2015-06-20 4:40 GMT+09:00 Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com:
* We have a vendor endpoint. This endpoint allows vendor to extend our
API to expose new hardware capabilities that aren't present in the
core API. Once multiple vendors starts implementing the same feature
on this
On 06/09/2015 04:07 PM, Mathieu Gagné wrote:
On 2015-06-08 2:48 AM, Yanis Guenane wrote:
If we look at openstacklib::db::postgresql[1] or
openstackib::db::mysql[2] they are simple wrapper around
puppet resources with no extra logic, but a common resource across all
modules.
I see a lot of
I have released the 1.3.0.rc.0 version of the knife-openstack[1] gem.
If you find any uses or have questions don’t hesitate to email me directly or
put an issue[2] in.
We are planning on waiting for the floating-ip issue[3] to be resolved before
the official release happens.
[1]:
Yes, it’s a pretty important thing that we’d like to clarify as soon as
possible.
Any input from Murano team?
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.
On 26 Jun 2015, at 06:01, Dmitri Zimine dzim...@stackstorm.com wrote:
Folks,
it’s been some time,what’s the news:
* Is Murano moving YAQL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
First of all, our M release has been named! Sadly, it hasn't cleared
legal yet, so we can't publicly announce it, however, here are the poll
results:
http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_4983776e190c8dbc It
was a close-run
Hi Samuel,
Here's my 2 cents on this topic. First of all, I'd like to ask you -
what problem do you try to solve? Please, answer on that first because
it'll help me to come back with solution.
Currently it looks like an error-prone approach to apply nova-nfs
tasks only on roles with some label.
Hi everyone,
I have submitted a spec in cinder and will implement the integration test
cases for volume migration for cinder in tempest.
The spec link is: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/186327
Volume migration integration tests need a devstack environment configured
with multiple back-ends
Hello guys,
As for TripleO+Upgrades, Kolla is one of ways to help with that. Keep in mind
that package upgrades also means dependency upgrades, and that can break things
unless we upgrade whole stack at once. No downtime upgrades will basically mean
that we need to decouple upgrade process to
Now that the spec for the reference plugin decomposition has merged [1], I
have some patches which begin to reorganize the code in-tree prior to the
move [2]. Since this will cause rebase nightmares, it would be ideal if we
could look at merging these patches to prevent constant rebase pain. I'd
Hi, Doug Hellmann, and oslo.log team members,
I'm Daisuke Fujita of Fujitsu.
May I ask you about this Blueprint?
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo.log/+spec/app-agnostic-logging-parameters
This patch has been already implemented in master branch of oslo_log.
But, blueprint status is
Hi guys,
And also for 7.0 there is a spec in review [1] about custom labels that
may be interesting to differentiate nodes with the same role if labels are
exposed via the astute.yaml.
Regards,
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/184076/
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Andrey Danin
We are not in a good way. The 'drivers' team is very small and just have a
small handful of people approving these specs is a huge bottleneck. Taking into
the fact that the core team is relatively small the cores will most probably
not even get to reviewing the code when it is posted, so it
-Original Message-
From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 2:22 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to properly detect and fence a
compromised host (and why I dislike
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/24/2015 04:41 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
We currently have the fast track process, where if a spec was
previously approved we will quickly re-approve it. (I do a git diff
between the previous version and make sure the diff is trivial). By
my
Hello team,
I’ve submitted a blueprint[1] for adding python 3 compatibility to Magnum. Many
of the other integrate release OpenStack projects have started on this[2]
journey and it would be great to add ourselves to that list.
This will entail refactoring a fairly small amount of code throughout
Hi,
please find our plan here:
https://github.com/csabahenk/manila/wiki/CI-plan-for-Manila-glusterfs-drivers
Csaba
- Original Message -
From: Ben Swartzlander b...@swartzlander.org
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Hi, Daisuke,
* 'resource' is not necessary in logging_context_format_string.
* IMO, I think 'resource' could satisfy your requrement, like this:
LOG.info(_LI('begin some operation'), resource=
{'type': 'volume',
'id': '40e0f194-0ccb-422f-a543-c5f9022acb6f'})
On Thu, Jun 25,
Apologies to go back in time in this thread, but I feel like I should
respond directly to this original email...
On 24 June 2015 at 11:28, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey Nova,
I'll cut to the chase and keep this email short for brevity and clarity:
Specs don't work!
In many
Hi all,
Within the neutron/QoS design I've been working on the messaging
bits trying to design
an architecture [1][2] which allowed (in combination with oslo versioned
objects) easy distribution
of resource changes across interested subscribers.
Our use case is neutron-server (or
I've repeatedly stated that the fact that we created an even smaller
clique of people to approve specs (nova-drivers which is a tiny subset
of the already fr too small nova-core) is madness, as it creates
an even worse review burden on them, and thus worsens the bottleneck
than we
I want to proclaim a new networking project that we plan to start:
It's called 'networking-macvtap'.
This project will contain a neutron ml2 driver and an corresponding
neutron l2 agent. It's aim is to allow instance network attachments via
macvtap in bridge mode independent of the physical
Hi Team,
Zhiyuan just added a new branch experiment for the purpose of hacking new
ideas, check it out at
https://github.com/stackforge/tricircle/tree/experiment.
--
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang
Standard Engineer
IT Standard Patent/IT Prooduct Line
Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd
Email:
On 06/25/2015 04:42 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
2015-06-25 17:25 GMT+09:00 Lucas Alvares Gomes lucasago...@gmail.com:
Hi,
If renaming Ironic to the other, is it still necessary to keep the
name in the header?
There are some projects which are already renamed like Neutron, Zaqar
and the
On 24 June 2015 at 09:35, Dulko, Michal michal.du...@intel.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sylvain Bauza [mailto:sba...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 9:39 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to
25.06.2015 14:58, Sergey Nikitin пишет:
I've repeatedly stated that the fact that we created an
even smaller
clique of people to approve specs (nova-drivers which is a
tiny subset
of the already fr too small nova-core) is madness,
+1. Not closing the spec process and alowing work to continue is good. Open
Source works by allowing developers to scratch itches. If you impeed that itch
scratching long enough they will go somewhere else to be able to meet their
needs. The window between missed spec deadline and next open
Hi, Samuel,
We use magic words in node names for Fuel Contrail plugin. It uses
the bare role to deploy Contrail controllers.
Unfortunately, we don't have node tags in 6.1, but we are going to
implement custom roles from a plugin in 7.0. Please see a spec
On 25 June 2015 at 14:09, Dulko, Michal michal.du...@intel.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 2:22 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to
Looking forward to this feature, too.
-tobe
-- Original --
From: niuzhenguoniuzhen...@huawei.com;
Date: Thu, Jun 25, 2015 05:05 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org;
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][horizon] Making a dashboard
Hi,
Sahara doesn't have user's username and password, only user's token, that
could expire in some time. The simplest installation requires you to
specify credentials explicitly, but you could configure Sahara to access
Swift using proxy user and trusts, more info in docs -
On 06/24/2015 03:42 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:28:59AM +0100, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
Hey Nova,
I'll cut to the chase and keep this email short for brevity and clarity:
Specs don't work! They do nothing to facilitate good design happening,
if anything they prevent
Hi,
On 06/24/2015 11:19 PM, Xingjun Chu wrote:
Hi,
Not sure if I should send this to glance or nova project, anyways ...
As far as I know, Openstack today does not support OVA/OVF image
natively (correct me if I were wrong). I am wondering if there is any
plan to support them?
Also Any
Samuel,
We could likely extend NodeGroups to do some of theses things. It was
initially intended to create separated underlay network schemes for
multiple-cluster-networks [1] but you would not be prevented from using the
same network addresses if you didn't need the partation from that. I'm not
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:01:45PM -0700, Dan Smith wrote:
Hi Dan,
I put together a quick etherpad to help outline the remaining patches
left to support package based upgrades within the TripleO heat
templates:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-package-upgrades
The
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/24/2015 10:17 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com
mailto:kcham...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:02:27AM -0500, Matt Riedemann
On 25 June 2015 at 09:49, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Maxim Nestratov wrote:
24.06.2015 20:21, Daniel P. Berrange пишет:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 04:46:57PM +, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
First: Overhead
- 1 week for vacation
- 1 week for holidays.
- 4 weeks for feature
On 25 June 2015 at 09:58, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Joe Gordon wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com
mailto:e...@leafe.com wrote:
[...]
Other emails have touched on the biggest disconnect in the process: that
an approved spec magically becomes
Zhou,
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 8:38 PM Zhou Zheng Sheng / 周征晟
zhengsh...@awcloud.com wrote:
Hi,
I also notice that in latest ceph-deploy source code, it allows us to
define public_network and cluster_network argument when calling
'ceph-deploy new'. It also checks if monitor IP address is
So this is also filed as https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1468808
But I figure a lot of folk are going to be running into it.
Its the interaction between the changes discussed in
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-June/067823.html
and dirty devstack VM's that already
Hi all,
We are proposing a spec[1], on which we describe how the deletion and
disablement of a subtree will work. This change improves the usabilty of
Reseller/Hierarchical Multitenancy that are two of the biggest Keystone
additions in the last releases. This feature will make it easier for
Event signup page is now live -- please RSVP!
