It looks like the problem is that there is a dependency on pyudev
which only works properly on Linux. The neutron setup_hook does
properly install pyudev on Linux (explains why the tests run in the
gate), but would not work properly on windows or OS X. I assume folks
are trying to run the
Tim Bell wrote:
- Changes in default behaviour: Always likely to affect existing systems
in some way. Maybe we should have an additional type of review vote that
comes from people who are recognised as reperensting large production
deployments ?
This is my biggest worry... there are
A bunch of the TripleO folk are going to be at LCA. I'd like to cancel
the meeting rather than get them all up at (IIRC) 3am.
If folk who aren't going want to hold the meeting, thats fine - but I
won't be around to chair :)
Cheers,
Rob
--
Robert Collins rbtcoll...@hp.com
Distinguished
Looking at the calendar, our options for 1500 UTC require us to change
the day that we meet. The following days are available:
* Tuesdays
* Fridays
Thoughts?
--
Sean M. Collins
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Happy New Year!
Since we're still hashing out the logistics of changing our meeting
time, we'll meet at 2100 UTC - and hopefully transition to a new meeting
day and time by next week.
I have created a section in the wiki for today's agenda:
Hi Thierry,
Thanks for a great summary.
I don't really share your view that there is a us vs them attitude emerging
between operators and developers (but as someone with a foot in both camps
maybe I'm just thinking that because otherwise I'd become even more bi-polar
:-)
I would suggest
Just FYI this backport has now merged. Hopefully this will mean it'll get you
past now.
Cheers,
Josh
From: Joshua Hesketh [joshua.hesk...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2014 11:40 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Hi again,
I've now run the experimental job a good deal of times, and I've filed bugs
for all the issues which came out.
Most of them occurred no more than once among all test execution (I think
about 30).
They're all tagged with neutron-parallel [1]. for ease of tracking, I've
associated all
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
In-Reply-To: 52c51651.9010...@redhat.com
On 2014-01-02 08:33:37 +0100 (+0100), Matthias Runge wrote:
[...]
Djangp-bootstrap-form was added to global requirements by[1], but is
seems it's not used at all, so I propose to remove
On 12/31/2013 3:58 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi.
So while turbo hipster is new, I've been reading every failure message
it produces to make sure its not too badly wrong. There were four
failures posted last night while I slept:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64521
On 12/30/2013 09:32 PM, Anita Kuno wrote:
Please.
When your third party testing structure votes on patches and your
testing structure is not stable, it will vote with a -1 on patches.
This results in three consequences:
1. The patch it votes on starts a countdown for abandonment, this is
On 25 December 2013 05:14, Qixiaozhen qixiaoz...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi,all
A blueprint is registered that is about shrinking the volume in thin
provision.
Have you got the link?
Thin provision means allocating the disk space once the instance writes the
data on the area of volume in the
On 22 December 2013 12:07, Irena Berezovsky ire...@mellanox.com wrote:
Hi Ian,
My comments are inline
I would like to suggest to focus the next PCI-pass though IRC meeting on:
1.Closing the administration and tenant that powers the VM use
cases.
2. Decouple the nova and
On 12/20/13, 11:57 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/20/2013 04:43 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20 2013, Herndon, John Luke wrote:
I think there is probably a tolerance for duplicates but you¹re right,
missing a notification is unacceptable. Can anyone weigh in on how
This seems like a great choice, assuming that we can verify that it works
properly.
Vish
On Dec 31, 2013, at 10:33 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if it would be possible for NoVNC to switch from
websockify to sockjs-client, which is available here:
On 01/01/2014 07:33 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if it would be possible for NoVNC to switch from
websockify to sockjs-client, which is available here:
https://github.com/sockjs/sockjs-client
This has the advantage of not using flash at all (pure javascript), and
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 26/12/13 20:05 +0200, Sergey Skripnick wrote:
Hi all,
I'm surprised there is no common ssh library in oslo so I filed this
blueprint[0]. I would be happy to address any comments/suggestions.
[0]
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-01-02 01:59:23 -0800:
A bunch of the TripleO folk are going to be at LCA. I'd like to cancel
the meeting rather than get them all up at (IIRC) 3am.
If folk who aren't going want to hold the meeting, thats fine - but I
won't be around to chair :)
On 2013-12-30 04:23, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 26/12/13 20:05 +0200, Sergey Skripnick wrote:
Hi all,
I'm surprised there is no common ssh library in oslo so I filed this
blueprint[0]. I would be happy to address any comments/suggestions.
[0]
On 01/01/2014 10:56 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 7:33 PM, 黎林果 lilinguo8...@gmail.com wrote:
I have met this problem too.The units can't be run.
The end info as:
Ran 0 tests in 0.673s
OK
cp: cannot stat `.testrepository/-1': No such file or directory
2013/12/28 Jay Pipes
On 2013-12-31 20:35, Robert Collins wrote:
So, we've spoken about using containers on baremetal - e.g. the lxc
provider - in the past, and with the [righteously deserved] noise
Docker is receiving, I think we need to have a short
expectation-setting discussion.
Previously we've said that
On 01/02/2014 06:41 AM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote:
On 20/12/13 17:34, Clint Byrum wrote:
OpenStack is non-deterministic. Deterministic systems are rigid and unable
to handle failure modes of any kind of diversity.
I wonder how you are going to debug a non-deterministic system :-)
Very
On 2014-01-01 00:33, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if it would be possible for NoVNC to switch from
websockify to sockjs-client, which is available here:
https://github.com/sockjs/sockjs-client
This has the advantage of not using flash at all (pure javascript), and
continuing to
Hi Illya,
I greatly appreciate what Denis is providing to the Trove community. Thank
you for letting him devote his time to trove. Denis and I have spoken
privately at length about core (most recently a few weeks ago), and I
believe he has a good idea of how to grow into a core member. Please
To be fair, neutron cores turned down reviews [1][2][3] for fear that
the patch would break Hyper-V support for Neutron.
Whether it's been hinted (erroneously) that this was a packaging issue
is irrelevant for the sake of this discussion, and I suggested (when I
turned down review [3]) if we
On 01/02/2014 12:50 PM, Armando M. wrote:
To be fair, neutron cores turned down reviews [1][2][3] for fear that
the patch would break Hyper-V support for Neutron.
Whether it's been hinted (erroneously) that this was a packaging issue
is irrelevant for the sake of this discussion, and I
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Armando M. arma...@gmail.com wrote:
To be fair, neutron cores turned down reviews [1][2][3] for fear that
the patch would break Hyper-V support for Neutron.
Whether it's been hinted (erroneously) that this was a packaging issue
is irrelevant for the sake of
On 12/20/2013 09:26 PM, Herndon, John Luke wrote:
On Dec 20, 2013, at 12:13 PM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/20/2013 05:27 PM, Herndon, John Luke wrote:
Other protocols may support bulk consumption. My one concern with
this approach is error handling. Currently the executors
Hi John,
We had one on 12/14/2013 with the log:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/pci_passthrough_meeting/2013/pci_pa
ssthrough_meeting.2013-12-24-14.02.log.html
The next one will be at UTC 1400 on Jan. 7th, Tuesday.
--Robert
On 1/2/14 10:06 AM, John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote:
On 2014-01-03 09:43:11 +1300 (+1300), Robert Collins wrote:
I disagree here - educational institutions have followed the trend,
not set it. Likewise corporate management. The trend setting occured
IMNSHO through organisations like Novell and Microsoft disrupting the
computing marketplace
Heh, I didn't know that wiki page existed. I've added an entry to the checklist.
There's also some talk of adding some help text to the vote message
turbo-hipster leaves in gerrit, but we haven't gotten around to doing
that yet.
Cheers,
Michael
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Matt Riedemann
Hi Salvatore!,
Good work on this.
About the quota limit tests, I believe they may be unit-tested,
instead of functionally tested.
When running those tests in parallel with any other tests that rely
on having ports, networks or subnets available into quota, they have
high chances of
Another way to tackle it would be to create a dedicated tenant for
those tests, then the quota won't interact with anything else.
On 3 January 2014 10:35, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo mangel...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Salvatore!,
Good work on this.
