Re: [Openstack] Puppet module for Quantum and vSwitches (Currently OVS)

2012-10-09 Thread Endre Karlson
I've got a noen multi i om the works. Will update during today or the week. Den 9. okt. 2012 06:52 skrev Dmitry Ukov du...@mirantis.com følgende: Thanks a lot On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Joe Topjian joe.topj...@cybera.ca wrote: Hi Dmitry, Great modules. But you're using function

[Openstack] Boot from volume (Ceph RBD) and live migration

2012-10-09 Thread Samuel Hassine, Another Service
Hi, I just joined this list and I already have a question: We successfully: - launched instances with lib/nova/instances directory on a Ceph partition, and performed live migration between physical nodes - launched instances from a nova-volume (boot on volume) which was a Ceph Rados Block

[Openstack] Configuration file and options alignment

2012-10-09 Thread Endre Karlson
Is there any plans to eliminate differences between configuration options? Like Keystone sections in config files and other options? Endre. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe :

[Openstack] Help about Quantum Conf

2012-10-09 Thread Bilel Msekni
Hi, I have finished installing OpenStack Folsom but i am encountring a small issue about configuring Quantum. I would like to start the simplest scenario Flat Network http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-network/admin/content/use_cases_single_flat.html but i dont know how to configure my

Re: [Openstack] Help about Quantum Conf

2012-10-09 Thread Emilien Macchi
Hi,I suggest you to read the official documentation [1] which helps to install and configure Quantum + OVS for many use cases.I think you should use 3 NICs for your controller node : eth0 for management network, eth1 for VMs traffic (used by OVS), and eth2 for public network (i.e. Internet). For

Re: [Openstack] Help about Quantum Conf

2012-10-09 Thread gong yong sheng
Hi, quantum.conf: core_plugin = quantum.plugins.openvswitch.ovs_quantum_plugin.OVSQuantumPluginV2 ovs_quantum_plugin.ini: network_vlan_ranges = physnet1 enable_tunneling = False bridge_mappings = physnet1:br-eth0 To create a shared provider network: quantum net-create sharednet1 --shared

Re: [Openstack] Help about Quantum Conf

2012-10-09 Thread Bilel Msekni
Thanks sheng ! you are a life saver ;) Le 09/10/2012 10:29, gong yong sheng a écrit : Hi, quantum.conf: core_plugin = quantum.plugins.openvswitch.ovs_quantum_plugin.OVSQuantumPluginV2 ovs_quantum_plugin.ini: network_vlan_ranges = physnet1 enable_tunneling = False bridge_mappings =

Re: [Openstack] NOVA errors

2012-10-09 Thread Daniel Oliveira
Hello... I'm sorry, does anybody know what's causing the problem? 2012/10/8 Daniel Oliveira dvalbr...@gmail.com Oh lol what was I thinking. The DEBUG message isn't exactly the same, it's the following: # nova-manage network create private --multi-host=T --fixed_range_v4= 192.168.0.0/24 \

Re: [Openstack] General questions regarding zones and replicas

2012-10-09 Thread Moritz Krinke
Micheal, thanks for your hints and explanations! Regards, Moritz 2012/10/8 Michael Barton mike-launch...@weirdlooking.com On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Moritz Krinke mkri...@fotocommunity.net wrote: - I cannot change the number of replicas after creating the ring (e.g. changing it from

Re: [Openstack] Help about Quantum Conf

2012-10-09 Thread Anne Gentle
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Bilel Msekni ski...@hotmail.fr wrote: Hi, thanks for replying Emilien, I will surely do my best in there but you know, OpenStack documentation is still really not updated especially for the Folsom release. Hi Bilel - The documentation for Folsom is updated

Re: [Openstack] metadata api with Quantum and provider networks

2012-10-09 Thread Jānis Ģeņģeris
Hi, I have managed to create the Quantum router so that all the VMs created on provider network are going through it. I had to simply use router-interface-add. But I have now the problem with accessing metadata service. As L3 agent adds DNAT rule in router, the packets are rewritten and arrives

[Openstack] Folsom nova-scheduler race condition?

2012-10-09 Thread Jonathan Proulx
Hi All, Looking for a sanity test before I file a bug. I very recently upgraded my install to Folsom (on top of Ubuntu 12.04/kvm). My scheduler settings in nova.conf are: scheduler_available_filters=nova.scheduler.filters.standard_filters

[Openstack] billing for openstack

2012-10-09 Thread Frans Thamura
hi all my member asks related to billing for openstack, so we can bill anyone use openstack's services are one of this? WHMCS, Clientexec, Blesta, Hostbill or anyone can help? F ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to :

Re: [Openstack] billing for openstack

2012-10-09 Thread Nick Barcet
On 10/09/2012 05:33 PM, Frans Thamura wrote: hi all my member asks related to billing for openstack, so we can bill anyone use openstack's services are one of this? WHMCS, Clientexec, Blesta, Hostbill or anyone can help? Hello Frans, We are just about to release a first version of

Re: [Openstack] Discussion / proposal: Ability to reset tenant's quotas to default

2012-10-09 Thread Eoghan Glynn
HI All, I would like to open a discussion on a topic user should have a option to reset the tenant’s quotas( to the default). Hi Vijaya, I don't think a new nova command is needed for this use-case, just add a simple custom script: nova quota-update `nova quota-defaults $1 | tail

Re: [Openstack] billing for openstack

2012-10-09 Thread Frans Thamura
interesting.. still learning how to implement best billing for openstack. in private this is good to make revenue center for IT division F On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com wrote: On 10/09/2012 05:33 PM, Frans Thamura wrote: hi all my member asks

Re: [Openstack] Discussion / proposal: Ability to reset tenant's quotas to default

2012-10-09 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Isn't that just changing one custom limit with another ? A true reset to the defaults would see the user stay in step with any changes to the default values. Do you mean configured changes to the defaults? AFAIK 'nova quota-defaults' returns the current set of defaults, which seems to be

Re: [Openstack] Discussion / proposal: Ability to reset tenant's quotas to default

2012-10-09 Thread Day, Phil
Hi Glynn, My point was that if a user is currently configured to have a quota of 50 VMs, and the default is currently configured to be 20 VMs then there is a difference between configuring the user to have a quota of 20 and configuring a user to have the default quota.The first is just a

Re: [Openstack] Folsom nova-scheduler race condition?

2012-10-09 Thread Day, Phil
Hi Jon, I believe the retry is meant to occur not just if the spawn fails, but also if a host receives a request which it can't honour because it already has too many VMs running or in progress of being launched. Maybe try reducing your filters down a bit (standard_filters means all

Re: [Openstack] Discussion / proposal: Ability to reset tenant's quotas to default

2012-10-09 Thread Eoghan Glynn
My point was that if a user is currently configured to have a quota of 50 VMs, and the default is currently configured to be 20 VMs then there is a difference between configuring the user to have a quota of 20 and configuring a user to have the default quota.The first is just a

Re: [Openstack] Discussion / proposal: Ability to reset tenant's quotas to default

2012-10-09 Thread Kevin L. Mitchell
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 12:17 -0400, Eoghan Glynn wrote: I don't think a new nova command is needed for this use-case, just add a simple custom script: nova quota-update `nova quota-defaults $1 | tail -n +4 | tr '_' '-' | awk '/|/ {printf( --%s %s, $2,$4)}'` $1 then call with the tenant

Re: [Openstack] Versioning for notification messages

2012-10-09 Thread David Ripton
On 10/09/2012 01:07 PM, Day, Phil wrote: What do people think about adding a version number to the notification systems, so that consumers of notification messages are protected to some extent from changes in the message contents ? For example, would it be enough to add a version number to the

