Hi Sean,
Is there any chance to change this time slot?
Unfortunately, I won't be there on Friday.
BR,
Irena
-Original Message-
From: Collins, Sean [mailto:sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 5:50 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Hello,
it is the really important design session, because we need to break the ice
and implement several good ideas, which we have.
The first one is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94473, we have the
blueprint for this spec
and one commit https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75425 in Abandoned
On 10/31/2014 05:03 PM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
Heh, wrong mailing list :(
Now I know your sekrits...
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi colleagues,
here you can find the weekly report for MOS Infra activity -
Hi,
I was wondering if some distribution OpenStack package maintainers would
be interested to have some cross-distribution discussion on Friday,
during the contributors sessions.
I'll be happy to discuss with Ubuntu people, but not only. I'd like to
meet also guys working with RedHat and Gentoo.
Hi Timur,
Thank you for your reply and adding interesting topics! I'll look at it.
By the way, could you please add the link to etherpad [2] to the event
description [1], it will help to find the correct link from mobile devices.
Actually, I don't have the permission to add/change the
On 10/28/2014 02:15 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
Vitaly,
though comments like this are definitely better than nothing, I think
we should address these issues in a more formal way.
For random failures we have to retrigger the build until it passes.
Yes, it could take some time (two-three
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 09:13:21PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if some distribution OpenStack package maintainers
would be interested to have some cross-distribution discussion on
Friday, during the contributors sessions.
I'll be happy to discuss with Ubuntu people,
+1 to this, with a term limit.
Notable that the Debian TC has been discussing term limits for
months now, and since DebConf they seem to have gotten much closer
to a concrete proposal[1] in the last week or so. Could be worth
watching for ideas on how our community might attempt to
On 11/01/2014 04:31 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote:
So, just to round out this thread, the key questions are:
* whether a low declining turnout is a real problem
I'd like to point out that there 580 'regular' contributors at the
moment[1], these are the authors of 95% of the OpenStack code. 506
On 10/31/2014 01:01 PM, Ian Wells wrote:
Maruti's talk is, in fact, so interesting that we should probably get
together and talk about this earlier in the week. I very much want to
see virtual-physical programmatic bridging, and I know Kevin Benton is
also interested. Arguably the MPLS VPN
+1 yep, as an NFV vendor this is how it really works, and no need for an
active/standby on ports….does not make sense for this type of deployment
scenario. Typically the two or more sets of apps synch together and address the
failover/HA, so no need to make this also in the Infra….you gain
On 11/01/2014 11:29 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 09:13:21PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if some distribution OpenStack package maintainers
would be interested to have some cross-distribution discussion on
Friday, during the contributors sessions.
So, just to round out this thread, the key questions are:
* whether a low declining turnout is a real problem
I'd like to point out that there 580 'regular' contributors at the
moment[1], these are the authors of 95% of the OpenStack code. 506 total
number of voters.
Thanks Stef,
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 01:45:24PM -0400, Adam Young wrote:
On 11/01/2014 11:29 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 09:13:21PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if some distribution OpenStack package maintainers
would be interested to have some
Summary from IRC chat 10/14/2014 on weekly meeting [1] [2]
Topic: Declarative Language for Congress — Enactor/Enforcer
Question: Shall we specify a declarative language for communicating policy
configured in Congress to enactors / enforcement systems
Hypothesis (derived at conclusion of
On 11/01/2014 11:29 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 09:13:21PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if some distribution OpenStack package maintainers
would be interested to have some cross-distribution discussion on
Friday, during the contributors sessions.
Hi,
cinder juno tests are failing after new barbicanclient release
- periodic-cinder-python26-juno
http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stable/periodic-cinder-python26-juno/d660c21
: FAILURE in 11m 37s
- periodic-cinder-python27-juno
%install
export OSLO_PACKAGE_VERSION=%{version}
%{__python} setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root %{buildroot}
Then everything should be ok and PBR will become your friend.
Still not my friend because I don't want a _build_ tool as runtime dependency :)
e.g. you don't ship make(1) to run
18 matches
Mail list logo
