Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest] Proposing Felipe Monteiro for Tempest core

+1 Thanks for your contribution, Felipe 2018年4月28日(土) 3:29 Ghanshyam Mann : > Hi Tempest Team, > > I would like to propose Felipe Monteiro (irc: felipemonteiro) to Tempest > core. > > Felipe has been an active contributor to the Tempest since the Pike > cycle. He has

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposing Eric Fried for nova-core

+1 2018-03-27 6:39 GMT-07:00 Dan Smith : >> To the existing core team members, please respond with your comments, >> +1s, or objections within one week. > > +1. > > --Dan > > __ > OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Adding Takashi Natsume to python-novaclient core

+1 2018年2月9日(金) 8:09 Stephen Finucane : > On Fri, 2018-02-09 at 09:01 -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > I'd like to add Takashi to the python-novaclient core team. > > > > python-novaclient doesn't get a ton of activity or review, but Takashi > > has been a solid reviewer

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] PTL Election Season

2018-01-22 15:09 GMT-08:00 Matt Riedemann : > On 1/15/2018 11:04 AM, Kendall Nelson wrote: >> >> Election details: https://governance.openstack.org/election/ >> >> Please read the stipulations and timelines for candidates and electorate >> contained in this governance

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Clarifying testing recommendation for interop programs

2018-01-18 12:36 GMT-08:00 Doug Hellmann : > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-01-18 15:21:12 -0500: >> Excerpts from Graham Hayes's message of 2018-01-18 19:25:02 +: >> > >> > On 18/01/18 18:52, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> > > Excerpts from Graham Hayes's

[openstack-dev] [doc] [glance] backport patch doesn't seem to be applied to doc site

Hi I tried to install glance manually according to docs site[1] for Pike release, and current doc site doesn't show how to create glance database. The bug has been already fixed and the backport patch[2] also has been merged into Pike branch. So how to affect these backport patches to actual doc

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposing Balazs Gibizer for nova-core

Yay (^_^) 2017-08-22 18:18 GMT-07:00 Matt Riedemann : > I'm proposing that we add gibi to the nova core team. He's been around for > awhile now and has shown persistence and leadership in the multi-release > versioned notifications effort, which also included helping new

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][tc] IMPORTANT upcoming change to technical elections

Hi Clark, Thanks for your support, that works for me :-) Thanks --- 2017-08-07 10:10 GMT-07:00 Clark Boylan <cboy...@sapwetik.org>: > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017, at 10:01 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >> Hi >> >> My name is on the nonmembers list and I guess that could be be

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][tc] IMPORTANT upcoming change to technical elections

Hi My name is on the nonmembers list and I guess that could be because of "Current Member Level: Speaker", not "Current Member Level: Foundation Member". Can I know how to change this member level? Thanks Ken'ichi Ohmichi --- 2017-08-03 8:07 GMT-07:00 Doug Hellmann &l

Re: [openstack-dev] [forum] Future of Stackalytics

2017-06-08 10:51 GMT-07:00 Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org>: > On 2017-06-08 09:49:03 -0700 (-0700), Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >> 2017-06-08 7:19 GMT-07:00 Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org>: > [...] >> > There is a foundation member directory API now which

Re: [openstack-dev] [forum] Future of Stackalytics

2017-06-08 7:19 GMT-07:00 Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org>: > On 2017-06-07 16:36:45 -0700 (-0700), Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > [...] >> one of config files is 30KL due to much user information and that >> makes the maintenance hard now. I am trying to separate user part &

Re: [openstack-dev] [forum] Future of Stackalytics

2017-05-17 11:55 GMT-07:00 Jeremy Stanley : > On 2017-05-17 16:16:30 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: > [...] >> we need help with completing the migration to infra. If interested >> you can reach out to fungi (Infra team PTL) nor mrmartin (who >> currently helps with the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest] Proposing Fanglei Zhu for Tempest core

+1, thanks Zhu for your work. 2017-05-16 4:22 GMT-04:00 Andrea Frittoli : > Hello team, > > I'm very pleased to propose Fanglei Zhu (zhufl) for Tempest core. > > Over the past two cycle Fanglei has been steadily contributing to Tempest > and its community. > She's done

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] GET or HEAD for checking trait existence

Hi Jay, Thanks for your reply. 2017-03-29 12:26 GMT-07:00 Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com>: > On 03/29/2017 02:04 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> I have some questions about plancement API design from >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/376200

[openstack-dev] [nova][api] GET or HEAD for checking trait existence

Hi I have some questions about plancement API design from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/376200 Current implementation of the above patch (PS26) adds GET method for checking trait existence, and tags.rst of api-wg guideline[1] requires GET for checking trait existence. On the other hand,

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][cinder] RFC: Cinder test on Tempest

.py#L776 > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 7:02 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi ＜ken1ohmi...@gmail.com＞ > wrote: >> >> 2017-03-22 14:32 GMT-07:00 Andrea Frittoli ＜andrea.fritt...@gmail.com＞: >> ＞ >> ＞ >> ＞ On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:31 PM Sean McGinnis ＜sean.mcgin...@gmx.com＞ >

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][cinder] RFC: Cinder test on Tempest

2017-03-22 14:32 GMT-07:00 Andrea Frittoli <andrea.fritt...@gmail.com>: > > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 8:31 PM Sean McGinnis <sean.mcgin...@gmx.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 01:08:23PM -0700, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >

[openstack-dev] [qa][cinder] RFC: Cinder test on Tempest

Hi, Now we need to update Tempest for following Cinder API status. I have an idea for restructuring and happy to see feedback about that. Now Cinder API status is V1: Deprecated V2: Deprecated V3: Current V1 API tests have been removed from Tempest side already, so we just need to

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][glance][keystone][cinder] Testing of deprecated API versions

2017-03-10 8:51 GMT-08:00 Sean McGinnis : >> > >> As far as I can tell: >> - Cinder v1 if I'm not mistaken has been deprecated in Juno, so it's >> deprecated in all supported releases. >> - Glance v1 has been deprecated in Newton, so it's deprecated in all >> supported

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][neutron-fwaas][networking-bgpvpn][nova-lxd] Removing old data_utils from Tempest

2017-03-14 18:52 GMT-07:00 Takashi Yamamoto <yamam...@midokura.com>: > thank you for heads up. > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 2:18 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi <ken1ohmi...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Many projects are using data_utils library which is provided

[openstack-dev] [qa][neutron-fwaas][networking-bgpvpn][nova-lxd] Removing old data_utils from Tempest

Hi, Many projects are using data_utils library which is provided by Tempest for creating test resources with random resource names. Now the library is provided as stable interface (tempest.lib) and old unstable interface (tempest.common) will be removed after most projects are switching to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][nova][cinder] Testing of a microversioned world

2017-03-13 12:23 GMT-07:00 Jim Rollenhagen : > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Chris Friesen > wrote: >> >> On 03/10/2017 01:37 PM, John Griffith wrote: >> >>> Now that micro-versions are *the API versioning scheme to rule them all* >>> one

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][nova][cinder] Testing of a microversioned world

2017-03-10 13:32 GMT-08:00 Matthew Treinish <mtrein...@kortar.org>: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:34:31PM -0800, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >> Hi John, >> >> Now Tempest is testing microversions only for Nova and contains some >> testing framework

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][nova][cinder] Testing of a microversioned world

Hi John, Now Tempest is testing microversions only for Nova and contains some testing framework for re-using for another projects. On this framework, we can implement necessary microversions tests as we want and actually many microversions of Nova are not tested by Tempest. We can see the tested

[openstack-dev] [qa][keystone] Tempest will use Keystone v3 API as the default

Hi, This is a kind of notification as the mail title. Now QA-team is trying to test most recent stable APIs which are marked as CURRENT in most components. The investigation is written on https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tempest-api-versions-in-pike On Keystone side, the V3 API is CURRENT and

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA]Refactoring Scenarios manager.py

I see Jordan's opinion here and I also faced this situation before. I proposed a hacking patch [1] to notify wrong usage of Tempest methods to projects and I saw some users of these methods didn't know the definition of stable interfaces of Tempest. We always face this issue on developments which

[openstack-dev] [all][qa] Use stable call_until_true()

Hi, QA team defines stable interfaces of Tempest for using them from outside(tempest plugins). We are removing a deprecated call_until_true() method from unstable module(test.py of Tempest), but some projects are still using it. We have prepared patches[1] for soft-landing on these projects,

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Pike PTG Schedule

Hi Andrea, Thanks for organizing QA sessions for PTG. 2017-02-13 16:16 GMT-08:00 Andrea Frittoli : > Hello team, > > I did some work on the etherpad [0] to organise the QA PTG schedule based on > the proposed sessions. > I separated discussion sessions from hands-on

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-wg/news

2017-02-07 10:31 GMT-08:00 Ed Leafe <e...@leafe.com>: > On Feb 6, 2017, at 3:28 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi <ken1ohmi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> To summarize, my point is that we shouldn't be worried that this case is >>> going to set a precedent. It wou

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-wg/news

2017-02-07 6:56 GMT-08:00 Brian Rosmaita <rosmaita.foss...@gmail.com>: > On 2/6/17 4:28 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >> 2017-02-06 6:45 GMT-08:00 Brian Rosmaita <rosmaita.foss...@gmail.com>: >>> On 2/6/17 5:51 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: >>> [super-enormous s

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-wg/news

2017-02-06 6:45 GMT-08:00 Brian Rosmaita : > On 2/6/17 5:51 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > [super-enormous snip -- Chris, Ken, and Jordan make good points, I > encourage you to read the entire thread; I just want to concentrate on > one point] >> >> I would say we should

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-wg/news

2017-02-06 2:51 GMT-08:00 Jordan Pittier : >> >> >> If we change the success status code (200 ->204) without any version >> >> bumps, OpenStack clouds return different status codes on the same API >> >> operations. >> >> That will break OpenStack interoperability and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-wg/news

2017-02-03 9:56 GMT-08:00 Chris Dent <cdent...@anticdent.org>: > On Thu, 2 Feb 2017, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >>> >>> In today's meeting [0] after briefly covering old business we spent >>> nearly >>> 50 minutes going round in circles discussing the co

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-wg/news

2017-02-02 9:38 GMT-08:00 Chris Dent : > > Greetings OpenStack community, > > In today's meeting [0] after briefly covering old business we spent nearly > 50 minutes going round in circles discussing the complex interactions of > expectations of API stability, the need to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa] gate-grenade-dsvm-neutron-multinode-live-migration-nv is 100% fail since 1/21

2017-01-27 19:35 GMT-08:00 Matt Riedemann : > On 1/27/2017 5:00 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> >> I noticed that this job is 100% failure since 1/21: >> >> http://tinyurl.com/zjh5bc5 >> >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] Planning for the Pike PTG

I am preparing for PTG sessions. How much capacity is in each room ? 30 people or more? We might want to have different discussions or coding meetups in parallel in the same room, because each developer concentrates on different working topics (Tempest, Devstack, Grenade, Patrole, etc under QA

[openstack-dev] [qa] PTL non-candidacy

Hi, I will step down as PTL after this Ocata cycle. I was happy to see new ideas and folks who try making ideas true in this 2 cycles. Now QA project has a lot of components with many people's effort and we help each other as a community. This experience is very exciting for me, I am proud to

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][tempest][api] community images, tempest tests, and API stability

2017-01-13 9:25 GMT-08:00 Ian Cordasco : > -Original Message- > From: Ian Cordasco > Reply: Ian Cordasco > Date: January 13, 2017 at 08:12:12 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][tempest][api] community images, tempest tests, and API stability

2017-01-12 5:47 GMT-08:00 Brian Rosmaita : > On 1/11/17 10:35 PM, GHANSHYAM MANN wrote: > >> But from meeting logs, it looks like impression was(if am not wrong) that >> Tempest test[1] is not doing the right thing and should be ok to change. >> I do not think this is

[openstack-dev] [qa][ptg] session idea for Pike cycle

Hi QA-team, We will have the first PTG[1] next Feb and it is nice to get session ideas now. I am looking forward to seeing new ideas and discussing them together as the community. The etherpad is https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-ptg-pike Please write your ideas down on that if you have. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][heat][QA] Tempest layer4 job failure due to heat devstack plugin switch.

2016-12-06 19:42 GMT-08:00 GHANSHYAM MANN : > Hi All, > > Recently all gate heat gate jobs were switched to use heat devstack plugin > and heat code was removed from devstack tree. > > During that tempest layer 4 job is missed and blocked the tempest gate[1]. > Also

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [openstack-health] Avoid showing non-official projects failure ratios

2016-12-02 5:39 GMT-08:00 Masayuki Igawa <masay...@igawa.me>: > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Andreas Jaeger <a...@suse.com> wrote: >> On 12/02/2016 10:03 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >>> Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >>>> Hi QA-team, >>&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nominating Stephen Finucane for nova-core

2016-12-02 7:22 GMT-08:00 Matt Riedemann : > I'm proposing that we add Stephen Finucane to the nova-core team. Stephen > has been involved with nova for at least around a year now, maybe longer, my > ability to tell time in nova has gotten fuzzy over the years.

[openstack-dev] [qa] [openstack-health] Avoid showing non-official projects failure ratios

Hi QA-team, In the big-tent policy, we continue creating new projects. On the other hand, some projects became non-active. That seems natural thing. Now openstack-health[1] shows non-active project as 100% failure ratio on "Project Status". The project has became non-official since

[openstack-dev] [release] New hacking 0.12.0

Hi, Today a new hacking 0.12.0 is released. The release contains a new hacking rule: [H904] Delay string interpolations at logging calls. BTW, the hacking repo starts containing reno since this release but it is not used yet. Please check the git history (or

[openstack-dev] [qa] Summary of design summit for Ocata

Hi QA-team, Thanks for joining QA sessions on OpenStack Summit Barcelona. They were interesting and good to get directions to move forward in this development cycle. This is a summary of these sessions for next steps and hope this helps our works. * (Tempest) Add an option for stopping cleanup

[openstack-dev] [QA][Tempest] Check puppet jobs on the gate

Hi QA team, There are three gate jobs related to puppet jobs (like gate-puppet-openstack-integration-4-scenario001-tempest-centos-7-nv) and they are marked as non-voting now. If finding these jobs failures during Tempest patch reviews even but jenkins +1, please notify the failures to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Request for design session ideas of Barcelona Summit

to us on the etherpad or this mail thread :) Thanks Ken Ohmichi. 2016-09-27 12:40 GMT-07:00 Ken'ichi Ohmichi <ken1ohmi...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > We have a Design Summit next month, and now we are trying to get ideas > for QA sessions. > There is an etherpad for ideas and it is

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] The end-user test suite for OpenStack clusters

this on clear document and it is clear to get a consensus about adding this. Thanks Ken Ohmichi --- . 2016-10-07 12:43 GMT-07:00 Ken'ichi Ohmichi <ken1ohmi...@gmail.com>: > Hi Timur, > > 2016-10-06 4:08 GMT-07:00 Timur Nurlygayanov <tnurlygaya...@mirantis.com>: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][Cinder]Removing Cinder v1 in Tempest

Thanks for pointing this up, Jordan Before removing volume v1 API tests, it is nice to make the v2 API the default of Tempest scenario tests. Now the v1 and v2 is set as True on the default in the configuration[1], and the v1 API is used in the scenario like [2]. So it is better to switch using

[openstack-dev] [QA] Presence at PTG Atlanta in February

Hi QA team, As you know, the first PTG(Project Teams Gathering) happens at Atlanta 20th-24th February the next year. After Barcelona, OpenStack Summit will be separated into two parts (conferences and design sessions) and PTG is a new format for design sessions for developers(Please see the

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] The end-user test suite for OpenStack clusters

the use in the >> os-faults/examples directory. >> >> Regards, >> Yaroslav Lobankov. >> >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi <ken1ohmi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Timur, >>> >>> Thanks for your e

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] The end-user test suite for OpenStack clusters

Hi Timur, Thanks for your explanation. 2016-09-29 6:22 GMT-07:00 Timur Nurlygayanov : > >> I am guessing the above "restart nodes" is for verifying each >> OpenStack service restarts successfully, right? > > Yes, this is right. And we also will check that HA logic for

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] The end-user test suite for OpenStack clusters

Hi Timur, Thanks for picking this up, that is interesting for me. 2016-09-22 5:58 GMT-07:00 Timur Nurlygayanov : > > we have an idea to create the test suite with destructive/HA and advanced > end-user scenarios for the OpenStack clusters. This test suite will

[openstack-dev] [QA] Request for design session ideas of Barcelona Summit

Hi, We have a Design Summit next month, and now we are trying to get ideas for QA sessions. There is an etherpad for ideas and it is good if writing your ideas on that: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-qa-summit-topics After getting ideas, we will arrange them into available slots for QA

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] tempest-cores update

Hi Hugh, 2016-09-25 22:50 GMT-07:00 Hugh Blemings : > Hi Ohmichi-san, > > Firstly congratulations on becoming PTL for Quality Assurance! Thanks >> As previous mail, Marc has resigned from tempest-cores. >> In addition, David also has done from tempest-cores to concentrate on

Re: [openstack-dev] tempest tests in Horizon GUI

Hi Ofer, The scenario test of Horizon has been removed from Tempest since https://review.openstack.org/#/c/313713/ And now the test[1] exists in openstack/tempest-horizon. The test is very simple like * checks that the login page is available * logs in as a regular user * checks that the user

[openstack-dev] [qa] tempest-cores update

Hi, As previous mail, Marc has resigned from tempest-cores. In addition, David also has done from tempest-cores to concentrate on new work. Thank you two for many contributions to the project and I wish your continuous successes. Thanks Ken Ohmichi

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] resigning from Tempest core

Hi Marc, Thanks for hosting a QA/Infra code sprint. All attendees have been satisfied with rooms, coffee, food and weather. And thanks for your work on QA project in long term. You have brought a lot of value to us. Thanks Ken Ohmichi 2016-09-19 11:51 GMT+02:00 Koderer, Marc

Re: [openstack-dev] [cue][qa] Status of OpenStack CI jobs

5/09/2016 00:12, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >> Hi Cue-team, >> >> As http://status.openstack.org/openstack-health/#/ , the cue gate jobs >> continues failing 100%. >> What is current status of the development? >> Hopefully the job will become stable for smooth deve

[openstack-dev] [qa] Cancelled: IRC meeting 0900UTC Sep. 22 2016

Hi, We have QA/Infra mid-cycle meetup next week, then it is hard to attend the next meeting for most people. So let's cancel the next week meeting. The next irc meeting of QA will be Sep. 29th 2016 (1700 UTC). Thanks Ken Ohmichi

[openstack-dev] [cue][qa] Status of OpenStack CI jobs

Hi Cue-team, As http://status.openstack.org/openstack-health/#/ , the cue gate jobs continues failing 100%. What is current status of the development? Hopefully the job will become stable for smooth development. Thanks Ken Ohmichi

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]tempest test case for force detach volume

Hi Chaoyi, That is a nice point. Now Tempest have tests for some volume v2 action APIs which doesn't contain os-force_detach. The available APIs of tempest are two: os-set_image_metadata and os-unset_image_metadata like

[openstack-dev] [Infra] bugdaystats for different time ranges

Hi Infra-team, (We told this a little bit on IRC, but it is happy to get more feedback widely) Recently, we are triaging bugs of Tempest on the launchpad and that work was fine to clean up old bugs and fixed bugs with different patches. There is bugdaystats[1] for showing a progress on bag days,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Possible REST API design change for get-me-a-network (2.37)

2016-08-11 14:53 GMT-07:00 Matt Riedemann : > I wanted to bring this up for awareness since we're getting close to feature > freeze and want consensus before it gets too late. > > Ken'ichi brought up a good question on my REST API change for the 2.37 > microversion: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Does this api modification need Microversion?

2016-08-03 9:53 GMT-07:00 Andrew Laski : > I think the discussion about whether or not this needs a microversion is > missing the bigger question of whether or not this should be in the API to > begin with. If it's safe to rollback from this error state why not just do > that

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] os-virtual-interfaces isn't deprecated in 2.36

2016-07-29 10:32 GMT-07:00 Sean Dague : > On 07/28/2016 05:38 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> On 7/28/2016 3:55 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >>> For os-attach-interfaces, we need that to attach/detach interfaces to a >>> server, so those actions don't go away with 2.36. We can also list

[openstack-dev] [QA] Cancel QA meeting today

Hi Sorry for notifying this too lately. We don't have enough attendees of QA meeting today and it is difficult to run that. So we cancel this week QA meeting. Thanks Ken Omichi __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa] When do we need tests for microversions in Tempest?

Hi Matt, 2016-07-14 11:55 GMT+09:00 Matt Riedemann : > There are several changes in Tempest right now trying to add response schema > validation for the 2.26 microversion which added server tags to the server > GET response. This is needed for anything testing a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][nova][defcore] Add option to disable some strict response checking for interop testing

2016-06-16 2:26 GMT-07:00 Morgan Fainberg <morgan.fainb...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi <ken1ohmi...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> This discussion was expected when we implemented the Tempest patch, >> then I sent a mail to de

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Tempest pre-provisioned credentials in the gate

2016-06-14 17:00 GMT-07:00 Andrea Frittoli : > Dear all, > > TL;DR: I'd like to propose to start running some of the existing dsvm > check/gate jobs using Tempest pre-provisioned credentials. > > Full Text: > Tempest provides tests with two mechanisms to acquire test

[openstack-dev] [QA][Infra] Newton Code Sprint

Hi Everyone, As we've done the past 3 cycles we'll be having another QA/Infra code sprint this cycle. Previous code sprints were amazing, and we could concentrate on the development with working together directly. At this time, we have gotten an opportunity to hold a code sprint with QA team and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][nova][defcore] Add option to disable some strict response checking for interop testing

This discussion was expected when we implemented the Tempest patch, then I sent a mail to defcore comittee[1] As the above ml, "A DefCore Guideline typically covers three OpenStack releases". That means the latest guideline needs to cover Mitaka, Liberty and Kilo, right? In the Kilo development,

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Tempest unstable interfaces in plugins

2016-06-10 17:01 GMT-07:00 Assaf Muller : > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Andrea Frittoli > wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I'm working on making the client manager in Tempest a stable interface, so >> that in future it may be used safely by plugins to

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [Tempest] Abondoned old code reviews

mail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, 30 May 2016, 6:25 p.m. Ken'ichi Ohmichi, <ken1ohmi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> There are many patches which are not updated in Tempest review queue >>> even if having gotten negative feedback from re

[openstack-dev] [qa] [Tempest] Abondoned old code reviews

Hi, There are many patches which are not updated in Tempest review queue even if having gotten negative feedback from reviewers or jenkins. Nova team is abandoning such patches like [1]. I feel it would be nice to abandone such patches which are not updated since the end of 2015. Any thoughts?

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] API changes on limit / marker / sort in Newton

2016-05-29 19:25 GMT-07:00 Alex Xu : > > > 2016-05-20 20:05 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague : >> >> There are a number of changes up for spec reviews that add parameters to >> LIST interfaces in Newton: >> >> * keypairs-pagination (MERGED) - >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][RFC] Skip this week meeting

Hi Masayuki, Sorry for late response. That is nice because we had much conversation at the summit. Next QA meeting is May 12th 1700UTC. I put the agenda for the next meeting on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_May_12th_2016_.281700_UTC.29 It is nice to add more

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][qa] devstack plugin

to do the devstack plugin in heat if there is no one is > doing it now. > > > > Thanks > dixiaoli > > > > > > > At 2016-04-30 05:30:02, "Ken'ichi Ohmichi" <ken1ohmi...@gmail.com> wrote: >>Hi Heat-team, >> >>Thanks for talki

[openstack-dev] [heat][qa] devstack plugin

Hi Heat-team, Thanks for talking the topic of devstack plugin with us in Austin summit. As you know, many projects have started to use devstack plugin in each project repo. and it is nice to use the plugin in heat also. A good sample is ironic one:

[openstack-dev] [qa] Summary of design summit for Newton

Hi QA-team, Thanks for joining QA sessions on OpenStack Summit Austin. They were interesting and good to get directions to move forward in this development cycle. This is a summary of these sessions for next steps and hope this helps our works. 1. Tempest: Cleanup

[openstack-dev] [QA] Meeting Thursday April 14th at 17:00 UTC

Hi, Please reminder that the weekly OpenStack QA team IRC meeting will be Thursday, April 14th at 17:00 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel. The agenda for the meeting can be found here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_April_14th_2016_.281700_UTC.29 Anyone is

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposing Andrey Kurilin for python-novaclient core

+1 Thanks for implementing microversion support, Andrey. 2016-04-13 10:53 GMT-07:00 Matt Riedemann : > I'd like to propose that we make Andrey Kurilin core on python-novaclient. > > He's been doing a lot of the maintenance the last several months and a lot > of times

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][stackalytics] Gaming the Stackalytics stats

2016/04/08 10:55、Anita Kuno : >> On 04/08/2016 01:42 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: >> 2016-04-08 19:26 GMT+02:00 Davanum Srinivas : >> >>> Team, >>> >>> Steve pointed out to a problem in Stackalytics: >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] Recently accepted API-WG guidelines

I much prefer this lib work. Thanks, Chris 2016/04/08 4:32、Chris Dent >> On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, michael mccune wrote: >> >> 1. version discover guideline for API microversions >> https://review.openstack.org/243429 >> >> 2. client interaction guideline for API

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] API priorities in Newton

2016-03-30 12:54 GMT-07:00 Matt Riedemann : >>> - Microversion Testing in Tempest (underway) > > How much coverage do we have today? This could be like novaclient where > people just start hacking on adding tests for each microversion (assuming > gmann would be working

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] API priorities in Newton

2016-03-30 12:26 GMT-07:00 Sean Dague : > > One other issue that we've been blocking on for a while has been > Capabilities discovery. Some API proposed adds like live resize have > been conceptually blocked behind this one. Once upon a time there was a > theory that JSON Home was

[openstack-dev] [QA] Request for design session ideas of Austin Summit

Hi We have a Design Summit next month, and now we are trying to get ideas for QA sessions. There is an etherpad for ideas and it is great if writing your ideas on the etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-qa-summit-topics After getting ideas, we will arrange them into available

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

2016-03-16 20:27 GMT-07:00 Assaf Muller <as...@redhat.com>: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Jim Rollenhagen > <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 06:20:11PM -0700, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I have o

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

2016-03-17 5:32 GMT-07:00 Adam Young <ayo...@redhat.com>: > On 03/16/2016 11:01 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >> >> 2016-03-16 19:29 GMT-07:00 Adam Young <ayo...@redhat.com>: >>> >>> On 03/16/2016 09:20 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >>>> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

2016-03-17 3:22 GMT-07:00 Jordan Pittier : >> >> If wanting to add negative tests, it is a nice option to implement >> these tests on each component repo with Tempest plugin interface. We >> can avoid operating negative tests on different component gates and >> each

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

2016-03-17 15:05 GMT-07:00 Rochelle Grober : > (Sorry for the top post. It was this or bottom post because of company > choice of email systems) (no problem :) > Integration tests, corner cases, negative tests. Lots of names that don't > have clear definitions in

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

2016-03-17 4:05 GMT-07:00 Andrea Frittoli <andrea.fritt...@gmail.com>: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:57 AM Ken'ichi Ohmichi <ken1ohmi...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> 2016-03-16 19:41 GMT-07:00 Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com>: >> > On Wed, Mar 1

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

Mar 18, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi <ken1ohmi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> 2016-03-17 4:05 GMT-07:00 Andrea Frittoli <andrea.fritt...@gmail.com>: >>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:57 AM Ken'ichi Ohmichi <ken1ohmi...@gmail.com> >>>&

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

2016-03-16 19:29 GMT-07:00 Adam Young <ayo...@redhat.com>: > On 03/16/2016 09:20 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> I have one proposal[1] related to negative tests in Tempest, and >> hoping opinions before doing that. >> >> Now Te

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

2016-03-16 19:41 GMT-07:00 Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com>: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 06:20:11PM -0700, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >> Hi >> >> I have one proposal[1] related to negative tests in Tempest, and >> hoping opinions before doing that. >>

[openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

Hi I have one proposal[1] related to negative tests in Tempest, and hoping opinions before doing that. Now Tempest contains negative tests and sometimes patches are being posted for adding more negative tests, but I'd like to propose removing them from Tempest instead. Negative tests verify

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova PTL for Newton

Thank you so much, John. Nova PTL is always a hard position, and you have accelerated our collaboration with your leadership. Thanks 2016-03-11 11:22 GMT-08:00 John Garbutt : > Hi, > > It has been greatly rewarding serving you all as Nova PTL over the > Liberty and Mitaka

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Not running for PTL

2016-03-11 11:34 GMT-08:00 Matthew Treinish : > Hi everyone, > > I'm writing this to announce that I am not running for QA PTL this cycle. I've > been the QA PTL for the past 4 cycles and I think it's time for another person > to take over the role. I think during the past 4

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do we need a microversion to return a 501 from GET os-virtual-interfaces?

2016-03-06 15:41 GMT-08:00 Jay Pipes : > On 03/06/2016 02:21 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> >> Thanks, good point. I think 400 would be best here. And according to our >> handy-dandy docs [1] it should be OK to do this without a microversion. > > > Yup, 400 is correct and yes,

  1   2   3   >