Re: [Openstack] anyone has a sample quantum.conf file that configures a valid quantum.log file?

2013-04-30 Thread Maru Newby
On Apr 29, 2013, at 6:03 PM, yulin...@dell.com wrote: Hi, I’m new to Quantum and trying to set up an openstack quantum environment. I installed a single node environment using DevStack(on a VM) successfully. I noticed that by default there is no log files for quantum. I tried to

Re: [Openstack] anyone has a sample quantum.conf file that configures a valid quantum.log file?

2013-04-30 Thread Maru Newby
Message- From: Maru Newby [mailto:ma...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 2:03 AM To: C, Yuling Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Openstack] anyone has a sample quantum.conf file that configures a valid quantum.log file? On Apr 29, 2013, at 6:03 PM, yulin

Re: [Openstack] anyone has a sample quantum.conf file that configures a valid quantum.log file?

2013-04-30 Thread Maru Newby
the physical NIC port MAC from Openstack Quantum? The plugin configured in my environment is OVS plugin. Thanks, YuLing -Original Message- From: Maru Newby [mailto:ma...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 11:32 AM To: C, Yuling Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net

Re: [Openstack] Quantum Help

2013-01-09 Thread Maru Newby
Hi Mark, Where are you attempting to execute ping against the internal ip from? Based on that guide, the internal ip would only be routable on the compute or network nodes, and it should be possible to ping the VM from either. If you are unable to ping the internal ip from one of those

[Openstack] [Quantum] Running plugin tests with tox

2012-08-24 Thread Maru Newby
Hi Salvatore, I see you're working on getting plugins testable with tox: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/11922/ What about keeping the plugins isolated for testing purposes? I have been unable to work on it yet, but I was thinking it might be a good idea to move the plugins out of the main

Re: [Openstack] Keystone: 'PKI Signed Tokens' lack support for revocation

2012-08-09 Thread Maru Newby
, Adam Young wrote: On 08/01/2012 09:19 PM, Maru Newby wrote: I see that support for PKI Signed Tokens has been added to Keystone without support for token revocation. I tried to raise this issue on the bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1003962/comments/4

Re: [Openstack] Keystone: 'PKI Signed Tokens' lack support for revocation

2012-08-02 Thread Maru Newby
/01/2012 11:05 PM, Maru Newby wrote: Hi Adam, I apologize if my questions were answered before. I wasn't aware that what I perceive as a very serious security concern was openly discussed. The arguments against revocation support, as you've described them, seem to be: - it's

Re: [Openstack] Keystone: 'PKI Signed Tokens' lack support for revocation

2012-08-02 Thread Maru Newby
up. - joe On Aug 1, 2012, at 8:05 PM, Maru Newby mne...@internap.com wrote: Hi Adam, I apologize if my questions were answered before. I wasn't aware that what I perceive as a very serious security concern was openly discussed. The arguments against revocation support, as you've

[Openstack] Keystone: 'PKI Signed Tokens' lack support for revocation

2012-08-01 Thread Maru Newby
I see that support for PKI Signed Tokens has been added to Keystone without support for token revocation. I tried to raise this issue on the bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1003962/comments/4 And the review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/7754/ I'm curious as to

Re: [Openstack] Keystone: 'PKI Signed Tokens' lack support for revocation

2012-08-01 Thread Maru Newby
-08-01, at 9:47 PM, Adam Young wrote: On 08/01/2012 09:19 PM, Maru Newby wrote: I see that support for PKI Signed Tokens has been added to Keystone without support for token revocation. I tried to raise this issue on the bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1003962/comments

Re: [Openstack] Swift Probetests

2012-06-26 Thread Maru Newby
Have I missed a response in the past week? On 2012-06-19, at 12:14 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 06/19/2012 11:10 AM, Maru Newby wrote: The swift probetests are broken: https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1014931 Does the swift team intend to maintain probetests going forward? Given how

[Openstack] Swift Probetests

2012-06-19 Thread Maru Newby
The swift probetests are broken: https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1014931 Does the swift team intend to maintain probetests going forward? Given how broken they are at present (bad imports, failures even when imports are fixed), it would appear that probetests are not gating commits.

Re: [Openstack] [QA] Aligning smoke / acceptance / promotion test efforts

2012-05-03 Thread Maru Newby
The rest api is the default interface, and the client tools target that interface. Since the clients are cli more than python api, they can be used by any language that can use a shell. What exactly does reimplementing the clients for the sake of testing accomplish? Double the maintenance

Re: [Openstack] Where does Keystone middleware for Swift belong?

2012-04-12 Thread Maru Newby
Hi John, On 2012-04-11, at 8:03 PM, John Dickinson wrote: I do not think that these pieces of middleware belong in the core swift repo. Understood. 1) Including them in swift would require swift to depend on keystone for full testing. As I mentioned in my initial email, the modules in

[Openstack] Where does Keystone middleware for Swift belong?

2012-04-11 Thread Maru Newby
The Keystone repo currently contains the following Swift-specific wsgi middleware modules: https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/middleware/s3_token.py https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/middleware/swift_auth.py Neither module depends directly on

Re: [Openstack] Where does Keystone middleware for Swift belong?

