Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-sfc] OpenStack Summit Barcelona: networking-sfc project team lunch meetup

Hi Cathy, Sorry, I won't be attending the summit. Will there be an etherpad to capture what is going to be discussed regarding networking-sfc during the summit? If so, please post the link. Thanks, - Stephen On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Cathy Zhang wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tacker] Proposing Yong Sheng Gong for Tacker core team

+1 On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Sridhar Ramaswamy wrote: > Tackers, > > I'd like to propose Yong Sheng Gong to join the Tacker core team. Yong is > a seasoned OpenStacker and has been contributing to Tacker project since > Nov 2015 (early Mitaka). He has been the major

Re: [openstack-dev] [tacker] Proposing Kanagaraj Manickam to Tacker core team

+1. Great addition to the team indeed! On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Sridhar Ramaswamy wrote: > Tackers, > > It gives me great pleasure to propose Kanagaraj Manickam to join the > Tacker core team. In a short time, Kanagaraj has grown into a key member of > the Tacker

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-sfc] Proposing Mohan Kumar for networking-sfc core

+1. Great addition to the team! On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Henry Fourie wrote: > +1 > > > > *From:* Cathy Zhang > *Sent:* Monday, June 13, 2016 11:36 AM > *To:* openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org; Cathy Zhang > *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-sfc]

Re: [openstack-dev] [tacker] Proposing Bharath Thiruveedula to Tacker core team

+1 On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Haddleton, Bob (Nokia - US) < bob.haddle...@nokia.com> wrote: > +1 > > Bob > > On Jun 3, 2016, at 8:24 PM, Sridhar Ramaswamy wrote: > > Tackers, > > I'm happy to propose Bharath Thiruveedula (IRC: tbh) to join the tacker > core team. Bharath

Re: [openstack-dev] [tacker] Proposing Lin Cheng for tacker-horizon core team

+1. Great addition! On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Sripriya Seetharam wrote: > +1 , glad to have Lin Cheng on board. > > > > *From:* Sridhar Ramaswamy [mailto:sric...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, May 26, 2016 7:45 AM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [networking-sfc] Network-sfc project f2f2 meet-up place and time

Hi Cathy, A technical discussion on networking-sfc tomorrow? Really? When and where? Is this going to be the same one as the common flow classifier discussion? Thanks, - Stephen On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Cathy Zhang wrote: > We will have a technical

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [networking-sfc] Network-sfc project f2f2 meet-up place and time

Hi, Unfortunately I will miss this f2f meeting since I won't arrive until late evening on Tuesday. But I did update the etherpad LouisF posted [1] (during the last IRC meeting) with some topics of interest. If any of them happens to be discussed during Tuesday's meetup, please update the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] work on Common Flow Classifier and OVS Agent extension for Newton cycle

+1 on Wednesday lunch On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Cathy Zhang wrote: > > Hi everyone, >> >> We have room 400 at 3:10pm on Thursday available for discussion of the >> two topics. >> Another option is to use the common

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]: Neutron naming legal issues

Wait... is this April's Fool? (hard to believe project name change resulting from name clashing with a Marvel comic character) On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Carl Baldwin wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka > wrote: > > We could

Re: [openstack-dev] [tacker] Proposing Sripriya Seetharam to Tacker core

+1 On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Sridhar Ramaswamy wrote: > I'd like to propose Sripriya Seetharam to join the Tacker core team. > Sripriya > ramped up quickly in early Liberty cycle and had become an expert in the > Tacker > code base. Her major contributions include

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tacker] Proposing Bob Haddleton to core team

+1 - Stephen On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Sridhar Ramaswamy wrote: > I would like to nominate Bob Haddleton to the Tacker core team. > > In the current Liberty cycle Bob made significant, across the board > contributions to Tacker [1]. Starting with many usability

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr] - Bringing Dockers networking to Neutron

+1 for Monday On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Mohammad Banikazemi m...@us.ibm.com wrote: Gal, This time conflicts with the Neutron ML2 weekly meeting time [1]. I realize there are several networking related weekly meetings, but I would like to see if we can find a different time. I suggest

[openstack-dev] [Tacker][Telco][NFV] Reminder: Tacker (VNF Manager) Team Meeting June 11

Meeting on #openstack-meeting @ 1600UTC (9am PDT) Agenda can be found here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Tacker#Meeting_June_11.2C_2015 Thanks, - Stephen __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] [Tacker] Tacker (NFV MANO VNFM) team meeting June 4th

Please note the change in time (and day of the week) and channel: Meeting on #openstack-meeting at 1600 UTC (9:00am PDT) Agenda can be found here (feel free to add yours): https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Tacker#Meeting_June_4.2C_2015 Thanks, - Stephen

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV][Telco] Service VM v/s its basic framework

Hi Murali, There is already a ServiceVM project (Tacker), currently under development on stackforge: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ServiceVM If you are interested in this topic, please take a look at the wiki page above and see if the project's goals align with yours. If so, you are

