Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 05/29/2014 09:09:18 PM:
update-failure-recovery
===
This is a blueprint I believe Zane is working on to land in Juno.
...
It's not just the observed state that you need in the database to
resume.
You also need the
Hi Sumit,
Review commitment sound like a good idea. Is this aiming core reviewers
only?
What number of cores / non cores are you ideally trying to reach?
Thanks,
Ivar.
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com
wrote:
During the Neutron Advanced Services'
I've tested exabgp against a v6 peer, and it's an independent feature, so I
added that as a row separately from whether v6 advertisements work. Might
be worth making the page general and adding in the vpn feature set too.
On 30 May 2014 16:50, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
Hi folks
Hi,
i have reported a bug[1]
[1]https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1324875
but no better idea about this issue now, maybe need more discussion.
any thoughts?
:)
Xurong Yang
2014-05-31 6:33 GMT+08:00 Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com:
I was thinking it would be a separate
Hi Ivar, This is not just aimed at Neutron core reviewers. We are
trying to get a set of reviewers who will commit to doing the reviews
on a weekly basis. In fact, we would like to have a large number of
non-core reviewers be a part of this review team. Patches which are
filtered through this team
+1 Summit.
This really helps a lot for code and spec reviews.
--
Trinath Somanchi - B39208
trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048
-Original Message-
From: Sumit Naiksatam [mailto:sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2014 5:31 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
On 5/28/2014 11:29 PM, Tracy Jones wrote:
Hi Folks – I spoke with Michael at the summit about bug management for
Juno. Other than tagging the untagged bugs each week, I will also be
driving a top ten list of bugs at the nova meeting. The meeting is
every Wednesday for 1/2 hour at 1630 UTC.
Hi,
I might be posting a question to a wrong thread, but what would be the
option to push a patch that I would like to share only with certain group
of people. In other words, is there still an option to push non-public
patches?
I wouldn't like such patches to affect gerrit stream or trigger CIs,
We're still working on a way to make it possible to review in server
side gerrit dashboards more easily to gerrit. In the mean time I've put
together a tool that makes it easy to convert gerrit dashboard
definitions into URLs that you can share around.
The project is called Gerrit Dash Creator -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Multiple Cinder drivers set insecure file permissions
- ---
### Summary ###
Several Cinder volume drivers set insecure file permissions for various
files and directories. These permissions render the files accessible for
read and write to any user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Glance allows non-admin users to create public images
- ---
### Summary ###
The default policy settings in Glance allow any user to upload an image
that is publicly available to all users. This can allow a malicious user
to upload a vulnerable image
On 05/30/2014 03:22 PM, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org
mailto:z...@debian.org wrote:
So I'm wondering: are we being careful enough when selecting
dependencies? In this case, I think we haven't, and I would recommend
Guys,
Sorry to ask this here but, how can I enable an emulated sound board for
KVM Instances on IceHouse with Ubuntu 14.04?
I already have configured the SPICE Consoles for my Cloud for Desktops
and, the only missing piece of configuration in now the sound device for
Instances (specially Windows
There isn't an option to push non public patches (and there really
wasn't before either, drafts are not properly private and this false
expectation is one of the reasons we have disabled them). Currently
the recommended alternative is work in progress. The code cannot merge
with a work in progress
I’ve had this question asked numerous times (by previous coworkers, people
interested in contributing to OpenStack, etc). The general feeling has always
been that the individual is concerned about 3 things when considering drafts in
gerrit.
1. Patch is very much WIP and doesn’t need to be
On 2014-05-29 20:55:01 + (+), Lyle, David wrote:
[...]
There are several more xstatic packages that horizon will pull in that are
maintained outside openstack. The packages added are only those that did
not have existing xstatic packages. These packages will be updated very
sparingly,
On 05/31/2014 04:30 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
I’ve had this question asked numerous times (by previous coworkers,
people interested in contributing to OpenStack, etc). The general
feeling has always been that the individual is concerned about 3 things
when considering drafts in gerrit.
1.
Hi folks
ExaBGP won't suit for BGPVPN implementation because it isn't support vpnv4.
Ryu is supporting it, however they have no internal api to binding
neutron network route target.
can you explain a little more?
do you have api suggestions?
YAMAMOTO Takashi
so I think contrail is a
2. Since a patch is very much WIP, there is concern about consuming CI
resources with needless testing.
