OK, so is everyone cool with me creating a new project called
openstack-common under the openstack umbrella? This project would be
specifically for *Python* common library and utilities.
We got a little off-track with discussing bindings (it's a great
topic, but not necessarily related to a
Done:
https://launchpad.net/openstack-common
Rick, feel free to change the branding to the openstack images, etc...
-jay
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Rick Clark r...@openstack.org wrote:
+1 This is the only reasonable thing to do.
On 08/30/2010 09:41 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
OK, so is
On Aug 28, 2010, at 10:21 AM, Michael Barton wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Jorge Williams
jorge.willi...@rackspace.commailto:jorge.willi...@rackspace.com wrote:
Sure,
We're aiming for consistency with our public APIs so that:
1) Collections are handled consistently
a)
Okay, I guess I'll just wait for things to start becoming more concrete and
then maybe I'll see what you're getting at. If we call one a language-binding
framework and the other a language binding, it's all the same to me. :)
On Aug 28, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Jorge Williams wrote:
Okay, I think
On Aug 26, 2010, at 4:31 PM, Erik Carlin wrote:
Jorge, I know you have some ideas about a binding framework that could be
used to build bindings in a common manner. Could you please share your
ideas with the group?
Sure,
We're aiming for consistency with our public APIs so that:
1)
5 matches
Mail list logo
