Re: [Openstack] Qcow2 Details on base images

On 28/07/12 05:42, Gaurab Basu wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to figure out the technology that openstack uses when > multiple VM's having the*same *base image (OS) are provisioned on a > physical server. > Does it use as many copy as the number of VM's or does it use the same > base image and then

[Openstack] [Nova] proposal to provide project specific instance type

Hi, In our use case, there is a need to provide project-specific instance type. Meaning that this instance type is only visible and available for several projects. It's an idea kind of like private image concept for Glance project. Has this proposal been discussed before somewhere? Any comments?

Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack Foundation] Individual Nominations for Foundation Board of Directors

Nope, that's perfectly clear, I just failed to spot it. Thanks. Best regards, Soren. Sent from my phone. Please pardon my brevity. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launch

[Openstack] OpenStack Community Weekly Newsletter (July 20-27)

Highlights of the week Join The OpenStack Foundation The OpenStack community has worked hard since the announcement of intention to establish an OpenStack Foundation in October 2011. We've come to the point w

Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack Foundation] Individual Nominations for Foundation Board of Directors

On Jul 27, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Soren Hansen wrote: > Sorry if it's already been made clear somewhere, but I'm unsure for > what term these individuals are being elected? The bylaws say that the > election happens each year in the first two weeks of January, so is > this an election to fill the seats

Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack Foundation] Individual Nominations for Foundation Board of Directors

Sorry if it's already been made clear somewhere, but I'm unsure for what term these individuals are being elected? The bylaws say that the election happens each year in the first two weeks of January, so is this an election to fill the seats until the first ordinary election in January? -- Soren

Re: [Openstack] User Friendly Development -was- Fwd: [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

Hi, From: openstack-bounces+atul.jha=csscorp@lists.launchpad.net [openstack-bounces+atul.jha=csscorp@lists.launchpad.net] on behalf of Mark Collier [mark.coll...@rackspace.com] Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 10:48 PM To: Lloyd Dewolf Cc: OpenStack Mai

Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack Foundation] Individual Nominations for Foundation Board of Directors

On Jul 26, 2012, at 6:05 PM, Lloyd Dewolf wrote: > Who receives email sent to secret...@openstack.org? Sorry, I missed > who is the acting secretary. It might be nice to include the person's > name on the page: > http://www.openstack.org/community/openstack-foundation-board-2012-election-candidate

Re: [Openstack] User Friendly Development -was- Fwd: [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

On 07/27/2012 11:18 AM, Ryan Lane wrote: > Users definitely need a better mechanism to give feedback early, and > to have their current production issues handled. The start of the > design summit is good, but it would also be nice to collect feedback > after the summit as well. Do you think you ca

[Openstack] Qcow2 Details on base images

Hi, I am trying to figure out the technology that openstack uses when multiple VM's having the* same *base image (OS) are provisioned on a physical server. Does it use as many copy as the number of VM's or does it use the same base image and then copy on write. I need to understand the complete d

[Openstack] Qcow2 Details on base images

Hi, I am trying to figure out the technology that openstack uses when multiple VM's having the* same *base image (OS) are provisioned on a physical server. Does it use as many copy as the number of VM's or does it use the same base image and then copy on write. I need to understand the complete d

Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack Foundation] Individual Nominations for Foundation Board of Directors

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote: > > > We definitely want to have some means for nominees to provide details on > what they would bring to the Board, and can easily add a section or > statement to their current bios. We are just starting by contacting each > nominee to get th

[Openstack] zombie_instance_updated_at_window on kvm+libviry

Hi guys, i saw the plugin to cleanup vms on xenserver, is this available from kvm+libvirt ? Also, i saw on the code that the "zombie state" its based on instance.updated_at , what actions over the server update this field on the db ? Regards Lean ___ Mai

Re: [Openstack] [keystone] Multi-tenants per user, authentication tokens and global roles

