Now with pull requests
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Sean Dague sda...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Looks like thanks to bcwaldon you wont have to wait much.
Also, +1 for Vish.
On 09/06/2012 02:12 PM, Duncan McGreggor wrote:
/me waits for http://vishfacts.com/ ...
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at
I'm going to be on a flight tomorrow.
Given that cinder started with nova code and removed code that was not
needed for nova-volumes, I'm hoping we can minimize the time that the
project isn't in core. (potentially replacing nova-volumes in folsom
- since the work to keep both nova+nova-volumes
Agree that there are pros and cons to caching at different layers.
As for plugins, in most places where we support memcache we revert to
an in-memory cache if it isn't configured.
The work that was done during essex was to make the metadata service
use either an external cache or internal cache.
With *all* services, if you know the endpoint you can query them
directly with the auth mechanism (either token or ec2 access/secret).
OpenStack has an identity service (keystone) that returns a catalog of
services (for discovery)
You don't need to look at the catalog if you know the endpoints.
There is the concept of limits that are very similar. Should we
align quotas limits?
j
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Kevin L. Mitchell
kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com wrote:
I wanted to let everyone know about a quota classes blueprint I've
submitted; you can find the details here:
*
Maybe it is just me, but most reviews seem to take hours to days to
complete. I'm been sitting here waiting for a one line change to get
a second +2 / approved so I can redeploy our test cluster for the
last 2 hours.
When lots of people are active, reviews can be approved in quickly -
especially
That looks like a line from devstack.
I just did a fresh install of oneiric and ran devstack (kvm) and
didn't see this issue.
Any details?
Jesse
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Shang Wu sh...@ubuntu.com wrote:
What is the environment that you used to deploy this? Did you specify the
It would be neat to see one with all the projects together - in HD.
Since many contributors work on all the projects, we would see people
zooming all around the screen.
Is this possible?
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Armaan dce3...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks everyone, i am delighted that you
I'd love to hear more specifics about what needs more focus. These
issues are large and have been the major focus of the core team for a
while.
* Nova is too big.
Very few (if any) core developers are comfortable reviewing every
part of the code base. In itself, this isn't necessarily a
There are certainly folks who review changes to stable/diablo
So if you want to propose patches to the branch, please do!
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Yun Mao yun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Anthony, the issues with stable/diablo branch are: mostly the left
over VMs are not scrubbed cleanly,
There isn't yet an API for PCI/USB passthrough.
If your goals can be accomplished by tweaking the libvirt.xml template
(and no additional data), then you might be able to accomplish this
without any changes to nova.
If you need fine-grained control of passthrough parameters per VM,
then changes
Deliberate change.
It used to be that KVM and XS did different things as far as disk partitioning.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/disk-configuration-parity
Now a flavor can specify the root vs ephemeral partition size
independently instead of being decided by choice of hypervisor.
to update the state
Thanks to all the contributors to the rewrite:
Andy Smith
Anthony Young
Brian Waldon
Chmouel Boudjnah
Chuck Short
Dean Troyer
Devin Carlen
Dolph Mathews
James E. Blair
Jesse Andrews
Joe Heck
Justin Santa Barbara
Monty Taylor
Vishvananda Ishaya
HOYOOO!
p.s
Yes
Light was the codename when it was an internal tool.
The first version was a couple hundred lines and supported all core APIs.
After it was decided it would be more effective to flesh out light than
continue to tweak the existing code base, it became the redux branch of the
official
You can add a selection of images to your localrc and it will add them
automatically
https://github.com/cloudbuilders/devstack/blob/master/stackrc#L57
example localrc:
the reason for adding tmux is that we were running into issues with
services not launching inside screen (due to a timing issue).
I'm for removing tmux - since the sleep between creating a screen
using it has resolved the issue.
Jesse
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Jay Pipes
At the end of devstack run it says:
echo keystone is serving at
$KEYSTONE_SERVICE_PROTOCOL://$KEYSTONE_SERVICE_HOST:$KEYSTONE_SERVICE_PORT/v2.0/
echo examples on using novaclient command line is in exercise.sh
echo the default users are: admin and demo
echo the password:
Silly thought: what about launching automating VM to do the work of
downloading and uploading the image to glance?
