Re: [Openstack] User Friendly Development -was- Fwd: [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

2012-07-27 Thread Atul Jha
Mailing List Subject: Re: [Openstack] User Friendly Development -was- Fwd: [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom I think these are some very thoughtful ideas on how to ensure users are influencing the roadmap (among other goals). +1 I do wonder if it would make sense to gather user

Re: [Openstack] User Friendly Development -was- Fwd: [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

2012-07-27 Thread Stefano Maffulli
On 07/27/2012 11:18 AM, Ryan Lane wrote: > Users definitely need a better mechanism to give feedback early, and > to have their current production issues handled. The start of the > design summit is good, but it would also be nice to collect feedback > after the summit as well. Do you think you ca

Re: [Openstack] User Friendly Development -was- Fwd: [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

2012-07-27 Thread Ryan Lane
>> I do wonder if it would make sense to gather user feedback and goals before >> the summit, like the day (or week) before, to help provide some priorities >> (from their perspective) to consider going into the summit. > > This does seem valuable, although keep in mind that most users are a rele

Re: [Openstack] User Friendly Development

2012-07-27 Thread Tim Bell
I worry that if the users meet just a day before the conference, we cannot consolidate the input. Having the time to work out that a large share of the users are blocked on a specific problem is an important input to the conference. A single user may have specific problems to be addressed but i

Re: [Openstack] User Friendly Development -was- Fwd: [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

2012-07-27 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
On Jul 27, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Mark Collier wrote: > I do wonder if it would make sense to gather user feedback and goals before > the summit, like the day (or week) before, to help provide some priorities > (from their perspective) to consider going into the summit. This does seem valuable,

Re: [Openstack] User Friendly Development -was- Fwd: [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

2012-07-27 Thread Mark Collier
I think these are some very thoughtful ideas on how to ensure users are influencing the roadmap (among other goals). I do wonder if it would make sense to gather user feedback and goals before the summit, like the day (or week) before, to help provide some priorities (from their perspective) t

Re: [Openstack] User Friendly Development -was- Fwd: [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

2012-07-27 Thread Lloyd Dewolf
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Lloyd Dewolf wrote: >> In my fantasies for the Grizzly release it would start something like: >> >> A. Grizzly Summit >> >> B. From the summit the Tech Committee & PTL have community consensus >> on the overarching goal for the release and t

Re: [Openstack] User Friendly Development

2012-07-27 Thread Thierry Carrez
Lloyd Dewolf wrote: > A. Grizzly Summit > > B. From the summit the Tech Committee & PTL have community consensus > on the overarching goal for the release and the projects' goals. > Articulated online in user friendly manner. > > C. Webinar / OpenStack User Groups get a presentation on the releas

[Openstack] User Friendly Development -was- Fwd: [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

2012-07-26 Thread Lloyd Dewolf
Oops, I meant to fork the thread. -- Forwarded message -- From: Lloyd Dewolf Date: Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:35 PM Subject: Re: [Openstack] [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > >