Hi all
I'm getting follwoing error when trying to run nova-compute service..
if ret is None: raise libvirtError ('virNodeListDevices() failed',
conn=self)
2014-04-29 00:51:47.153 28127 TRACE nova.openstack.common.threadgroup
libvirtError: this function is not supported by the connection driver:
Hi all:
Currently I'm working on ssl vpn, based on patchsets by Nachi[1] and Rajesh[2]
There are secure issues pointed by mark, that ssl private keys are
stored plain in database and in config files of vpn-agents. As
Barbican is incubated, we can store certs and their private keys in
Barbican.
Currently, Nova API achieve this feature based on the database’s REGEX support.
Do you have advice on alternative way to achieve it?
--
zhangleiqiang (Trump)
Best Regards
From: laserjetyang [mailto:laserjety...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 1:49 PM
To: OpenStack Development
On 29 April 2014 12:27, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure: domain names are unambiguous but user mutable, whereas Heat's approach
to using admin tenant name is at risk to both mutability and ambiguity (in
a multi-domain deployment).
Isn't domainname/user unambiguous and
Hi, all:
I find in some of the cinder backend volume drivers, there are codes in
create_volume as follows:
#cinder.volume.drivers.lvm
def _sizestr(self, size_in_g):
if int(size_in_g) == 0:
return '100m'
Similar
Hi all,
I have a patch in flight at the moment [0] to install check_mk server and
compliment the already merged installation of check_mk agent [1] so my thoughts
are now turning to how we would recommend adding new service checks.
The concept behind check_mk makes this really simple to do.
Hi, all:
I find Nova has supported volume encryption for LVM volume ([1]).
Currently , qcow2 also support encryption now, and there is libvirt's support
too ([2]). After reading up the implementation, qcow2's support can be added to
current framework.
Do you think it is
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 09:17:05AM +, Zhangleiqiang (Trump) wrote:
Hi, all:
I find Nova has supported volume encryption for LVM volume ([1]).
Currently , qcow2 also support encryption now, and there is libvirt's
support too ([2]). After reading up the implementation, qcow2's
Hi,guys:
There is a nova-specs add force detach volume to nova
（https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84048/）that need more review.
It has core review +1 by John. I wish it could be merged before May Day.
Thanks your help a lot!
app:ds:May%20Day
___
On 28/04/14 17:41 +, Janczuk, Tomasz wrote:
Hello,
Have any performance numbers been published for Marconi? I have asked this
question before
(http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/031004.html) but
there were none at that time.
Hi Tomasz,
Some folks in the
@Daniel:
Thanks for your explanation, it helps me a lot.
--
zhangleiqiang (Trump)
Best Regards
-Original Message-
From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 5:33 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Hi all,
Dima, I think I understand your reasoning but I have some issues with that.
I agree that binary logic is much more straightforward and easy to
understand and use. But following that logic, having the only one hardcoded
consistency level is even easier and more understandable.
As I can
Hi,
Thanks to all those involved. Any chance of restoring the Diff side by side
button. The new interface may take a while to get used to. In the past there
was a link to the current branch patches. That too is missing.
Thanks
Gary
___
OpenStack-dev
Hi,
I think it is a good idea to have the use cases in a different document that
API proposals (Stephen's, included)
Once we declare the uses cases done for Juno, I will move it to the BP
repository.
I would also like to see operator's use cases flushed out in the document.
Stephen, could you
... the $subject says it all.
Wondering about dedicated spaces for a cores meet-up prior
to the design summit proper kicking off on the Tuesday.
Thanks!
Eoghan
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
While the infra team I've seen a lot of questions floating on IRC where
people are finding that things are missing, not usable. They are mostly
related to the New change view.
It's worth noting that among the infra team the New change screen is
considered unusable (there is a solid jeblair rant
IIRC Thierry said that pods will be available starting from Monday.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote:
... the $subject says it all.
Wondering about dedicated spaces for a cores meet-up prior
to the design summit proper kicking off on the Tuesday.
Yup, it sounds like for now the old screen is the only option. I'm now
trying to work using the new screen and collect some most annoying
issues.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
While the infra team I've seen a lot of questions floating on IRC where
people are
Hi, guys:
For two weeks in the row, I have customer meeting at 10am EDT, which conflicts
with our weekly Neutron IPv6 call. I hope this meeting schedule won’t be
permanent…Will try my best to avoid it.
Sorry for the absence. :(
Shixiong
Shixiong Shang
!--- Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish ---!
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Pendergrass, Eric
eric.pendergr...@hp.com wrote:
Hi, I pulled devstack yesterday and have been trying to get any test to run
successfully.
My process is this:
Install tox =1.6,1.7
Install libmysqlclient-dev
Install mongodb-server
Source
Hey
In this patch:
https://review.openstack.org/83681
by Ghanshyam Mann, we encountered an unusual situation where a timestamp
in the returned XML looked like this:
2014-04-08 09:00:14.399708+00:00
What appeared to be unusual was that the timestamp had both sub-second
time resolution and
On 04/29/2014 08:26 AM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
Yup, it sounds like for now the old screen is the only option. I'm now
trying to work using the new screen and collect some most annoying
issues.
Khai had linked to an etherpad that wikimedia has been working on to
collect their thoughts on the new
On 2014-04-29 07:09:42 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote:
Use the old change view.
Specifically, if you browse to
https://review.openstack.org/#/settings/preferences by default
everyone normally starts at Change View: Server Default (Old Screen)
so if you make sure it's set to that (or really just
Anita, thanks, I'll take a look on it.
I just find the very nice pros - new screen detects changes and shows
small notification, it's very useful for folks like me how opening 500
tabs for review and than iterating through them.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 14:48 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
My conclusions from all that:
1) This sucks
2) At the very least, we should be clear in our API samples tests
which of the three formats we expect - we should only change the
format used in a given part of the API
On 04/29/2014 06:42 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-04-26 17:05:41 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
Just a friendly reminder to add yourself to this list if you are
interested in participating in the key signing in Atlanta:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OpenPGP_Web_of_Trust/Juno_Summit
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey
In this patch:
https://review.openstack.org/83681
by Ghanshyam Mann, we encountered an unusual situation where a timestamp
in the returned XML looked like this:
2014-04-08 09:00:14.399708+00:00
What
Hi, everybody.
I’ve started to work on implementation of Event in ceilometer on HBase
backend in the edges of blueprint
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/hbase-events-feature
By now Events has been implemented only in SQL.
You know, using SQL we can build any query we need.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:58:50AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote:
On 04/25/2014 03:15 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
There are myriad problems with the above user experience and
implementation. Let me explain them.
1. The user isn't creating a server group when they issue a nova
server-group-create
Just a couple quick notes, since I've been pinged off-list. The summit
proposal for the QoS API was rejected due to time constraints, but I'm
hoping that we can still meet in Atlanta and discuss the next steps.
In the meantime, I have created a draft spec in neutron-specs, but it's
mostly just a
This is a development list, and your question sounds usage-related. I
suggest asking again on the users list:
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack
Thanks.
-Ben
On 04/29/2014 12:53 AM, abhishek jain wrote:
Hi all
I'm getting follwoing error when trying to run
On 04/29/2014 03:16 AM, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew wrote:
Hi all,
I have a patch in flight at the moment [0] to install check_mk server and
compliment the already merged installation of check_mk agent [1] so my thoughts
are now turning to how we would recommend adding new service checks.
The
Please don't send review requests to the list. The preferred methods
are discussed here:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html
Thanks.
-Ben
On 04/29/2014 04:45 AM, sxmatch wrote:
Hi,guys:
There is a nova-specs add force detach volume to nova
In Keystone, users are assigned to a domain when they are created. This is a
unique combination.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Collins [mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net]
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 11:25 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject:
How about 10:30 AM Break on Wednesday at the Developers Lounge (Do we
have one this time?)
-- dims
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
On 04/29/2014 06:42 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2014-04-26 17:05:41 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
Just a friendly
Break time is extremely busy in the developers lounge. We can have
others in the room, but we need enough of a space for everyone to stand
in two lines and rotate and be uninterrupted.
Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas's message of 2014-04-29 09:07:12 -0700:
How about 10:30 AM Break on Wednesday at
Since this is the scheduled off week, I thought we would skip the team
meeting on Friday 2 May.
Doug
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
This was added long ago to support testing environments without a lot of disk
space.
Vish
On Apr 29, 2014, at 12:12 AM, Zhangleiqiang (Trump) zhangleiqi...@huawei.com
wrote:
Hi, all:
I find in some of the cinder backend volume drivers, there are codes in
create_volume as
Using OVS with nova-nework will bring you more issues that what you are
expected.
Security groups will not work and other L3 capabilities.
Edgar
From: laserjetyang laserjety...@gmail.commailto:laserjety...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Hi Zang
Thank you for your contribution on this!
The private key management is what I want to discuss in the summit.
[1] We are depending DB security, anyway
When we get stolen the private key in the DB, it means we are also
stolen ID/PW for DB.
If we stolen the key, even if we keep the private
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
Hi Zang
Thank you for your contribution on this!
The private key management is what I want to discuss in the summit.
Has the idea of using Barbican been discussed before? There are many
reasons why using Barbican for this may
Hi Kyle
2014-04-29 10:52 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
Hi Zang
Thank you for your contribution on this!
The private key management is what I want to discuss in the summit.
Has the idea of using Barbican
Hi all,
I have a patch in flight at the moment [0] to install check_mk server and
compliment the already merged installation of check_mk agent [1] so my
thoughts are now turning to how we would recommend adding new service
checks.
The concept behind check_mk makes this really
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
Hi Kyle
2014-04-29 10:52 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
Hi Zang
Thank you for your contribution on this!
The private key management is
Hi Everyone,
Since this is the scheduled off week, I'm going to cancel this week's QA
meeting.
The next meeting will be on May 8th and will be at 22:00 UTC instead of having
two consecutive meetings at the same time. I will send out the usual reminder
email next week.
Thanks,
Matt Treinish
On 2014-04-29 09:16:53 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote:
[...]
I think Wednesday would be the ideal day, as it has the most overlap
with the conference and is at least adjacent to if not within most
design tracks.
[...]
Seconded.
I suggest we ensure that everyone understands the process and
I mis quoted it should be in RFC 5246 not 5264.
On Apr 25, 2014, at 2:50 AM, Carlos Garza
carlos.ga...@rackspace.commailto:carlos.ga...@rackspace.com wrote:
Trevor is referring to our plans on using the SSL session ID of the
ClientHello to provide session persistence.
See RFC 5264
On 2014-04-29 08:52:38 +0400 (+0400), Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
+1 to lock May 7
I've updated the wiki article to note that I'll lock it for further
edits at the end of the (UTC) day on the 7th and generate the
checksummed list from it, then link it there for everyone to
download as quickly as I
Hi Zzelle, Carl and others,
We’ve been doing work on a more modular agent whose responsibilities are
basically to:
1: apply configurations in devices when Neutron service resources (like Neutron
Routers) are created or updated.
2: monitor the health of devices hosting such service resources
Aside from creating a sort of cyclic dependency between the two, it
is my understanding that Neutron is meant to be a stand alone
service capable of being consumed by other compute managers (i.e.
oVirt). This breaks that paradigm.
snip
So my question is: Why use API and not RPC?
I saw
On 04/29/2014 02:16 AM, Zhangleiqiang (Trump) wrote:
Currently, Nova API achieve this feature based on the database’s REGEX
support. Do you have advice on alternative way to achieve it?
Hi Trump,
Unfortunately, REGEXP support in databases is almost always ridiculously
slow compared to prefix
Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote on 04/29/2014 02:26:42 PM:
From: Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 04/29/2014 02:27 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] cinder not support query
volume/snapshot with regular expression
On 04/29/2014 02:16 AM,
I would prefer to link to docs.openstack.org or the API reference pages
with specific links like this:
http://api.openstack.org/api-ref-blockstorage-v2.html,
http://api.openstack.org/api-ref-compute-v2.html, and so on.
The
issue I have with linking to the specs is that they are likely going
to
I have exported the gettextutils code and related files to a new git
repository, ready to be imported as oslo.i18n. Please take a few
minutes to look over the files and give it a sanity check.
https://github.com/dhellmann/oslo.i18n
Thanks,
Doug
___
Hi Flavio,
Thanks! I also added some comments to the performance test plan at
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/marconi-benchmark-plans we talked about
yesterday.
Thanks,
Tomasz
On 4/29/14, 2:52 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 28/04/14 17:41 +, Janczuk, Tomasz wrote:
Hello,
The design summit discussion topic I submitted [1] for my DNS
blueprints [2][3][4] and this one [5] just missed the cut for the
design session schedule. It stung a little to be turned down but I
totally understand the time and resource constraints that drove the
decision.
I feel this is an
Ok, so, the May 1 meeting is canceled.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.com wrote:
We'll have one more meeting before the summit - May 8 :)
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Matthew Farrellee m...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/25/2014 07:23 AM, Sergey Lukjanov
You may want to take a peek at this recent thread, there may be
information in it you'll find useful.
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/029408.html
--
John
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Hi Sam, Evgeny,
I've reviewed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74031 with my comments. I am
not sure if there is a request with code newer than this link - please do
let me know if that is the case.
Thanks,
Regards,
Vijay
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Eichberger, German
Also, a section for the API specification for the newly created SSL
extensions needs to be added to
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/SSL.
Regards,
Vijay
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Vijay B os.v...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sam, Evgeny,
I've reviewed
Stephen + Sam,
I have added some of the operator use cases. We also created a document earlier
(https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ar1FuMFYRhgadDVXZ25NM2NfbGtLTkR0TDFNUWJQUWc#gid=0)
listing all the features we consider essential (and everybody voted with real
world data) for the LB
Or have a check-mk.d directory and pull stuff on from there automatically
On 30 Apr 2014 04:03, Gregory Haynes g...@greghaynes.net wrote:
Hi all,
I have a patch in flight at the moment [0] to install check_mk server
and compliment the already merged installation of check_mk agent [1] so
Vijay,
SSL and certificate management is a major requirement from a cloud operator
perspective. The VPN part of Neutron is looking into using Barbican and I am
surprised that LB is going a different way/implementing their own store. Just
for the record I prefer Barbican ☺
Furthermore, we are
Per Samuel's request, I have set my API proposal document to be edit-able
by all.
Also, my work priorities have changed somewhat in preparation for the
summit in two weeks, so I may not be able to add more use cases prior to
the summit.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Samuel Bercovici
Per decision in the the Solum weekly IRC meeting today, we will have the
environment working group discussion via ML/etherpad.
GOAL: develop a POV on
1. Which OpenStack program/projects should Environments live under
2. What projects does Environments depend on (Heat, Keystone, OpenStack
Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-04-29 10:58:53 -0700:
Hi Kyle
2014-04-29 10:52 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com:
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
Hi Zang
Thank you for your contribution on this!
The private key management
Hi Clint
Thank you for your suggestion. Your point get taken :)
Kyle
This is also a same discussion for LBaaS
Can we discuss this in advanced service meeting?
Zang
Could you join the discussion?
2014-04-29 15:48 GMT-07:00 Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com:
Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of
Hi, I thought I'd send out the link to the etherpad I've put together
for the summit session I proposed on TripleO and Docker. If there's
any initial discussion or something you'd like to see added, please
reply here or add directly to the etherpad.
On Apr 27, 2014, at 8:35 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
enikano...@mirantis.commailto:enikano...@mirantis.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:03 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
enikano...@mirantis.commailto:enikano...@mirantis.com wrote:
Speaking of SSL - we have a few few project-wise issues such as lack of
Hi German,
Thanks for bringing up the VPN SSL implementation - we just took a look at
the blueprint:
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4kh-7VVPWlPOWlTM0QzNDJucjg/edit
and it matches the design we would take with the SSL entity portion of the
effort, in that we would like to make them first class
This blueprint was marked abandoned.
On Apr 29, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Vijay B
os.v...@gmail.commailto:os.v...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Sam, Evgeny,
I've reviewed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74031 with my comments. I am not
sure if there is a request with code newer than this link - please do
Hi,
It looks like there are areas of common effort in multiple efforts that are
proceeding in parallel to implement SSL for LBaaS as well as VPN SSL in
neutron.
Two relevant efforts are listed below:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74031/ (
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/SSL)
Hi Carlos,
It looks like only the gerrit review has been marked abandoned because of a
week of inactivity.
Regards,
Vijay
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Carlos Garza carlos.ga...@rackspace.comwrote:
This blueprint was marked abandoned.
On Apr 29, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Vijay B
On 04/29/2014 06:59 PM, Collins, Sean wrote:
Count me in!
+1
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
I'll be an alpha / beta tester, for sure!! :-D
I'm very interested on DNS for IPv6 in Neutron (and in Horizon too)... Hope
to see it in Juno!!
IPv6 (with a perfect DNS setup) is very important...
Best!
Thiago
On 29 April 2014 17:09, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:
The design summit
75 matches
Mail list logo
