Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] PTL Non-Candidacy

Kyle, You have done an exceptional job over the three cycles. Neutron has matured to a new level under your leadership. You will be missed. Enjoy your new free time! Fawad Khaliq On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > I'm writing to let everyone know that

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TC] 'team:danger-not-diverse tag' and my concerns

> -Original Message- > From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org] > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 9:03 AM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TC] 'team:danger-not-diverse tag' and my > concerns > > > Or are you suggesting it is

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] FFE request for scheduler and suspend EDP job for sahara

Hi, Not approved. Unfortunately it seems like dangerous patch, API changing and Liberty client will not support it as well. Let's have it merged early in M cycle (after Liberty RC published, master will be open for M). Thanks. On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Ethan Gafford

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Andrey Sledzinskiy for fuel-ostf core

Andrey, welcome to fuel-core-ostf! Nastya. On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Dmitry Tyzhnenko wrote: > +1 > 8 сент. 2015 г. 13:07 пользователь "Alexander Kostrikov" < > akostri...@mirantis.com> написал: > > +1 >> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Dmitriy Shulyak

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Followup to review in gerrit relating to RHOS + RDO types

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Sam Yaple wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Paul Bourke > wrote: > >> >> >> On 13/09/15 18:34, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: >> >>> Response inline. >>> >>> From: Sam Yaple

Re: [Openstack-operators] Adding v1 LIKE support to python-glanceclient releases 1.x.x

On 09/09/15 21:46 -0400, Clayton O'Neill wrote: I'd be glad to see the backwards compatibility parts go in.  I got bitten by this earlier this week and ended up switching my scripts over to using the python-openstackclient library to work around it. Hey Clayton, Thanks for the feedback.

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] [Cinder] [Keystone] Showing Cinder quotas for non-admin users in Horizon

Hi all! It seems that recent changes in Cinder policies [1] forbade non-admin users to see the disk quotas. Yet the volume creation is allowed for non-admins, which effectively means that from now on a volume creation in Horizon is free for non-admins (as soon as quotas:show rule is propagated

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] glance core rotation part 1

+1. I hope that Zhi Yan joined Alibaba to make it use Openstack in the future :) On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: > +1 > > > > *From:* Alex Meade [mailto:mr.alex.me...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, September 11, 2015 7:37 PM > *To:* OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] mitaka summit session ideas

Thank you for starting it ;) On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:28 AM, michael mccune wrote: > hey all, > > i started an etherpad for us to collect ideas about our session for the > mitaka summit. > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-sahara-session-plans > > please drop any

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Followup to review in gerrit relating to RHOS + RDO types

On 13/09/15 18:34, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Response inline. From: Sam Yaple > Reply-To: "s...@yaple.net" > Date: Sunday, September 13, 2015 at 1:35 AM To: Steven Dake

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] FFE request for heat wait condition support

Approved. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sahara-liberty-ffes updated On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Ethan Gafford wrote: > Seems reasonable; +1. > > -Ethan > > >- Original Message - > >From: "michael mccune" > >To:

[openstack-dev] [Mistral] Mistral PTL Candidacy

Greetings, After contributing consistently to Mistral since the Kilo dev cycle, I'd like to run for the Mistral PTL position for the Mikata release cycle. In case you don't immediately recognize me, I'm 'xylan_kong' on IRC, where you can always find me. Although I know that I have served as

[openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

After having some conversations with folks at the Ops Midcycle a few weeks ago, and observing some of the more recent email threads related to glance, glance-store, the client, and the API, I spent last week contacting a few of you individually to learn more about some of the issues confronting

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] FFE request for nfs-as-a-data-source

Hi, Not approved. Unfortunately spec wasn't approved in time, so, it's too late for FFEs. Patches seems not ready too and has unresolved comments for some time. Thanks. On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Ethan Gafford wrote: > This seems like a sanely scoped exception,

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

On 14/09/15 08:10 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: After having some conversations with folks at the Ops Midcycle a few weeks ago, and observing some of the more recent email threads related to glance, glance-store, the client, and the API, I spent last week contacting a few of you individually to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Andrey Sledzinskiy for fuel-ostf core

Congrats, Andrew !!! On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Anastasia Urlapova wrote: > Andrey, > welcome to fuel-core-ostf! > > Nastya. > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Dmitry Tyzhnenko > wrote: > >> +1 >> 8 сент. 2015 г. 13:07 пользователь

