Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [group-policy] Changing the meeting time

2014-02-17 Thread Stephen Wong
Hi, On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.comwrote: I'd like to make it sure. The followings pages seems still have old time. Which is correct? 1700UTC or 1900UTC Thursday? Per our agreement from the previous meeting, starting from this coming Thursday

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Multiple backends

2014-02-17 Thread 한승진
You sould define the volume type related to volume backends. For example, you set lvm backend driver in your cinder.conf like below. enabled_backends=lvmdriver-1 [lvmdriver-1] volume_group=cinder-volumes volume_driver=cinder.volume.drivers.lvm.LVMISCSIDriver volume_backend_name=LVM you set your

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7Policy deletion

2014-02-17 Thread Avishay Balderman
Hi Question: Do we want to block the deletion of L7Policy if it is associated with a Vip already? In my eyes we can do that, it will drop the L7PolicyVip assoc from DB. All we have to do is invoke the driver and let him know that a L7Policy was removed. At the end of the day it will be the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

2014-02-17 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Hi Avishay, 1) I think name might be useful. Consider user forms a list of rules which route requests to a pool with static images or static pages, it may make sense to give those policy a name 'static-iamges', 'static-pages', rather then operate on ids. 2) I think updating the name is useful as

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7Policy deletion

2014-02-17 Thread Oleg Bondarev
Hi Avishay, I agree that we can do that as you proposed. However I'd like to remind that for health monitors we decided to prohibit deletion if there are any associations (https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1243129). So I'd like l7 policy deletion to be consistent with health monitor

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

2014-02-17 Thread Oleg Bondarev
Hi, On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.comwrote: Hi Avishay, 1) I think name might be useful. Consider user forms a list of rules which route requests to a pool with static images or static pages, it may make sense to give those policy a name

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] bp proposal: filter based on the load averages of the host

2014-02-17 Thread sahid
yes I want to use the load average because it is based on more information than the cpu utilization. May be instead of to add a new field to hypervisor status I can create a new monitor or update the exiting one. - Original Message - From: yunhong jiang yunhong.ji...@linux.intel.com To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

2014-02-17 Thread Samuel Bercovici
Hi, My concern is that if from some reason the driver implementer would like to reflect the name also in the backend device, than an update should also be calling the driver. Using readable names also makes sense on the back-end device. -Sam. From: Oleg Bondarev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

2014-02-17 Thread Avishay Balderman
I agree with #1 I am not sure I understand #2... Let's assume that the user created a policy named static-images. The policy was associated with a vip and it contains rules. When we have created the VipL7PolicyAssoc the driver used the L7Policy name attribute in its backend. Now we modify this

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][Keystone][Cinder] Feature proposal freeze tomorrow (Feb 18)

2014-02-17 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi everyone, Just a quick reminder that some of our projects have a deadline tomorrow (end of day, Feb 18th) for proposing Icehouse feature code for review. To my knowledge, this affects Nova, Neutron, Keystone and Cinder. This means that starting on Wednesday, Feb 19, blueprints for those

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] L7 - Update L7Policy

2014-02-17 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Folks, I wonder why using names on the backend could be needed? For the code there is no much difference between name and the id. Thanks, Eugene. On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Samuel Bercovici samu...@radware.comwrote: Hi, My concern is that if from some reason the driver implementer

[openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-17 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, It seems that the command 'reverify bug number' is not working. Anyone else experienced this lately. Thanks Gary ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Neutron] Urgent python-neutronclient release needed

2014-02-17 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
I've asked Mark McClain to tag a new release before *specifically* because we're going to hit the issue. The issue is in both master and stable/havana. Latest client releases were tagged by Mark, but since he seems to be busy these days, I think someone should step in and tag and release a new

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] port forwarding from gateway to internal hosts

2014-02-17 Thread Yair Fried
Hi, What's the status of this BP? - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/router-port-forwarding will it be ready for I3? The BP is approved but the patch is abandoned Regards Yair ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron]Do you think tanent_id should be verified

2014-02-17 Thread Yongsheng Gong
It is not easy to enhance it. If we check the tenant_id on creation, if should we also to do some job when keystone delete tenant? On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.comwrote: keystoneclient.middlware.auth_token passes a project ID (and name, for convenience)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] bp proposal: filter based on the load averages of the host

2014-02-17 Thread sahid
I have implemented a new monitor based on the system load averages https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74014/1 What do you think? s. - Original Message - From: sahid sahid.ferdja...@cloudwatt.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Neutron] Urgent python-neutronclient release needed

2014-02-17 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
And for those interested in details: the issue was triggered by 3799efe792700e773c40cc42c265eee09230 in master (15a912b1ca3c24ba8851b8b77d6de8027e120d78 in stable/havana). The required fix in neutronclient that should be released ASAP is: 02baef46968b816ac544b037297273ff6a4e8e1b. I'm going

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][QA]

2014-02-17 Thread Elena Ezhova
Hi! I am writing API tests for binding extended attributes for ports and I faced an issue that looks strange to me. The problem is that when you try to create a port with empty binding:host_id attribute the returned value depends on a plugin. For an instance, ml2 returns an empty string

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-17 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Hi Gary, That's normal, this command has been removed since Dec'13, see http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-December/021649.html -Sylvain 2014-02-17 13:00 GMT+01:00 Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com: Hi, It seems that the command 'reverify bug number' is not working. Anyone

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-17 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, The reverify no bug was removed. But reverify bug # used to work. That no longer does. With the constant gate failures how can we ensure that a approved patch does a retry? Thanks Gary From: Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@gmail.commailto:sylvain.ba...@gmail.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-17 Thread Denis Makogon
As mentioned at those email - reverify bug # must work. You may still use reverify bug # to re-enqueue if there is a bug report for a failure, and of course you are encouraged to file a bug report if there is not. Elastic-recheck is doing a great job of indicating which bugs might have

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-17 Thread Hayes, Graham
Was that not for 'reverify no bug' ? Graham On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 13:53 +0100, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Hi Gary, That's normal, this command has been removed since Dec'13, see http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-December/021649.html -Sylvain 2014-02-17 13:00

[openstack-dev] [savanna] plugin version or hadoop version?

2014-02-17 Thread Matthew Farrellee
$ savanna plugins-list +-+--+---+ | name| versions | title | +-+--+---+ | vanilla | 1.2.1| Vanilla Apache Hadoop | | hdp | 1.3.2| Hortonworks Data Platform |

[openstack-dev] [Cinder]Do you think volume force delete operation should not apply to the volume being used?

2014-02-17 Thread yunling
Hi stackers: I found that volume status become inconsistent (nova volume status is attaching, verus cinder volume status is deleted) between nova and cinder when doing volume force delete operation on an attaching volume. I think volume force delete operation should not apply to the volume

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-17 Thread Akihiro Motoki
Hi Gary, According to zuul layout.yaml [1], reverify bug # should still work but it seems to work only when verified score from jenkins is -2. https://github.com/openstack-infra/config/blob/master/modules/openstack_project/files/zuul/layout.yaml#L25 Note that core team can trigger gate jobs by

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] reverify/recheck

2014-02-17 Thread Gary Kotton
Thanks! That makes sense. Just odd how a -1 was received. On 2/17/14 3:15 PM, Akihiro Motoki mot...@da.jp.nec.com wrote: Hi Gary, According to zuul layout.yaml [1], reverify bug # should still work but it seems to work only when verified score from jenkins is -2.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [group-policy] Changing the meeting time

2014-02-17 Thread Kyle Mestery
All of the meeting pages should be updated to reflect the new 1900UTC time as Stephen mentions below. On Feb 17, 2014, at 1:52 AM, Stephen Wong s3w...@midokura.com wrote: Hi, On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Isaku Yamahata isaku.yamah...@gmail.com wrote: I'd like to make it sure. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][review] Please treat -1s on check-tripleo-*-precise as voting.