2012-04-11 Thread Maru Newby
Agreed that s3_token belongs in Swift, and as per Joshua, ec2_token probably belongs in Nova. Cheers, Maru On 2012-04-11, at 3:07 PM, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: This also seems to make sense for other items in

Re: [Openstack] Being pedantic about pedanticism: HACKING styleguide

2012-03-23 Thread Maru Newby
Hi Andy, On 2012-03-22, at 10:00 PM, Andy Smith wrote: The rule is there because it makes it obvious where you are using objects from (and they aren't in the current namespace), prevents that where is this defined -scan around the file- oh, it is being imported from this other thing,

Re: [Openstack] Being pedantic about pedanticism: HACKING styleguide

2012-03-22 Thread Maru Newby
Hi Jay, On 2012-03-22, at 2:13 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: Object Imports == In addition, the following DOES NOT appear in Glance's section on imports: - Do not import objects, only modules Nowhere in PEP8 does it mention anything about not importing objects. In fact, PEP8

Re: [Openstack] Keystone's Swift Integration

2012-03-20 Thread Maru Newby
a discussion for Folsom summit. On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Maru Newby mne...@internap.com wrote: I'd like to write unit tests for keystone.middleware.swift_auth in advance of some functional changes (adding support for unauthenticated container sync and referrer access). It appears

[Openstack] Keystone's Swift Integration

2012-03-19 Thread Maru Newby
I'd like to write unit tests for keystone.middleware.swift_auth in advance of some functional changes (adding support for unauthenticated container sync and referrer access). It appears that swift_auth lacks unit tests, though. Is this due to its dependency on swift, or is there another

Re: [Openstack] Enabling data deduplication on Swift

2012-03-10 Thread Maru Newby
Hi Joe, There's one huge difference between page deduplication and object deduplication: Page size is small and predictable, whereas object size is not. Given this, full compares would not be a good way to implement performant object deduplication in swift. Thanks, Maru On 2012-03-10, at

Re: [Openstack] Enabling data deduplication on Swift

2012-03-10 Thread Maru Newby
that the match is real, and not just a hash collision. See the source of all knowledge: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rsync#Algorithm On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Maru Newby mne...@internap.com wrote: Hi Joe, There's one huge difference between page deduplication and object

Re: [Openstack] Keystone database (using latest devstack)

2012-03-09 Thread Maru Newby
On 2012-03-09, at 7:52 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: The data is stored in a python dictionary, inside of the metadata table. You will not be able to use SQL without an unwieldy wildcard search. IMO this seems overly complicated for a core function of the tool, and possibly the reason why

Re: [Openstack] WebOb + DeprecationWarning

2012-03-08 Thread Maru Newby
Hi Keven, On 2012-03-08, at 8:31 AM, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: On Wed, 2012-03-07 at 22:40 -0800, Maru Newby wrote: I'm using a devstack-configured box with all the latest code and am running into DeprecationWarning wherever weob.Request.str_[GET,PUT,cookies,params] are accessed

[Openstack] WebOb + DeprecationWarning

2012-03-07 Thread Maru Newby
I'm using a devstack-configured box with all the latest code and am running into DeprecationWarning wherever weob.Request.str_[GET,PUT,cookies,params] are accessed (they are being replaced by unicode equivalents). Since Python 2.7 does not ignore DeprecationWarning, and I am running on Python

[Openstack] Test Dependencies

2012-03-01 Thread Maru Newby
Is there any interest in adding unittest2 to the test dependencies for openstack projects? I have found its enhanced assertions and 'with self.assertRaises' very useful in writing tests. I see there have been past bugs that mentioned unittest2, and am wondering if the reasons for not adopting

Re: [Openstack] [DEVSTACK] officialize it!

2012-02-06 Thread Maru Newby
-1 on multi-distribution devstack. Being cross-platform is arguably a place where chef/puppet/cfengine automation comes into play, and that's not where devstack's self-declared mission lies. +1 to continuing to have Ubuntu be the reference devstack target. Maintaining support for an

Re: [Openstack] [CHEF] Aligning Cookbook Efforts

2012-02-06 Thread Maru Newby
I've submitted a Swift AIO cookbook for review: https://review.openstack.org/#change,3613 It follows the latest single-node AIO instructions pretty much to the letter, so the resulting environment is well-documented. We use this cookbook as the basis for building Swift development

[Openstack] Swift-core PPA appears broken

2011-12-16 Thread Maru Newby
While following the saio instructions (http://swift.openstack.org/development_saio.html) I ran into a problem with the swift-core ppa. I get the following on apt-get update after adding the ppa repo: W: Failed to fetch

Re: [Openstack] Swift-core PPA appears broken

2011-12-16 Thread Maru Newby
Please disregard. I've added a bug in launchpad and submitted a fix to gerrit. Apologies for the newb email. Thanks! Maru On 2011-12-16, at 7:24 PM, Maru Newby wrote: While following the saio instructions (http://swift.openstack.org/development_saio.html) I ran into a problem