Re: [Openstack] [Quantum][Nova] requested_id and port spec

2012-07-31 Thread Dan Wendlandt
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:28 PM, Nati Ueno nati.u...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Matt, Yong, Dan and folks Matt Thank you for your comment in launchpad https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1031096 Quantum team get consensus in a Netstack meeting today to propose port-id for requested

Re: [Openstack] [Quantum][Nova] requested_id and port spec

2012-07-31 Thread Nati Ueno
Hi Dan Matt Thank you for your comment in launchpad https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1031096 Quantum team get consensus in a Netstack meeting today to propose port-id for requested networks. I took the job. At first, i thought i can write extension for this. But as you say we

Re: [Openstack] python 3 advocacy

2012-07-31 Thread Haynes, Dave (Cloud Services)
I would not assume that *-paste.ini files always need to be there... Paste is a pain point if we are to support Python 3 one day, so it's also on the black list of the (still inexistant) OpenStack Python3 advocacy group. Who else is interested in contributing to Python 3 support in a future

Re: [Openstack] Keyring support in openstack

2012-07-31 Thread Sandy Walsh
I added similar functionality to novaclient. There is a --nocache option to ignore the cache and the 'import keyring' check is just to keep it from crashing on non-supported systems. I key off the following: auth url + username + service name + region to prevent conflicts with other users.

[Openstack] The flavor_id and instance type id for flavor extra spec

2012-07-31 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
Hi, all When I'm trying to add support to python nova-client to list/update flavor extra specs, I noticed that the flavor extra_specs API extension use the flavor ID to access database API, while the corresponding parameter should be instance_type id. I create a bug for it at

Re: [Openstack] [Bug 1030646] [NEW] Devstack vs. Horizon client versions

2012-07-31 Thread Monty Taylor
On 07/29/2012 07:47 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: Hey! This might be fairly tricky to fix properly given the design of the devstack gate. I could be wrong, it might not be terrible now that we can release new client lib versions to PyPI more quickly. The devstack gate explicitly tests proposed

Re: [Openstack] [Quantum][Nova] requested_id and port spec

2012-07-31 Thread Dan Wendlandt
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Nati Ueno nati.u...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Dan Matt Thank you for your comment in launchpad https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1031096 Quantum team get consensus in a Netstack meeting today to propose port-id for requested networks. I took the

Re: [Openstack] Instance stuck in deleting state with error

2012-07-31 Thread Kevin L. Mitchell
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 07:14 +0200, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote: On 07/30/2012 09:35 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: That said, be aware that there is a reset-state command to novaclient, so that you can do Chris's recommended reset without having to muck around with the database directly.

Re: [Openstack] Instance stuck in deleting state with error

2012-07-31 Thread Karajgi, Rohit
Hi Wolfgang, Have you updated the your python-novaclient? The 'nova reset-state server --active' command is pretty much there. It is an admin action in Nova extensions. $ nova help | grep reset reset-state Reset the state of an instance Regards, Rohit Karajgi | Lead Engineer |

[Openstack] Openstack/Hyper-V meeting on #openstack-meeting

2012-07-31 Thread Peter Pouliot
Adgenda Items for Openstack/Hyper-V Meeting * Status of the Mock Hyper-V Compute * Move from Essex to Folsom o Installer is for essex integration * Hyper-V Testing Procedures o Dev stack for hyper-v testing o Chef for Windows automation Peter J. Pouliot,

Re: [Openstack] Instance stuck in deleting state with error

2012-07-31 Thread Day, Phil
Sorry for a dumb question, but can someone point me to where the authorization is configured to determine who does and doesn't get access to these actions please ? Thanks, Phil -Original Message- From: openstack-bounces+philip.day=hp@lists.launchpad.net

Re: [Openstack] Openstack/Hyper-V meeting on #openstack-meeting

2012-07-31 Thread Frans Thamura
Hi peter Sound that ms wanna active again in openstack Can i know the roadmap and relation between azure I am azure insider work with mark brown. And try to organize openstack indonesian chapter F On Jul 31, 2012 9:38 PM, Peter Pouliot ppoul...@microsoft.com wrote: Adgenda Items for

[Openstack] using two physical interfaces on compute nodes

2012-07-31 Thread Mark H
Hello, I would like to use the second physical NIC on my compute nodes to bridge to a second virtual interface on my instances. I am using the VLAN mode network manager. I understand how to reserve two IPs from separate networks for a given tenant, but both VLANs end up bridged to the first

Re: [Openstack] Instance stuck in deleting state with error

2012-07-31 Thread Karajgi, Rohit
Hi Phil, You might want to look at https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/interim-nova-authz-service https://github.com/openstack/nova/commits/master/etc/nova/policy.json Regards, Rohit Karajgi | Lead Engineer | NTT Data Global Technology Services Private Ltd | w. +91.20.6604.1500 x 378

[Openstack] Hyper-V meeting minutes

2012-07-31 Thread Peter Pouliot
Here's the url's to the log and minutes from today's meeting. Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-07-31-15.00.html Minutes (text):

Re: [Openstack] using two physical interfaces on compute nodes

2012-07-31 Thread Mark H
I see. I am running Ubuntu 12.04. I do need them physically isolated since the primary purpose for my cluster is for use with some experimental network hardware. Thanks for your reply. I'll see what I can find. -Mark On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Mark Lehrer m...@knm.org wrote: compute

Re: [Openstack] [Quantum][Nova] requested_id and port spec

2012-07-31 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
For now it is fine to put it in the same place where network_id is specified. In the nova meeting on Thursday, we are going to discuss a better way to do extensions that need to do things based on additional post params. Vish On Jul 31, 2012, at 12:30 AM, Nati Ueno nati.u...@gmail.com wrote:

[Openstack] [heat] Heat Version 5 Released

2012-07-31 Thread Tomas Sedovic
The heat developers are happy to announce the release of new version of Heat. Heat is a project designed for OpenStack that implements AWS CloudFormation. CloudFormation is a programmable interface and tempalting system for orchestrating multiple cloud applications. Try it out on Fedora 17:

Re: [Openstack] [Quantum][Nova] requested_id and port spec

2012-07-31 Thread Nati Ueno
Hi Vish Thanks. I got it. 2012/7/31 Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com: For now it is fine to put it in the same place where network_id is specified. In the nova meeting on Thursday, we are going to discuss a better way to do extensions that need to do things based on additional post

Re: [Openstack] Networking issue with VlanManager and Floating IPs

2012-07-31 Thread Xu (Simon) Chen
Two ways that I can think of... 1) disable forwarding on the NC, not sure if this would impact regular services. 2) add additional rules, something like -s 10.10.10.0/24 -d 10.0.0.0/8 drop. -Simon On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Wael Ghandour (wghandou) wghan...@cisco.com wrote: We are also

[Openstack] Default reply to behavior for mailing list

2012-07-31 Thread Bhuvaneswaran A
Stefano, If a subscriber reply to a mailing list message, it's sent to the author only. Each subscriber should use Reply to All every time, to post a reply to mailing list. Can you please configure the mailing list and set reply-to header as mailing list address, openstack@lists.launchpad.net.

Re: [Openstack] Default reply to behavior for mailing list

2012-07-31 Thread Matt Joyce
+1 On Jul 31, 2012 10:52 AM, Bhuvaneswaran A bhu...@apache.org wrote: Stefano, If a subscriber reply to a mailing list message, it's sent to the author only. Each subscriber should use Reply to All every time, to post a reply to mailing list. Can you please configure the mailing list and

Re: [Openstack] Default reply to behavior for mailing list

2012-07-31 Thread Johannes Erdfelt
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012, Bhuvaneswaran A bhu...@apache.org wrote: If a subscriber reply to a mailing list message, it's sent to the author only. Each subscriber should use Reply to All every time, to post a reply to mailing list. Can you please configure the mailing list and set reply-to header

Re: [Openstack] Default reply to behavior for mailing list

2012-07-31 Thread Jay Pipes
On 07/31/2012 02:09 PM, Johannes Erdfelt wrote: On Tue, Jul 31, 2012, Bhuvaneswaran A bhu...@apache.org wrote: If a subscriber reply to a mailing list message, it's sent to the author only. Each subscriber should use Reply to All every time, to post a reply to mailing list. Can you please

[Openstack] [glance] legacy client removal and python-glanceclient

2012-07-31 Thread Brian Waldon
This is a reminder that the client in glance is deprecated and will not ship with Folsom. Horizon and Devstack both use python-glanceclient, and I'm presently working on updating Nova. I also wanted to point out that I just released python-glanceclient v0.2.0 and would love to gather some

Re: [Openstack] Networking issue with VlanManager and Floating IPs

2012-07-31 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
Communication should be blocked via security groups, but perhaps you want more complete isolation. The network host (which in this case is the compute host) will be able to route packets between subnets even though they are on different networks, so you will need to drop packets between vlans.

Re: [Openstack] Default reply to behavior for mailing list

2012-07-31 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:50:02AM -0700, Bhuvaneswaran A wrote: Stefano, If a subscriber reply to a mailing list message, it's sent to the author only. Each subscriber should use Reply to All every time, to post a reply to mailing list. Can you please configure the mailing list and set

Re: [Openstack] Default reply to behavior for mailing list

2012-07-31 Thread Sean Dague
On 07/31/2012 02:13 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: As a counter-point, I'd prefer to keep the list as it is and *not* munge Reply-To. Since Chip summarizes it better than I can, I'll link to his article 'Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful': http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html ++ Just use

Re: [Openstack] Default reply to behavior for mailing list

2012-07-31 Thread Kiall Mac Innes
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.comwrote: This discussion invariably turns up on most open source mailing lists from time to time. People never agree on the best setting. Asking for this reply-to setting to be changed is merely shifting the pain away from

Re: [Openstack] Default reply to behavior for mailing list

2012-07-31 Thread Matt Joyce
That being said, I realize we're entering mostly a land of religion here. So I'll just end with a long live emacs! to try to get us to the godwin rule as fast as possible. The Nazis had Headers too. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack

Re: [Openstack] Default reply to behavior for mailing list

2012-07-31 Thread Alex Glikson
From: Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:50:02AM -0700, Bhuvaneswaran A wrote: Stefano, If a subscriber reply to a mailing list message, it's sent to the author only. Each subscriber should use Reply to All every time, to post a reply to mailing list.

Re: [Openstack] Default reply to behavior for mailing list

2012-07-31 Thread Bhuvaneswaran A
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Alex Glikson glik...@il.ibm.com wrote: This discussion invariably turns up on most open source mailing lists from time to time. People never agree on the best setting. Asking for this reply-to setting to be changed is merely shifting the pain away from one set

Re: [Openstack] Default reply to behavior for mailing list

2012-07-31 Thread Matt Joyce
I'm sure Launchpad doesn't support user level configuration, to edit email headers. We're moving off of launchpad to mailman proper anyways. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe :

Re: [Openstack] Default reply to behavior for mailing list

2012-07-31 Thread Jay Pipes
On 07/31/2012 03:21 PM, Sean Dague wrote: On 07/31/2012 02:13 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: As a counter-point, I'd prefer to keep the list as it is and *not* munge Reply-To. Since Chip summarizes it better than I can, I'll link to his article 'Reply-To Munging Considered Harmful':

Re: [Openstack] [glance] legacy client removal and python-glanceclient

2012-07-31 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 11:41 -0700, Brian Waldon wrote: released python-glanceclient v0.2.0 and would love to gather some feedback. Please file bugs on the python-glanceclient project in launchpad if you find anything to be missing. What is the plan to deal with the fact that the user interface

Re: [Openstack] [glance] legacy client removal and python-glanceclient

2012-07-31 Thread Brian Waldon
On Jul 31, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 11:41 -0700, Brian Waldon wrote: released python-glanceclient v0.2.0 and would love to gather some feedback. Please file bugs on the python-glanceclient project in launchpad if you find anything to be missing.

Re: [Openstack] [glance] legacy client removal and python-glanceclient

2012-07-31 Thread Matt Joyce
We really can't be breaking compatibility where people are probably writing shell scripts. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack More help :

Re: [Openstack] [glance] legacy client removal and python-glanceclient

2012-07-31 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 15:17 -0700, Brian Waldon wrote: On Jul 31, 2012, at 2:37 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 11:41 -0700, Brian Waldon wrote: released python-glanceclient v0.2.0 and would love to gather some feedback. Please file bugs on the python-glanceclient

Re: [Openstack] [glance] legacy client removal and python-glanceclient

2012-07-31 Thread Lorin Hochstein
On Jul 31, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Brian Waldon bcwal...@gmail.com wrote: This is a reminder that the client in glance is deprecated and will not ship with Folsom. Horizon and Devstack both use python-glanceclient, and I'm presently working on updating Nova. I also wanted to point out that I

Re: [Openstack] [glance] legacy client removal and python-glanceclient

2012-07-31 Thread Matt Joyce
I think we're running out of opportunities to do stuff like this. This is exactly the sort of thing that will drive George Reese into a homocidal rage. More to the point its exactly the sort of thing our users are going to despise us for. And that hatred will outlive any benefit. Users only

Re: [Openstack] [glance] legacy client removal and python-glanceclient

2012-07-31 Thread Jay Pipes
On 08/01/2012 12:49 AM, Matt Joyce wrote: I think we're running out of opportunities to do stuff like this. This is exactly the sort of thing that will drive George Reese into a homocidal rage. More to the point its exactly the sort of thing our users are going to despise us for. And that

Re: [Openstack] [glance] legacy client removal and python-glanceclient

2012-07-31 Thread Brian Waldon
On Jul 31, 2012, at 9:49 PM, Matt Joyce wrote: I think we're running out of opportunities to do stuff like this. This is exactly the sort of thing that will drive George Reese into a homocidal rage. More to the point its exactly the sort of thing our users are going to despise us for.

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: quantal_folsom_keystone_trunk #23

2012-07-31 Thread openstack-testing-bot
at 20120731

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Failure: quantal_folsom_cinder_trunk #25

2012-07-31 Thread openstack-testing-bot
Title: quantal_folsom_cinder_trunk General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/quantal_folsom_cinder_trunk/25/Project:quantal_folsom_cinder_trunkDate of build:Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:31:54 -0400Build duration:18 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: quantal_folsom_swift_trunk #36

2012-07-31 Thread openstack-testing-bot
at 20120731