Many thanks!
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:52 AM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.orgwrote:
I have created a mailman topic for Murano too, so people interested
only in receiving messages with [Murano] in the subject line can
subscribe to the topic only.
How to use Mailman topics:
It is my personal opinion that there is no necessary condition between
'having the possibility of leaving a resource without service provider' and
'API users want to create resources without service providers'.
While being able to change the 'provider' associated with a resource is a
reasonable
Today in the Project release status meeting, we'll look into havana-3
plans.
Feel free to add extra topics to the agenda:
[1] http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/ProjectMeeting
All Technical Leads for integrated programs should be present (if you
can't make it, please name a substitute on [1]).
Jay Buffington wrote:
I haven't closely looked at rootwrap, but it seems to me that you could
use the
rootwrap config files to generate a gigantic sudoers config file which
would not
necessarily be human readable. That would have the flexibility and
maintainability of rootwrap with the
Hi,
From reviewing the patches for
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/utilization-aware-scheduling it
seems like there is a lot of code here that may already existing the
Ceilometer. I wonder if this is something that should be implemented in Nova
or if Nova should receive the
Hi,
Would it be possible that we also discuss the instance groups. This was blocked
because the new API did not support objects. The relevant patches for objects
have been added and it is pending review.
Thanks
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Dugger, Donald D
Hi All,
Recently I have come across a bug in launchpad/nova which states that,
while creating flavors, leading/trailing spaces around flavor names is
currently allowed and expected not to be allowed. Bug reference -
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1206396
I want to extend this to other
This question was asked several times. So we decided to provide a
detailed response.
1. The first question is “Why doesn’t Savanna use Heat to provision VMs?”
Generally using Heat underneath for infrastructure provisioning looks
reasonable. In a tactic perspective there are few factors making
Gary,
+1 for groups
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible that we also discuss the instance groups. This was
blocked because the new API did not support objects. The relevant patches
for objects have
Hi,
I am interested in helping out with QE efforts on upstream
OpenStack, specifically around Neutron.
I'm trying to understand the following blueprint,It will be great if you can
point me to a detailed spec
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/security-group-rules-protocol-numbers
Please discard
Thanks
Ofer
- Original Message -
From: Ofer Blaut obl...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: aro...@nicira.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 3:50:42 PM
Subject: Blueprint information - security-group-rules-protocol-numbers
Hi,
I am interested
Gary-
Sure, we should have time to go over this.
--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
-Original Message-
From: Gary Kotton [mailto:gkot...@vmware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 4:07 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Aaron Rosen aro...@nicira.com wrote:
Hi Peter,
Great article. Any interest in pushing your N-work quantum-server patch
upstream?
Thanks Aaron!
I'm certainly interested in pushing the patch upstream :-) When I
submit a review, we'll see if the community
Gary-
We discussed this at the last meeting, log at:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/scheduler/2013/scheduler.2013-07-23-15.00.log.html
basically, the concensus was somethings should be done in the Nova scheduler
(reduce dependencies on other components) but we should
On Jul 19, 2013, at 3:34 AM, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Jeff,
thanks for contribution. As long as there is no more input in gathering
issues, I'll try to wrap all the problems up in BP's whiteboard and we can
start designing proposals.
Best
-- Jarda
Hi Jarda,
Hi Everyone,
Hyper-V meeting will resume today.
Topics will include:
* Development Updates
* Summit Sessions
* Puppet Openstack-Hyper-V
Peter J. Pouliot, CISSP
Senior SDET, OpenStack
Microsoft
New England Research Development Center
One Memorial Drive,Cambridge,
Joe Gordon wrote:
Going forward I think we should support two approaches:
1) some faster mostly python based (because we are a python project)
rootwrap solution, there are many good ideas proposed above. Although
Robert Collins comments have yet to be addressed.
About Robert's arguments:
Hey Liz,
I briefly brought up horizontal navigation in the IRC meeting last week. I
agree, first of all, that Left Nav will run into scaling issues at some point
but I think Gabriel Hurley made a good point in that doing something as drastic
as getting rid of the Left Nav and replacing it with
Hi Everyone,
Here are the minutes from today's meeting.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-07-30-16.02.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-07-30-16.02.txt
Log:
Hi Sergey
On 07/24/2013 01:49 AM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
We decided to use openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org mailing list
instead of savanna-...@lists.launchpad.net for all savanna-related
communication.
I have created a mailman topic for Savanna too, so people interested
only in receiving
Hello,
Below, you can see the meeting minutes from today's Murano meeting.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/murano/2013/murano.2013-07-30-15.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/murano/2013/murano.2013-07-30-15.00.txt
Log:
Hi Stefano,
thank you!
Sincerely yours,
Sergey Lukjanov
Savanna Technical Lead
Mirantis Inc.
On Jul 30, 2013, at 21:29, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org wrote:
Hi Sergey
On 07/24/2013 01:49 AM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
We decided to use openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org mailing list
After lots of discussion, here are the image import/export/cloning blueprints
unified as a tasks API. Please reply with comments!
Take a look at this doc first:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Glance-tasks-api
It's got a related documents section with links to the previous proposals and
In our deployment we have a custom solution for the orchestration of
Openstack through the API that connects with billing and other external
systems on the back end.
We have found that most of the corruption is introduced by messaging
issues in Openstack. There are a myriad of edge cases
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Walter A. Boring IV
walter.bor...@hp.comwrote:
So how frequently would this be required and when do the results need to
be provided?
To start I'd like to propose any new driver, and then each driver upon
milestone release, or at the very least each cycle.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:56 AM, Ruslan Kamaldinov rkamaldi...@mirantis.com
wrote:
This question was asked several times. So we decided to provide a
detailed response.
1. The first question is “Why doesn’t Savanna use Heat to provision VMs?”
Generally using Heat underneath for
Hello everyone,
I'm glad to announce the 0.2.1 release of Savanna. This release contains 3
components: Savanna core, plugin for OpenStack Dashboard and diskimage-builder
elements.
Release Notes (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Savanna/ReleaseNotes/0.2.1):
Features implemented:
*
Here are the logs from the last meeting (July, 25), sorry for delay.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/savanna/2013/savanna.2013-07-25-18.06.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/savanna/2013/savanna.2013-07-25-18.06.txt
Log:
Salvatore, thanks for your feedback.
Let me comment on some of your statements
* The possibility Eugene describes in his post - a service provider being
deleted - is probably not a 'regular' use case, but more the consequence of
a potentially error-prone operation.*
Nachi initially raised a
I would love that tool, is it opened??
I've thought about such a tool myself actually. Something that keeps
enough info on the compute node to be able to analyze the actual state of
the cluster and find discrepancies for what the varying openstack db's
believe is the 'state' of the clusters.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph
l...@princessleia.com wrote:
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting tomorrow, Tuesday July 30th, at 19:00 UTC in
#openstack-meeting
Logs and meeting minutes:
Minutes:
Hi,
There will be OpenStack I18n team meeting at 0700UTC on Thursday (August
1st) in IRC channel #openstack-meeting.
The time, we use Asia/Europe friendly time. Welcome to join the meeting.
We will cover following topics this time:
Action items from the last meeting
Progress
32 matches
Mail list logo
