Hi All,
As this bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1167931) says, we have
to do sth:
1) Just remove 'reattach' in file 'cinder/bin/cinder-manage'. I didn't find
any reference to this call. it's om to remove it.
2) If we keep it, 'reattach' function in cinder-manage will be moved to
Is there any use case for reattach?
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Ray Chen chenrano2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
As this bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1167931) says, we
have to do sth:
1) Just remove 'reattach' in file 'cinder/bin/cinder-manage'. I didn't
find any
Just for clarification. Jenkins link in the description puts the generated
HTML in the section Juno approved specs even tho' the blueprint is still
being reviewed. Am I looking at the right link?
Regards,
Mandeep
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Mike Scherbakov
mscherba...@mirantis.comwrote:
Aaron
One use case is that tenant would like to put all the servers in a single
broadcast domain (thus single IP/subnet domain). The servers can include
the 3 tier servers (web database and application server). Why would he do
that - Because it is simpler.
Then the tenant would like to put
Yes. It shows up in the approved section since it's just a build of the
patch as-is.
The link is titled gate-neutron-specs-docs in the message from Jenkins.
--
Kevin Benton
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Mandeep Dhami dh...@noironetworks.comwrote:
Just for clarification. Jenkins link in
That's because spec was proposed to the juno/ folder. Look at
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openstack/neutron-specs/master/doc/source/index.rst,
if spec is in juno/ folder, then contents shows it as approved one.
Once merged, it means approved, right? So it is going to be Ok after merge.
Hi, Ceilometer dev cores,
There is a patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/66006/, which is
backported from 59669, aims at fixing bug :
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1257232 in havana branch, but it
is blocked by
Alan Pevec
Feb 11
Patch Set 4: Do not merge
2013.2.2 freeze
Got it. Thanks.
Regards,
Mandeep
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Mike Scherbakov
mscherba...@mirantis.comwrote:
That's because spec was proposed to the juno/ folder. Look at
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openstack/neutron-specs/master/doc/source/index.rst,
if spec is in juno/ folder,
I plan to register a blueprints in nova for record this. Can I?
-邮件原件-
发件人: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2014年4月20日 21:06
收件人: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
主题: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron][Cinder][Heat]Should we support tags for
os resources?
On Sun,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.comwrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Oleg Bondarev obonda...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi all,
While investigating possible options for Nova-network to Neutron
migration
I faced a couple of issues with libvirt.
One
+1
Ruslan, congratulations!
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.com wrote:
Ruslan,
welcome to the Murano core team :)!
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Anastasia Kuznetsova
akuznets...@mirantis.com wrote:
+1
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Stan Lagun
Hi all,
We have many new bugs in Murano and I suggest to conduct the meeting and
discuss all bugs, assign these bugs to developers and set the mailstones.
Let's schedule this meeting on 04/23/14, at 16:00 UTC, im #murano IRC.
Thank you!
--
Timur,
QA Engineer
OpenStack Projects
Mirantis Inc
Hi,
(2014/04/17 21:29), CARVER, PAUL wrote:
Akihiro Motoki wrote:
To cope with such cases, allowed-address-pairs extension was implemented.
http://docs.openstack.org/api/openstack-network/2.0/content/allowed_address_pair_ext_ops.html
Question on this in particular: Is a tenant permitted to
Thank you, guys :)
Ruslan
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Timur Nurlygayanov
tnurlygaya...@mirantis.com wrote:
+1
Ruslan, congratulations!
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.com wrote:
Ruslan,
welcome to the Murano core team :)!
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at
Hi Liu sheng,
We're also investigating alarm_evaluator performance.
We observed that alarm_evaluator spends half of the time for calling
ceilometerclient while evaluating alarms.
Allowing alarm_evaluator directly access db will greatly improve the
performance if you have many alarms.
Best
How does it impact development process? If I change code of, let's say,
shotgun, and then run make iso, will I get an ISO with my code of
shotgun? What about other packages, sources of which I did not touch (let's
say nailgun) ?
Everything is packaged, with two exceptions: *astute* and
Hi,
As per I understand, onwards qemu 1.3 release all qemu-kvm features have been
merged into upstream QEMU. So, if I use qemu 1.7.1 and use the -enable-kvm
flag, the VM will use all kvm capabilities.
