Re: [openstack-dev] [k8s] OpenStack and Containers White Paper

Hello! I'm working on Keystone authentication and authorization and other related parts of openstack cloud provider. I will be happy to help you! Best, Mike On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 8:38 AM, Jaesuk Ahn wrote: > Hi Chris, > > I can probably help on proof-reading and making

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][nova][neutron][qa][panko][blazar]: OpenStack meets ETSI NFV workshop on 12.09.2017

in the catalog of VNF packages. Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) < gergely.csat...@nokia.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > We can try to squeeze it into the schedule. Can you collect your > discussion topics to an e

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] multi threads with swift backend

Hey! As you said it's not possible now. I implemented the support several years ago, bit unfortunately no one wanted to review it: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218993 If you want, we can revive it. Best, Mike On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][nova][neutron][qa][panko][blazar]: OpenStack meets ETSI NFV workshop on 12.09.2017

Yes, It will be even better! I can record a demo and publish it before the meeting. Could you schedule a short talk about IFA007 during the workshop? Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Csatari, Gergely (Nokia - HU/Budapest) < gergely.csat...@nokia.com> wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][nova][neutron][qa][panko][blazar]: OpenStack meets ETSI NFV workshop on 12.09.2017

in the discussions, too? I plan to create an artifact type and present a short demo there, about how glare can work with the packages. If this topic is interesting, then we can discuss it in more detail on Wednesday or Thursday in dedicated Glare team room. Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin On Mon, Aug

[openstack-dev] [Glare] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects - Answers

Hello! Thank you all for your answers and advises! I will try to summarize all of the above. The purpose of the application was to get the community's views on including Glare in the list of official projects, and a potential replacement of Glance in the foreseeable future. A large number of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 1:43 AM, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com> wrote: > On 07/10/2017 04:31 PM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > >> Thank you for asking this! It's really very important and interesting, so >> I'm going to explain those things more detailed. >> >&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:31 AM, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com> wrote: > On 07/10/2017 01:21 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > >> On Jul 10, 2017, at 5:06 AM, Mikhail Fedosin <mfedo...@gmail.com > mfedo...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Given all the advantages an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com> wrote: > On 07/10/2017 04:31 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > >> On 07/10/2017 01:21 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: >> >>> On Jul 10, 2017, at 5:06 AM, Mikhail Fedosin <mfedo...@gmail.com >>> <mail

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

ger, and we switched pretty smoothly. So I hope everything will be fine here, too. Best, Mike Fedosin On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:55 PM, Joshua Harlow <harlo...@fastmail.com> wrote: > Ed Leafe wrote: > >> On Jul 10, 2017, at 5:06 AM, Mikhail Fedosin <mfedo...@gmail.com >> <

[openstack-dev] [Glare][TC] Application for inclusion of Glare in the list of official projects

Hello! Recently I applied for inclusion of Glare in the list of official OpenStack projects: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/479285/ In this regard, I would like to ask the community what other things can be improved in the project to meet all the necessary requirements. Also in this thread I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC][All] Past, Present and Future of Glare project

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 26/06/17 17:35 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > >> 2. We would like to become an official OpenStack project, and in general >> we >> follow all the necessary rules and recommendation

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC][All] Past, Present and Future of Glare project

erry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org >> <mailto:thie...@openstack.org>> wrote: >> >> Mikhail Fedosin wrote: >> > Does the above mean you are implementing a share secret >> storage >> > solution or that you are goin

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC][All] Past, Present and Future of Glare project

On Jun 26, 2017 7:14 PM, "Jay Pipes" <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: On 06/26/2017 11:32 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > > On Jun 26, 2017 5:54 PM, "Jay Pipes" <jaypi...@gmail.com jaypi...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 06/26/2017 10:35 AM, Mikhail Fedo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC][All] Past, Present and Future of Glare project

On Jun 26, 2017 5:54 PM, "Jay Pipes" <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: On 06/26/2017 10:35 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: >* Storage of secrets - a new artifact type in Glare, which will store > private information (keys, passwords, etc.) in an encrypted form (like in > Bar

[openstack-dev] [Glare][TC][All] Past, Present and Future of Glare project

Hello! It's me again. I hasten to inform you about the latest news in Glare project! To begin with, I want to say that: First, we created the stable branch (stable/ocata), which is already used in production. This is undoubtedly a joyful event and the result of long months of work! Secondly, we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Mistral][Devstack] Confusion between auth_url and auth_uri in keystone middleware

<jamielen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 16 June 2017 at 00:44, Mikhail Fedosin <mfedo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks György! >> >> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Gyorgy Szombathelyi < >> gyorgy.szombathe...@doclerholding.com> wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Abhishek Kekane for glance core