Re: [openstack-dev] [controller-dev] Group-Based Policy Understanding and Queries

CC'ed ODL GBP --- although this doesn't concern them at this point, it may be of interest to the team On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Sachi Gupta sachi.gu...@tcs.com wrote: Hi All, Request you all to provide inputs of the below queries: - As per my understanding GBP constructs are

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Group-based Policy next steps

I agree with Kevin. Like in Juno, we as a subteam will be shooting for option 1 (again) for Kilo - ideally we can land in Kilo, and we will work closely with the community to try to accomplish that. In the meantime, we need to have a repo to iterate our implementations, build package (Juno based)

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Group-based Policy next steps

I agree with Prasad here. There remains lots of unknown about Neutron incubator and its workflow at this point, and the idea of Neutron feature branch is at best in embryonic stage. It seems like among the three options, the most well-defined one is indeed through stackforge. When and if the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy] Group Based Policy - Renaming

policy target sounds good. +1 On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Jay for your constructive feedback on this. I personally think that 'policy-target' is a good option. I am not sure what the rest of the team thinks, perhaps they can chime

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: FW: [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward

Hi, Thanks to Armando for steering the discussion back to the original intent. On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Armando M. arma...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 August 2014 15:47, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: I think we should merge it and just prefix the API for now with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward

Agreed with Kevin and Sumit here. As a subgroup we talked about Nova integration, and the preliminary idea, as Bob alluded to, is to add endpoint as an option in place of Neutron port. But if we can make Nova EPG-aware, it would be great. On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Sumit Naiksatam

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Bridging the 2-group gap in group policy

I agree with Hemanth also - that this suggestion should be a different patch. And we should proceed with the current CLI patch. Thanks, - Stephen On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Hemanth Ravi hemanthrav...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Adding this CLI command seems to be a good way to provide

Re: [openstack-dev] mid-cycle policy summit

Hi Sean, Yes - please make sure it is going to be in the Bay Area this time :-) Thanks, - Stephen On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Sean Roberts seanrobert...@gmail.com wrote: I'm thinking location as yahoo Sunnyvale or VMware Palo Alto. ~sean On Jul 10, 2014, at 5:12 PM, sean roberts

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Flavor meeting log captured?

Hi Vijay, Yes, it was logged under advanced service: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_advanced_services/2014/networking_advanced_services.2014-06-27-17.30.log.html

Re: [openstack-dev] [ovs-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Basic Geneve Support

sorry, please ignore On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Stephen Wong s3w...@midokura.com wrote: Hey, What Dan has been waiting for, Geneve support in OVS!!! - Stephen -- Forwarded message -- From: Jesse Gross je...@nicira.com Date: Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:47 PM

[openstack-dev] Fwd: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Basic Geneve Support

Hey, What Dan has been waiting for, Geneve support in OVS!!! - Stephen -- Forwarded message -- From: Jesse Gross je...@nicira.com Date: Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:47 PM Subject: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Basic Geneve Support To: d...@openvswitch.org This series implements support

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][group-based-policy] Should we revisit the priority of group-based policy?

Hi, Sorry for the late reply. Some comments on Maru's and Amando's points below: (1) this model is more complex than linked based --- as one of the three original members who had action items during the very first network-policy IRC meeting, I can say that we actually originally went with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Weekly IRC Meeting?

Hi Sean, Sounds good! +1 - Stephen On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: Hi, The session that we had on the Quality of Service API extension was well attended - I would like to keep the momentum going by proposing a weekly IRC meeting.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit

Hi, I am part of the ServiceVM team and I will attend the NFV IRC meetings. Thanks, - Stephen On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Chris Wright chr...@sous-sol.org wrote: * balaj...@freescale.com (balaj...@freescale.com) wrote: -Original Message- From: Kyle Mestery

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Neutron] Port Mirroring Extension in Neutron

);} On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Stephen Wong s3w...@midokura.com wrote: Hi Vinay, I am interested. Please sign up a slot on Neutron pod for tomorrow (Friday) and announce the timeslot to the ML. Thanks, - Stephen On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:13 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit

Hi Chris, A good number of people involved in Neutron advanced service / group-policy / individual services subteams will be at the Group Policy conference session (at 1:30pm). Is it possible to reschedule this to a different time? Thanks, - Stephen On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Chris

Re: [openstack-dev] [NFV] New Sub-team and Meeting

Hi Russ, Are you in Atlanta? If so, should we find a time to meet at (for example) the Neutron pod area for face to face meeting over the next two days? Thanks, - Stephen On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: It is clear that a number of us have been

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit

+1 for lunch break tomorrow (Friday) - we can still meet at the Neutron pod On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Alan Kavanagh alan.kavan...@ericsson.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev][Neutron] Port Mirroring Extension in Neutron

Hi Vinay, I am interested. Please sign up a slot on Neutron pod for tomorrow (Friday) and announce the timeslot to the ML. Thanks, - Stephen On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 7:13 AM, Vinay Yadhav vinayyad...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am Vinay, working with Ericsson. I am interested in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit

. -Original Message- From: Chris Wright [mailto:chr...@sous-sol.org] Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 11:06 AM To: Steve Gordon; CARVER, PAUL; Stephen Wong; Alan Kavanagh Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); iawe...@cisco.com Subject: Re: [openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit

Hi Steve, Agreed. I believe Chris already suggested this meeting will reconvene tomorrow (Friday) at lunchtime - and a number of folks already stated that they will come. Thanks, - Stephen On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Steve Gordon sgor...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Interest in a meeting at the Networking pod at the design summit?

Hi Sean, Perfect (I assume it is local time, i.e. 2:30pm EDT). And I also assume this will be at the Neutron pod? - Stephen On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 07:17:26PM EDT, Mohammad Banikazemi wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [group-based-policy] Moving the meeting time

Hi Kyle, Is 1730UTC available on that channel? If so, and if it is OK with everyone, it would be great to have it at 1730 UTC instead (10:30am PDT / 1:30pm EDT, which would also be at the same time on a different day of the week as the advanced service meeting). Thanks, - Stephen On Thu,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] advanced servicevm framework: meeting time slot proposal 5:00UTC (Tue) and minutes (was Re: [Neutron] advanced servicevm framework IRC meeting March 18(Tuesday) 23:00 UTC

Hi Mohammad, I am sorry to say that the new schedule is indeed 1am EST... - Stephen On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Mohammad Banikazemi m...@us.ibm.com wrote: Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.com wrote on 03/19/2014 04:38:34 AM: From: Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.com To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Service VM: irc discussion?

Hi Isaku, Seems like you had the meeting at 22:00 UTC instead of 23:00 UTC? [15:01] yamahata hello? is anybody there for servicevm meeting? [15:02] yamahata #startmeeting neutron/servicevm [15:02] openstack Meeting started Tue Mar 11 22:02:14 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Mini-summit Interest?

+1 - that is a good idea! Having it several days before the J-Summit in Atlanta would be great. - Stephen On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.comwrote: I think mini summit is no worse than the summit itself. Everyone who wants to participate can join. In

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Mini-summit Interest?

I agree with that, and it should take place before the J-Summit. Location is key here :-) On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Jorge Miramontes jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com wrote: Hi everyone, I'd like to gauge everyone's interest in a possible mini-summit for Neturon LBaaS. If enough

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [group-policy] Changing the meeting time

On Feb 11, 2014, at 11:30 AM, Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Kyle, The new time sounds good to me as well, thanks for initiating this. ~sumit. On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Stephen Wong s3w...@midokura.com wrote: Hi Kyle, Almost missed

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Policy questions

Hi Carlos, On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Carlos Gonçalves m...@cgoncalves.ptwrote: Hi, I've a couple of questions regarding the ongoing work on Neutron Group Policy proposed in [1]. 1. One of the described actions is redirection to a service chain. How do you see BPs [2] and [3]

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [group-policy] Changing the meeting time

Hi Kyle, Almost missed this - sounds good to me. Thanks, - Stephen On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@siliconloons.comwrote: Folks: I'd like to propose moving the Neutron Group Policy meeting going forward, starting with this Thursday. The meeting has been at 1600

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Policy-Rules discussions based on Dec.12 network policy meeting

Hi Subra, On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Subrahmanyam Ongole osm...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Stephan Comments inline for redirect action. Perhaps we may want to discuss each section in different email threads. On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Stephen Wong s3w...@midokura.com wrote: Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Policy-Rules discussions based on Dec.12 network policy meeting

Hi Prasad, Thanks for the comments, please see responses inline. On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Prasad Vellanki prasad.vella...@oneconvergence.com wrote: Hi Please see inline On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Stephen Wong s3w...@midokura.com wrote: Hi, During Thursday's

[openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Policy-Rules discussions based on Dec.12 network policy meeting

Hi, During Thursday's group-policy meeting[1], there are several policy-rules related issues which we agreed should be posted on the mailing list to gather community comments / consensus. They are: (1) Conflict resolution between policy-rules --- a priority field was added to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] LBaaS Subteam meeting

Hi Eugene, LBaaS meeting on #openstack-meeting was previously schedule on Thursdays 1400UTC. And indeed it is still listed on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings as such, so I believe keeping it in that timeslot should be fine. - Stephen On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Eugene

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] IPv6 sub-team?

+1 for me as well. So have we finalized on the meeting time? Thanks, - Stephen On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest...@cisco.com wrote: On Nov 8, 2013, at 12:01 AM, Brian Haley brian.ha...@hp.com wrote: On 11/08/2013 11:21 AM, Collins, Sean (Contractor) wrote: