Hi,
Don is on vacation. Lets try and have the meeting today.
Topics that come to mind:
1. https://etherpad.openstack.org/IceHouse-Nova-Scheduler-Sessions
2. Scheduling BP's that missed H. Bad timing or do we need to discuss and see
how we can improve the process
3. Open issues
Thanks
Gary
Hello,
The feature BP at
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/read-only-volumes. The
Cinder server side change (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38322/)
was done and merged, but since there was a delay of a few weeks on the
Cinder side while team debated between some design options, and
Robert Collins wrote:
Thierry, is it possible to change this to 'Deployment' rather than
TripleO in the summit tool? I think it would avoid folk interested in
Tuskar failing to find a place to submit their proposals, and as a
program we are multi-project - Tomas and I have just discussed this
Mark Washenberger wrote:
I buy an exception here if the configuration defaults to off (no change).
+1
Also don't forget to mention that new configuration option to the Docs
team to make sure they are aware of its late addition.
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
Today in the project/release status meeting, we'll check status for
feature freeze exceptions and review havana-rc1 buglists.
Feel free to add extra topics to the agenda:
[1] http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/ProjectMeeting
All Technical Leads for integrated programs should be present (if you
Hi,
We have gone through the below link for new plug-in development.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronDevelopment#Developing_a_Neutron_Plugin
Just want to confirm that is it mandatory to be Core Neutron Developer for
submitting a new plug-in.?
How do we get a reviewer for this like Can
Hi,
Anyone can submit a new plugin :). The proposed code will go through the
regular review process.
It is best to open a blueprint for the proposed plugin
(https://launchpad.net/neutron). At the moment we are in a feature freeze for
the H cycle. So the chances of it getting in now are pretty
Hi all,
I have been trying to add a new table to the database. Now, I have created
the table and I am going through conductor API to populate/update it. I have
defined some function to achieve the task. There function are defined in
conductor
and db api, along with in conductor.manage and
Hi,
I noticed Horizon has dependency to the binary code of
django_openstack_auth.
When I want to enable I18n of Horizon, I also need to enable the I18n of
django_openstack_auth ?
The po files of django_openstack_auth were out of date. (only a small
change)
Do I need to add the translation
Hi
Was looking at the below link and checking if the feature to support
Multihost networking is part of Havana.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/quantum-multihost
I couldnot find out the feature in the Havana blue print. Could you let me
know details reg. the feature ?
On 09/06/2013 03:00 PM, Andrei Savu wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Matthew Farrellee m...@redhat.com
mailto:m...@redhat.com wrote:
Once done, what will the procedure be for me to verify it without
becoming a Cloudera customer? What will the limitations be to its
use, if
I have been trying to add a new table to the database.
Just FYI, new database interfaces should be added using objects, which
are automatically remotable. New conductor interfaces should not be
added to make database queries.
#In class LocalAPI
def xx(self, context, node_id, values):
Hi folks,
due to the Incubator Application we should prepare Program name and Mission
statement for Savanna, so, I want to start mailing thread about it.
Please, provide any ideas here.
P.S. List of existing programs: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Programs
P.P.S.
My suggestion OpenStack Data Processing.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.comwrote:
Hi folks,
due to the Incubator Application we should prepare Program name and
Mission statement for Savanna, so, I want to start mailing thread about it.
Please, provide
It sounds too broad IMO. Looks like we need to define Mission Statement first.
Sincerely yours,
Sergey Lukjanov
Savanna Technical Lead
Mirantis Inc.
On Sep 10, 2013, at 17:09, Alexander Kuznetsov akuznet...@mirantis.com wrote:
My suggestion OpenStack Data Processing.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013
On Sep 10, 2013, at 4:05 AM, P Balaji-B37839 b37...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi,
We have gone through the below link for new plug-in development.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronDevelopment#Developing_a_Neutron_Plugin
Just want to confirm that is it mandatory to be Core Neutron
Assignments (user to project, group to project, user to domain, group to
domain) are OpenStack specific Data, where as Identity (users, groups,
and user to group assignments) is general organizational data. When all
of this was in a single backend, we had no choice but to force people to
use
Rough cut -
Program: OpenStack Data Processing
Mission: To provide the OpenStack community with an open, cutting edge,
performant and scalable data processing stack and associated management
interfaces.
On 09/10/2013 09:26 AM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
It sounds too broad IMO. Looks like we
On 09/10/2013 03:15 AM, lzy@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
The feature BP at
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/read-only-volumes. The
Cinder server side change (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38322/)
was done and merged, but since there was a delay of a few weeks on the
Cinder
The Heat team holds a weekly meeting in #openstack-meeting, see
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HeatAgenda for more details
The next meeting is on Wed Sept 11th at 2000 UTC
Current topics for discussion:
* Review last week's actions
* RC1 bugs
* Summit design session proposals :
A quick dictionary lookup of data processing yields the following. I
wonder if you mean something more specific.
data processing |ˈˌdædə ˈprɑsɛsɪŋ|
noun
a series of operations on data, esp. by a computer, to retrieve,
transform, or classify information.
From: Matthew Farrellee
Hi Roman,
Yes eventlet works well on PyPy, both Marconi and Swift use it.
Alex
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Roman Podolyaka rpodoly...@mirantis.comwrote:
Hi Alex,
That's really cool! I believe, performance is not the only benefit we can
get from running OpenStack projects on PyPy. We
I think Gary and Kyle have answered this very well; however I do have a few
things to add. It is definitely too late for Havana, so Icehouse is next
available release for new plugins. I can work with you offline to find you a
core sponsor.
mark
On Sep 10, 2013, at 9:37 AM, Kyle Mestery
Thanks Matt!
You can check the list of supported operating systems at:
http://www.cloudera.com/content/cloudera-content/cloudera-docs/CM4Ent/latest/Cloudera-Manager-Installation-Guide/cmig_cm_requirements.html
Cheers,
-- Andrei
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Matthew Farrellee m...@redhat.com
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Alex Gaynor wrote:
Many of you have probably seen me send review requests in the last few
weeks
about adding PyPy support to various OpenStack projects. A few people
were
confused by these, so I wanted to fill
Looking further in to this. The bug you mentioned appears to have been
marked as a duplicate of a bug that was resolved about a month ago. I
added the recheck comment to the gerrit review and Jenkins did not do
anything with it overnight. I assume it noticed that the bug was marked
as resolved.
On 09/10/2013 10:45 AM, Mark McClain wrote:
I think Gary and Kyle have answered this very well; however I do have a few
things to add. It is definitely too late for Havana, so Icehouse is next
available release for new plugins. I can work with you offline to find you a
core sponsor.
One
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2013-09-10 00:56:29 -0700:
Robert Collins wrote:
Thierry, is it possible to change this to 'Deployment' rather than
TripleO in the summit tool? I think it would avoid folk interested in
Tuskar failing to find a place to submit their proposals, and
Alex Gaynor wrote:
Many of you have probably seen me send review requests in the last few weeks
about adding PyPy support to various OpenStack projects. A few people were
confused by these, so I wanted to fill everyone in on what I'm up to :)
First, for those who aren't familiar with what
Hi Dan,
Yeah, I figured that out. I was already using objects, but
I didn't add the interface to the conductor.rpcapi. It's working
fine now.
Thanks.
~Peeyush Gupta
From: Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com
To: Peeyush Gupta gpeey...@ymail.com; OpenStack
Clint Byrum wrote:
My point is this: The summit isn't just about us sitting around pushing
our vision. We need to be open to the OpenStack Deployment tool chain
supporting other deployment models. So while I'm not sure calling it
Deployment will have a positive effect, I am also not sure that
+1 for OpenStack Data Processing and
Mission: To provide the OpenStack community with an open, cutting edge,
performant and scalable data processing stack and associated management
interfaces.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Matthew Farrellee m...@redhat.com wrote:
Rough cut -
Program:
Hi all,
I've created a temporary page for UIs mockups. Please take a look:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Savanna/UIMockups/JobCreationProposal
Chad, it's just pictures demonstrate how we see dependencies in UI. It's
not a final decision.
Guys, feel free to comment this. I think it's time to
+1 for both program name and mission statement
Sincerely yours,
Sergey Lukjanov
Savanna Technical Lead
Mirantis Inc.
On Sep 10, 2013, at 21:22, Ilya Elterman ielter...@mirantis.com wrote:
+1 for OpenStack Data Processing and
Mission: To provide the OpenStack community with an open, cutting
On 10/09/13 08:18 -0700, Alex Gaynor wrote:
Hi Roman,
Yes eventlet works well on PyPy, both Marconi and Swift use it.
Small nit, Marconi is not using eventlet. It used to depend on eventlet
because openstack.common.local did but that part is gone now.
FF
--
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
Hi everyone,
Today’s Hyper-V meeting minutes.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-09-10-16.02.html
Minutes (text):
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-09-10-16.02.txt
Log:
performant isn't a word. Or, if it is, it means having performance. I
think you mean high-performance.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Matthew Farrellee m...@redhat.com wrote:
Rough cut -
Program: OpenStack Data Processing
Mission: To provide the OpenStack community with an open, cutting
On 09/10/2013 05:03 PM, David Kang wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: David Kang dk...@isi.edu
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 4:42:41 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
- Original Message -
From: Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: David Kang dk...@isi.edu
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 4:42:41 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [pci device passthrough] fails with
On 09/10/2013 03:56 PM, David Kang wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to test pci device passthrough feature.
Havana3 is installed using Packstack on CentOS 6.4.
Nova-compute dies right after start with error NameError: global name '_' is
not defined.
I'm not sure if it is due to misconfiguration
On 09/10/2013 04:42 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 09/10/2013 03:56 PM, David Kang wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to test pci device passthrough feature.
Havana3 is installed using Packstack on CentOS 6.4.
Nova-compute dies right after start with error NameError: global name '_'
is not defined.
Hi,
I'm trying to test pci device passthrough feature.
Havana3 is installed using Packstack on CentOS 6.4.
Nova-compute dies right after start with error NameError: global name '_' is
not defined.
I'm not sure if it is due to misconfiguration of nova.conf or bug.
Any help will be
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph
l...@princessleia.com wrote:
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting tomorrow, Tuesday September 10th, at 19:00 UTC in
#openstack-meeting
Meeting minutes and logs:
Minutes:
+1
This is the best approach and one we discussed in Portland and a track most
folks are developing plugins under ML2
/Alan
-Original Message-
From: Robert Kukura [mailto:rkuk...@redhat.com]
Sent: September-10-13 12:27 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re:
First, I'm a newbie here, wondering: is this the right place for
comments/questions on blueprints? Supposing it is...
I am referring to
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/instance-group-api-extension
In my own research group we have experience with a few systems that do
something
On 10 September 2013 18:02, D.Selvaraj ds...@kent.ac.uk wrote:
I am working in providing federated access to Horizon. As of now I have
got a dropdown form that displays the list of Identity providers available
in teh Keystone. But I am confused on how to redirect the user to the
server that
- Original Message -
From: Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
To: David Kang dk...@isi.edu
Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 5:17:15 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [pci device passthrough] fails with
On 09/10/2013 04:58 PM, Mike Spreitzer wrote:
First, I'm a newbie here, wondering: is this the right place for
comments/questions on blueprints? Supposing it is...
Yes, this is the right place.
I am referring to
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/instance-group-api-extension
In
Why not OpenStack MapReduce? I think that pretty much says it all?
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Glen Campbell g...@glenc.io wrote:
performant isn't a word. Or, if it is, it means having performance. I
think you mean high-performance.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Matthew Farrellee
I vote for 'Open Stack Data'
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Zhongyue Luo zhongyue@intel.comwrote:
Why not OpenStack MapReduce? I think that pretty much says it all?
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:54 AM, Glen Campbell g...@glenc.io wrote:
performant isn't a word. Or, if it is, it means
Openstack Big Data Platform
On Sep 10, 2013, at 8:39 PM, David Scott david.sc...@cloudscaling.com wrote:
I vote for 'Open Stack Data'
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Zhongyue Luo zhongyue@intel.com wrote:
Why not OpenStack MapReduce? I think that pretty much says it all?
On
Jon Maron jma...@hortonworks.com wrote on 09/10/2013 08:50:23 PM:
From: Jon Maron jma...@hortonworks.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 09/10/2013 08:55 PM
Subject:
Hello,
I can confirm this is a bug.
I use nosetests instead for the moment.
nosetests -s test.module
nosetests -s another.test:TestCase.test_method
nosetests -s a.test:TestCase
nosetests -s /path/to/test/file.py:test_function
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Rosa, Andrea (HP Cloud Services)
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Rosa, Andrea (HP Cloud Services)
andrea.r...@hp.com wrote:
Hi all
I need to debug a specific test but when I try to run it in debug mode using
the run_tests -d (I need to attach pdb) that command fails but if I run the
script without the -d option that works.
I have a different point of view. First I will offer some assertions:
A-1) We need to keep it simple.
A-1.1) Systems that are hard to comprehend are hard to debug, and
that's bad.
A-1.2) Complex systems tend to be much more brittle than simple ones.
A-2) Scale-up operations need
Hi folks,
I will be out this week after 23:00 UTC Wednesday, so I can't hold the
glance meeting this Thursday. I'll be back next Wednesday the 19th.
Let's get those RC1 bugs finished and reviewed!
Thanks!
markwash
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
56 matches
Mail list logo