Wasn't Abhishek a glance core before? What a surprise for me o_O I thought that he was just being modest and did not put -2 on the patches. Undoubtedly, we need to correct this misunderstanding as quickly as possible and invite Abhishek to the core team. On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Erno

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Mistral][Devstack] Confusion between auth_url and auth_uri in keystone middleware

Thanks György! On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Gyorgy Szombathelyi < gyorgy.szombathe...@doclerholding.com> wrote: > Hi Mikhail, > > (I'm not from the Keystone team, but did some patches for using > keystonauth1). > > > > > 2. Even if auth_url is set, it can't be used later, because it is not >

[openstack-dev] [Keystone][Mistral][Devstack] Confusion between auth_url and auth_uri in keystone middleware

Recently I decided to remove deprecated parameters from keystone_authtoken mistral config and replace them with recommended function of devstack [1]. In doing so, I discovered a strange behavior of configuration mechanism, and specifically parameters auth_uri and auth_url. 1. The parameter

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc][glance] Glance needs help, it's getting critical

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 4:43 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017, 19:47 Mikhail Fedosin <mfedo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc][glance] Glance needs help, it's getting critical

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:01 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 12/06/17 23:20 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > >> My opinion is that Glance stagnates and it's really hard to implement new >> features there. In two years, only one major improvement was de

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc][glance] Glance needs help, it's getting critical

to be exact). If we continue in the same spirit, it certainly will not increase the joy of OpenStack users and they will look for other solutions that meet their desires. Best, Mike On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:20 PM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 12/06/17 16:56 +0300, Mikhai

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc][glance] Glance needs help, it's getting critical

Hello! Flavio raised a very difficult and important question, and I think that we, as community members, should decide what to do with Glance next. I will try to state my subjective opinion. I was involved in the Glance project for almost three years and studied it fairly plank. I believe that

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Mike Fedosin for glance core

Thank you very much for your trust! I will try not to let you down, and be with the project in these difficult times. Despite the fact that most of the time I'm involved in the Glare project, I agree that they have much in common. And at least they both share glance_store library. For this

[openstack-dev] [Glare][Mistral][Murano] Glare client was added to global requirements

commands and I hope it will be published this week. It means that soon projects like murano and mistral may begin the experimental integration with glare v1 api. If you have any questions - feel free to ask them in our irc channel #openstack-glare Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin

Re: [openstack-dev] Arrivederci

So long, Ian, and good luck on your new job! You know it has been a pleasure working with you, and I hope we'll meet again many times. So do not get lost and take care of yourself! Best, Mike P.S. ketogenic diet doesn't work On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Luke Hinds

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG

nstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] > glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG > > > On 2017-02-13 18:23:19 +0300 (+0300), Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > > [...] > > > Almost every project works with some binary data and must store it > > > somewhere, and almost a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][glance][glare][all] glance/glare/artifacts/images at the PTG

Hello! Let me quickly describe my vision of the problem. I asked this question to Brian last Friday, because it is evident that the projects have the intersection in functionality. For this reason, I proposed to bring Glare back and develop it as a new generation of Glance service. Perhaps such

Re: [openstack-dev] [TC][Glance][Nova][TripleO][Heat][Mistral][Ironic][Murano] Glare

ies (they are not available without it) > > >Is Glare being deployed already? > Mirantis OpenStack 9.0 by default is deploying Murano with Glare used > as a backend. > > >What projects are the main consumers of Glare? > Murano > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Mike P

Re: [openstack-dev] [TC][Glance][Nova][TripleO][Heat][Mistral][Ironic][Murano] Glare

to this and all people are welcome to participate! Best, Mike On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:26 AM, Renat Akhmerov <renat.akhme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 26 Jan 2017, at 22:29, Dougal Matthews <dou...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On 24 January 2017 at 16:16, Mikhail Fedo

Re: [openstack-dev] [TC][Glance][Nova][TripleO][Heat][Mistral][Ironic][Murano] Glare

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 19/01/17 12:48 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > >> Hi Matt! >> >> This should be discussed, for sure, but there is a lot of potential. In >> general, it depends on how far

Re: [openstack-dev] [TC][Glance][Nova][TripleO][Heat][Mistral][Ironic][Murano] Glare

wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Mikhail Fedosin <mfedo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> And here I want to ask the community - how exactly Glare may be useful in >> OpenStack? Glare was developed as a repository for all possible data types, >> and it has man

Re: [openstack-dev] [TC][Glance][Nova][TripleO][Heat][Mistral][Ironic][Murano] Glare

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:30 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Mikhail Fedosin's message of 2017-01-18 19:54:01 +0300: > > Hello! > > > > In this letter I want to tell you the current status of Glare project and > > discuss its future development within the entire

Re: [openstack-dev] [TC][Glance][Nova][TripleO][Heat][Mistral][Ironic][Murano] Glare

, I notice that there are a few nasty bugs in Glance (you know what I mean), which make it extremely inconvenient for a number of deployments. On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On 1/18/2017 10:54 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > >> Hello!