3. The code is “example”, “toy”, or “exploratory” (not planning to
submit to the project, but not private/proprietary)
The general advice I give to people is to post the patches
Hi-
Kindly update the email address for Freescale CI account to new address
fslo...@freescale.com.
Thanking you
--
Trinath Somanchi - B39208
trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Stanley [mailto:fu...@yuggoth.org]
Sent: Saturday, February 15,
Email address for freescale-ci has been updated to the requested address.
Clark
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 8:01 PM, trinath.soman...@freescale.com
trinath.soman...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi-
Kindly update the email address for Freescale CI account to new address
fslo...@freescale.com.
Thanking
Hi all,
I am designing a Dynamic Resource Allocation for my company lab
resources. The focal point of this solution should be OpenStack.
*Background:*
The testing and dev environments are built out of multiple nodes. Servers,
clients. Some could be virtual but must support also bare-metal.
The
Hi Avi,
This is a very interesting use-case. We have been experimenting internally
with similar ideas (dynamic management of virtualized and bare-metal
resources).
In a nutshell, you can use Heat templates to provision the different
environments. For bare-metal, you can configure Nova to
Hi!
For some days now I am trying to figure out what is the problem and
IceHouse instances don't get internet access (you can have a look here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack@lists.openstack.org/msg07138.html
)
Today I 've discovered that I have to put a NAT-firewall rule in the
Hi,
As the topic implied, in order to have better control over the instances,
is there any agent software, that need to be installed on the openstack
virtual machines?
If so, what is the project name?!
___
Mailing list:
On Sat May 31 2014 07:21:15 PM HKT, hossein zabolzadeh zabolza...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
As the topic implied, in order to have better control over the instances,
is there any agent software, that need to be installed on the openstack
virtual machines?
If so, what is the project name?!
Hi,
Thanks a lot.
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr wrote:
On Sat May 31 2014 07:21:15 PM HKT, hossein zabolzadeh
zabolza...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
As the topic implied, in order to have better control over the instances,
is there any agent software, that
hi all: The network node(s) is the only node(s) that expose to the
internet,so it's security setting is more important,So I think it needs to be
protect by iptables or firewall etc. On the other hand,network nodes
control all the vm instances' network traffic,I have no ideas how
Hi Alex,
First of all, Thanks for the excellent answer. Indeed I'll be participating
the event in Israel. It will be cool to meet face-to-face and discuss these
scenarios.
Thanks
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Alex Glikson glik...@il.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Avi,
This is a very interesting
Be permissive on br-ex to allow VM traffic to flow out to the internet.
Otherwise be protective of the host address that the machine listens to.
Excerpts from walterxj's message of 2014-05-31 13:46:24 +0100:
hi all: The network node(s) is the only node(s) that expose to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Multiple Cinder drivers set insecure file permissions
- ---
### Summary ###
Several Cinder volume drivers set insecure file permissions for various
files and directories. These permissions render the files accessible for
read and write to any user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Glance allows non-admin users to create public images
- ---
### Summary ###
The default policy settings in Glance allow any user to upload an image
that is publicly available to all users. This can allow a malicious user
to upload a vulnerable image
Foreman supports both bare metal and Openstack provisioning, so you could
use the Foreman API to achieve all of this. Off the top of my head, for
bare metal you'd use the foreman discovery plugin so that non-configured
hosts are available as discovered hosts, get a list of hosts available in
It seems that the chains
- Chain nova-network-OUTPUT
- Chain nova-network-POSTROUTING
- Chain nova-network-PREROUTING
- Chain nova-network-float-snat
are not populated correctly every time I start an instance.
Any ideas why this is happening?
Best,
G.
On Sat, 31 May 2014 14:09:13 +0300,
I wouldn't like to use foreman for the entire solution because I believe
OpenStack is the future and I prefer treating OpenStack as the focal point
and foreman as bare metal workaround until TripleO or Ironic will be out
for production.
Foreman will also be used for the post install requirements.
Thank you for your advice,Clint,I'll try.
2014-05-31 21:47 GMT+08:00 Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com:
Be permissive on br-ex to allow VM traffic to flow out to the internet.
Otherwise be protective of the host address that the machine listens to.
Excerpts from walterxj's message of
36 matches
Mail list logo
