The Manchester Grand Hyatt is booked out for the conference. I made the
mistake of waiting to book hotel until I was surely going. Does anyone have
any reservations they can't keep?
thanks,
-tr3buchet
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
The transition is going to be difficult either way when you consider data
migrations..
Gary, I've scheduled a talk about the future of nova networking. I hope it
to be an open forum of ideas.
Also, for what it's worth, I'd like to keep quantum code and nova code as
separate as possible even if ovs
merge prop: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/6847/
now has both required +2s. I'll wait a day or two to approve just in case
there are any lingering objections.
-tr3buchet
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John Garbutt
Kölker 77 (2.2%)
Mark McLoughlin 73 (2.1%)
Jake Dahn 73 (2.1%)
Rick Harris 71 (2.0%)
Alex Meade 70 (2.0%)
Trey Morris 62 (1.8%)
Joe Heck58 (1.7%)
Chris Behrens 52
I agree with Soren.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Dan Wendlandt d...@nicira.com wrote:
Context for openstack-mailing list:
This is a thread from the netstack list about integrating VPN capability
with Quantum. Wanted larger community feedback.
-
Hi Debo,
Based on
I assume other developers are in the same boat as we often make better
tacticians than politicians.
+1
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Todd Willey t...@ansolabs.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Todd,
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 18:29 -0500,
+1
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Gabriel Hurley
gabriel.hur...@nebula.comwrote:
Big +1 from me on using tox to manage testing across various Python
versions. Another advantage it has over matrix builds in Jenkins is the
fact that an ordinary developer can use it locally and verify the
Fantastic! I've been tired of having to look up people to see what their
vote counted as. It's gotten hard to keep track of everyone.
-tr3buchet
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
James E. Blair wrote:
Monty and I have been working on a solution to a
This problem has to have been solved before. Anyone know how multinational
companies deal with meetings? Also, Soren, to be fair, I'm don't believe
I've heard anyone propose a meeting that wasn't on ~utc-7 business time,
yourself included. Maybe there should be some give and take here? Perhaps
Weekly status emails sent to whom? I think it could be a good idea but my
worry is that while the mailing list is efficient in terms of information
per second, it's an inefficient place for coordinating. Solve this and I'm
on board.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Soren Hansen so...@linux2go.dk
excellent ideas. I especially like the standardized list of headers.
just to be sure, mondays at 2100utc? if so, no conflicts on my end
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
2) *Closing down the team mailinglists.* Some of the
I retract any concerns I brought up earlier as Soren gracefully answered
them in last week's meeting. +1 from me. I look forward to the review.
-tr3buchet
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Soren Hansen so...@linux2go.dk wrote:
2011/11/24 Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com:
haha ... worse
Add me as a +1 to ensuring that unittests are actually unittests instead of
a mix'n'match of different styles of test. This would make writing and
updating tests much more straightforward and actually catch problems in the
correct layer of tests, for example a change in network should not under
Mao, if you are familiar with launchpad, can you file a bug and assign it
to the nova-network team? You will be able to track the bug's status there
as well.
Thanks,
-tr3buchet
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:04 AM, mao weijie mwjpi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have found something maybe bug in
I notices a gap - networking
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello Everyone,
I've been assimilating the plans from the design summit into blueprints.
In the process i've noticed that we have a lot planned for the next few
months. Some of
yeah repo is pretty nice. I've been using it in conjunction with regular git
commands. Really though, all these tools do is shorthand a few git commands.
Why not just use the git?
I don't think our official docs should reflect the use of a tool like
git-review; they should describe the entire git
+1
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Brian Waldon brian.wal...@rackspace.comwrote:
I would like to propose we remove our implementation of OSAPI v1.0 from
Nova for the following reasons:
1) Our implementation is incomplete, and there are no (visible) plans to
complete it. Shared IP Groups
yep
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Brian Waldon brian.wal...@rackspace.comwrote:
Chris (comstud) has been a great help with reviews lately and has quite a
bit of knowledge of the system overall. I think he would add a great amount
to the team, so I'm proposing we add him to nova-core.
very nice!
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.comwrote:
Here's a wiki page of some screencasts I put together of recent Nova
changes I've been working on.
Please feel free to add your own.
http://wiki.openstack.org/DemoVideos
-S
This email may include
I am!
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:54 AM, Soren Hansen so...@linux2go.dk wrote:
At the design summit, we agreed we'd work hard on improving our test
coverage. Our friendly neighbourhood butler, Jenkins, keeps track of
our test coverage:
if you plan on using multiple networks, i would get into the habit of
specifying the bridge with the --bridge parameter to nova-manager network
create. If you rely on the flag and then create multiple networks they'll
all end up connected to the same bridge.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 7:17 PM,
I had to register my git email with gerrit as well, no problems after.
If you do a git commit --amend will the hook add the change-id after you
edit the commit message? I ask because it didn't when doing an interactive
rebase. I did it this morning but I pasted the change-id in myself.
-trey
On
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Soren Hansen so...@linux2go.dk wrote:
2011/7/27 Trey Morris trey.mor...@rackspace.com:
I'm fairly certain that in this particular case, without support from the
hypervisor and api lieutenants, and a testing guru or two, I would still
be
trying to fit all
*cheers*
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Glance contributors,
The time has come for us to move to the new code platform, using Git and
Gerrit.
I'd like to know what date you think is a good time for us to begin
the transition?
Everyone should read
Just so we are all on the same page: step 3 refers to refactoring the
existing network managers to use melange, is the ultimate goal here for
melange to replace the current nova ip management scheme entirely?
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:10 PM, Troy Toman troy.to...@rackspace.comwrote:
At the
If I had to choose between dropping or truncating UUIDs and failing feature
parity with the ec2 api, i'd go with the latter. Pros and cons for UUIDs
have already been discussed and decisions made. The EC2 api shouldn't get in
the way. A translation layer to sit in between the EC2 and OS APIs would
The goal isn't for ec2 api to be a second class citizen, but to keep it
from being a limiting factor since we don't have control over it. How does
the compatibility layer make it second class?
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Soren Hansen so...@linux2go.dk wrote:
2011/7/7 Vishvananda Ishaya
I think timestamp is the way to go. File name conflict shouldn't be the way
we prevent ourselves from doing stupid things. If someone merge props a
change with a migration, it's the job of both the developer and the core
reviewers to make sure something horrible isn't happening in the database as
+1
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello Everyone,
We have quite a large backlog of merge proposals here:
https://code.launchpad.net/~rlane/nova/lp773690/+merge/59565
I've been attempting to go through them to find some high priority ones to
Keep in mind you can choose other hypervisors and still run the whole stack
on a single host.
-trey
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.comwrote:
If you are running inside of virtualbox, you will have to use nova in
software mode (--libvirt_type=qemu) and it
Appears my response got lost somehow. I vote for #3 as it's the most
configurable (and affects nothing contrariwise). In addition to believing we
use flags too often, I don't think having a flag solves the problem very
well. A couple of examples show why:
you want a few instances having floating
, it makes a lot of sense now. Thanks.
Does this mean that when an instance launches, all the MAC
addresses/Networks that belong in the same project get assigned to that
instance? I couldn't find this in the code so I just wanted to verify.
Ryu
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Trey Morris
All, consider me as a nova core dev. Seems we could use a few more and I
need an excuse to spend more time reviewing code :)
Thanks,
-tr3buchet
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message (including any attached or
embedded documents) is intended for the exclusive and confidential use of the
maybe I'm missing something, but if you don't want to run a recent API why
should you expect to be able to run it with a recent release of nova? I
think trying to support older and new versions at the same time would clip
our wings, or at the very least add some nastiness to the code. If someone
@brian: the problem with a json field is that searching would be really
expensive if we ever need to pull mac addresses from the db to ensure
uniqueness.
@Ilya: If I make a table, I plan on putting mac address, instance id,
network id, and if zones are about ready, some sort of zone information in
:)
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
All done, and waiting to be almost immediately out of date. :)
Cheers,
jay
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Andy Smith andys...@gmail.com wrote:
Please summarize these on the wiki and add your information the wiki,
reconfiguration of the network, ie cannot plug a vNic into
a network after the VM is started.
Just so we're all on the same page, in what cases is dhcp/ra not
appropriate?
Cheers,
Dan
On Feb 25, 2011 7:11 AM, Trey Morris trey.mor...@rackspace.com wrote:
definitely not fine to use dhcp in all
+1 for long term plan discussion at the summit
+1 for having this in the diablo release
+1 for short term goal: tool being under our control via fork I don't think
JKM will keep up (nothing against JKM, it's just a lot of work).
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 3:20 AM, Thierry Carrez
Tracking mac addresses is going to have to change for multi-nic. Instances
are going to have more than one mac address. It's been proposed that we
don't need to track the mac address(es) but I think it's necessary in order
to determine whether a mac is unique or not. Mac addresses don't need to be
congratulations!
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Soren Hansen so...@linux2go.dk wrote:
This is now done.
Den 21/02/2011 08.46 skrev Soren Hansen so...@ubuntu.com:
2011/2/19 Rick Harris rick.har...@rackspace.com:
Throwing my hat into the ring for nova-core membership. Eager to help
knock
+1 to improving reviews since I agree with sandy on it being our greatest
strength. I also I prefer sandy's approach (unless I'm mistaken), jump in
and see how it goes, we can update a wiki as things proceed. I don't
understand the need for a more formal documentation of process. I'd just
hate for
+2 from me
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Matt Dietz matt.di...@rackspace.comwrote:
+1 to this!
On 2/17/11 3:28 PM, Soren Hansen so...@ubuntu.com wrote:
+1! (Yup, that was +factorial(1), for those keeping score at home)
2011/2/17 Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com:
I'd like to
+10 for lowercase.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Eric Day e...@oddments.org wrote:
I would encourage using all lowercase for command line tools
(oscompute), I don't really care what the name is though. :)
-Eric
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 05:42:56PM +, Sandy Walsh wrote:
Perfect.
Instead of an unstable trunk, i think code should just be better vetted
before it lands in the trunk. If the difference between trunk and your
proposed unstable trunk is a set of automated tests, then those tests can
just as easily be run on a LP branch before it gets into current trunk. We
just
I'm curious what the point of having a line of trunks for a commit to bounce
down on its way to trunk would gain us other than having to manage a line of
trunks. What's wrong with status quo branch management (other than tests)?
What's wrong with having the commit sit in its LP topic branch, which
trunks will not
need to be managed, as tarmac/jenkins will control them.
-Eric
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 04:24:11PM -0600, Trey Morris wrote:
I'm curious what the point of having a line of trunks for a commit to
bounce down on its way to trunk would gain us other than having to
manage
off what we did in the past, and I know things
have changed some since then.
-Eric
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 04:46:28PM -0600, Trey Morris wrote:
yikes! i assumed tarmac was running things locally merged with trunk
to
test and actually merging after success. That's surprising
47 matches
Mail list logo