[openstack-dev] [TC][Glance][Nova][TripleO][Heat][Mistral][Ironic][Murano] Glare

Hello! In this letter I want to tell you the current status of Glare project and discuss its future development within the entire OpenStack community. In the beginning I have to say a few words about myself - my name is Mike and I am the PTL of Glare. Currently I work as a consultant at Nokia,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun][Glare][Glance] Building Docker images

I believe we can add Glare driver to Zun [1] and allow it to pull container images from Glare directly. Then, as Kairat mentioned, we should prepare 'container-images' artifact type for Glare [2]. For sure, we can use 'images' (which are actually vm images) to store containers, but it's ugly,

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr][Magnum] How stable is kuryr-kubernetes?

Hi folks! We at Samsung are trying to integrate containers in OpenStack and at this moment we are looking at Kubernetes deployed by Magnum, which works good enough for now. One challenge we have faced recently is making containers able to communicate with Nova VM instances (in other words we

Re: [openstack-dev] [glare] Few questions regarding OpenStack Glare

Hi Moshe! Thank you for your interest in the project. I answered your questions below. On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Elisha, Moshe (Nokia - IL) < moshe.eli...@nokia.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > > My name is Moshe Elisha and I work at CloudBand, Nokia. > > I watched "Glare - A Unified Binary

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][VMT][Security] Glance coresec reorg

Agree :) +1 for both of them! Best, Mike On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Michael Xin wrote: > +1 for both. > > yours, > Michael > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > >> On 20/10/16 12:33 -0700, Steve Lewis wrote: >> >>> I'm not

[openstack-dev] [App-Catalog][Glare][Infra] Vm for app-catalog

to deploy staging vm on debian sid, managed by openstack-infra, and let people test and play with it. When ubuntu packages appear we will able to deploy ubuntu 16.04 immediately. Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] [all] Ocata Design Summit - Proposed slot allocation

Hey! If it's possible we could use one wr to discuss the integration of Glare with Heat, Murano, Tacker and App-Catalog. Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Kirill Zaitsev <kzait...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Your email says, that in Murano we have: &

[openstack-dev] [Glare] IRC meeting time changed

Hey! Since Glare became an independent project [1], we decided to change the meeting time from Monday at 1730 UTC to biweekly one-hour meetings on Thursdays 1600 UTC in #openstack-meeting [2] Please, add your topics to our new agenda etherpad [3]! Also, I have noticed that this meeting is not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Glare] External locations design

Thanks for you comments Stuart! I also have some thoughts on this matter: first of all, I never liked how locations are implemented in glance v2, and not just because of inconsistencies in multiple locations per one image, but for the reason that there are no differences between internal and

Re: [openstack-dev] [glare][kolla] timing of release of glare and request for technical interview on IRC wherever the glare team wants to have it

Hello Steven! Our plans for Glare in Newton are: 1. Implement beta version of App-Catalog, based on Glare v1; 2. Develop an experimental support (POC) for Murano, Heat and probably Tacker. It means that all big updates will be in Ocata, and despite the fact that the code will be ready in this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project

Thank you all for your responses! >From my side I can add that our separation is a deliberate step. We pre-weighed all pros and cons and our final decision was that moving forward as a new project is the lesser of two evils. Undoubtedly, in the short term it will be painful, but I believe that in

[openstack-dev] [Glance][TC][Heat][App-Catalog][Murano][Tacker] Glare as a new Project

weekly IRC meeting remains intact: it is 17:30 UTC Mondays in #openstack-meeting-alt, it will just become a Glare project meeting instead of a Glare sub-team meeting. Please feel free to join! Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin P.S. For those of you who may be curious on the project name. We'll still

[openstack-dev] [Glance][Heat][Horizon] Glance v2 and custom locations

involved people. Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman

[openstack-dev] [Glare][Heat][Tacker][Murano][App-Catalog] How to validate your binary data in OpenStack

storing their binary assets. Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/337633/10/contrib/glare/openstack_app_catalog/artifacts.py@159 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][Heat][TripleO] Heat artifact type

On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Qiming Teng wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 06:44:06PM +0300, Oleksii Chuprykov wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Today it was announced that Glare is ready for public review > >

[openstack-dev] [Glance][Heat][Murano][App-Catalog][Tacker] Glare is ready for wider review

: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292327/46/glance/objects/heat-templates.py Best regards. Mikhail Fedosin __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] [Glare] No meeting today - 07/04/2016

Hi, We’re cancelling team meeting today because a bunch of team members are on holidays or won’t be able to attend. Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][glance][qa] - Nova glance v2 work complete