[openstack-dev] [third-party] Third party CI working group chair

The amount of time I am able to spend on third party CI efforts has been on the decline over the last release cycle, so it's time for me to step back from chairing the working group and let someone else take over. Ramy Asselin has agreed to take over chairing the working group starting with this

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] Request for Feature Freeze Exception

Approved. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sahara-liberty-ffes updated On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Sergey Reshetnyak wrote: > +1 from me. > > Thanks, > Sergey R. > > 2015-09-03 23:27 GMT+03:00 Ethan Gafford : > >> Agreed. We've talked about

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] glance core rotation part 1

+1 Yep, it would be nice if Zhi Yan can promote OpenStack in Alibaba :) On 14/09/15 22:59, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: +1. I hope that Zhi Yan joined Alibaba to make it use Openstack in the future :) On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Kuvaja, Erno > wrote:

Re: [Openstack-operators] Adding v1 LIKE support to python-glanceclient releases 1.x.x

I ran into this issue on my laptop where I had just pip installed glance client and gotten the latest version. The script I was working on I want to run in multiple environments, so it was easier to rely on the openstack client which has the same CLI API (and generally easier to integrate with)

Re: [openstack-dev] [zaqar] Zaqar PTL Candidacy

Well, I'm a new guy in Zaqar, but still glad to +1 to vote Fei Long. 2015-09-14 14:43 GMT+08:00 Fei Long Wang : > Greeting, > > I'd like to announce my candidacy for the Zaqar PTL in Mikata. > > I've been working on and contributing to Zaqar since Icehouse release as a >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Olga Gusarenko for fuel-docs core

+1 Nice!) Alexander On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote: > +1 > > Great work Olga! > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015, 11:09 Irina Povolotskaya > wrote: > >> Fuelers, >> >> I'd like to nominate Olga Gusarenko for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Followup to review in gerrit relating to RHOS + RDO types

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Paul Bourke wrote: > > > On 13/09/15 18:34, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > >> Response inline. >> >> From: Sam Yaple > >> Reply-To: "s...@yaple.net"

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Security hardening

On 09/14/2015 03:28 AM, Jesse Pretorius wrote: > On 10 September 2015 at 19:21, Clint Byrum > wrote: > > Excerpts from Major Hayden's message of 2015-09-10 09:33:27 -0700: > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > On 09/10/2015 11:22 AM, Matthew Thode

[openstack-dev] [all][ptl][release] final liberty cycle client library releases needed

PTLs and release liaisons, In order to keep the rest of our schedule for the end-of-cycle release tasks, we need to have final releases for all client libraries in the next day or two. If you have not already submitted your final release request for this cycle, please do that as soon as

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][release] final liberty cycle client library releases needed

Doug, All oslo libraries are ready for stable/liberty branch. Thanks, -- Dims On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > PTLs and release liaisons, > > In order to keep the rest of our schedule for the end-of-cycle release > tasks, we need to have final

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Team meeting - 09/14/2015

Hi Mistral team (and not only), This is a reminder that we’ll have a team meeting today at #openstack-meeting at 16.00 UTC. The agenda is: * Review action items * Current status (progress, issues, roadblocks, further plans) * Scoping RC releases * Open discussion Add your own items by editing

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] PTL Non-Candidacy

On 09/12/2015 01:14 PM, Armando M. wrote: On 12 September 2015 at 18:38, Gary Kotton > wrote: Thanks! You did a great job. Looking back you made some very tough and healthy decisions. Neutron has a new lease on life! It is tradition

[openstack-dev] [sahara] FFE for Ambari plugin

Hello I would like to request FFE for Ambari plugin. Core parts of Ambari plugin merged, but scaling and HA support on review. Patches: * Scaling: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/193081/ * HA: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/197551/ Blueprint:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Suggestion to split install guide

On 11 September 2015 at 04:56, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi all! > > Our install guide is huge, and I've just approved even more text for it. > WDYT about splitting it into "Basic Install Guide", which will contain bare > minimum for running ironic and deploying instances, and

[openstack-announce] [release][ironic] python-ironicclient release 0.8.1 (liberty)

We are glad to announce the release of: python-ironicclient 0.8.1: OpenStack Bare Metal Provisioning API Client Library This release is part of the liberty release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/python-ironicclient With package available at:

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] PTL Candidacy

Hello everyone, I'm announcing my candidacy for Cinder PTL for the Mitaka release. The Cinder team has made great progress. We've not only grown the number of supported backend drivers, but we've made significant improvements to the core code and raised the quality of existing and incoming code

[openstack-announce] [release][oslo] taskflow release 1.21.0 (liberty)

