Is there a flag in nova.conf that permits we configure that? In
documentation we can see that exists some algorithms used by scheduler.
But, I don't know how to choose that one best fit our requirements.
Thanks!
:)
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Ed Leafe ed.le...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Nov
+1 :)
Razique Mahrouarazique.mahr...@gmail.com
Le 10 nov. 2011 à 11:27, Jorge Luiz Correa a écrit :Is there a flag in nova.conf that permits we configure that? In documentation we can see that exists some algorithms used by scheduler. But, I don't know how to choose that one best fit our
We now have a sufficient amount of +1 to go ahead with this. If noone
objects before Tuesday next week, I'll make it so.
--
Soren Hansen | http://linux2go.dk/
Ubuntu Developer | http://www.ubuntu.com/
OpenStack Developer | http://www.openstack.org/
That brings us to +5. If noone objects by Tuesday next week, I'll make it so.
--
Soren Hansen | http://linux2go.dk/
Ubuntu Developer | http://www.ubuntu.com/
OpenStack Developer | http://www.openstack.org/
___
Mailing list:
Hi Sandy,
Thanks for taking the time to read this.
My understanding is that a typical Nova deployment would span across multiple
zones, that zones may have subzones, and that child zones will have a number of
availability zones in them; please do correct me if I am wrong :)
That stated, it
Are you using Diablo or Trunk?
If you're using trunk the default scheduler is MultiScheduler, which uses
Chance scheduler. I think Diablo uses Chance by default?
--scheduler_driver
Unless you've explicitly selected the LeastCostScheduler (which only exists in
Diablo now) I wouldn't worry
Ok, that helps ... now I see the abstraction your going for (a new layer under
availability zones).
Personally I prefer a tagging approach to a modeled hierarchy. It was something
we debated at great length with Zones. In this case, the tag would be in the
capabilities assigned to the host.
I
The flag (of type list) you can use is --least_cost_functions
Multiple algorithms can be specified, the default one is
compute_fill_first_cost_fn which gives priority to the compute host
(XenServer/ESX etc.) with more free RAM.
Regards,
Sateesh
Hey,
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 16:50 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hi everyone,
Since there seems to be some confusion around master vs. stable/diablo
vs. core reviewers, I think it warrants a small thread.
When at the Design Summit we discussed setting up stable branches, I
warned about the
Hi all.
What are the best practices for HA of the hardware compute-node, and
virtual machines.
After googling I found matahari, pacemaker-cloud, but nothing about
build-in fiches openstack.
1) How do you create such environments?
2) Does it is right way to use pacemaker-cloud with openstack? Is
On 11/10/2011 02:38 PM, Viacheslav Biriukov wrote:
Hi all.
What are the best practices for HA of the hardware compute-node, and virtual
machines.
After googling I found matahari, pacemaker-cloud, but nothing about build-in
fiches openstack.
1) How do you create such environments?
2011/11/10 Viacheslav Biriukov v.v.biriu...@gmail.com:
Hi all.
What are the best practices for HA of the hardware compute-node, and virtual
machines.
After googling I found matahari, pacemaker-cloud, but nothing about
build-in fiches openstack.
1) How do you create such environments?
2)
There is a blueprint that touches these aspects:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/guest-ha
This is tailored at use cases where you cannot redesign an existing app.
The work is at the early stages, but you are more than welcome to join the
effort!
Cheers,
Armando
-Original
Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com writes:
To mitigate that, we decided that the group doing stable branch
maintenance would be a separate group (i.e. *not* core developers), and
we decided that whatever ends up in the stable branch must first land in
the master branch.
Well, I recall it a
Hm
If we planning vm hosting we work on the other level. So if hw node fails
we need fast automatic migration to other node.
2011/11/10 Soren Hansen so...@linux2go.dk
2011/11/10 Viacheslav Biriukov v.v.biriu...@gmail.com:
Hi all.
What are the best practices for HA of the hardware
Funny you bring that up today;I spent the day working on that. I've implemented Gluster FS on my openstack running installation and written a script along that.Here is the implementationnode1- 1 instance runningthe node 1 crashes (could be anything atm)the script detect the node is gone (to be
Hello pf
thanks for sending this. Did you write this down on a wiki page
somewhere, too? I fear that in the mailing list archive this won't get
the visibility it deserves.
Cheers,
stef
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 17:00 +1100, pf shineyear wrote:
openstack swift install on centos 6
1. proxy
The main thing that the idea of host-aggregates provides is the ability to
specify metadata at a group of hosts level. If you put 10 hosts into a single
aggregate, you can specify characteristics for those hosts as a group (i.e.
which san they are backing files onto, whether they support live
On Nov 10, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
But wait! Vish +2ed a stable branch patch yesterday:
https://review.openstack.org/328
I don't mind losing my powers over stable/diablo.
On a related note, is there a way we can change the color scheme in gerrit (to
red??) for stable
Hi Armando!
It is very interesting feature. Are you already have specs for this
blueprints or may be etherpad?
Regards,
Ilya
10 ноября 2011 г. 20:16 пользователь Armando Migliaccio
armando.migliac...@eu.citrix.com написал:
There is a blueprint that touches these aspects:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 08:02:23AM -0800, James E. Blair wrote:
SNIP
But wait! Vish +2ed a stable branch patch yesterday:
https://review.openstack.org/328
James, help a poor confused soul out here, would you? :)
Right, that makes sense. Only folks that understand the stable
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 14:57 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Soren Hansen wrote:
2011/11/9 Nachi Ueno ueno.na...@nttdata-agilenet.com:
I understand your point. Stop QAing stable/diablo and focus on Essex.
Oh, no no. That's not the point. I'm thrilled to have you work on
QAing Diablo. The
Thanks a lot for your answers. Unfortunately I can't follow the trunk
and I have to use the Diablo release. Is it possible to backport that
new scheduler to Diablo?
Anyway I gave the least cost scheduler a try, it loads but never
schedules a vm correctly.
2011/11/10 Viacheslav Biriukov v.v.biriu...@gmail.com:
Hm
If we planning vm hosting we work on the other level. So if hw node fails we
need fast automatic migration to other node.
That's the whole point. For most interesting applications, fast
automatic migration isn't anywhere near fast
Hi everyone,
It's my great pleasure to announce the immediate availability for
Keystone, Glance, Nova and Horizon of the first milestone of the Essex
development cycle, called essex-1.
This milestone picks up all development made on trunk since Diablo
release branches were cut in early
Hi folks
Thank you for your help Mark and Jay and Reviewers
I removed all review request for diablo/stable from Gerrit.
And, We will follow community policy.
Current our test code and bug fix is based on stable/diablo.
For each branch. forward-porting is needed.
12 bug patch branch is in
2011/11/10 Ryan Lane rl...@wikimedia.org:
That's the whole point. For most interesting applications, fast
automatic migration isn't anywhere near fast enough. Don't try to
avoid failure. Expect it and design around it.
This assumes all application designers are doing this. Most web
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 13:22 -0600, Anne Gentle wrote:
Thanks, Jay. I usually try to be more careful with the API names, so
thanks for clarifying.
Sorry if I sounded patronizing there.. didn't mean to be.
I think the landing page containing Draft API docs looks something
like the attached
That's the whole point. For most interesting applications, fast
automatic migration isn't anywhere near fast enough. Don't try to
avoid failure. Expect it and design around it.
This assumes all application designers are doing this. Most web
applications do this fairly well, but most
I know. That's what makes them a poor fit for the cloud.
Meh. Private clouds will still use applications like this. I think
the cloud is great for cloud providers, but why limit nova's
usefulness to just cloud providers?
The cloud way of doing things pushes the responsibility of keeping
I'm having problems trying to follow the steps in Gerrit Workflow Quick
Reference (wiki.openstack.org/GerritWorkflow), in fact I'm failing on the first
step. When I try and get the list of available projects I'm getting the
failure:
Permission denied (publickey).
I've uploaded my
Nevermind. I'm not sure how I did it but by some magic incantation of
resetting login name/public key it's now working.
Sorry for the noise.
--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
-Original Message-
From: Dugger, Donald D
Sent: Thursday,
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 09:02 -0800, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
On Nov 10, 2011, at 6:22 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
But wait! Vish +2ed a stable branch patch yesterday:
https://review.openstack.org/328
I don't mind losing my powers over stable/diablo.
On a related note, is there a
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 08:02 -0800, James E. Blair wrote:
Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com writes:
Only folks that understand the stable branch policy[1] should be
allowed to +2 on the stable branch.
Basically, a stable branch reviewer should only +2 if:
- It fixes a significant
Hi Dave,
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 17:33 +, Dave Walker wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 08:02:23AM -0800, James E. Blair wrote:
SNIP
But wait! Vish +2ed a stable branch patch yesterday:
https://review.openstack.org/328
James, help a poor confused soul out here, would you? :)
35 matches
Mail list logo
