> -Original Message-
> From: shengjie_...@dell.com [mailto:shengjie_...@dell.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:38 AM
> To: Jiang, Yunhong
> Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: RE: [Openstack] [Ceilometer] Ganglia Ceilometer integration
>
> >
My 2 cents.
Basically there are two method to interact with Ganglia. One is to push all
data from ceilometer into Gangalia, another one is your suggestion, put all
data from Gangalia to ceilometer.
According to current definition of ceilometer "infrastructure to collect
measurements within Op
I think trusted_filter is not in the scheduler_default_filters, so you have to
make sure it's used by the filter scheduler.
Thanks
--jyh
From: openstack-bounces+yunhong.jiang=intel@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+yunhong.jiang=intel@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Dale,
Do you plan to implement it? Per my understanding, If yes, then begin
implementation, and don't forget to add something like "for bp " in your
patch. Otherwise, wait someone who has interests to work on it :)
Thanks
--jyh
> -Original Message-
> From: openstack-bounces+yunhong.jiang=
Eoghan, thanks for you comments. I will change it to openstack-common.
--jyh
> -Original Message-
> From: Eoghan Glynn [mailto:egl...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 10:33 PM
> To: Jiang, Yunhong
> Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net; Robert Collins
> Subje
t; Behalf Of Jiang, Yunhong
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 8:17 AM
> To: Robert Collins
> Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] One potential issue on the normalize_time() in
> timeutils
>
> Rob, thanks for comments.
> I totally agree with you that
_specs",
foreign_keys=instance_type_id,
primaryjoin='and_('
'InstanceTypeExtraSpecs.instance_type_id == InstanceTypes.id,'
'InstanceTypeExtraSpecs.deleted == False)')
Thanks
--jyh
From: Vinay Bannai [mailto:vban...@g
Original Message-
> From: Robert Collins [mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net]
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 3:25 AM
> To: Jiang, Yunhong
> Cc: egl...@redhat.com; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] One potential issue on the normalize_time() in
> timeutils
>
Hi, Eoghan and all,
When I implement an enhancement to trusted_filter, I need utilize
timeutils() to parse ISO time. However, I suspect there is one potential issue
in normalize_time() and want to get some input from your side.
In normalize_time(), if the parameter "timestamp"
lavor).
Thanks
--jyh
From: Vinay Bannai [mailto:vban...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2012 6:26 AM
To: Jiang, Yunhong
Cc: Dugger, Donald D; Patrick Petit; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
(openstack@lists.launchpad.net)
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Nova] Instance Type Extra Specs clarif
#x27;updated_at')})
From: Dugger, Donald D
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 5:18 AM
To: Vinay Bannai
Cc: Patrick Petit; Jiang, Yunhong; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
(openstack@lists.launchpad.net)
Subject: RE: [Openstack] [Nova] Instance Type Extra Specs clarifications
OS-FLV-EXTRA-DA
finish current task).
Thanks
--jyh
From: Dugger, Donald D
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 4:28 AM
To: Vinay Bannai; Patrick Petit; Jiang, Yunhong
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net (openstack@lists.launchpad.net)
Subject: RE: [Openstack] [Nova] Instance Type Extra Specs clarifications
Well, Yunh
Currently the python-novaclient have no operation to set/unset the flavor extra
specs. I upload a patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10768/ to add the
support to nova client, can anyone have a review to it?
Thanks
--jyh
___
Mailing list: https://l
sday, August 02, 2012 12:16 AM
> To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] python novaclient's response when extension is
> disabled
>
> On 08/01/2012 10:10 AM, Jiang, Yunhong wrote:
> > Currently, if an extension is disabled, there will be no clear informat
Currently, if an extension is disabled, there will be no clear information like
"extension is not support", instead, it will return " ERROR: n/a (HTTP 404)",
like followed output in my devstack.
yjiang5@yjiang5-linux1:~/work/openstack/devstack$ nova hypervisor-list
ERROR: n/a (HTTP 404)
I'm not
Hi, all
When I'm trying to add support to python nova-client to list/update
flavor extra specs, I noticed that the flavor extra_specs API extension use the
flavor ID to access database API, while the corresponding parameter should be
instance_type id.
I create a bug for it at htt
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Suh [mailto:j...@isi.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 9:38 PM
> To: Jiang, Yunhong
> Cc: Dugger, Donald D; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: One question on the compute_filter
>
> Yunhong,
>
> Thanks for y
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Fehlig [mailto:jfeh...@suse.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 11:37 AM
> To: Jiang, Yunhong
> Cc: j...@isi.edu; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Openstack] One question on the compute_filter
>
> Jiang, Yunhong w
Hi, Joseph
I'm working on the patch for blueprints
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/update-flavor-key-value, to
add/delete the extra_specs for flavor through nova-manage. I'm still setting up
my environment to push the patch.
However, when I was testing my patch, I
19 matches
Mail list logo
