Re: [Openstack] VM resize time comparison

Chathura M. Sarathchandra Magurawalage <77.chathura@...> writes: > > Hi, > > Does anyone know the reason for VM resizing time to increase faster if you continuously increase CPU or DISK > resources by +1 (e.g. 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5). Whereas, when you increase from 1 to any of +1/+2/+3/+4…..+n >

Re: [Openstack-operators] [neutron] Packet loss with DVR and IPv6

Tomas Vondra <vondra@...> writes: > The setup has 3 network nodes and 1 compute node currently hosting a virtual > network (GRE based). DVR is enabled. I have just added IPv6 to this network > and to the external network (VLAN based). The virtual network is set to SLAAC. > &

[Openstack-operators] [neutron] Packet loss with DVR and IPv6

Dear list, I've stumbled upon a weird condition in Neutron and couldn't find a bug filed for it. So even if it is happening with the Kilo release, it could still be relevant. The setup has 3 network nodes and 1 compute node currently hosting a virtual network (GRE based). DVR is enabled. I have

Re: [Openstack] Nova and Magnum on the same host?

Turbo Fredriksson writes: > > On Jun 9, 2016, at 11:55 AM, Ricardo Carrillo Cruz wrote: > > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Docker > > I'm trying this and although I know very little of OS (and I haven't > managed to boot up my first container yet because of other issues), I >

Re: [Openstack-operators] How are folks providing GPU instance types?

Nordquist, Peter L writes: > You will also have to enable iommu on your hypervisors to have libvirt expose the capability to Nova for PCI > passthrough. I use Centos 7 and had to set 'iommu=pt intel_iommu=on' for my kernel parameters. Along with > this, you'll have to

Re: [Openstack] Openstack instances with more than one block device file

Robson Ramos Barreto writes: > > Hi Guys,My environment is Juno / KVM.I wonder to know if it's possible an openstack instance to have more than one block device file attachedI know that is possible in libvirt attach a second disk something like:# virsh attach-disk domain

Re: [Openstack] Ceilometer - Meter for getting active tenants

murali writes: > > Hello All, I have one query regarding the ceilometer meters available.Is there any default meters available for getting the active tenants. (Non-metric or metric)That is I need to get the active tenants from the ceilometer for some particular goal.So I

Re: [Openstack] Change the default # of floating ips and security groups

Jagga Soorma writes: > > Hi Guys, > > I need to change the default # of floating ips and security groups in > our kilo based openstack environment which has been integrated into > AD. I don't see a Identity tab in the horizon ui (due to AD > integration) and don't want to

Re: [Openstack] [Neutron] Deploying Liberty Neutron needs how many NICs

liyulei writes: > > > Hello, >   > I am deploying Liberty Neutron in CentOS7, according to the official document there are two interfaces in controller: one for management, the other for public, and the public interface uses a special configuration without an IP address

Re: [Openstack] Default security groups

Jagga writes: > > Hi Guys, > > I was wondering if there is a way for us to change what the default security group looks like for new projects > without having to change it manually. Basically I want to make sure that when a new project is created it > automatically gets a minimal

Re: [Openstack] DHCP + vlan

Sergey Arlashin writes: > > Hi All, > > I have a simple VLAN-based setup: single controller node and multiple > compute nodes. Currently neutron DHCP agent resides on controller node > and uses dnsmasq as a DHCP server. > > mean controller node) VLAN tags are

Re: [Openstack] unrescue VM instance

Balazs Varhegyi writes: > > > Found this in the cloud-init.log:in cloud-init.log:2016-02-10 14:02:09,604 - cc_resizefs.py[DEBUG]: Resizing / (ext4) using resize2fs > /dev/disk/by-label/cloudimg-rootfs2016-02-10 14:02:09,604 - util.py[DEBUG]: Running command

Re: [Openstack] unrescue VM instance

Balazs Varhegyi writes: > > Hi guys, > I have an openstack instance that run out of storage on core machine and > the instance got paused. > I cleared up the core machine so it has more disk now but when I start > the machine I can't ssh in. > In rescue mode I'm able to ssh

Re: [Openstack] br-ex question ubuntu and Liberty

Martin Wilderoth writes: > > > I have a question regarding the br-ex interface openvswitch and dvr setup. > > I use dvr-ovs config in liberty. I have problems with accessing external network. > Checking my ovs-vsctl it seems I have vlan taging on networks that could

Re: [Openstack] Question about external network showing on dashboard (Kilo)

Erdősi Péter writes: > > Hello! > > We faced a problem, when we let our beta users to our new cloud. > They constantly tried to create an instance and add network named EXT1, > which is a tenant network, and they not made any router and local subnet. > The VM creation is failed of