About the quota limit tests, I believe they
On 01/02/2014 04:29 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Heh, I didn't know that wiki page existed. I've added an entry to the
checklist.
There's also some talk of adding some help text to the vote message
turbo-hipster leaves in gerrit, but we haven't gotten around to doing
that yet.
Cheers,
I took a little time to think some more about this and pushed a little
working prototype of some ideas I had
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64733/1.
Comments about the approach are most welcome. Note that I minimized any
refactoring of the existing hierarchy for this prorotype.
-David
Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com writes:
Heh, I didn't know that wiki page existed. I've added an entry to the
checklist.
There's also some talk of adding some help text to the vote message
turbo-hipster leaves in gerrit, but we haven't gotten around to doing
that yet.
I would rather not
Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes:
On 01/02/2014 04:29 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Heh, I didn't know that wiki page existed. I've added an entry to the
checklist.
There's also some talk of adding some help text to the vote message
turbo-hipster leaves in gerrit, but we haven't gotten around
On 3 January 2014 11:26, James E. Blair jebl...@openstack.org wrote:
If you are able to do this and benchmark the performance of a cloud
server reliably enough, we might be able to make progress on performance
testing, which has been long desired. The large ops test is (somewhat
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:24 AM, James E. Blair jebl...@openstack.org wrote:
However, there are _a lot_ of third-party test systems coming on-line,
and I'm not sure that expanding the recheck language to support ever
more complexity is a good idea. I can see how being able to say
recheck foo
I have a box with a newer version of pip ( 1.5 ) and it refuses to install
netaddr = 0.7.6 as it's an external/insecure pip package.This may cause
issues for devs that are running newer versions of pip than standard system
packages. There maybe other packages in the larger
On 01/02/2014 05:39 PM, Michael Still wrote:
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:24 AM, James E. Blair jebl...@openstack.org wrote:
However, there are _a lot_ of third-party test systems coming on-line,
and I'm not sure that expanding the recheck language to support ever
more complexity is a good idea.
On 1/2/14, 11:36 AM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/20/2013 09:26 PM, Herndon, John Luke wrote:
On Dec 20, 2013, at 12:13 PM, Gordon Sim g...@redhat.com wrote:
On 12/20/2013 05:27 PM, Herndon, John Luke wrote:
Other protocols may support bulk consumption. My one concern with
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
I'd love to attend this chat, if possible. A number of the coming
on-line third-party test systems are motivated by neutron plugins. I'd
get a lot from hearing this discussion.
I've created a BoF on Monday night straight
On 01/02/2014 05:58 PM, Michael Still wrote:
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
I'd love to attend this chat, if possible. A number of the coming
on-line third-party test systems are motivated by neutron plugins. I'd
get a lot from hearing this discussion.
Hi,
I¹m working on adding a vertica (www.vertica.com) storage driver to
ceilometer. I would love to get this driver into upstream. However, I¹ve
run into a bit of a snag with the tests. It looks like all of the existing
storage drivers have ³in-memory² versions that are used for unit tests.
Excerpts from Herndon, John Luke's message of 2014-01-02 15:16:26 -0800:
Hi,
I¹m working on adding a vertica (www.vertica.com) storage driver to
ceilometer. I would love to get this driver into upstream. However, I¹ve
run into a bit of a snag with the tests. It looks like all of the existing
On 01/02/2014 12:48 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
Hey all!
This morning, we experienced our first systemic breakage of the gate of
2014! There are a few reasons for this, which are related to pip and
virtualenv making new releases. The new releases do WONDERFUL things and
are more secure, but
On 1/2/14, 4:27 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Excerpts from Herndon, John Luke's message of 2014-01-02 15:16:26 -0800:
Hi,
I¹m working on adding a vertica (www.vertica.com) storage driver to
ceilometer. I would love to get this driver into upstream. However, I¹ve
run into a bit
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:24 AM, James E. Blair jebl...@openstack.org wrote:
However, there are _a lot_ of third-party test systems coming on-line,
and I'm not sure that expanding the recheck language to support ever
more
On 2014-01-02 22:46:06 + (+), Paul Czarkowski wrote:
[...]
Dropping the netaddr version to 0.7.3 fixes the error I see as
does running 'pip install --allow-all-external --allow-unverified
netaddr -r requirements.txt'
Yes, this and needing a new virtualenv release for the issue Monty
[Apologies if mesg is duplicated]
Hi Kyle/Team,
I’m looking at open daylight support in openstack and see the relevant
blueprint for the neutron plugin for ODL at
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rdowsQSYBirS634RMFePOaJu1FysjUUZtobChTkfOIY/edit
-
is there a repo where we can review the
No argument here. I agree that it's an optimization and you know what they
say about premature optimization. :-)
I do wonder whether the ongoing discussion about where container support
should live in OpenStack is relevant to this as well. Or would we not
intend to manage the TripleO
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 3 January 2014 14:34, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 3 January 2014 12:40, Herndon, John Luke john.hern...@hp.com wrote:
On 1/2/14, 4:27 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
I don’t
On 01/02/2014 08:36 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 3 January 2014 14:34, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 3 January 2014 12:40, Herndon, John Luke john.hern...@hp.com wrote:
On 1/2/14, 4:27 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
I don’t think it would be that hard to
Sean,
Tuesdays is better for China :) thank you so much.
Thanks Best Regards,
Yang Yu(于杨)
Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com
2014-01-02 18:08
Please respond to
OpenStack
A lot of elastic recheck this fall has been based on the ad hoc needs of
the moment, in between diving down into the race bugs that were
uncovered by it. This week away from it all helped provide a little
perspective on what I think we need to do to call it *done* (i.e.
something akin to a 1.0
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
A lot of elastic recheck this fall has been based on the ad hoc needs of the
moment, in between diving down into the race bugs that were uncovered by it.
This week away from it all helped provide a little perspective on what I
Hi,
I'm not sure if this question has been asked, but I wonder what is the
purpose to have the following function in ovs, linuxbridge and ml2 plugins.
disable_security_group_extension_if_noop_driver()
With this logic, if I set neutron to use NOOP firewall, creating a Nova
instance will fail,
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Clark Boylan clark.boy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
A lot of elastic recheck this fall has been based on the ad hoc needs of the
moment, in between diving down into the race bugs that were uncovered by it.
On 01/02/2014 09:44 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
snip
This is great stuff. Out of curiousity is doing the graphing with
pandas and ES vs graphite so that we can graph things in a more ad hoc
fashion?
So, we need to go to ES for the fingerprints anyway (because that's
where we mine them from),
Hi,
All
Attach a volume when creating a server, the API contains
'block_device_mapping', such as:
block_device_mapping: [
{
volume_id: VOLUME_ID,
device_name: /dev/vdc,
delete_on_termination: true
}
]
It allows the
Either day works for me. Thanks for setting it up, Sean!
On Jan 2, 2014, at 5:08 AM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com
wrote:
Looking at the calendar, our options for 1500 UTC require us to change
the day that we meet. The following days are available:
* Tuesdays
* Fridays
Hi,
All
Should we add the api to move the removed or damaged hosts?
See also: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/add-delete-host-api
Best regards!
Lee
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Its duplicate with
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/remove-nova-compute
Thanks,
Jay
2014/1/3 黎林果 lilinguo8...@gmail.com
Hi,
All
Should we add the api to move the removed or damaged hosts?
See also:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/add-delete-host-api
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Tim Bell wrote:
- Changes in default behaviour: Always likely to affect existing
systems in some way. Maybe we should have an additional type of review
vote that comes from people who are recognised as
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
Is there a mechanism to tag changes as being potentially more appropriate
for the more ops related profiles ? I'm thinking more when someone proposes
a change they suspect could have an operations impact, they could highlight
On 12/27/2013 03:52 PM, Maxime Vidori wrote:
Hi all,
I send this mail to talk about Javascript coding style improvement, like
python has pep8, it could be interesting to have some rules for javascript
too. JSHint provides some rules to perform this and I think it could be a
great idea to
Hi,
thanks a lot to all who have responded already!
Joe, thanks a lot for those comments. See below.
On 01.01.2014 01:14, Joe Gordon wrote:
This sounds like what I would imagine should be a very common use
case, so it would be really great if we can support this. And as
always support
68 matches
Mail list logo