2014-02-17 Thread Derek Higgins
On 17/02/14 01:25, Robert Collins wrote: Hi! The nascent tripleo-gate is now running on all tripleo repositories, *and should pass*, but are not yet voting. They aren't voting because we cannot submit to the gate unless jenkins votes verified... *and* we have no redundancy for the

[openstack-dev] Storing license information in openstack/requirements

2014-02-17 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi everyone, A year ago there was a discussion about doing a license inventory on OpenStack dependencies, to check that they are compatible with our own license and make sure any addition gets a proper license check. Back then I proposed to leverage the openstack/requirements repository to store

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [Tempest - Stress Test] : implement a full SSH connection on ssh_floating.py and improve it

2014-02-17 Thread LELOUP Julien
Hello Marc, I'm raising this subject again since I have pushed a patch set implementing this SSH stress test in Tempest. As you suggested, I wrote it as a scenario test : I'm currently using it to check the ability of my stack to launch x servers at the same time and having them fully

[openstack-dev] [Mistral] [pylint] Mistral Repository: pylint errors

2014-02-17 Thread Timur Nurlygayanov
Hi Mistral team, We have the following critical errors in Mistral repositoryhttps://github.com/stackforge/mistral, whose I suggest to fix: Code E1101 http://pylint-messages.wikidot.com/messages:e1001, occurrences: 231 Code E1002 http://pylint-messages.wikidot.com/messages:e1002, occurrences: 9

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] py26 test failures since Thursday

2014-02-17 Thread Devananda van der Veen
Hi all, Last Thursday, a series of patches introduced sporadic failures to our python unit tests. It only showed up on the py26 tests (most of us test with py27 locally), and it only happened ~ 40% of the time, so we didn't notice it right away. The issue persisted on Friday and into the weekend

Re: [openstack-dev] Storing license information in openstack/requirements

2014-02-17 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote: Hi everyone, A year ago there was a discussion about doing a license inventory on OpenStack dependencies, to check that they are compatible with our own license and make sure any addition gets a proper license

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][VPNaaS] Re: How to implement and configure a new Neutron vpnaas driver from scratch?

2014-02-17 Thread Julio Carlos Barrera Juez
Escuse me. I add tags to subject. [image: i2cat] Julio C. Barrera Juez Office phone: +34 93 357 99 27 Distributed Applications and Networks Area (DANA) i2CAT Foundation, Barcelona, Spain http://dana.i2cat.net On 17 February 2014 12:18, Julio Carlos Barrera Juez juliocarlos.barr...@i2cat.net

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][EC2][Cinder] Asking for time to review my patches

2014-02-17 Thread Ben Nemec
Rushi, please see http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html Thanks. -Ben On 2014-02-15 07:18, Rushi Agrawal wrote: Over the last two months, I have submitted few patches which increases support of block storage volumes in OpenStack's EC2 API. The

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Nova][Heat][qa] Gate blocker bug: 1253896

2014-02-17 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi, I've provided an update on this bug (which by the way is finally not anymore #1 gate blocker!). Please see the bug report [1] I've tagged heat as well since over 50% of hits are from a non-voting heat job which is trying to ssh into machines using their private IP; this might not work with

[openstack-dev] [Mistral] Community meeting minutes - 02/17/2014

2014-02-17 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Hi, Thanks for joining the community meeting at #openstack-meeting today. Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/mistral.2014-02-17-16.00.html Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/mistral.2014-02-17-16.00.log.html Looking forward to see you again!

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Policy questions

2014-02-17 Thread Carlos Gonçalves
Hi, Firstly, I would like to thank you all for your replies! I am very much interested in taking some kind of participation on this subject, especially on service chain. I’m a entry-level guy on Neutron, but you can count on me to discuss and develop these BPs. Besides BP documents, I’ve been

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] VMware tools in oslo-incubator or straight to oslo.vmware

2014-02-17 Thread Doug Hellmann
Jeremy took care of creating the repository today, and I have set up the oslo-vmware-core and oslo-vmware-milestone groups with the appropriate members. Doug On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote: Thanks, Dims! On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:12 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Policy questions

2014-02-17 Thread Kyle Mestery
Great, welcome to the team Carlos! Look forward to collaborating with you and we’ll see you at this Thursday’s IRC meeting! Kyle On Feb 17, 2014, at 11:19 AM, Carlos Gonçalves m...@cgoncalves.pt wrote: Hi, Firstly, I would like to thank you all for your replies! I am very much

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

2014-02-17 Thread Rudra Rugge
JC, BP has been updated with the correct links. I have removed the abandoned review #3. Please review #1 and #2. 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40071/ This is the active review. There is one comment by Sean regarding adding a knob when Neutron is not used. That will be

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] plugin version or hadoop version?

2014-02-17 Thread Andrew Lazarev
IDH uses version of IDH distro and there is no direct mapping between distro version and hadoop version. E.g. IDH 2.5.1 works with apache hadoop 1.0.3. I suggest to call the field as just 'version' everywhere and assume this version as plugin specific property. Andrew. On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] nova-network in Icehouse and beyond

2014-02-17 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 1/30/2014 7:10 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote: On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com mailto:mi...@stillhq.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com mailto:cbky...@gmail.com wrote: So if nova-network doesn't go away

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] test

2014-02-17 Thread Ling Gao
This is a test. Ling Gao ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][QA]

2014-02-17 Thread Miguel Lavalle
Per commitment during last week's Neutron IRC meeting, I have classified below all the api Tempest tests in review for Neutron. This is to assist core developers in reviewing this code - Core api - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/66921 Sukhdev Kapur -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QA]

2014-02-17 Thread Anita Kuno
On 02/17/2014 03:33 PM, Miguel Lavalle wrote: Per commitment during last week's Neutron IRC meeting, I have classified below all the api Tempest tests in review for Neutron. This is to assist core developers in reviewing this code - Core api - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/66921

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] plugin version or hadoop version?

2014-02-17 Thread John Speidel
Andrew +1 The HDP plugin also returns the HDP distro version. The version needs to make sense in the context of the plugin. Also, many plugins including the HDP plugin will support deployment of several hadoop versions. -John On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Andrew Lazarev

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

2014-02-17 Thread jc Martin
Thanks, Do you have the links for the discussions ? Thanks, JC Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2014, at 11:29 AM, Rudra Rugge rru...@juniper.net wrote: JC, BP has been updated with the correct links. I have removed the abandoned review #3. Please review #1 and #2. 1.

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] plugin version or hadoop version?

2014-02-17 Thread Alexander Ignatov
Agree to rename this legacy field to ‘version’. Adding to John's words about HDP, Vanilla plugin is able to run different hadoop versions by doing some manipulations with DIB scripts :-) So the right name of this field should be ‘version’ as version of engine of concrete plugin. Regards,

[openstack-dev] [solum] Question about solum-minimal-cli BP

2014-02-17 Thread Shaunak Kashyap
Hey folks, I was reading through https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/FeatureBlueprints/CLI-minimal-implementation and have a question. If I’m understanding “app create” and “assembly create” correctly, the user will have to run “app create” first, followed by “assembly create” to have a

[openstack-dev] [infra] Meeting Tuesday February 18th at 19:00 UTC

2014-02-17 Thread Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph
Hi everyone, The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly meeting tomorrow, Tuesday February 18th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Meeting agenda available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is welcome to to add agenda items) Everyone

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Meetup Summary

2014-02-17 Thread Russell Bryant
Greetings, Last week we had an in-person Nova meetup. Bluehost was a wonderful and generous host. Many thanks to them. :-) Here's some observations and a summary of some of the things that we discussed: 1) Mark McClain (Neutron PTL) and and Mark Washenberger (Glance PTL) both attended.

[openstack-dev] [Horizon] User friendly error messages

2014-02-17 Thread George Peristerakis
Hello everyone, Last week, the discussion on user friendly error messages was touched on during the meeting. There's a blueprint in place https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/improve-error-message-details-for-usability I want to get the ball rolling and get some feedback on it.

Re: [openstack-dev] Storing license information in openstack/requirements

2014-02-17 Thread Sean Dague
Honestly, if we are going to track this, we should probably do the set of things that reviewers tend to do when running through these. License: Upstream Location: Ubuntu/Debian Package: Y/N? (url) Fedora Package: Y/N? (url) Suse Package: Y/N? (url) Last Release: Date (in case of abandonware)

Re: [openstack-dev] [All]Optional dependencies and requirements.txt

2014-02-17 Thread Ben Nemec
On 2014-02-12 21:35, David Koo wrote: Most of the reason for the #2 there is for plugins that taskflow can use (but which are not required for all users). Ideally there would be more dynamic way to list requirements of libraries and projects, one that actually changes depends on the features

Re: [openstack-dev] [All]Optional dependencies and requirements.txt

2014-02-17 Thread Ben Nemec
On 2014-02-12 18:22, David Koo wrote: We could use a separate requirements file for each driver, following a naming convention to let installation tools pick up the right file. For example, oslo.messaging might include amqp-requirements.txt, qpid-requirements.txt, zmq-requirements.txt, etc.

[openstack-dev] [Tripleo]help needed - nodepool and zuul support for ci-overcloud

2014-02-17 Thread Robert Collins
So we experimented with the ci-overcloud (a TripleO deployed cloud for running CI for TripleO) and it uncovered some bugs/limitations in nodepool and zuul. We need to fix these to reduce our negative impact on the Openstack-infra team, before they'll be comfortable having the ci-overcloud back in

Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] Question about solum-minimal-cli BP

2014-02-17 Thread devdatta kulkarni
Hi Shaunak, -Original Message- From: Shaunak Kashyap shaunak.kash...@rackspace.com Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 3:47pm To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [solum] Question about solum-minimal-cli BP

Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] Question about solum-minimal-cli BP

2014-02-17 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 17/02/14 21:47 +, Shaunak Kashyap wrote: Hey folks, I was reading through https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/FeatureBlueprints/CLI-minimal-implementation and have a question. If I’m understanding “app create” and “assembly create” correctly, the user will have to run “app create”

Re: [openstack-dev] Storing license information in openstack/requirements

2014-02-17 Thread Joshua Harlow
+1 for yaml instead of shoving all kinds of package metadata in comments. Sent from my really tiny device... On Feb 17, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Honestly, if we are going to track this, we should probably do the set of things that reviewers tend to do when running

Re: [openstack-dev] Storing license information in openstack/requirements

2014-02-17 Thread David Koo
Should we store licensing information as a comment in the *-requirements files ? Can it be stored on the same line ? Something like: oslo.messaging=1.3.0a4 # Apache-2.0 Since it's licenses we're tracking shouldn't we be tracking indirect dependencies too (i.e. packages pulled in by

Re: [openstack-dev] Sent the first batch of invitations to Atlanta's Summit

2014-02-17 Thread Robert Collins
How do you put the code in? It's asking for a credit card no matter what I do.. On 29 January 2014 09:45, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org wrote: A few minutes ago we sent the first batch of invites to people who contributed to any of the official OpenStack programs[1] from 00:00 UTC on

Re: [openstack-dev] Sent the first batch of invitations to Atlanta's Summit

2014-02-17 Thread Robert Collins
On 18 February 2014 13:25, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: How do you put the code in? It's asking for a credit card no matter what I do.. NVM. Found the nicely styled small text in low contrast colour. /me headdesks -- Robert Collins rbtcoll...@hp.com Distinguished

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Need a new DSL for Murano

2014-02-17 Thread Keith Bray
Can someone elaborate further on the things that Murano is intended to solve within the OpenStack ecosystem? My observation has been that Murano has changed from a Windows focused Deployment Service to a Metadata Application Catalog Workflow thing (I fully admit this may be an invalid

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] plugin version or hadoop version?

2014-02-17 Thread Matthew Farrellee
ok, i spent a little time looking at what the change impacts and it looks like all the template validations we have currently require hadoop_version. additionally, the client uses the name and documentation references it. due to the large number of changes and the difficulty in providing

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][wsme][pecan] Need help for ceilometer havana alarm issue

2014-02-17 Thread ZhiQiang Fan
Hi, When I try to figure out the root cause of bug[1], I found that once wsme.exc.ClientSideError is triggerd when create an alarm, assume the faultstring is x, then if next http trigger a EntityNotFound(Exception) will get http response with faultstring equal to x. I trace the calling stack

Re: [openstack-dev] Sent the first batch of invitations to Atlanta's Summit

2014-02-17 Thread Steve Kowalik
On 18/02/14 11:26, Robert Collins wrote: NVM. Found the nicely styled small text in low contrast colour. /me headdesks I found it completely non-obvious too, and had to go back and look for the link. If the promotion code text box was always visible with the Apply button grayed out when the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove] Trove-Gate timeouts

2014-02-17 Thread Lowery, Mathew
Hi Nikhil, This is great! You may have assumed this but I wanted to be explicit: To get the higher timeout, I think all that needs to be done is to upgrade the boot-hpcloud-vm plugin. Then the plugin will pass the current timeout (7200 in rdjenkins) down to the net-ssl-simple library. (This is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove] Trove-Gate timeouts

2014-02-17 Thread Nikhil Manchanda
Hi Mat: If I recall correctly, rdjenkins is actually running a version of the plugin specifically built by Matty for it (should be the latest). I'm not sure why it's still hitting the timeout issue mentioned earlier, so we'll have to check with Matty and try to figure out what the deal with that

[openstack-dev] [gantt] Scheduler sub-group meeting 2/18 - Agenda

2014-02-17 Thread Dugger, Donald D
1) Mid-cycle meetup summary 2) No-db scheduler -- Don Dugger Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale Ph: 303/443-3786 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [stable/havana] cherry backport, multiple external networks, passing tests

2014-02-17 Thread Li Ma
Hi, I tested the code and found it difficult to use. I have a Open vSwitch+VXLAN neutron environment with multiple external networks. I'd like to serve all the external network via only one L3-agent. I applied this patch to l3_agent.py and also modified l3_agent.ini: external_network_bridge =

Re: [openstack-dev] VPC Proposal

2014-02-17 Thread Rudra Rugge
I am not sure on how to dig out the archives. There were a couple of emails exchanged with Salvatore on the thread pertaining to the extensions we were referring to as part of this blueprint. There are a few notes on the whiteboard of the blueprint as well. Regards, Rudra On 2/17/14, 1:28 PM,

[openstack-dev] [Nova] libvirt doesn't migrate cdrom devices?

2014-02-17 Thread Michael Still
Hi. For the last day or so I've been chasing https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1246201, and I think I've found the problem... libvirt doesn't migrate devices of type cdrom, even if they're virtual. If I change the type of the config drive to disk, then block migration works just fine. Does

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Need a new DSL for Murano

2014-02-17 Thread Stan Lagun
Keith, I believe it is the same place Marketplace has in AWS or OpenShift Application Gallery to Red Hat OpenShift. The idea was of having free/open app catalog that cloud admins can fill with application metadata describing those apps and then end users construct environments from those

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] renaming: initial voting

2014-02-17 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Currently, we have only 19/47 votes, so, I'm adding one more day. On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.comwrote: Hi folks, I've created a poll to select 10 candidates for new Savanna name. It's a first round of selecting new name for our lovely project. This