Re: [Openstack] Guest networking and magic IP

Andre Goree writes: > I am trying to determine how exactly I can manipulate traffic from a > _guest's_ NIC using iptables on the _host_. On the host, there is a > bridged virtual NIC that corresponds to the guest's NIC. That interface > does not have an IP setup on it on the

Re: [Openstack] Error while launching instance | unexpected error ['NoneType' object has no attribute 'status_code']

John Depp writes: > > Hello Team,While trying to spawn a new CentOS instance on openstack, the following error is being logged :url_helper.py[WARNING]: Calling 'http://169.254.169.254/2009-04-04/meta-data/instance-id  ' failed [0/120s]: unexpected error ['NoneType' object has

Re: [Openstack] [Neutron][Monasca]

Rubab Syed writes: > > > Hi, > I'm doing a university project in OpenStack. The aim is to monitor virtual routers per tenant with Monasca(which according to my knowledge hasn't been implemented yet). The initial features would include monitoring of in/out traffic per

Re: [Openstack-operators] New networking solution for Cloud Native apps....

Clint Byrum writes: > > I also think you should share this on openstack-dev, as the developers > may also be aware of other efforts that may conflict with or complement > Romana. Your mission seems to be very close to that of Project Calico.

Re: [Openstack-operators] DVR and public IP consumption

Carl Baldwin writes: > You're right, the IP in the fip namespace doesn't ever get written in > to any packets or used as an arp destination. It is currently > meaningless. That will change with BGP's capability to routed DVR > traffic in Mitaka because that IP will be used as a next

Re: [Openstack-operators] New networking solution for Cloud Native apps....

Chris Marino writes: > > > Hello everyone, just wanted to let you know that today we opened up the repos for the new open source networking project we’ve been working on. It’s called Romana and the project site is romana.io. > Thought you would be interested because it enables

Re: [Openstack] Network monitoring in monasca

it. And if you were at it, you could do the same for CPU utilizations. I'm currently using Ceilometer, which has no dashboards at all built in. Tomas Vondra, for the purposes of this post affiliated with the Czech Technical University ___ Mailing list:

Re: [Openstack-operators] DVR and public IP consumption

Fox, Kevin M writes: > > Hi Tomas, > > The using external addresses per tenant router is a feature to a lot of sites, like ours. We want to know for > sure, at minimum, which tenant was responsible for bad activity on the external network. Having the > external address tied to a

Re: [Openstack] Cells: *how* experimental?

Clint Byrum writes: > However, if you have some requirement to have everything under that > one region, I can say that even in a 1000 hypervisor simulation I don't > see more than 100Mbit of traffic to the control plane that all of the > nodes share. I'd expect 30 nodes to be quite a

Re: [Openstack-operators] DVR and public IP consumption

burn 3 External addresses > for the router (and 3 internal network addresses per tenant side interface if that matters). > > Hope that clarifies a bit, > Robert > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Carl Baldwin > ecbaldwin.net> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:45 AM, T

Re: [Openstack] DVR and public IP consumption

Tomas Vondra <vondra@...> writes: > > James Denton ...> writes: > To not let the discussion die: There is a parallel discussion on the Operators list about a very similar topic - how to recycle the IP address of the router External Gateway if SNAT is turned off. I wo

Re: [Openstack] DVR and public IP consumption

onsume one public IP > address each as overhead. You cannot get around each tenant gateway router consuming an extra public IP address itself as far as I know. > > Does that answer your question? > > Cheers, > > Tom > > > > > > 2016-01-20 13:48 GMT+01:00

Re: [Openstack] DVR and public IP consumption

sume one public IP address each as overhead. You cannot get around each tenant gateway router consuming an extra public IP address itself as far as I know. > > Does that answer your question? > > Cheers, > > Tom > > > > 2016-01-20 13:48 GMT+01:00 Tomas Vo

Re: [Openstack] [Help-Ask]creating a Cinder volume problem --> volume status is stuck in creating status......

디케이 writes: > > > Hello, I have a problem about cinder volume, > After cinder create command, new volume status is stuck in creating status. is not changed to available or error.. > What part of service should I focous on ???..   lvm? rabbit? cinder-api? cinder-volume?

[Openstack] DVR and public IP consumption

Hi! I have just deployed an OpenStack Kilo installation with DVR and expected that it will consume one Public IP per network node as per http://assafmuller.com/2015/04/15/distributed-virtual-routing-floating-ips/, but it still eats one per virtual Router. What is the correct behavior? Otherwise,

[Openstack-operators] DVR and public IP consumption

Hi! I have just deployed an OpenStack Kilo installation with DVR and expected that it will consume one Public IP per network node as per http://assafmuller.com/2015/04/15/distributed-virtual-routing-floating-ips/, but it still eats one per virtual Router. What is the correct behavior? Otherwise,