https://review.openstack.org/#/c/11524/
Patches posted. Review solicited. Thanks in advance...
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help :
Hi Dan and ttx. I've posted what I sincerely hope is the last rev of
changes for bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/quantum/+bug/1037815
I believe this addresses the last round of cleanups and questions,
with the exception of amotoki's request for other agent support, eg
L3. Since I don't have a goo
>From: j...@redhat.com
>Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:23:52 -0400
>
>>From: Dan Wendlandt
>>Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 15:22:31 -0700
>>
>>
>>jrd, my feeling is that we'd need a patch for this
use cases, so
>definitely not something that is simple or self-contained. On the
> other,
>it's quite easy to trace back issues to this. In summary, if it's the
>only exception in Quantum, it's not really a problem :)
>
> [w
>From: j...@redhat.com
>Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 11:52:49 -0400
[...]
>Very much, thanks. More news as it happens...
Here's where I've got to so far
I've ported/transliterated code from nova/cinder to manage rootwrap
filter defs the same way in quantum.
I've plowed through most of
>From: Thierry Carrez
>Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 17:38:52 +0200
>
>j...@redhat.com wrote:
>> Apologies for the not-very coherent description. Please let me know
>> if you think I'm off in the weeds or missing important bits.
>
>One other thing I spotted when I evaluat
>From: Thierry Carrez
>Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:32:23 +0200
>
[...]
>
>> My goal is by end of today , or tomorrow morning latest, to have at
>> least a reasonably complete understanding of the changes necessary to
>> get the quantum-rootwrap facility up to parity with
>From: Thierry Carrez
>Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:32:23 +0200
>
>j...@redhat.com wrote:
>>>* Switch to rootwrap_config and deprecate root_helper
>>>This would fully align quantum-rootwrap with nova-rootwrap. However
> I'm
>>>not sure it's reasonable to depre
>From: Thierry Carrez
>Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 10:34:17 +0200
>
>j...@redhat.com wrote:
>>> From: Dan Wendlandt
>>> If someone (Bob?) has the immediate cycles to make rootwrap work in
> Folsom with low to medium
>>> risk of disruption, I'd be open to exploring that, ev
>From: Dan Wendlandt
>Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 10:28:37 -0700
>
>On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Thierry Carrez
> wrote:
>
>Robert Kukura wrote:
>> On 08/08/2012 09:31 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>>> Quantum currently contains bin/quantum-rootwrap, a copy o
>From: jvlcek
>Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:42:33 -0400
>
>On 07/18/2012 03:00 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>> On 07/18/2012 09:47 PM, jvlcek wrote:
>>> On 07/18/2012 01:47 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>>> On 07/17/2012 10:03 PM, jvlcek wrote:
>
> I just wanted to let
11 matches
Mail list logo