Re: [Openstack] Versioning for notification messages

2012-10-09 Thread Eric Windisch
On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 at 15:58 PM, David Ripton wrote: On 10/09/2012 01:07 PM, Day, Phil wrote: What do people think about adding a version number to the notification systems, so that consumers of notification messages are protected to some extent from changes in the message

Re: [Openstack] Call for testing : nova, glance and keystone 2012.1.3 tarballs

2012-10-09 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 22:53 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Hey, We're hoping to publish Nova, Keystone and Horizon 2012.1.3 releases this Thursday (Oct 11). Doh, I only noticed the incorrect subject line after sending :) Cheers, Mark. ___ Mailing

[Openstack] Call for testing : nova, glance and keystone 2012.1.2 tarballs

2012-10-09 Thread Mark McLoughlin
Hey, We're hoping to publish Nova, Keystone and Horizon 2012.1.3 releases this Thursday (Oct 11). The list of issues fixed so far can be seen here: https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/2012.1.3 https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/2012.1.3

Re: [Openstack] Versioning for notification messages

2012-10-09 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Eric Windisch e...@cloudscaling.com wrote: On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 at 15:58 PM, David Ripton wrote: On 10/09/2012 01:07 PM, Day, Phil wrote: What do people think about adding a version number to the notification systems, so that consumers of

[Openstack] Cinder Improvement for Grizzly

2012-10-09 Thread Akira Yoshiyama
Hi all, I want to join the next design summit but I can't because of the current job. So I wrote my ideas for cinder improvement to etherpad. I hope someone will take up them (or a part of them) at the summit. http://etherpad.openstack.org/CinderImprovementsForGrizzly Table of contents: * New

[Openstack] Bottleneck of message queue

2012-10-09 Thread Hao Wang
Hi guys, I am trying to figure out how the internal interaction processes within different modules of OpenStack. Frankly speaking, while I'm reading the source codes I lost myself and have to jump out again to look at OpenStack from out of the box. I don't know if anybody has the similiar feeling

Re: [Openstack] Folsom nova-scheduler race condition?

2012-10-09 Thread Huang Zhiteng
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Jonathan Proulx j...@jonproulx.com wrote: Hi All, Looking for a sanity test before I file a bug. I very recently upgraded my install to Folsom (on top of Ubuntu 12.04/kvm). My scheduler settings in nova.conf are:

Re: [Openstack] Cinder Improvement for Grizzly

2012-10-09 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Akira Yoshiyama akirayoshiy...@gmail.comwrote: Hi all, I want to join the next design summit but I can't because of the current job. So I wrote my ideas for cinder improvement to etherpad. I hope someone will take up them (or a part of them) at the summit.

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_folsom_swift_trunk #95

2012-10-09 Thread openstack-testing-bot
Title: precise_folsom_swift_trunk General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_folsom_swift_trunk/95/Project:precise_folsom_swift_trunkDate of build:Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:30:34 -0400Build duration:3 min 40 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: quantal_folsom_swift_trunk #105

2012-10-09 Thread openstack-testing-bot
Title: quantal_folsom_swift_trunk General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/quantal_folsom_swift_trunk/105/Project:quantal_folsom_swift_trunkDate of build:Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:30:34 -0400Build duration:3 min 46 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_folsom_swift_trunk #96

2012-10-09 Thread openstack-testing-bot
Title: precise_folsom_swift_trunk General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_folsom_swift_trunk/96/Project:precise_folsom_swift_trunkDate of build:Tue, 09 Oct 2012 14:30:33 -0400Build duration:3 min 39 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_folsom_swift_trunk #98

2012-10-09 Thread openstack-testing-bot
Title: precise_folsom_swift_trunk General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_folsom_swift_trunk/98/Project:precise_folsom_swift_trunkDate of build:Tue, 09 Oct 2012 16:30:33 -0400Build duration:3 min 19 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt