On 07/31/2012 04:17 PM, Rohit Karajgi wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
Have you updated the your python-novaclient?
no I didn't.
The 'nova reset-state
--active' command is pretty much there. It is an admin
action in Nova extensions. $ nova help | grep reset reset-state
Reset the state of an instance
On Jul 31, 2012, at 9:49 PM, Matt Joyce wrote:
> I think we're running out of opportunities to do stuff like this.
>
> This is exactly the sort of thing that will drive George Reese into a
> homocidal rage. More to the point its exactly the sort of thing our users
> are going to despise us fo
On 08/01/2012 12:49 AM, Matt Joyce wrote:
> I think we're running out of opportunities to do stuff like this.
>
> This is exactly the sort of thing that will drive George Reese into a
> homocidal rage. More to the point its exactly the sort of thing our
> users are going to despise us for. And t
I think we're running out of opportunities to do stuff like this.
This is exactly the sort of thing that will drive George Reese into a
homocidal rage. More to the point its exactly the sort of thing our users
are going to despise us for. And that hatred will outlive any benefit.
Users only rem
On Jul 31, 2012, at 3:34 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 15:17 -0700, Brian Waldon wrote:
>> On Jul 31, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 11:41 -0700, Brian Waldon wrote:
released python-glanceclient v0.2.0 and would love to gather
On Jul 31, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Brian Waldon wrote:
> This is a reminder that the client in glance is deprecated and will not ship
> with Folsom. Horizon and Devstack both use python-glanceclient, and I'm
> presently working on updating Nova.
>
> I also wanted to point out that I just released p
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 15:17 -0700, Brian Waldon wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 11:41 -0700, Brian Waldon wrote:
> >> released python-glanceclient v0.2.0 and would love to gather some
> >> feedback. Please file bugs on the python-glancecli
We really can't be breaking compatibility where people are probably writing
shell scripts.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help : https://
On Jul 31, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 11:41 -0700, Brian Waldon wrote:
>> released python-glanceclient v0.2.0 and would love to gather some
>> feedback. Please file bugs on the python-glanceclient project in
>> launchpad if you find anything to be missing.
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 11:41 -0700, Brian Waldon wrote:
> released python-glanceclient v0.2.0 and would love to gather some
> feedback. Please file bugs on the python-glanceclient project in
> launchpad if you find anything to be missing.
What is the plan to deal with the fact that the user interfa
On 07/31/2012 03:21 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 07/31/2012 02:13 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>>>
>>> As a counter-point, I'd prefer to keep the list as it is and *not* munge
>>> Reply-To.
>>>
>>> Since Chip summarizes it better than I can, I'll link to his article
>>> '"Reply-To" Munging Considered Harmful
> I'm sure Launchpad doesn't support user level configuration, to edit
> email headers.
>
>
We're moving off of launchpad to mailman proper anyways.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Alex Glikson wrote:
>> This discussion invariably turns up on most open source mailing lists
>> from time to time. People never agree on the "best" setting. Asking
>> for this reply-to setting to be changed is merely shifting the pain
>> away from one set of users
> From: "Daniel P. Berrange"
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:50:02AM -0700, Bhuvaneswaran A wrote:
> > Stefano,
> >
> > If a subscriber reply to a mailing list message, it's sent to the
> > author only. Each subscriber should use "Reply to All" every time, to
> > post a reply to mailing list.
> >
>
> That being said, I realize we're entering mostly a land of religion here.
> So I'll just end with a "long live emacs!" to try to get us to the godwin
> rule as fast as possible.
>
>
The Nazis had "Headers" too.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~o
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> This discussion invariably turns up on most open source mailing lists
> from time to time. People never agree on the "best" setting. Asking
> for this reply-to setting to be changed is merely shifting the pain
> away from one set of user
On 07/31/2012 02:13 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
As a counter-point, I'd prefer to keep the list as it is and *not* munge
Reply-To.
Since Chip summarizes it better than I can, I'll link to his article
'"Reply-To" Munging Considered Harmful':
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
++
Just us
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:50:02AM -0700, Bhuvaneswaran A wrote:
> Stefano,
>
> If a subscriber reply to a mailing list message, it's sent to the
> author only. Each subscriber should use "Reply to All" every time, to
> post a reply to mailing list.
>
> Can you please configure the mailing list a
Communication should be blocked via security groups, but perhaps you want more
complete isolation. The network host (which in this case is the compute host)
will be able to route packets between subnets even though they are on different
networks, so you will need to drop packets between vlans.
This is a reminder that the client in glance is deprecated and will not ship
with Folsom. Horizon and Devstack both use python-glanceclient, and I'm
presently working on updating Nova.
I also wanted to point out that I just released python-glanceclient v0.2.0 and
would love to gather some feedb
On 07/31/2012 02:09 PM, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012, Bhuvaneswaran A wrote:
>> If a subscriber reply to a mailing list message, it's sent to the
>> author only. Each subscriber should use "Reply to All" every time, to
>> post a reply to mailing list.
>>
>> Can you please configu
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012, Bhuvaneswaran A wrote:
> If a subscriber reply to a mailing list message, it's sent to the
> author only. Each subscriber should use "Reply to All" every time, to
> post a reply to mailing list.
>
> Can you please configure the mailing list and set reply-to header as
> maili
+1
On Jul 31, 2012 10:52 AM, "Bhuvaneswaran A" wrote:
> Stefano,
>
> If a subscriber reply to a mailing list message, it's sent to the
> author only. Each subscriber should use "Reply to All" every time, to
> post a reply to mailing list.
>
> Can you please configure the mailing list and set repl
Stefano,
If a subscriber reply to a mailing list message, it's sent to the
author only. Each subscriber should use "Reply to All" every time, to
post a reply to mailing list.
Can you please configure the mailing list and set reply-to header as
mailing list address, openstack@lists.launchpad.net.
Two ways that I can think of...
1) disable forwarding on the NC, not sure if this would impact regular services.
2) add additional rules, something like "-s 10.10.10.0/24 -d 10.0.0.0/8 drop".
-Simon
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Wael Ghandour (wghandou)
wrote:
>
> We are also seeing another
Hi Vish
Thanks. I got it.
2012/7/31 Vishvananda Ishaya :
> For now it is fine to put it in the same place where network_id is specified.
> In the nova meeting on Thursday, we are going to discuss a better way to do
> extensions that need to do things based on additional post params.
>
> Vish
>
The heat developers are happy to announce the release of new version of
Heat.
Heat is a project designed for OpenStack that implements AWS
CloudFormation. CloudFormation is a programmable interface and
tempalting system for orchestrating multiple cloud applications.
Try it out on Fedora 17:
For now it is fine to put it in the same place where network_id is specified.
In the nova meeting on Thursday, we are going to discuss a better way to do
extensions that need to do things based on additional post params.
Vish
On Jul 31, 2012, at 12:30 AM, Nati Ueno wrote:
> Hi Dan
>
Mat
I see. I am running Ubuntu 12.04. I do need them physically isolated
since the primary purpose for my cluster is for use with some experimental
network hardware.
Thanks for your reply. I'll see what I can find.
-Mark
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Mark Lehrer wrote:
> compute nodes. How
Here's the url's to the log and minutes from today's meeting.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-07-31-15.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-07-31-15.00.t
Hi Phil,
You might want to look at
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/interim-nova-authz-service
https://github.com/openstack/nova/commits/master/etc/nova/policy.json
Regards,
Rohit Karajgi | Lead Engineer | NTT Data Global Technology Services Private Ltd
| w. +91.20.6604.1500 x 378
Hello,
I would like to use the second physical NIC on my compute nodes to bridge
to a second virtual interface on my instances. I am using the VLAN mode
network manager.
I understand how to reserve two IPs from separate networks for a given
tenant, but both VLANs end up bridged to the first phys
Hi peter
Sound that ms wanna active again in openstack
Can i know the roadmap and relation between azure
I am azure insider work with mark brown.
And try to organize openstack indonesian chapter
F
On Jul 31, 2012 9:38 PM, "Peter Pouliot" wrote:
> Adgenda Items for Openstack/Hyper-V Meeting*
Sorry for a dumb question, but can someone point me to where the authorization
is configured to determine who does and doesn't get access to these actions
please ?
Thanks,
Phil
-Original Message-
From: openstack-bounces+philip.day=hp@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+ph
Adgenda Items for Openstack/Hyper-V Meeting
* Status of the Mock Hyper-V Compute
* Move from Essex to Folsom
o Installer is for essex integration
* Hyper-V Testing Procedures
o Dev stack for hyper-v testing
o Chef for Windows automation
Peter J. Pouliot, C
Hi Wolfgang,
Have you updated the your python-novaclient? The 'nova reset-state
--active' command is pretty much there. It is an admin action in Nova
extensions.
$ nova help | grep reset
reset-state Reset the state of an instance
Regards,
Rohit Karajgi | Lead Engineer | NTT Data
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 07:14 +0200, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote:
> On 07/30/2012 09:35 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote:
> > That said, be aware that there is a "reset-state" command to novaclient,
> > so that you can do Chris's recommended reset without having to muck
> > around with the database direc
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Nati Ueno wrote:
> Hi Dan
>
> >> > Matt
> >> Thank you for your comment in launchpad
> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1031096
> >>
> >>
> >> Quantum team get consensus in a Netstack meeting today to propose
> >> port-id for requested networks. I took th
On 07/29/2012 07:47 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> Hey!
>
> This might be fairly tricky to fix properly given the design of the
> devstack gate. I could be wrong, it might not be terrible now that we
> can release new client lib versions to PyPI more quickly. The devstack
> gate explicitly tests propos
Hi, all
When I'm trying to add support to python nova-client to list/update
flavor extra specs, I noticed that the flavor extra_specs API extension use the
flavor ID to access database API, while the corresponding parameter should be
instance_type id.
I create a bug for it at htt
I added similar functionality to novaclient. There is a --nocache option to
ignore the cache and the 'import keyring' check is just to keep it from
crashing on non-supported systems.
I key off the following: auth url + username + service name + region to prevent
conflicts with other users.
Ho
> I would not assume that *-paste.ini files always need to be there...
> Paste is a pain point if we are to support Python 3 one day, so it's
> also on the black list of the (still inexistant) OpenStack Python3
> advocacy group.
> Who else is interested in contributing to Python 3 support in a fut
Hi Dan
>> > Matt
>> Thank you for your comment in launchpad
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1031096
>>
>>
>> Quantum team get consensus in a Netstack meeting today to propose
>> port-id for requested networks. I took the job.
>> At first, i thought i can write extension for this. But as y
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Nati Ueno wrote:
> Hi Matt, Yong, Dan and folks
>
> > Matt
> Thank you for your comment in launchpad
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1031096
>
Quantum team get consensus in a Netstack meeting today to propose
> port-id for requested networks. I took the
44 matches
Mail list logo