> You can use a token to get a token. Look at the authenticate code in > keystone/service.py > > Have the user initially get a non-tenant specific token. Pass that in the > x-auth header to POST /tokens/ along with a tenantid and you will get a new > one scoped to the tenant > Ah. This is perfe

Re: [Openstack] User Friendly Development -was- Fwd: [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

>> I do wonder if it would make sense to gather user feedback and goals before >> the summit, like the day (or week) before, to help provide some priorities >> (from their perspective) to consider going into the summit. > > This does seem valuable, although keep in mind that most users are a rele

Re: [Openstack] User Friendly Development

I worry that if the users meet just a day before the conference, we cannot consolidate the input. Having the time to work out that a large share of the users are blocked on a specific problem is an important input to the conference. A single user may have specific problems to be addressed but i

Re: [Openstack] User Friendly Development -was- Fwd: [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

On Jul 27, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Mark Collier wrote: > I do wonder if it would make sense to gather user feedback and goals before > the summit, like the day (or week) before, to help provide some priorities > (from their perspective) to consider going into the summit. This does seem valuable,

Re: [Openstack] User Friendly Development -was- Fwd: [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

I think these are some very thoughtful ideas on how to ensure users are influencing the roadmap (among other goals). I do wonder if it would make sense to gather user feedback and goals before the summit, like the day (or week) before, to help provide some priorities (from their perspective) t

Re: [Openstack] User Friendly Development -was- Fwd: [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Lloyd Dewolf wrote: >> In my fantasies for the Grizzly release it would start something like: >> >> A. Grizzly Summit >> >> B. From the summit the Tech Committee & PTL have community consensus >> on the overarching goal for the release and t

Re: [Openstack] [ceilometer] Metering team meeting agenda for Thursday 26 July, 2012 @ 16:00 UTC

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > The metering project team holds regular meetings via IRC in > #openstack-meeting, Thursdays at 1600 UTC < > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?hour=16&min=0&sec=0>. > > Everyone is welcome to participate. > > Agenda: http://

[Openstack] [OSSA 2012-010] Various Keystone token expiration issues (CVE-2012-3426)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 OpenStack Security Advisory: 2012-010 CVE: CVE-2012-3426 Date: July 27, 2012 Title: Various Keystone token expiration issues Impact: Medium Reporter: Derek Higgins Products: Keystone Affects: Essex, Folsom Description: Derek Higgins reported various

Re: [Openstack] [openstack-dev] High Available queues in rabbitmq

Hi >As for consumer cancellation notifications - I need to remember when >exactly they happen in an HA setup. Maybe you're right. With the HA active/active configuration clients always consume from the Master node so we can have a scenario where the queue is declared on a Slave node but the cl

Re: [Openstack] [keystone] Multi-tenants per user, authentication tokens and global roles

On 07/27/2012 12:50 AM, Ryan Lane wrote: Not in Essex. When we discussed the Domains blueprint, one issue that I brought up was nested groups/projects. That would solve your problem. It is not currently being developed. Ok. I can deal with handling tens of thousands of tokens, but I need so

Re: [Openstack] [OpenStack Foundation] Individual Nominations for Foundation Board of Directors

Duncan McGreggor wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Stefano Maffulli > wrote: >> Speaking of that process, it's broken and needs to be fixed ASAP, since >> we'll have the PTL elections soon. The current nomination process, >> especially, is broken: it requires way too much manual processin

Re: [Openstack] User Friendly Development

Lloyd Dewolf wrote: > A. Grizzly Summit > > B. From the summit the Tech Committee & PTL have community consensus > on the overarching goal for the release and the projects' goals. > Articulated online in user friendly manner. > > C. Webinar / OpenStack User Groups get a presentation on the releas

Re: [Openstack] [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

Lloyd Dewolf wrote: > In my fantasies for the Grizzly release it would start something like: > > A. Grizzly Summit > > B. From the summit the Tech Committee & PTL have community consensus > on the overarching goal for the release and the projects' goals. > Articulated online in user friendly mann