Re: [Openstack] Test Dependencies

2012-03-02 Thread Jay Pipes
On 03/01/2012 08:12 PM, Maru Newby wrote: Is there any interest in adding unittest2 to the test dependencies for openstack projects? I have found its enhanced assertions and 'with self.assertRaises' very useful in writing tests. I see there have been past bugs that mentioned unittest2, and

[Openstack] Test Dependencies

2012-03-01 Thread Maru Newby
Is there any interest in adding unittest2 to the test dependencies for openstack projects? I have found its enhanced assertions and 'with self.assertRaises' very useful in writing tests. I see there have been past bugs that mentioned unittest2, and am wondering if the reasons for not adopting

Re: [Openstack] Test Dependencies

2012-03-01 Thread Mark Gius
Apologies to Maru for the double-email. Left out the list by mistake. When you say non-replay mocking, are you talking about ensuring that a particular function is not called, or replacing a function/whatever with a lambda that doesn't care if it gets called or how often it gets called but still

Re: [Openstack] Test Dependencies

2012-03-01 Thread Lorin Hochstein
Mark: I think Maru is talking about the distinction between record/replay mocking and action/assertion mocking. In record/replay mocking (e.g., mox) you define the expected behavior *before* executing the code under test (i.e., I expect A, B, and C to happen, now go execute the code under