We are pleased to announce the release of: taskflow 1.21.0: Taskflow structured state management library. This release is part of the liberty release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/taskflow With package available at:

[openstack-announce] [release][oslo] oslo.db release 2.6.0 (liberty)

We are eager to announce the release of: oslo.db 2.6.0: Oslo Database library This release is part of the liberty release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.db With package available at: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/oslo.db For more

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][release] final liberty cycle client library releases needed

Hi Doug, Please find python-glanceclient 1.0.1 release request https://review.openstack.org/#/c/222716/ - Erno > -Original Message- > From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 1:46 PM > To: openstack-dev > Subject: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][release] final liberty cycle client library releases needed

Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-09-14 08:46:02 -0400: > PTLs and release liaisons, > > In order to keep the rest of our schedule for the end-of-cycle release > tasks, we need to have final releases for all client libraries in the > next day or two. > > If you have not already

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] There is a function to display the VGA emulation screen of BMC in the baremetal node on the Horizon?

I dont believe the ipmi specification standardizes vga consoles. Only serial consoles. So it may be possible to get it to work for specific models, but not generically. Thanks, Kevin From: Shinya Hoshino Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2015 8:48:57 PM To: OpenStack

[openstack-announce] [release][oslo] oslo.versionedobjects release 0.10.0 (liberty)

We are satisfied to announce the release of: oslo.versionedobjects 0.10.0: Oslo Versioned Objects library This release is part of the liberty release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.versionedobjects With package available at:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][SR-IOV] Hardware changes and shifting PCI addresses

Brent is our Neutron-Nova liaison - can someone from the SR-IOV team please respond? -- Sean M. Collins __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Suggestion to split install guide

On 09/14/2015 03:54 PM, Ruby Loo wrote: On 11 September 2015 at 04:56, Dmitry Tantsur > wrote: Hi all! Our install guide is huge, and I've just approved even more text for it. WDYT about splitting it into "Basic Install Guide",

Re: [openstack-dev] [app-catalog] PTL Candidacy

+1 Great job leading the app catalog and looking forward for all these new features! On 9/11/15, 12:23 PM, "Christopher Aedo" wrote: >It's time for the Community App Catalog to go through an official >election cycle, and I'm putting my name in for PTL. I've been filling

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Suggestion to split install guide

Looking at what they¹re building for Neutron, http://docs.openstack.org/networking-guide, they have a quite fine grain splitting of their guide with a large contents page that helps find things easily. My personal issues with the current ironic guide all comes down to navigation, the current Table

[openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

Hello all, I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Each cycle I ran was for a reason [1][2], and the Cinder team should feel proud of our accomplishments: * Spearheading the Oslo work to allow *all* OpenStack projects to have their database being independent of services during

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

Doug Hellmann wrote: > [...] > 1. Resolve the situation preventing the DefCore committee from >including image upload capabilities in the tests used for trademark >and interoperability validation. > > 2. Follow through on the original commitment of the project to >provide an image API

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TC] 'team:danger-not-diverse tag' and my concerns

Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2015-09-14 08:41:37 -0700: > Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Joshua Harlow wrote: > >> I believe it is the TC job (in part) to help make the community better, > >> and not via tags like this that IMHO actually make it worse; > > > > I think it's important to see

[openstack-dev] Call for mentors Outreachy Dec-March 2016

Hi everyone, OpenStack will join next round of the Outreachy internships and we need you help: we are looking for full-time contributors willing to share some of their time, knowledge and experience to make our open-source organization more diverse and have the opportunity to meet new talents.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [tripleo] [kolla] Possible to support multiple compute drivers?

On 09/10/2015 12:00 PM, Jeff Peeler wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Steve Gordon > wrote: - Original Message - > From: "Jeff Peeler" > > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing

[openstack-dev] [Gnocchi] Some update on Grafana support

Hi folks, I've just published a little blog post about the job we've been working on with the rest of the Gnocchi team: adding support for Gnocchi¹ in Grafana². As Gordon pointed out, that might be of some interest for some of you, so I'll leave that here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Followup to review in gerrit relating to RHOS + RDO types

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Swapnil Kulkarni wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Sam Yaple wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Paul Bourke >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 13/09/15 18:34, Steven Dake (stdake)

[openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] format/pep8 checks for translations?