Hooray :) After a long period of time it's done. Thanks all who helped us there! Best regards, Mike Fedosin On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Kairat Kushaev wrote: > \0/ > That's awesome. > Big thanks to mfedosin and sudipto for driving this work. > > Best regards, >

[openstack-dev] [all][glare][api] How's going to use Glare?

as much RESTful as possible. Thanks in advance! Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [glare] [heat] [tosca] [tacker] [murano] [magnum] [app-catalog] Austin summit summary: Generic cataloging and Glare v1 API

can continue this work. Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Nikhil Komawar <nik.koma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Bob, > > Thanks for reaching out! > > We're in the process of finalizing the API and the team is working hard on > getting the c

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Glare and future of artifacts in OpenStack.

ant to say YES, you are spot on that the Domain proxy stuff made the > code virtually unreadable and introduced too great a surface area for bugs. > Great to see a move away from it. > > Thanks :) > Best, > -jay > > On 04/21/2016 12:47 PM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > >&g

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Glare and future of artifacts in OpenStack.

-40 PM. Will be glad if you may join us there. https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/events/9162?goback=1 Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [glance] Getting the ball rolling on glance v2 in nova in newton cycle

elp it cannot be done. Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin <https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1539698> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Nikhil Komawar <nik.koma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Inline comment. > > On 4/1/16 10:16 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > > On 04/01/2016 10:08 AM, Mo

Re: [openstack-dev] [defcore][glance] Glare not defcore ready

th the API WG principles and in such a way that it could be included in DefCore at the appropriate time. Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote: > Greetings, > > I missed yday's Glance meeting but I went ahead and read

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Artifacts] Current status of Glance artifacts

weekly irc meeting on Monday at 1730 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt [3]. Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/283136/ [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292327/ [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-artifacts-sub-team-meeting-agenda On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 3:12 AM

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance]Glance v2 api support in Nova

patches are split into small commits (100 LOC max), so they should be relatively easy to review. I wonder if Nova community members may change their decision and unblock this patches? Thanks in advance! Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat-translator][tacker] Openstack Artifact Repository

in #openstack-meeting-alt https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-artifacts-sub-team-meeting-agenda There we can discuss all things you need. Thanks for looking at Glare! Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin __ OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Glance Core team additions/removals

I'm always happy to add new cores :) +1 for Kairat. He has been working really hard and the huge number of high-quality reviews and commits is a good proof of this. Welcome Kairat! +1 for Brian. He is one of the most experienced technical specialists and he's a well-known member in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

ote: > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> On 29/12/15 07:41 -0600, Sam Matzek wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Mikhail Fedosin < > mfedo...@mirantis.com> > >>

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Nova + Glance_v2 = Love

work without it. In conclusion, I want to congratulate you with this huge progress and say there is a big chance that we can deprecate glance v1 in Mitaka cycle. Hooray! And Merry Christmas! -- Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin _

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Glance] Xenplugin + Glance_v2 = Hate

will be very helpful. Thanks in advance! -- Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Add Ian Cordasco back into glance-core

+1 Hooray! Welcome back :) On Dec 8, 2015 18:32, wrote: > +1 > > I'm delighted to hear this. > > Welcome back Ian. > > >> +1 from me! Glad to have Ian back. >> >> On 12/7/15, 11:36 AM, "Flavio Percoco" wrote: >> >> > Greetings, >> > > Not long ago,

[openstack-dev] [Infra] Remove .mailmap files from OpenStack repos

/.mailmap etc. But it seems that they're very outdated (last time many of them were updated about 2 years ago). So, do we still need these files or it's better to remove them? -- Best regards, Mikhail Fedosin __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][glance] glance-stable-maint group refresher

Thank you for your confidence in me folks! I I'll be happy to maintain the stability of our project and continue working on its improvements. Best regards, Mike On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: > > > On 9/30/15 8:46 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: > > Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] glance core rotation part 1

+1. I hope that Zhi Yan joined Alibaba to make it use Openstack in the future :) On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote: > +1 > > > > *From:* Alex Meade [mailto:mr.alex.me...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, September 11, 2015 7:37 PM > *To:* OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Proposal to change Glance meeting time.

Both options are good, it's a little better at 1500 UTC. +1 consistent time. On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Steve Lewis steve.le...@rackspace.com wrote: +1 consistent time +1 for 1500 UTC since that has come up. On 09/03/15 09:07, Nikhil Komawar wrote: So, the new proposal is: Glance

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

. 2015-03-05 17:46 GMT+03:00 Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/05/2015 11:35 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: Yes, it's absolutely right. For example, Nova and Neutron have official rules for that: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/CoreTeam

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

Yes, it's absolutely right. For example, Nova and Neutron have official rules for that: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/CoreTeam where it says: A member of the team may be removed at any time by the PTL. This is typically due to a drop off of involvement by the member such that they are no