Hi,
Anyone having problems with gerrit?
Thanks
Gary
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Hi all,
These are what I did (nova version is 'Essex'):
1. logon the instance
2. shutdown it using 'shutdown -h now'
3. wait a few minutes until the instance's vm_state, power_state change to
'shutoff', '5' respectively
4. run cmd 'nova image-create server name' to snapshot the server instance
Thierry Carrez wrote:
Happy voting!
Results are in, and the G release will be named Grizzly !
The regular poll selected Gazelle (35 votes), with Gilroy (27 votes)
being a close second. But the Grizzly revolt poll showed overwhelming
support for the Grizzly name (88 votes) rather than going with
Replied :-)Cheers
Nuage Co - Razique Mahrouarazique.mahr...@gmail.com
Le 11 juil. 2012 à 05:18, Nick Lothian a écrit :Hi,I'm trying to understand how people are doing management of servers and storage across multiple clouds (or perhaps it is only me that has this problem!).I've created a short
Hi Gary,
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 09:16 +0300, Gary Kotton wrote:
Anyone having problems with gerrit?
I can access it fine and the monitoring system doesn't show anything out
of the ordinary. Can you please be a bit more specific as to the
problem?
Kind Regards
--
Andrew Hutchings - LinuxJedi -
On 07/11/2012 05:18 AM, Nick Lothian wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to understand how people are doing management of servers and
storage across multiple clouds (or perhaps it is only me that has this
problem!).
I've created a short survey I'd appreciate any responses on:
So, I wonder how the OpenStack Gerrit avoids sending these start messages.
Has it been customized?
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 8:28 PM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote:
Scott Lavender slaven...@internap.com writes:
Does anyone know how to suppress the build started messages from
Hi,
What you describe seems like a bug. If the VM is running when you do
snapshot, the VM will be temporarily suspended, snapshotted, then
resumed. But if the VM is off when you do snapshot, the VM should
remained to be off after the snapshot, not to be set back to the
ACTIVE state. Would you
As voted on the July 5th meeting the Ceilometer team members will soon
vote on electing it's project team lead (PTL). Even though Ceilometer is
not yet an official OpenStack project, we are applying for it, so we
should be following the standard process as much as possible. The
details of the
Hi,
The metering project team holds a meeting in #openstack-meeting,
Thursdays at 1600 UTC
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?hour=16min=0sec=0.
Everyone is welcome.
Agenda:
http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda
* Review last week's actions
- nijaba to send an
On 07/10/2012 04:23 PM, Matt Ray wrote:
Bluntness appreciated, this process is already in motion.
http://opscode.com/openstack was launched 2 weeks ago and I promptly
left for conferences and vacation. I am consolidating GitHub repos
here:
Awesome.
I the future, I'd like to suggest Condorcet voting for future polls.
It's a more comprehensive voting mechanism than the polling done on
Launchpad. It's also easy to use (both in creating polls and in voting
on favorites).
Here's an example set of results (favorite programming language poll):
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 01:50 +0200, Rafael Durán Castañeda wrote:
I'm working on a blueprint [1] and implementation [2] doing rate limit
middleware for Keystone; after discussing it at keystone's meeting
today I was suggested to ask for some feedback from the community.
Have you taken a look at
I should be able to help out getting these working with XenServer/XCP, if that
is useful to anyone?
Curiosity leads me to ask: Where do I find the puppet equivalent these days?
Cheers,
John
-Original Message-
From: openstack-bounces+john.garbutt=eu.citrix@lists.launchpad.net
-Original Message-
From: openstack-bounces+jonpaul.sullivan=hp@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+jonpaul.sullivan=hp@lists.launchpad.net]
On Behalf Of Monty Taylor
Sent: 11 July 2012 14:37
To: Matt Ray
Cc: Nati Ueno; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re:
Duncan McGreggor wrote:
I the future, I'd like to suggest Condorcet voting for future polls.
It's a more comprehensive voting mechanism than the polling done on
Launchpad. It's also easy to use (both in creating polls and in voting
on favorites).
It's also extremely easy to game if you don't
On 07/11/2012 03:33 PM, John Garbutt wrote:
Curiosity leads me to ask: Where do I find the puppet equivalent these days?
I've been using these on RHEL with the fedora EPEL packages, testing has
been limited but what I have tested so far is working
I am running for PTL for the ceilometer project. I have posted some
information about myself and my thoughts for the project to the wiki under
http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering/PTLElectionProcess/DougHellmann
Doug
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Nick Barcet
I know Rackspace gates their commits with foodcritic
(https://rubygems.org/gems/foodcritic), which is becoming the standard
we're recommending to people for cookbooks style. For doing Travis CI
testing automatically, I plan on adding testing outlined in this post:
Hello Everyone,
Now that the PPB has decided to promote Cinder to core for the Folsom
release, we need to decide what happens to the existing Nova Volume
code. As far as I can see it there are two basic strategies. I'm going
to give an overview of each here:
Option 1 -- Remove Nova Volume
+1 for Option 1.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Now that the PPB has decided to promote Cinder to core for the Folsom
release, we need to decide what happens to the existing Nova Volume
code. As far as I can see it there are
One vote for option 1.
Remove Volumes
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
REPOSE would be worth taking a look at, as well (includes rate limiting):
https://github.com/rackspace/repose
http://openrepose.org/documentation.html
-Dolph
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Kevin L. Mitchell
kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 01:50 +0200, Rafael
+1 for option 1
On 7/11/12 8:26 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Now that the PPB has decided to promote Cinder to core for the Folsom
release, we need to decide what happens to the existing Nova Volume
code. As far as I can see it there are two basic
Hi All,
I'm looking at the network bandwidth code with a view to how the current
framework could be made to work with libvirt, and a I have a couple of
questions that hopefully someone familiar with the Xen implementation can
answer:
- Do the Xen counters get reset after they are
+1 for option 1
--
Mike Perez
DreamHost.com
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
Option 1 -- Remove Nova Volume
==
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to :
I also vote for option 1, but the migration path really needs to be
solid and well documented.
-nld
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Andrew Clay Shafer
a...@parvuscaptus.com wrote:
One vote for option 1.
Remove Volumes
___
Mailing list:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
OpenStack Security Advisory: 2012-009
CVE: CVE-2012-3371
Date: July 11, 2012
Title: Scheduler denial of service through scheduler_hints
Impact: Medium
Reporter: Dan Prince (Red Hat)
Products: Nova
Affects: Essex, Folsom series
Description:
Dan
On Wed, Jul 11 2012, Nick Barcet wrote:
Candidates should, before July 24th:
1/ declare themselves on this mailing list
I do declare myself as a candidate.
I've added a page about this here:
http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering/PTLElectionProcess/JulienDanjou
2/ add their name on
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:26:56 -0700
Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Now that the PPB has decided to promote Cinder to core for the Folsom
release, we need to decide what happens to the existing Nova Volume
code. As far as I can see it there are two basic
+1 on 1
chuck
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:26:56 -0700
Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Now that the PPB has decided to promote Cinder to core for the Folsom
release, we need to decide what happens to the existing Nova Volume
code. As far as I can see it there are
+1 for option 1. Bite the bullet now, rather than making it worse later.
-Paul
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help :
-Original Message-
From: openstack-bounces+gregory_althaus=dell@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+gregory_althaus=dell@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Vishvananda Ishaya
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 10:27 AM
To: Openstack (openstack@lists.launchpad.net)
On 07/11/2012 12:00 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
snip
Let me know if there are any things that people are wanting related to
any of these projects from the OpenStack CI infrastructure.
Foodcritic/jsonlint seem pretty easy - deployments on to bare nodes
using the chef stuff similar to our
On Jul 11, 2012, at 11:18 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
Hi All,
I’m looking at the network bandwidth code with a view to how the current
framework could be made to work with libvirt, and a I have a couple of
questions that hopefully someone familiar with the Xen implementation can
answer:
-
More info on the Repose rate limiter here:
http://wiki.openrepose.org/display/REPOSE/Rate+Limiting+Filter
The rate limiter has the concept of limit groups -- you can specify rate limits
for a particular group -- then introspect the request to see which group
applies. Typically a user can be
Hi all,
I've been taking a look at the way Nova uses its MySQL database. Having
done MySQL performance audits for years as a consultant, a few things
jumped out right away at me. First is the way that SQLAlchemy is wrapping
nearly every query in an unnecessary ping check and rollback, eg.:
Before we completely pile on option 1, can we get devstack changed to
run this way? I think the amount of pain / ease that transition is for
users and the OpenStack CI team will greatly inform this decision, and
give us some good data points on how tough this is for people to convert.
+1 for option 1
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
+1 option one.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Paul McMillan paul.mcmil...@nebula.comwrote:
+1 for option 1. Bite the bullet now, rather than making it worse later.
-Paul
__**_
Mailing list:
+1 for 1
On 11/07/12 8:26 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Now that the PPB has decided to promote Cinder to core for the Folsom
release, we need to decide what happens to the existing Nova Volume
code. As far as I can see it there are two basic strategies.
On 07/10/2012 12:49 PM, Gary Kotton wrote:
On 07/10/2012 06:29 PM, Eric Windisch wrote:
2. I based my integration on the patch
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/9166/. A number of files were missing.
Should this have specifically mentioned the missing files or should the
rpc part have taken
+1 to option 1, rip the band-aid off quickly :-)
-Doug
-Original Message-
From: openstack-bounces+gregory_althaus=dell@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+gregory_althaus=dell.com@lists.launchpad.
net] On Behalf Of Vishvananda Ishaya
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012
On 07/11/2012 09:22 AM, Narayan Desai wrote:
I also vote for option 1, but the migration path really needs to be
solid and well documented.
-nld
I feel the same. I think documented and tested migration paths are of
utmost importance here. Unlike the Keystone - Keystone Light
migration,
All,
Just wanted to note that either decision means a revision and addition
of documentation - to me, one option does not create more doc need
than the other. Removal or deprecation, both require documentation.
Anne
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Narayan Desai narayan.de...@gmail.com wrote:
Vish,
How would the Nova migration from Essex to Folsom take place ? I'm wondering
how we can validate Folsom without risking an existing Essex installation
via some sort of clone/migrate operation.
What is your assessment of the risk that Cinder is less stable than Nova
volume ?
Option 1
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Sean Dague sda...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Before we completely pile on option 1, can we get devstack changed to run
this way? I think the amount of pain / ease that transition is for users and
the OpenStack CI team will greatly inform this decision, and give
+1 to all your ideas below, Devananda.
On 07/11/2012 01:33 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Hi all,
I've been taking a look at the way Nova uses its MySQL database. Having
done MySQL performance audits for years as a consultant, a few things
jumped out right away at me. First is the way
For me it's +1 to 1, but...
Here at Globo.com we're already deploying clouds based on openstack (not in
production yet, we have dev and lab), and it's really painful when
openstack just forces us to change, I mean, sysadmins are not that happy,
so I think it's more polite if we warn them in
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Adam Gandelman ad...@canonical.com wrote:
On 07/11/2012 09:22 AM, Narayan Desai wrote:
I also vote for option 1, but the migration path really needs to be
solid and well documented.
-nld
I feel the same. I think documented and tested migration paths are
+1
Chris
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 11, 2012, at 3:02 PM, Sean Dague sda...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
Before we completely pile on option 1, can we get devstack changed to
run this way? I think the amount of pain / ease that transition is for
users and the OpenStack CI team will greatly
Thanks pete for a quick reply,
Here is the output of the keystone endpoint-list command. I made sure there are
no typos. When i get the tenant list, i see only service and openstackdemo in
the list. Which tenant name am i supposed to use in my swift command?
# nova:/usr/local/strongauth
Just to be clear, I was +1 ing Sean's point that we should get sme
experience behind this before pulling the plug.
Chris
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 11, 2012, at 3:02 PM, Sean Dague sda...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
Before we completely pile on option 1, can we get devstack changed to
run this
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Duncan McGreggor wrote:
I the future, I'd like to suggest Condorcet voting for future polls.
It's a more comprehensive voting mechanism than the polling done on
Launchpad. It's also easy to use (both in creating
I would also love to see these changes applied.
With regards to the bugs around not issuing a commit or rollback, is it
possible to have sqlachemy track whether or not a transaction starts and
only issue a rollback when a session is handed back with an open
transaction on it? Seems like a useful
I'm normally very much in favor of stable APIs and slow deprecation, but in
this case I'm far more concerned about having to support two completely
independent codebases. If we pursue option 2 I think the language there needs
to be even stronger and we'd have to say that nova-volume is
Now with the new fabulous mailing list server and the help of Duncan
McGreggor, we have a real mailing list for anyone interested in
OpenStack docs.
To subscribe, go to:
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-docs
Originally we had a group at
I believe sqlalchemy already tracks the session state, though I haven't
seen anything (in the docs or code that I've touched) suggesting it knows
how to be selective in issuing ROLLBACK. It would be a good feature, though
I still think the sql_idle_timeout should be lowered ;)
-Deva
On Wed, Jul
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 16:38 -0400, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
You just don't know what the Bear Revolt crew was ready to do to let
Grizzly win :)
*laughs*
Not the BEAR REVOLT!!!
Nobody expects the BEAR REVOLT!
--
Kevin L. Mitchell kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com
Hi,
A proposal for the implementation of the public networks feature has been
published.
It can be reached from the quantum-v2-public-networks blueprint page [1].
Feedback is more than welcome!
Regards,
Salvatore
[1]:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/quantum-v2-public-networks
It would be great if anyone who is already deploying Openstack, even if in
non-production environments, could give cinder a try.
For a test environment, it seems easy enough to make the switch using devstack
(I have verified this with XenServer, and I believe, John and folks at
Rackspace have
El 11/07/12 19:23, Jorge Williams escribió:
More info on the Repose rate limiter here:
http://wiki.openrepose.org/display/REPOSE/Rate+Limiting+Filter
The rate limiter has the concept of limit groups -- you can specify
rate limits for a particular group -- then introspect the request to
see
is there an easy way to see free -vs- allocated nova resources?
for example that 300 of 1000 cpu cores are in use (and similar with
memory and storage).
Thanks,
-Jon
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to :
Hey All-
I'd like to announce the availability of Folsom trunk testing PPAs for
Ubuntu 12.04 and and 12.10. We've spent a considerable amount of time
this cycle expanding our test infrastructure + coverage and packaging
efforts in order to support a single Openstack release across two Ubuntu
option 1.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Renuka Apte renuka.a...@citrix.com wrote:
It would be great if anyone who is already deploying Openstack, even if in
non-production environments, could give cinder a try.
For a test environment, it seems easy enough to make the switch using
Hi Jon,
There's actually a review up right now proposing to add an OS API extension to
be able to give some of this data:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/9544/
I don't know how you may be looking to query it, but it's not too difficult to
get it directly from the instances table in the
Re-including openstack ML in the loop, as several Quantum contributors
might not yet be registered to openstack-dev.
Apologies for spamming.
Salvatore
-- Forwarded message --
From: Yong Sheng Gong gong...@cn.ibm.com
Date: 11 July 2012 19:10
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Quantum]
Yes, I'll be happy to share results
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.comwrote:
On 07/11/2012 05:18 AM, Nick Lothian wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to understand how people are doing management of servers and
storage across multiple clouds (or perhaps it is only
Hi all, I'm hoping I could get some assistance figuring out my networking
problems with a small Essex test cluster. I have a small Diablo cluster
running without any problems but have hit a wall in deploying Essex.
I can launch VMs without issue and access them from the compute host, but
from
Hi-
I have installed Openstack on a Machine ESSEX-1 which is the controller and
Nova-Compute on another machine ESSEX-2 which acts as an agent/node.
When ever I start an new instance, the VM instance is getting created in
the CONTROLLER (ESSEX-1) machine not in the ESSEX-2 machine, the
Hi-
I have set up two machine a Controller (All Openstack Modules) and Node
(Only Nova-Compute).
In the first instance, the VM is getting created in the Controller and is
Active and able to a login.
In the Second Instance the VM is getting created in the Node but stops with
an Spawning error.
at 20120711-1505Build needed 00:01:43, 436k disc spaceERROR:root:Error occurred during package creation
Title: precise_folsom_deploy
General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_folsom_deploy/40/Project:precise_folsom_deployDate of build:Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:16:03 -0400Build duration:38 secBuild cause:Started by command lineBuilt on:masterHealth
at 20120711
at 20120711
See http://10.189.74.7:8080/job/precise_folsom_coverage/60/
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
Post to : openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications
More
76 matches
Mail list logo