I have a Openstack Grizzly deployment with nova-network and I want to use qemu
1.7.1. So, I
I'm trying to deploy ironic with devstack. I'm following the instructions @
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ironic/dev/dev-quickstart.html#deploying-ironic-with-devstack.
It is failing to start nova-scheduler and failing with below error.
2014-04-21 08:01:13.005 INFO nova.virt.driver
Hi,
This is regarding the new teeth agent that is proposed in Ironic. I
understand that the teeth agent is still under development, but is there
some document available on how I can include the teeth agent in my ramdisk,
so that I can get it handshaked with the ironic driver.
I just checked the
(2014/04/21 18:10), Oleg Bondarev wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 9:10 PM, Kyle Mestery
mest...@noironetworks.commailto:mest...@noironetworks.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Oleg Bondarev
obonda...@mirantis.commailto:obonda...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi all,
While investigating
Hi All,
As this bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1167931) says, we have
to do sth:
1) Just remove 'reattach' in file 'cinder/bin/cinder-manage'. I didn't find
any reference to this call. it's om to remove it.
2) If we keep it, 'reattach' function in cinder-manage will be moved to
Hi,
You may want to take a look at:
https://github.com/openstack/ironic-python-agent/blob/master/imagebuild/coreos/README.md
https://github.com/openstack/ironic-python-agent/blob/master/imagebuild/coreos/oem/run.sh#L5-L10
It uses its own build scripts and builds image based on coreos
We discussed this with the Glance community back in January and it was agreed
that we should extend Glance's scope to include Heat templates as well as other
artifacts. I'm planning on submitting some patches around this during Juno.
Adding the Glance tag as this is relevant to them as well.
Please provide the log file： /var/log/swift/swift.log AND
/var/log/keystone/keystone.log
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Sumit Gaur sumitkg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I using jclouds lib integrated with Openstack Swift+ keystone combination.
Things are working fine except stability test.
Hi,
I think both PTL candidates mentioned process improvements wrt
contributions and reviews in their candidacy announcements. As a new
Neutron dev I have seen that it is easy for reviews to go unnoticed,
especially when they are stand-alone bug fixes that aren't part of a
particular blueprint
Now that the branchless tempest idea is gaining steam, we have to
address this issue along with how we handle releases that are not longer
supported upstream. The current state of running master tempest against
stable havana can be seen in the bottom two jenkins entries at
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:38 AM, mar...@redhat.com mandr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I think both PTL candidates mentioned process improvements wrt
contributions and reviews in their candidacy announcements. As a new
Neutron dev I have seen that it is easy for reviews to go unnoticed,
Hi Marios,
Just my two cents. I have found these Review Jam's to be quite useful.
Ironic has been able to accomplish quite a bit having this style of review,
and I believe been able to provide good concise reviews back to the Devs.
Chris Krelle
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:38 AM,
On 21/04/14 18:29, Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:38 AM, mar...@redhat.com mandr...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi,
I think both PTL candidates mentioned process improvements wrt
contributions and reviews in their candidacy announcements. As a new
Neutron dev I have seen that it is
This is a development list, and this sounds like a usage question so I
would suggest that you ask on the users list instead:
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Thanks.
-Ben
On 04/18/2014 09:36 PM, shenwei9008 wrote:
I hava a problem that in windows 7 VM about the
Please don't make review requests on the list. Details here:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html
Thanks.
-Ben
On 04/20/2014 02:44 PM, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew wrote:
Hi all,
Can I please ask for some reviews on the following:
This is a development list and your question sounds like a usage one. I
suggest you ask it on the users list:
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Thanks.
-Ben
On 04/21/2014 05:34 AM, Arindam Choudhury wrote:
Hi,
As per I understand, onwards qemu 1.3 release all
+1
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 8:54 AM, mar...@redhat.com mandr...@redhat.comwrote:
On 21/04/14 18:29, Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:38 AM, mar...@redhat.com mandr...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi,
I think both PTL candidates mentioned process improvements wrt
contributions and
+1 for the alternate slots.
