I've tested exabgp against a v6 peer, and it's an independent feature, so I added that as a row separately from whether v6 advertisements work. Might be worth making the page general and adding in the vpn feature set too.
On 30 May 2014 16:50, Nachi Ueno <na...@ntti3.com> wrote: > Hi folks > > ExaBGP won't suit for BGPVPN implementation because it isn't support vpnv4. > Ryu is supporting it, however they have no internal api to binding > neutron network & route target. > so I think contrail is a only solution for BGPVPN implementation now. > > > > 2014-05-30 2:22 GMT-07:00 Mathieu Rohon <mathieu.ro...@gmail.com>: > > Hi, > > > > I was about mentionning ExaBGP too! can we also consider using those > > BGP speakers for BGPVPN implementation [1]. > > This would be consistent to have the same BGP speaker used for every > > BGP needs inside Neutron. > > > > [1]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93329/ > > > > > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Jaume Devesa <devv...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hello Takashi, > >> > >> thanks for doing this! As we have proposed ExaBgp[1] in the Dynamic > Routing > >> blueprint[2], I've added a new column for this speaker in the wiki > page. I > >> plan to fill it soon. > >> > >> ExaBgp was our first choice because we thought that run something in > library > >> mode would be much more easy to deal with (especially the exceptions and > >> corner cases) and the code would be much cleaner. But seems that Ryu BGP > >> also can fit in this requirement. And having the help from a Ryu > developer > >> like you turns it into a promising candidate! > >> > >> I'll start working now in a proof of concept to run the agent with these > >> implementations and see if we need more requirements to compare between > the > >> speakers. > >> > >> [1]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/BGPSpeakersComparison > >> [2]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90833/ > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> > >> On 29 May 2014 18:42, YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamam...@valinux.co.jp> wrote: > >>> > >>> as per discussions on l3 subteem meeting today, i started > >>> a bgp speakers comparison wiki page for this bp. > >>> > >>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/BGPSpeakersComparison > >>> > >>> Artem, can you add other requirements as columns? > >>> > >>> as one of ryu developers, i'm naturally biased to ryu bgp. > >>> i appreciate if someone provides more info for other bgp speakers. > >>> > >>> YAMAMOTO Takashi > >>> > >>> > Good afternoon Neutron developers! > >>> > > >>> > There has been a discussion about dynamic routing in Neutron for the > >>> > past few weeks in the L3 subteam weekly meetings. I've submitted a > review > >>> > request of the blueprint documenting the proposal of this feature: > >>> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90833/. If you have any feedback or > >>> > suggestions for improvement, I would love to hear your comments and > include > >>> > your thoughts in the document. > >>> > > >>> > Thank you. > >>> > > >>> > Sincerely, > >>> > Artem Dmytrenko > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Jaume Devesa > >> Software Engineer at Midokura > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev