From: Vishvananda Ishaya [mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 9:41 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Proposal to revert per-user-quotas
On Aug 20, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Yingjun Li
Hello,
You have to add the oAuth filter (oauth_extension) in your pipeline, in
/etc/keystone/keystone.conf or /etc/keystone/keystone-paste.ini:
[pipeline:api_v3]
pipeline = access_log sizelimit url_normalize token_auth admin_token_auth
xml_body json_body oauth_extension ec2_extension
The Heat team holds a weekly meeting in #openstack-meeting, see
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HeatAgenda for more details
The next meeting is on Wed August 21st at 2000 UTC
Current topics for discussion:
- Review last weeks actions
- Reminder re FeatureProposalFreeze
- h3 blueprint
On Tue, Aug 20 2013, Thomas Maddox wrote:
[…]
I hope I'm not seeing a problem that doesn't exist, but either way I'll
learn something so, thoughts? =]
That sounds like a good idea.
--
Julien Danjou
// Free Software hacker / independent consultant
// http://julien.danjou.info
I got the solution, There is not 'enable' attribute in objectClass
inetOrgPerson
of openldap inetOrgPerson schema. Now everything is OK.
2013/8/21 XINYU ZHAO xyzje...@gmail.com
Which release are you using?
According to my experience last year when ldap backend was much more
premature, i had
Hi All,
Os: ubuntu 12.04 LTS
keystone version: stable/grizzly
I hava seen keystone-manage ssl_setup in keystone tag 2013.2.b1. but
I can't use it in my version.
So I want to know:
* how to configure ssl with keystone manual?
* how to test configure is ok?
Tks for you
Qing Long,
Here's a document in keystone FYI.
https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/doc/source/apache-httpd.rst
Meanwhile, I'm submitting a patch into devstack to enable apache and ssl
for keystone service:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/36474/
Please help me to test it if you
Hi everyone,
We would like to announce Tuskar, an OpenStack management service.
Our goal is to provide an API and UI to install and manage OpenStack at
larger scale: where you deal with racks, different hardware classes for
different purposes (storage, memory vs. cpu-intensive compute), the
On 8/20/13 1:48 PM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com wrote:
On 08/20/2013 10:42 AM, Thomas Maddox wrote:
On 8/19/13 8:21 AM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com wrote:
On 08/18/2013 04:04 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 08/17/2013 03:10 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16 2013, Jay
The full suite of neutron tests is non voting; your jenkins job is failing
because of unit tests.
The reason for this failure, I believe, is the inability of querying
neutron ports by IP using a regex.
There is a blueprint for that already registered: allow filters to use
'like' operation of
Hi,
I have been trying to use some additional capabilities in host.
As shown in the following link:
http://russellbryantnet.wordpress.com/2013/05/21/availability-zones-and-host-aggregates-in-openstack-compute-nova/
I created a flavor and an aggregate. But when I try to
boot the instance using
On 8/20/13 6:47 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/19/2013 08:27 AM, Sandy Walsh wrote:
On 08/19/2013 05:08 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18 2013, Jay Pipes wrote:
I'm proposing that in these cases, a *new* resource would be added to
the
resource table (and its ID
On 08/21/2013 02:32 PM, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
Hi everyone,
We would like to announce Tuskar, an OpenStack management service.
Our goal is to provide an API and UI to install and manage OpenStack at
larger scale: where you deal with racks, different hardware classes for
different purposes
If you miss only the 'enabled' attribute you can just turn on
'user_enabled_emulation' in [ldap] section of your config.
This way you won't need to modify LDAP schema in your server.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Qinglong.Meng mengql112...@gmail.comwrote:
I got the solution, There is not
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.comwrote:
On 08/16/2013 04:58 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
The notification messages don't translate 1:1 to database records. Even
if the notification payload includes multiple resources, we will store
those as multiple
IIUC, git sub-modules point to a specific revision of the external
repository, right? So would projects still have to explicitly update to
newer versions of the incubator code by changing that sub-module reference?
With the copy process we have now it is possible to update only part of the
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.comwrote:
In this thread about code review:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-August/013701.html
I mentioned that I thought there were too many blueprints created without
sufficient supporting design
Dolph Mathews wrote:
With regard
to:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/key-distribution-server
[...]
Dolph: you don't mention Barbican at all, does that mean that the issue
is settled and the KDS should live in keystone ?
Dolph and I talked about having a design session to
On 2013-08-21 10:03, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21 2013, Doug Hellmann wrote:
IIUC, git sub-modules point to a specific revision of the external
repository, right?
Yes.
So would projects still have to explicitly update to newer versions of
the incubator code by changing that
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Jarret Raim jarret.r...@rackspace.comwrote:
Dolph Mathews wrote:
With regard
to:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/key-distribution-server
[...]
Dolph: you don't mention Barbican at all, does that mean that the issue
is settled and the
On Aug 21, 2013, at 8:03 AM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21 2013, Doug Hellmann wrote:
IIUC, git sub-modules point to a specific revision of the external
repository, right?
Yes.
So would projects still have to explicitly update to newer versions of
the
For the case of an item that has no significant doc of its own but is
related to an extensive blueprint, how about linking to that extensive
blueprint?
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On 08/21/2013 11:44 AM, Jarret Raim wrote:
Dolph Mathews wrote:
With regard
to:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/key-distribution-server
[...]
Dolph: you don't mention Barbican at all, does that mean that the issue
is settled and the KDS should live in keystone ?
Dolph and I
--
Thanks,
-Sriram
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On 21/08/13 16:07, Doug Hellmann wrote:
IIUC, git sub-modules point to a specific revision of the external
repository,
right? So would projects still have to explicitly update to newer versions of
the incubator code by changing that sub-module reference?
Normally - Yes.
With Gerrit -
Thanks Bryan, would like to get involved more. Meet you tomorrow at 10 am
PST/ 1800 UTC.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Bryan D. Payne bdpa...@acm.org wrote:
Thursdays at 1800 UTC.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/OpenStackSecurity
-bryan
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:57 AM,
Mac Innes, Kiall wrote:
Even if Gerrit was to make it *really easy* and testable .. I'd vote
against any attempt to bring submodules into our repositories.
I can use them, and have used them successfully with teams in the past.
But it wasn't worth it. Training every new person in, and
Hi,
Really sorry, but I don't understand why using some specific oslo sync util
is simpler then git submodules?)
I mean this two things are almost the same but:
In case of oslo we are copy-pasting code
In case of submodules we are bumping commit hashs
So why submodules are terrible and
+100
If one blueprint points to another, then the pointers should be present and
available in both blueprints. Dependency linking, folks.
--Rocky
From: Mike Spreitzer [mailto:mspre...@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:04 AM
To: Daniel P. Berrange
Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing
IMHO, the jars should be served from the Apache Hadoop community. I
don't know what hoops have to jumped through for that though. It may be
far simpler to put them in the mirantis CDN.
Best,
matt
On 08/21/2013 02:21 PM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
Agreed that storing Hadoop-Swift integration
On 21/08/13 19:48, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
So why submodules are terrible and oslo-sync is good?=)
I think the biggest mistake people make with submodules, which oslo's
sync avoids, is dropping commits / Going backwards / Switching
branches on submodule - or worse - pointing at a detached commit.
Hello everyone!
We are excited to present the new release of
Stackalyticshttp://www.stackalytics.com/- 0.2. One of major features
of this release is review processing. It gives
data on who reviews most, distribution of reviews by engineers or by
modules, what is the ratio of positive to negative
Notes from today's meeting are at
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/swift/2013/swift.2013-08-21-19.01.html
--John
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Qing, you can take a look at this link:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Baremetal
Yapeng
From: Qing He [mailto:qing...@radisys.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 2:23 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] can openstack compute manage both physical
and
Attempting to submit code to Nova, I got the following error from Jenkins:
2013-08-21 17:23:55.604 | pep8 runtests: commands[0] | flake8
2013-08-21 17:23:55.615 | /home/jenkins/workspace/gate-nova-pep8$
/home/jenkins/workspace/gate-nova-pep8/.tox/pep8/bin/flake8
2013-08-21 17:25:44.400 |
Hi folks,
We'll be have the Savanna team meeting as usual in #openstack-meeting-alt
channel.
Agenda:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SavannaAgenda#Agenda_for_August.2C_22
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Savanna+Meetingiso=20130822T18
Sincerely yours,
Sergey
Thanks Aaron!
From: Aaron Rosen [mailto:aro...@nicira.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 12:24 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron]can you create network between a VM and a
physical machine in neutron?
Hi,
Yes, if you use the providernetwork
Thanks, Yapeng!
From: Yapeng Wu [mailto:yapeng...@huawei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 1:20 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] can openstack compute manage both physical
and machine machines?
Qing, you can take a look at this link:
Hi,
We are considering the LXC host device passthrough for GPU.
Is anybody already working on this LXC host device passthrough?
If it is not already done,
we are interested in implementing this LXC host device passthrough.
We want to get some opinions/comments about LXC host device passthrough.
Another question related to making oslo.db a pypi library and relevant to how
taskflow is used.
Currently taskflow has a persistence layer, its using a copy of oslo-incubator
db module to do this.
That copied code (soon to be library I hope) has the following:
db_opts = [
Technical Committee Members and OpenStack Contributors,
As you may already know, over the last seven months, contributors from a
variety of companies and backgrounds have been designing and developing the
Marconi project, a highly-scalable and redundant messaging service.
Marconi was proposed
FYI, currently 1800 UTC is 11a Pacific. Hopefully you can still make it.
Cheers,
-bryan
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Sriram Subramanian
sri...@sriramhere.comwrote:
Thanks Bryan, would like to get involved more. Meet you tomorrow at 10 am
PST/ 1800 UTC.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:07
Hi all,
The [state-management] project team holds a weekly meeting in
#openstack-meeting on thursdays, 2000 UTC. The next meeting is tomorrow, Aug
22!!!
As usual, everyone is welcome :-)
Link: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/StateManagement
Taskflow:
Josh thanks for highlighting this. This example is a good reason why oslo
libraries should decouple their useful bits from any configuration
assumptions. Much of the code already allows use without requiring you to
adopt configuration code. But we should make all of it like that.
On Wed, Aug 21,
Yes, I only get 2013.2.b1 from git tags.
2013/8/21 ZhiQiang Fan aji.zq...@gmail.com
2013.2 should be in havana?
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Qinglong.Meng mengql112...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi All,
Os: ubuntu 12.04 LTS
keystone version: stable/grizzly
I hava seen
Tks for you reply,
Can you tall me more about user_enable_emulation in keystone.conf?
Best Regards,
2013/8/21 Yuriy Taraday yorik@gmail.com
If you miss only the 'enabled' attribute you can just turn on
'user_enabled_emulation' in [ldap] section of your config.
This way you won't need to
Ok - in /etc/memcache.conf IP to listen on needs to be 0.0.0.0 not the actual
node IP address.
# IP to listen on
-l 0.0.0.0
Thx.
From: Snider, Tim
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 5:08 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [swift] temp auth tokens expire immediately
I've
There is always room for improvement I hope ;)
+openstack-dev (I think where u wanted this to go).
A question, are u thinking about organizing the 'metadata' associated with
resources?
If so it might be interesting to see if there could be a grand unification
around something like
Hi, everyone!
We are working on Climate, and we are interested in
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/configurable-ip-allocation I
see two changes connected with this bp, but they both were abandoned in the
beginning of the year. Can anyone give me an answer about implementation
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 01:14 +, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Agreed, any thoughts from the oslo folks on how this could be done
(without a major refactoring??). Can it even be done?
It will be a continuous problem for libraries which want to be
integrated with the various openstack projects,
I've been doing some pondering on how Keystone handles the various
pluggable systems with it's Manager / Driver architecture.
Currently we implement the base driver class as follows:
There is a driver object that has a number of reference functions defined
on it, each of these functions
51 matches
Mail list logo