Ghe Rivero
El 21/04/2014 17:57, mar...@redhat.com mandr...@redhat.com escribió:
On 21/04/14 18:29, Kyle Mestery wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:38 AM, mar...@redhat.com mandr...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi,
I think both PTL candidates mentioned process
Hi,
Previously Neutron team had ReviewDays [1] and core members made themselves
focus on reviews and be available on IRC channel one or more day(s) of each week
(as possible as they can).
The number of neutron reviews has increased compared to that time and
I am afraid one or two days reviews
Hi folks
I'm +1 for Review Hour on IRC because it shorten communication round
trip time.
As Akihiro said, it won't solve everything, but we can improve it
Best
Nachi
2014-04-21 9:20 GMT-07:00 Akihiro Motoki amot...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Previously Neutron team had ReviewDays [1] and core members
+1 excellent idea!
Fawad Khaliq
(m) +1 408.966.2214
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
Hi folks
I'm +1 for Review Hour on IRC because it shorten communication round
trip time.
As Akihiro said, it won't solve everything, but we can improve it
Best
Nachi
I propose that we add Victor Stinner (haypo on freenode) to the Oslo
core reviewers team.
Victor is a Python core contributor, and works on the development team
at eNovance. He created trollius, a port of Python 3's tulip/asyncio
module to Python 2, at least in part to enable a driver for
If scaling becomes the issue, you can always do review at sub-team level
with at least two cores in each review meeting (say neutron-parity, ML2,
Services, LBaaS, etc). But probably best to start with one meeting and hit
that scale issue first.
Regards,
Mandeep
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:20 AM,
Hi Everyone,
The Barbican team is hosting our weekly meeting today, Monday April 21, at
20:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt
Meeting agenda is avaialbe here
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Barbican and everyone is welcomed
to add agenda items
You can check this link
On 21/04/14 19:20, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
Hi,
Previously Neutron team had ReviewDays [1] and core members made themselves
focus on reviews and be available on IRC channel one or more day(s) of each
week
(as possible as they can).
The number of neutron reviews has increased compared to
Hi everyone,
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting tomorrow, Tuesday April 22nd, at 19:00 UTC in
#openstack-meeting
Meeting agenda available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is
welcome to to add agenda items)
Everyone
Alex, thanks for your answer very much.
--jyh
-Original Message-
From: Alex Xu [mailto:x...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 7:06 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions);
Christopher Yeoh
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] How to add a property
+1 from me.
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
I propose that we add Victor Stinner (haypo on freenode) to the Oslo
core reviewers team.
Victor is a Python core contributor, and works on the development team
at eNovance. He created trollius, a
You know the drill - fill in anything you wish to discuss.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-IPv6-Subteam#Agenda_for_April_21st
--
Sean M. Collins
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Great questions, Shaunak. Yep I've been thinking about this for a while but
not sure I have complete conclusions. More below.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Shaunak Kashyap
shaunak.kash...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hi folks,
As part of working on
Hi,
Despite there are some good use cases for the re-encryption I think it’s out of
scope for a Load Balancer. We can defer that functionality to the VPN – as long
as we have a mechanism to insert a LoadBalancer as a VPN node we should get all
kind of encryption infrastructure “for free”.
I
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:56 AM, mar...@redhat.com mandr...@redhat.com wrote:
On 21/04/14 19:20, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
Hi,
Previously Neutron team had ReviewDays [1] and core members made themselves
focus on reviews and be available on IRC channel one or more day(s) of each
week
(as
For the upcoming Summit there are 3 sessions filed around Service
VMs in Neutron. After discussing this with a few different people,
I'd like to propose the idea that the Service VM work be moved out
of Neutron and into it's own project on stackforge. There are a few
reasons for this:
1. There is
On Apr 21, 2014, at 3:07 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com wrote:
For the upcoming Summit there are 3 sessions filed around Service
VMs in Neutron. After discussing this with a few different people,
I'd like to propose the idea that the Service VM work be moved out
of Neutron and
Absolutely. Feel free.
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Huangtianhua huangtian...@huawei.comwrote:
I plan to register a blueprints in nova for record this. Can I?
-邮件原件-
发件人: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2014年4月20日 21:06
收件人: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
主题:
Hi Tianhua, Jay,
A blueprint has already been submitted in this regard:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZqW7qeyHTm9AQt28GUdfv46ui9mz09UQNvjXiewOAys/edit#
We've been working to implement a generic tagging framework where tags are
a first class resource and other resources can be associated
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 13:15 -0700, Vijay B wrote:
Hi Tianhua, Jay,
A blueprint has already been submitted in this regard:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZqW7qeyHTm9AQt28GUdfv46ui9mz09UQNvjXiewOAys/edit#
We've been working to implement a generic tagging framework where tags
We use postgresql 8 on master node right now. At some point we will have to
migrate to 9th version. And database migration can became painful part of
master node upgrade at that point.
At the moment part of our developers use psql9 in their environments and
see no issues. Should we enforce
On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 00:55 +0400, Dmitry Pyzhov wrote:
We use postgresql 8 on master node right now. At some point we will
have to migrate to 9th version. And database migration can became
painful part of master node upgrade at that point.
At the moment part of our developers use psql9 in
Hi team!
In light of discussions about ceilometer backends, we decided to test
performance of different
storage backends with collector and api services because these services
depend on backends availability.
For the collector testing we are using not completely real data, we are
generating
Hi Team,
Please join me in welcoming the following students to our GSoC program
[1]. Congrats everyone. Now the hard work begins :) Have fun as well.
Artem Shepelev
Kumar Rishabh
Manishanker Talusani
Masaru Nomura
Prashanth Raghu
Tzanetos Balitsaris
Victoria Martínez de la Cruz
-- dims
[1]
On 04/17/2014 03:06 PM, Chad Roberts wrote:
Per blueprint
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/merge-sahara-dashboard we are
merging the Sahara Dashboard UI code into the Horizon code base.
Over the last week, I have been working on making this merge happen and along
the way some
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com wrote:
For the upcoming Summit there are 3 sessions filed around Service
VMs in Neutron. After discussing this with a few different people,
I'd like to propose the idea that the Service VM work be moved out
of Neutron and
Excerpts from Eichberger, German's message of 2014-04-21 11:51:05 -0700:
Hi,
Despite there are some good use cases for the re-encryption I think it’s out
of scope for a Load Balancer. We can defer that functionality to the VPN – as
long as we have a mechanism to insert a LoadBalancer as a
+++
We already use PostgreSQL 9 on some of our dev boxes, and Nailgun
works fine in fake mode and unit tests, so the risk of upgrading it
now is minimal. I agree with Dmitry P. that it will cost us more to
postpone it and make that upgrade a part of Fuel upgrade.
-DmitryB
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014
+MAX_ULONG :-)
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko dborodae...@mirantis.com
wrote:
+++
We already use PostgreSQL 9 on some of our dev boxes, and Nailgun
works fine in fake mode and unit tests, so the risk of upgrading it
now is minimal. I agree with Dmitry P. that it will
Have you considered filing a blueprint for this? It'd be good to keep
this on the radar.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints#Neutron
--
Sean M. Collins
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Hi all,
In compute/manager.py the function wrap_instance_event() just calls
function().
This means that if it's used to decorate a function that returns a
value, then the caller will never see the return code.
Is this a bug, or is the expectation that we would only ever use this
wrapper
Hello All,
For anyone interested in the Microsoft .NET side of things... The .NET SDK
project has a high level architecture document with details on our design for
extensibility. If anyone is interested, the doc can be found here:
I nearly opened a spec for this, but I'd really like to get some feedback
first. One of the challenges I've seen lately for Nova teams not using KVM or
Xen (Ironic and LXC are just a few) is how to properly run the subset of
Compute tests that will run for their hypervisor or driver. Regexes
Hi Wayne,
Thanks for sharing this!
Alessandro
On 22/apr/2014, at 01:41, Foley, Wayne
wayne.fo...@hp.commailto:wayne.fo...@hp.com wrote:
Hello All,
For anyone interested in the Microsoft .NET side of things… The .NET SDK
project has a high level architecture document with details on our
German:
I'm hearing from a lot of different sources / organizations on this list
that re-encryption at the load balancer is a must-have feature. And I was
already part of previous discussions on SSL functionality. (
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/SSL )
Also, even if the load
This is interesting. How is key distribution handled when I want to use OE
with someone like Google.com for example?
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com
wrote:
Guys,
I here thinking about IPSec when with IPv6 and, one of the first
ideas/wishes of
Hi folks!
I am working to add Sheepdog as a disk backend for the libvirt driver. I
have a blueprint started and an early version of the code. However I am
having trouble working my way thorough the code in the libvirt driver. The
storage code doesn't feel vary modular to start with and my changes
So we are trying to create an instance (Precise Cloud Image) via nova with
two NICs. It appears that the second Interface does not get configured.
Does the Image Itself need to contain the configuration for the 2nd
Interface or is this something the Neuton/Nova should take care of us
Are the two NICs on the same or different networks? Currently there is a
limitation of Nova that does not permit two NICs to be attached to the same
Neutron network.
--
Kevin Benton
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Hopper, Justin justin.hop...@hp.comwrote:
So we are trying to create an
They are on separate Networks.
Justin Hopper
Software Engineer - DBaaS
irc: juice | gpg: EA238CF3 | twt: @justinhopper
From: Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Monday, April 21, 2014 at
I've pulled the summit talks into an etherpad
(https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-icehouse-summit) - btw, who
can review these within the system itself?
Anyhow - please put comments in the etherpad and help select the
sessions we'll do during the summit.
I think we need to ensure
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 10:52:39PM +, Daryl Walleck wrote:
I nearly opened a spec for this, but I'd really like to get some feedback
first. One of the challenges I've seen lately for Nova teams not using KVM or
Xen (Ironic and LXC are just a few) is how to properly run the subset of
Just uploaded a nova-specs for review related to this topic:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88755/
Can any of you help review and show your comments if any?
2014-01-13 22:56 GMT+08:00 Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.com:
Thanks Russell, will add this to V3 api ad leave V2 API as it is.
Regards,
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com
wrote:
For the upcoming Summit there are 3 sessions filed around Service
VMs in Neutron. After discussing this with a few different people,
Thanks very much.
I have register the blueprints for nova.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/add-tags-for-os-resources
The simple plan is:
1. Add the tags api (create tags/delete tags/describe tags) for v3 api
2. Change the implement for instance from “metadata” to “tags”
+1 for its own project for service VM.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com
wrote:
For the
Hello Eugene!
Are you talking about seeing the code in a simplified approach for a
single create call using the current API objects, or one that uses
objects created based on the proposal?
I was experimenting over the weekend on getting a single create call in
the current API model. I was able
Just for live snapshot, my understanding is the instance state will not be
saved.
From: Cristian Tomoiaga [mailto:ctomoi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 6:20 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nova and LVM thin support
Hello everyone,
Before
Sorry for the late notice but I can't make it this week (I got called for jury
duty). If people want to hang out on the IRC channel (#openstack-meeting at
1500 UTC) the list of things I wanted to go over was:
1) Open action items
a. The wiki page is there
Hi,
I'm guessing the scripts inside your guest is only setup to configure dhcp
on the first interface. See /etc/network/interfaces
Best,
Aaron
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Hopper, Justin justin.hop...@hp.comwrote:
They are on separate Networks.
Justin Hopper
Software Engineer -
No worries, I'll handle it.
-Sylvain
Le 22 avr. 2014 06:29, Dugger, Donald D donald.d.dug...@intel.com a
écrit :
Sorry for the late notice but I can't make it this week (I got called for
jury duty). If people want to hang out on the IRC channel
(#openstack-meeting at 1500 UTC) the list of
On Apr 21, 2014, at 1:51 PM, Eichberger, German
german.eichber...@hp.commailto:german.eichber...@hp.com
wrote:
Hi,
Despite there are some good use cases for the re-encryption I think it’s out of
scope for a Load Balancer. We can defer that functionality to the VPN – as long
as we have a
Hi xueyan,
You can do it by yourself via the following link:
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Li Ma
- Original Message -
From: l adolphxue...@163.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: 星期一, 2014年 4 月 21日 上午 10:56:08
Subject: [openstack-dev]
86 matches
Mail list logo