Right now translations can't be merged into Horizon because of a formatting error: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-i18n/+bug/1494914   Daisy and the i18n team have been responsive and are actively working to fix this. Thanks for your efforts!   I'm sharing here because this seems to me to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] FFE for Ambari plugin

Approved. This code is scoped into the new Ambari plugin, so, no possible issues with existing functionality. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sahara-liberty-ffes updated. On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Sergey Reshetnyak wrote: > Hello > > I would like to request

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Bugs which we should accept in 7.0 after Hard Code Freeze

Hi Everyone! I would like to reiterate the bugfix process after Hard Code Freeze. According to our HCF definition [1] we should only merge fixes for *Critical* bugs to *stable/7.0* branch, High and lower priority bugs should NOT be accepted to *stable/7.0* branch anymore. Also we should accept

[openstack-dev] Angular Directives / Tables

I'm curious about the status of work on creating Angular Directives that mimic the functionality in the non Angular code. Specifically in relation to Tables. I need to create a custom panel and I was debating on doing it in Angular or not. The panel needs a table and much of the functionality

[openstack-dev] [glance] tasks (following "proposed priorities for Mitaka")

Apologies for forking the thread, but there was way too much in Doug's email (and Flavio's response) and I only want to make a few points about tasks. Please read Doug's original email and Flavio's reply at some point, preferably before you read this. I'm going to limit myself to 4 points.

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

> -Original Message- > From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 1:41 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka > > On 14/09/15 08:10 -0400, Doug

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TC] 'team:danger-not-diverse tag' and my concerns

Thierry Carrez wrote: Joshua Harlow wrote: I believe it is the TC job (in part) to help make the community better, and not via tags like this that IMHO actually make it worse; I think it's important to see the intent of the tag, rather than only judge on its current proposed name. The big

[Openstack-operators] [Gnocchi] Some update on Grafana support

Hi folks, I've just published a little blog post about the job we've been working on with the rest of the Gnocchi team: adding support for Gnocchi¹ in Grafana². As Gordon pointed out, that might be of some interest for some of you, so I'll leave that here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TC] 'team:danger-not-diverse tag' and my concerns

Perhaps gamify the tagging process? By inverting the tagging convention from something negative to something positive like "sponsored-by-company-x", you're offering bragging rights to companies that are the sole sponsors of projects. "Here's a list of projects that Company X directly supports,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TC] 'team:danger-not-diverse tag' and my concerns

OpenSSL is a recent case. Everyone relied upon it in production but it just wasn't getting the support it needed to be healthy, and everyone suffered. An event shone light on the problem and its getting better. But it was an unfortunate event that caused people to look at it. It would be better

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][TC] 'team:danger-not-diverse tag' and my concerns

This might encourage companies to create new projects rather then support existing ones to get their name on something. That would be horrible. Thanks, Kevin From: Dolph Mathews [dolph.math...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 8:50 AM To: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

Excerpts from Kuvaja, Erno's message of 2015-09-14 15:02:59 +: > > -Original Message- > > From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] > > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 1:41 PM > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

On 09/14/2015 12:15 PM, Mike Perez wrote: Hello all, I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Each cycle I ran was for a reason [1][2], and the Cinder team should feel proud of our accomplishments: * Spearheading the Oslo work to allow *all* OpenStack projects to have their

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

> -Original Message- > From: Mike Perez [mailto:thin...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 6:16 PM > > Hello all, > > I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Each cycle I ran was > for a > reason [1][2], and the Cinder team should feel proud of our >

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Team meeting minutes/log

Thanks for joining us for the meeting today. Meeting minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2015/mistral.2015-09-14-16.00.html Meeting log:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

Mike, you've been an awesome help for me getting started in Cinder. Thanks for all your hard work as PTL! -Patrick On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Walter A. Boring IV wrote: > Thanks for your leadership and service Mike. You've done a great job! > > Walt > >> Hello

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

On 09/14/2015 11:27 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Doug Hellmann wrote: >> [...] >> 1. Resolve the situation preventing the DefCore committee from >>including image upload capabilities in the tests used for trademark >>and interoperability validation. >> >> 2. Follow through on the original

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Security hardening

On 09/14/2015 03:28 AM, Jesse Pretorius wrote: > I agree with Clint that this is a good approach. > > If there is an automated way that we can verify the security of an > installation at a reasonable/standardised level then I think we should add a > gate check for it too. Here's a rough draft

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

Thanks Mike. Enjoy a break (albeit thin and brief.) I've appreciated your guiding the Cinder cats. On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Mike Perez wrote: > Hello all, > > I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Each cycle I ran > was for a reason [1][2], and the

