Re: [Openstack-operators] [kolla] Inviting Operators to participate in the specification of a new deployment tool

2015-06-07 Thread Craig Tracey
+1 I would much rather see this be a feature of any one of the vast number of deployment tools vs. creating yet another CM repo. On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 5:26 PM, James Denton james.den...@rackspace.com wrote: Hi Steven, Can I ask how Kolla would differ from another project on StackForge

Re: [Openstack-operators] Operations project: Packaging

2014-11-22 Thread Craig Tracey
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 5:08 AM, Michael Chapman wop...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Craig Tracey cr...@craigtracey.com wrote: Great input Kris. We also took a look at Anvil, and as you mention it is heavily biased for RH based distros. With regard to your

Re: [Openstack-operators] Operations project: Packaging

2014-11-19 Thread Craig Tracey
Thanks Michael for continuing this conversation. This is something that we are particularly interested and involved in. A while back (around the first Ops mid-cycle), I along with John Dewey started a project called giftwrap https://github.com/blueboxgroup/giftwrap. The primary objective was to

Re: [Openstack-operators] Proposal for an 'Operations' project

2014-11-08 Thread Craig Tracey
+1000 to what Matt said. Another point worth considering is that operations-type projects are often in a fast-follow mode. All of areas of interest (logging, packaging, monitoring, etc.) are effectively out of band from anything OpenStack proper. We should be able to release these at our own

Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] PTL and core team members

2014-06-19 Thread Craig Tracey
I'd like to nominate Brandon Logan and Doug Wiegley as core members. On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.net wrote: Howdy y'all! Among other things that happened at the Neutron LBaaS mid-cycle hackathon, we have now put together process around, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] LBaaS Mid Cycle Sprint

2014-06-17 Thread Craig Tracey
WebEx is here: https://a10networks.webex.com/a10networks/e.php?MTID=m3351a8eb388c2ade866bac44cc272c5b On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Susanne Balle sleipnir...@gmail.com wrote: We are now on: #openstack-lbaas The #neutron-lbaas is now deprecated. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Dustin

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model?

2014-05-14 Thread Craig Tracey
Hi all, From what I heard last night, it sounds like there has been some consensus achieved around the LBaaS object model. Unfortunately, I missed this ad-hoc conversation. Is someone capturing this information and/or perhaps posting to the list? someplace else? On a related note, does it make

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model?

2014-05-14 Thread Craig Tracey
and Eugene. Note that we don't necessarily have HP's blessing on this model yet, nor do we have Neutron core developer buy in. But in any case, here it is. Also, I think the #openstack-lbaas channel is a great idea! Stephen On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Craig Tracey cr

Re: [openstack-dev] Incubation Request for Barbican

2013-12-17 Thread Craig Tracey
++ As someone who has required patches to Barbican (and not affiliated with Rackspace) I can attest to the fact that my, albeit simple, changes have been reviewed and merged in a timely and constructive manner. Even if the project were to bring on a flood of new developers it wouldn't move this