-7c1b16a9370c
This has the advantage of allowing
Jay Payne wrote:
Can we dial down the drama a bit?It's things like this that will
discourage people from submitting new ideas. Calling just the
introduction of a new idea a revolt is a diservice to the community.
Well, maybe revolt is not the best term, but this is about resisting
the
I don't intend to fan the fumes here, but I think the point we are trying to
make is that the decision to use Gerrit was made before most of the community
was even aware of it -- much less having a chance to come up with a solution
like Sandy did (which, IMHO, is far more practical than the
I'm interested in assessing the difficulty of implementing IPSEC tunneling
as a cloud pipe feature using open/strongSwan. I was hoping someone could
provide direction and possibly mentorship to identify what would need to be
done to implement this feature and provide guidance on the implementation
5 matches
Mail list logo