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Tres Henry t...@treshenry.net wrote:
I think this is a slightly different (but related) use case. In this case the
user wants to add an image to
).
* an opensource backend for the LB service (haproxy, pound, ...)
The thought is that an entire eco-system of components that plug into
a cloud is more powerful than having OpenStack choose winners that
become core. [3]
I look forward to conversations about LBaaS and the definition of OpenStack.
Jesse
I think having a session on devstack at the summit would be valuable.
I'm still torn on it being python vs. bash because I see
non-developers using it all the time because they can take snippets of
the shell script and use it.
Jesse
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Joshua Harlow
...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 02/06/2012 10:37 AM, Jesse Andrews wrote:
I think having a session on devstack at the summit would be valuable.
++
I'm still torn on it being python vs. bash because I see
non-developers using it all the time because they can take snippets of
the shell script and use
Agreed. Supporting more than just ubuntu is important!
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
+ There needs to be a way to install on multiple distributions (without
saying go figure out the deps yourself).
I know everyone is ubuntu, ubuntu, ubuntu, but
I know that the RCB deploy team works with the Crowbar team on chef
recipes for that project.
Regarding the github.com/ansolabs github.com/rcb recipes - I'll have
to delegate to Vishy who worked on those.
Jesse
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stackers,
/CLIAuth
Horizon openrc generation: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/891851/horizon-openrc.png
---
If any other teams have big plans for E4, it would be great to hear them.
Thanks!
Jesse Andrews on behalf of the entire Rackspace Cloud Builders team
___
Mailing list
There have been conversations about changing that. That nova should
use /etc/nova/nova.conf
Thoughts?
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Jorge Luiz Correa corre...@gmail.com wrote:
When using Devstack the files are written to /opt/stack/component. So, you
can find nova.conf in
looks like you have instances running.
virsh list
then terminate the instances.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) dedu...@cisco.com wrote:
Gabriel
As a control experiment I ran devstack on a fresh vm using non Quantum
Observations:
· When I try to add
devstack-pi (play on version numbers and python)
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Sure, this was just a name I picked. It can be renamed to anything, works
for me. I just needed a name for a github project (and it seemed to make
sense at the time,
VNC consoles used to be an openstackx extension. Anthony is working today
on moving it into openstack contrib.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Mohammad Banikazemi m...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Thanks for the script.
Maybe I am being paranoid or I have messed up my setup but since yesterday
I
This is a known issue with master due to a change to how extension work
with nova. I expect it will be fixed within a day.
On Jan 17, 2012 12:08 AM, Gary Kotton ga...@radware.com wrote:
Hi,
When I connect to the dashboard after a devstack installation I get the
following error:
I think a goal would be to have easy fabric integration.
Right now our fabric scripts for devstack look like:
@task
@parallel
def stop():
Kill devstack and all VMs running
run(killall -9 screen || true)
run(screen -wipe || true)
# note we can probably remove this once devstack
Nice!
Jay - are you expecting folks to run this on the same server or in the
same rack as the glance server? (eg, do you expect the transfer
between the client and glance to make an noticeable impact on
performance)
Perhaps if people are going to share these numbers they should share
benchmarks
Agreed - filing a bug.
Jesse
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Ewan Mellor ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
We now have a script called ‘keystone’ as the entry point to
python-keystoneclient, and a script called ‘keystone’ that launches a
combined admin and service API server. Either could be
Devstack isn't for production. I recommend using packages (even if
they are your own).
repeat: WHAT FOLLOWS IS NOT FOR PRODUCTION!
If you are just experimenting with a multi-node dev deploy - you can
set a few options in your nova.conf:
Looks like you are missing the %tenant_id% in the service endpoint catalog
$BIN_DIR/keystone-manage $* endpointTemplates add RegionOne nova
http://%HOST_IP%:8774/v1.1/%tenant_id%
http://%HOST_IP%:8774/v1.1/%tenant_id%
http://%HOST_IP%:8774/v1.1/%tenant_id% 1 1
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 11:10 PM,
IMPORTANT: this is NOT about removing EC2 api or admin apis - it is
about moving admin extensions to openstack api extensions.
When we first created nova, we created a set of admin apis that helped
make the project configurable without nova-manage. We shoved them
into the ec2 api layer since the
python-keystoneclient is based on python-novaclient, and is already in
use by horizon as mentioned.
What are the reasons for not using python-keystoneclient?
Jesse
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
Hrm. For some reason I thought we'd already decided to
I agree except I though the preference was for
instance_uuid = instance['uuid']
not
instance_uuid = instance.uuid
(use dict's and don't assume sqlalchemy)
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Devin Carlen devin.car...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, we should absolutely push to make this more
Great question.
Right now there are 3 approaches to metadata/runtime config:
* ec2 metadata service - http://169.254.169.254/ (used by ubuntu's
cloud-init for example)
* config drive - added in diablo
* xenstore via openstack agent - https://launchpad.net/openstack-guest-agents
* injecting
Definitely we should be filing bugs.
Jesse
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Julien Danjou
julien.dan...@enovance.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15 2011, Narayan Desai wrote:
Hello all. We've recently upgraded our cactus system to more recent
code. In the process of doing this, we've started logging
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 8:43 AM, Scott Moser smo...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I'm just curious, what are the motivations behind inventing something
other than the EC2 Metadata service? It is generally functional, and
quite a lot can (and has) built atop this simple service.
I should clarify - the
I would interpret that to include the snapshots - but I'm not sure
that is what I'd expect as a user.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Nachi Ueno
ueno.na...@nttdata-agilenet.com wrote:
Hi folks
I wanna make Delete server spec clear.
The API doc says,
When a server is deleted, all images
A tenant is what used to be called a project in nova, and an account in swift.
When you validate a token using keystone you get the account
(tenant) and the user who is performing the account (who is a member
of the tenant)
Jesse
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 7:58 AM, John Dickinson m...@not.mn
What version of libvirt bin/d/python are you running?
on debian/ubuntu do:
dpkg -l | grep libvirt
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't seen this happen. Sounds like it may be a libvirt bug.
On Oct 27, 2011, at 7:48 AM, mao weijie
I don't think the debate is whether to do migrations or not. I think
the debate should be:
Is there more value in not doing it the same way another openstack
project does it?
If you can use nova's method, then we get closer to having standard
operating procedures for openstack projects...
On
++
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Josh Kearney j...@jk0.org wrote:
++
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:59 PM, Brian Waldon brian.wal...@rackspace.com
wrote:
I would like to propose we remove our implementation of OSAPI v1.0 from
Nova for the following reasons:
1) Our implementation is
Actually right now it doesn't re-check out.
You have to manually pull in the project you want to update.
I've got a patch that I want to get reviewed / fixed before I merge
https://github.com/cloudbuilders/devstack/pull/52 that will update the
repos on each run.
Jesse
2011/10/10 Joseph Heck
at various points in time they have worked together. We
(cloudbuilders) keep a list of repositories that work well together.
# compute service
NOVA_REPO=https://github.com/openstack/nova.git
NOVA_BRANCH=2011.3
# image catalog service
GLANCE_REPO=https://github.com/cloudbuilders/glance.git
, the normal flow?)
Jesse
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Am I to assume the below is going to be the Diablo+ release/package or
whatever was agreed upon at the last #openstack-meeting?
:)
-jay
2011/9/28 Jesse Andrews anotherje...@gmail.com:
at various
I can add ami style images to diablo nova/glance via:
wget
http://uec-images.ubuntu.com/natty/current/natty-server-cloudimg-amd64.tar.gz
tar -zxvf natty-server-cloudimg-amd64.tar.gz
glance add -A KEYSTONE_TOKEN name=uec-natty-kernel is_public=true
container_format=aki \
Is there / will there be a git tag/branch for diablo in the
github.com/openstack/nova repository?
Thanks,
Jesse
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe :
If you aren't using qauntum you can get dashboard doing something like:
export DASH_DIR=path_to_dashboard_checkout
mkdir -p $DASH_DIR/openstack-dashboard/quantum
touch $DASH_DIR /openstack-dashboard/quantum/__init__.py
touch $DASH_DIR /openstack-dashboard/quantum/client.py
Then
I disagree. I find lots of valuable in github even if trunk merges require
gerrit.
Teams can (and IMHO should) use pull requests to improve the quality before it
is proposed to trunk. Pull requests to branches can be made while the work is
still in progress (sending patches to others
Devin,
Thank you for putting this so eloquently. I cannot agree more
+1000
On Aug 26, 2011 11:38 AM, Devin Carlen devin.car...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
I've been following the code vs architect debate that's been unfolding
over the past week or so. Here are some of the problems I've seen
I highly advise running using mod_wsgi, gunicorn or other techniques that allow
you to run multiple application servers since the API calls dashboard makes to
nova/keystone/... are synchronous.
Jesse
On Aug 4, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Thanks that seemed to work.
I think the
Todd was doing some work on keystone
https://github.com/rackspace/keystone/commit/722fcd8ebef3fe1268ace5c05e014f6a945abfab
It still needs some work and might not be at the right place.
Jesse
On Jun 21, 2011, at 4:31 PM, Tres Henry wrote:
Trying to get a Swift+Keystone dev environment
We need to make it more clear the relationship between keystone and
user/tenants.
When you authenticate against keystone, a service is sent a token with an
associated User/Tenant.
The current backend of keystone supports a specific tenant/user model, but as
far as the rest of openstack
A few of us were looking at starting to implement
http://wiki.openstack.org/SystemUsageData, starting with updating the
spec to reflect plans related to unified auth (the keystone project).
In the blueprint, it was called out that data was to be aggregated by
Account ID - which it claimed is NOT
Atlas is an api/service which controls load balancers. Currently they
support zeus, but they have a model where folks can add additional software
like haproxy/pound/... much like nova supports additional
hypervisors/storage systems via drivers
On Apr 23, 2011 7:26 AM, Thomas Goirand
The PBB talked a few meetings ago about the incubation process.
Incubation is a phase of saying I want to align myself with openstack. Any
project can incubate, but to become core requires the PBB consent.
Competing projects (for db, lb, dashboards, ...) are welcome. Once the
project has proper
Agreed that auth needs improved. Multiple auths per site would be horrible.
Ziad just sent an email about the first phase and we (openstack community
members who care about auth) will work with ptls to make sure it works for
them.
On Apr 19, 2011 11:53 AM, Ken Pepple ken.pep...@rabbityard.com
I like the simple solution (#3) as well.
It gets parity for the APIs while leaving more advanced topics for the NaaS
discussions.
-- Sent from my Tandy 1000sx
Jesse Andrews
anotherje...@gmail.com
On Apr 18, 2011, at 11:36 AM, Trey Morris wrote:
Appears my response got lost somehow. I vote
+1
We were hoping to move it to an openstack admin api. Hopefully now that
openstack api 1.1 exists we can get traction on flushing it out with commands
like these (and those contained within the ec2 extensions for administration)
-- Sent from my Tandy 1000sx
Jesse Andrews
anotherje
The decision hasn't been made. The decision is to talk about it at the summit
and on the mailing list.
-- Sent from my Tandy 1000sx
Jesse Andrews
anotherje...@gmail.com
On Apr 8, 2011, at 3:08 PM, Rick Clark wrote:
Therefore, at this time, we are only proposing moving the code hosting
What to do when an instance dies is application specific.
Some applications may not care, autoscaling back to the proper size by
themselves. Other applications may need the resources to be returned in the
most recent state.
Currently openstack requires the user to handle recovery.
I expect
I can make it.
I know vish is unavailable.
On Mar 10, 2011, at 8:26 AM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
We're scheduled for a meeting today at 20:00 UTC/2:00 PM CST. Who's going to
be able to make it? I know several of you are traveling.
Jonathan.
___
the auth services return?
From: Jesse Andrews anotherje...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:53:01 -0800
To: Erik Carlin erik.car...@rackspace.com
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!)
I'm also
I'm also confused because nova (compute/block/network) is in 1 repository
doesn't mean it isn't 3 different services.
We've talked about moving the services inside nova to not reaching inside of
each other via RPC calls and instead making HTTP calls. But they are mostly
already designed in a
Great work!
Vishy and termie got jenkins launching ubuntu+kvm and running smoke tests.
There are a few isssues left but I'm excited to increase coverage.
We'd like to add coverage for rhel 5/6 and suse.
http://ansolabs.no-ip.org:9000/
We'll write an email about how it works so others can run
Catching up as well...
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
The Anso team has told me that they run the smoketests regularly, but
I would assume they only run these smoketests against a test cluster
that mimicks the Nebula environment. Devin and termie can
69 matches
Mail list logo