[openstack-dev] [sahara] hadoop-openstack.jar and proxy users

hey all, in doing some work recently with proxy users and hadoop deployments, i am noticing that the modified version of the hadoop-openstack.jar we package from the sahara-extras repo is not being used in our current images. this jar file adds support for keystone v3 to the swift interface

[openstack-dev] [puppet] weekly meeting #51

Hello, Here's an initial agenda for our weekly meeting, tomorrow at 1500 UTC in #openstack-meeting-4: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20150915 Tomorrow we will make our Sprint Retrospective, please share your experience on the etherpad [1]. Also, feel free to

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

On 9/14/15 12:15 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > Hello all, > > I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Thanks for helping make me feel welcome as I started up, for your example of gutsy and consistent leadership, and for some really good coffee! -- Tom

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > After having some conversations with folks at the Ops Midcycle a > few weeks ago, and observing some of the more recent email threads > related to glance, glance-store, the client, and the API, I spent > last week

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:15:44AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: > Hello all, > > I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Each cycle I ran > was for a reason [1][2], and the Cinder team should feel proud of our > accomplishments: Thanks for a couple of awesome cycles Mike!

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

On 09/14/2015 02:41 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 14/09/15 08:10 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: After having some conversations with folks at the Ops Midcycle a few weeks ago, and observing some of the more recent email threads related to glance, glance-store, the client, and the API, I spent last

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

Thanks for your leadership and service Mike. You've done a great job! Walt Hello all, I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Each cycle I ran was for a reason [1][2], and the Cinder team should feel proud of our accomplishments: * Spearheading the Oslo work to allow *all*

[openstack-dev] [L3][QA] DVR job failure rate and maintainability

Hi, Carl Baldwin, Doug Wiegley, Matt Kassawara, Ryan Moats, and myself are at the QA sprint in Fort Collins. Earlier today there was a discussion about the failure rate about the DVR job, and the possible impact that it is having on the gate. Ryan has a good patch up that shows the failure rates

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] TripleO Updates & Upgrades [was: Upgrade plans for RDO Manager - Brainstorming]

Firstly thanks Emilien for starting this discussion, I revised the subject in an effort to get wider feedback, apologies for my delay responding; On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:34:26AM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 24/08/15 15:12, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >Hi, > > > >So I've been working on OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Barbican] Nominating Dave Mccowan for Barbican core

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 As described in the Barbican Core Team wiki [1] Dave has gotten the requierd +1s and no objections, so I'm happy to welcome him to the Barbican Core reviewer team. Douglas Mendizábal On 9/9/15 11:33 AM, John Wood wrote: > AgreedŠ+1 > > On

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Bugs which we should accept in 7.0 after Hard Code Freeze

Thanks Andrew. Team, if there are any disagreements - let's discuss it. Otherwise, I think we should be just strict and follow defined process. We can deliver high priority bugfixes in updates channel later if needed. I hope that reasoning is clear for everything. Every bugfix has a potential to

[openstack-announce] [release][stable][oslo] pbr release 1.8.0 (liberty)

We are delighted to announce the release of: pbr 1.8.0: Python Build Reasonableness This release is part of the liberty stable release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-dev/pbr With package available at: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pbr For

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][keystone] Choose domain names with 'composite namevar' or 'meaningless name'?

Morgan Fainberg writes: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Rich Megginson > wrote: > > > On 09/14/2015 02:30 PM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: > > Hi, > > Gilles Dubreuil writes: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Non-Candidacy

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:15:44AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I will not be running for Cinder PTL this next cycle. Each cycle I ran > > was for a reason [1][2], and the Cinder team should feel

[Openstack] Swift-proxy server failed

Hi Guys, Successfully configured swift. But when start the swift-proxy server. It through the error is : openstack-swift-proxy.service - OpenStack Object Storage (swift) - Proxy Server Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/openstack-swift-proxy.service; enabled) Active: failed (Result:

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] PTL Non-Candidacy

Hello Everyone, TL;DR - I'm sending this out to announce that I won't be running for PTL of the OpenStack-Ansible project in the upcoming cycle. Although I won't be running for PTL, with community support, I intend to remain an active contributor just with more time spent more cross project

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][keystone] Choose domain names with 'composite namevar' or 'meaningless name'?

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > On 09/14/2015 02:30 PM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Gilles Dubreuil writes: >> >> A. The 'composite namevar' approach: >>> >>> keystone_tenant {'projectX::domainY': ... } >>> B.

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][keystone] Choose domain names with 'composite namevar' or 'meaningless name'?

Rich Megginson writes: > I think we could support both. I don't see it as an either/or > situation. +1 >>> A. >> I think it's the B: meaningless approach here. >> >>>Pros >>> - Easier names >> That's subjective, creating unique and meaningful name don't look easy

[openstack-dev] [Magnum] API response on k8s failure

I was giving a devstacked version of Magnum a try last week, and from a new user standpoint, I hit a big roadblock that caused me a lot of confusion. Here's my story: I was attempting to create a pod in a k8s bay, and I provided it with an sample manifest from the Kubernetes repo. The Magnum

[openstack-dev] [oslo] PTL candidacy

Howdy folks, I'd like to propose myself for oslo PTL for the mitaka cycle, For those that don't know me I've been involved in openstack for ~4 years, Have worked at yahoo! for ~7 years, ~4 of the last years have been getting openstack adopted in yahoo! (where it is now used by everyone, and

[openstack-dev] [magnum] Maintaining cluster API in upgrades

I have some food for thought with regards to upgrades that was provoked by some incorrect usage of Magnum which led me to finding [1]. Let's say we're running a cloud with Liberty Magnum, which works with Kubernetes API v1. During the Mitaka release, Kubernetes released v2, so now Magnum

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] tasks (following "proposed priorities for Mitaka")

Excerpts from Monty Taylor's message of 2015-09-14 20:41:38 +0200: > On 09/14/2015 04:58 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > > Apologies for forking the thread, but there was way too much in Doug's > > email (and Flavio's response) and I only want to make a few points about > > tasks. Please read Doug's

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-09-14 12:51:24 -0700: > Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-09-14 14:41:00 +0200: > > On 14/09/15 08:10 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > > >After having some conversations with folks at the Ops Midcycle a > > >few weeks ago, and observing

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Is SSL offload config possible using non "admin" tenant?

You need to set up ACLs on the Barbican side for that container, to make it readable to the Neutron-LBaaS tenant. For now, the tenant-id should just be documented, but we are looking into making an API call that would expose the admin tenant-id to the user so they can make an API call to

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][keystone] Choose domain names with 'composite namevar' or 'meaningless name'?

Hi, Gilles Dubreuil writes: > A. The 'composite namevar' approach: > >keystone_tenant {'projectX::domainY': ... } > B. The 'meaningless name' approach: > > keystone_tenant {'myproject': name='projectX', domain=>'domainY', ...} > > Notes: > - Actually using both

[openstack-dev] Cross-Project meeting, Tue Sept 15th, 21:00 UTC

Dear PTLs, cross-project liaisons and anyone else interested, We'll have a cross-project meeting tomorrow at 21:00 UTC, with the following agenda: * Review past action items * Team announcements (horizontal, vertical, diagonal) * Centralized Code Coverage Index/Stats --

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-09-14 13:25:43 -0700: > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-09-14 12:51:24 -0700: > > Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-09-14 14:41:00 +0200: > > > On 14/09/15 08:10 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > > > > >After having some

Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-operators] Announcement! We have everything ready to get to Stackforge!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 9/2/15 2:21 PM, JJ Asghar wrote: > > I've put the review[1] and it looks like it's pretty good. I'd like to announce it has been merged! > > I've created a launchpad[2] with both answers[3] and bugs[4] to help > organize this code base. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][keystone] Choose domain names with 'composite namevar' or 'meaningless name'?

On 09/14/2015 03:26 PM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot wrote: Rich Megginson writes: I think we could support both. I don't see it as an either/or situation. +1 A. I think it's the B: meaningless approach here. Pros - Easier names That's subjective, creating unique

[openstack-dev] [puppet] monasca,murano,mistral governance

Hi, As a reminder, Puppet modules that are part of OpenStack are documented here [1]. I can see puppet-murano & puppet-mistral Gerrit permissions different from other modules, because Mirantis helped to bootstrap the module a few months ago. I think [2] the modules should be consistent in

[openstack-dev] [neutron] PTL Candidancy

I'd like to announce my candidacy for the Mitaka cycle as Neutron PTL. While not currently a Neutron core, I've been looking at hard at Neutron for several cycles now and I feel that while we've accomplished a great deal, more consolidation at this point will be desirable. Therefore, if

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] proposed priorities for Mitaka

Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-09-14 13:46:16 -0700: > Excerpts from Clint Byrum's message of 2015-09-14 13:25:43 -0700: > > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2015-09-14 12:51:24 -0700: > > > Excerpts from Flavio Percoco's message of 2015-09-14 14:41:00 +0200: > > > > On

  1   2   >