*https://www.eventbrite.com/e/openstack-ironic-sprint-august-2015-tickets-17533862254
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/openstack-ironic-sprint-august-2015-tickets-17533862254*
-Devananda
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 8:46 AM Stafford, John Richard
Yeah I think it's fair to say this is just the first step of probably
several iterations towards fully orchestrated upgrades such as you
describe, atm really it's just a way of pushing out minor updates not
version-to-version upgrades (yet).
Okay, that's cool, I just wanted to make sure I
I think this make sense. I have lost any faith on third party CIs after the
Vancouver decision of not police them (I was doing that for a while and I was
fine doing it). So, why to keep them with voting rights? I will say, let’s
remove voting rights for all of them.
Edgar
From: John Davidge
hi Chen,
i agree with Sergey has said, also i have posted a small article[1]
about how i configure proxy domains. i hope this may help clear the
confusion surrounding this feature.
regards,
mike
[1]:
https://elmiko.github.io/2015/06/25/configuring-sahara-with-proxy-domains.html
Hi,
just wanted to mention another tool to work with 'Puppetfile' - r10k:
https://github.com/puppetlabs/r10k/blob/master/doc/puppetfile.mkd
Regards,
Alex
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Paul Belanger pabelan...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 06/23/2015 01:51 PM, Alex Schultz wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to formalize
scheduler hints, both with API validation and Nova objects defining
them, and want to air those concerns and see if others agree or can help
me see why I shouldn't worry.
Starting with the API I think the strict input
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 06:42:11AM MDT, Kyle Mestery wrote:
Is there an RFE files for this? At this point, since Liberty-1 is this
week, an RFE would be the best approach forward. My gut is leaning towards
this not being in-scope for Liberty at this point, but an RFE would allow
us to have the
Hi all,
Recent neutron third party CI issues have got me thinking again about a topic
which we discussed in Vancouver:
Should any Third Party CI have voting rights for neutron patches in gerrit?
I’d like to suggest that they shouldn’t.
A -1 from a third party CI tool can often be an
Thank you Rado!
-Xingjun Chu
-Original Message-
From: Radoslav Gerganov [mailto:rgerga...@vmware.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 9:44 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] import OVA/OVF into openstack
Hi,
On 06/24/2015 11:19 PM, Xingjun Chu
Thank for your response Salvatore. I am not sure what is your position in this
topic? Are you fine removing voting rights to all Cis?
Edgar
From: Salvatore Orlando
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Date: Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 7:59 AM
To: OpenStack
Hi,
I agree, and only vote +1 myself, but I don’t agree on mandating it. If someone
has invested enough in their CI to be confident, we just supply rope.
Thanks,
doug
On Jun 25, 2015, at 8:08 AM, John Davidge (jodavidg) jodav...@cisco.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Recent neutron third party CI
On 25 June 2015 at 16:08, John Davidge (jodavidg) jodav...@cisco.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Recent neutron third party CI issues have got me thinking again about a
topic which we discussed in Vancouver:
Should any Third Party CI have voting rights for neutron patches in
gerrit?
Why should
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 06/25/2015 04:42 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
2015-06-25 17:25 GMT+09:00 Lucas Alvares Gomes lucasago...@gmail.com:
Hi,
If renaming Ironic to the other, is it still necessary to keep the
name in the header?
There are
Hello Fellow Ironic-ers,
I am confirming the Mid-Cycle Sprint, hosted in the HP Seattle, WA [USA] Office
on Aug 12-14, 2015. We look forward to seeing everyone there!
Cheers!
John Stafford
Engineering Manager |HP Helion Openstack | Openstack-Ironic
E:
On 06/25/2015 11:33 AM, Anne Gentle wrote:
Also I hadn't discovered X-OpenStack-Nova-API-Version until now -- and I
don't think that we should use project names in end-user-facing
messaging, ever. They then have to do a look up for nova among over 20
project names. [1] Since that got unmarked
On 06/25/2015 10:22 AM, Andrew Laski wrote:
I have been growing concerned recently with some attempts to formalize
scheduler hints, both with API validation and Nova objects defining
them, and want to air those concerns and see if others agree or can help
me see why I shouldn't worry.
I'll defer to Kevin, the spec author, but you should know that the
implementation is not merged yet.
- Original Message -
Hi Assaf,
Now reading the rbac network specs carefully, I believe it does allow private
networks to be shared to other tenants by non-admin users.
So the
Sean's point and Dmitri's are similar.
There are APIs for projects which do not have official team or program
names. And some teams may produce more than one forward-facing service.
Naming the API based in the team name doesn't make sense.
My previous point is that restricting the API name to
In OpenStack, we have a very common problem of VM's needing to talk to
OpenStack Services.
Heat, Trove, Sahara, Octavia, Magnum, other services that provision vm's, all
have need to either have a guest agent talk to a controller via Zaqar using a
Keystone credential, or fetch Secrets from
Excerpts from Fujita, Daisuke's message of 2015-06-25 10:42:05 +:
Hi, Doug Hellmann, and oslo.log team members,
I'm Daisuke Fujita of Fujitsu.
May I ask you about this Blueprint?
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo.log/+spec/app-agnostic-logging-parameters
This patch has been
On 06/25/2015 12:04 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Dmitry Tantsur dtant...@redhat.com
mailto:dtant...@redhat.com wrote:
snip
I'm not sure where the assumption comes from that people will know
compute better than nova.
I have been supporting
Aleksandr Didenko wrote:
just wanted to mention another tool to work with 'Puppetfile' - r10k:
I am a big fan of r10k - it is what we use internally @ Puppet and we
encourage our users to do the same.
https://github.com/puppetlabs/r10k
Regards,
Richard
SysOps Engineer @ Puppet Labs
On 06/25/2015 05:33 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
On 06/25/2015 04:42 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
2015-06-25 17:25 GMT+09:00 Lucas Alvares Gomes
lucasago...@gmail.com mailto:lucasago...@gmail.com:
On 06/25/2015 06:04 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Dmitry Tantsur dtant...@redhat.com
mailto:dtant...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/25/2015 05:33 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net
On 25/06/15 09:49, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Maxim Nestratov wrote:
24.06.2015 20:21, Daniel P. Berrange пишет:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 04:46:57PM +, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
First: Overhead
- 1 week for vacation
- 1 week for holidays.
- 4 weeks for feature freeze.
-Original Message-
From: ext John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 4:39 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to properly detect and fence a
compromised host (and why I dislike
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Dmitry Tantsur dtant...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 06/25/2015 05:33 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
On 06/25/2015 04:42 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
2015-06-25 17:25
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Andreas Scheuring
scheu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I want to proclaim a new networking project that we plan to start:
It's called 'networking-macvtap'.
Cool!
This project will contain a neutron ml2 driver and an corresponding
neutron l2 agent. It's aim
Hello,
ml2 conf file looks fine.
nova logs look fine.
neutron logs also seem fine, but this worries me a bit:
2015-06-24 20:45:18.556 4116 DEBUG hyperv.neutron.security_groups_driver
[req-3786da36-6b03-433d-941e-00327839603c ] Creating port 3 rules
prepare_port_filter C:\Program Files
On 06/25/2015 01:35 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Sean's point and Dmitri's are similar.
There are APIs for projects which do not have official team or program
names. And some teams may produce more than one forward-facing service.
Naming the API based in the team name doesn't make
Hi Dan,
I put together a quick etherpad to help outline the remaining patches
left to support package based upgrades within the TripleO heat
templates:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-package-upgrades
The etherpad includes a brief overview of the upgrade approach, a list
of
Hi,
I have noticed that even though account/container information is
cached using memcached in Swift, it doesn't cache any actual object
data.
Could someone enlighten me what's the consideration behind this
decision? Because it seems like it might be useful...
Thanks a lot
Suli
--
Suli
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Znoinski, Waldemar
waldemar.znoin...@intel.com wrote:
Hi Kyle and Neutron Cores,
I would like to nominate Intel-Networking-CI (
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/Intel-Networking-CI) to
have voting (non-gating) rights.
It’s been
Hi all,
Endpoint filtering is a keystone extension since the Havana release, in
Juno it was expanded by the Multi-Attribute Endpoint Grouping spec [1] that
improves the filtering flexibility.
Since Kilo, we added the concept of Service Providers to keystone, the list
of such resources is
Hi,
I put together a quick etherpad to help outline the remaining patches
left to support package based upgrades within the TripleO heat
templates:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-package-upgrades
The etherpad includes a brief overview of the upgrade approach, a list
of patches related
Hi, creating rbac entries by non-admins will be controlled by policy.json.
So you can enable it or disable it there.
Also is the action access_as_external available now ?
Not yet. The code is still under review.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com wrote:
I'll
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
For someone that's extremely familiar with what they are doing, they'll
understand that http://service.provider/compute is Nova, and can find
their way to Nova docs on the API. But for new folks, I can only see
this adding to
Hi,
since the quota enforcement patches for the 'better-quotas' blueprint did
not merge by liberty-1, and I forgot to resubmit the already-approved kilo
spec [1], I have submitted a RFE to comply with the process agreed for
Liberty [2].
As the policy [3] does not explicitly state that the
Hi,
I just wanted to let people know that we're setting a deadline of 7
July for mid-cycle meetup signups. So, if you're intending to sign up
but haven't already I'd do it real soon now.
You can sign up at:
Thank you to those who joined in the conversation today, I thought it
was pretty productive. Today we focused on two things - creating a
Horizon plugin that would allow for browsing and consuming catalog
contents, and expanding the catalog framework to accommodate more
asset types[1]. In the
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 01:57:14PM -0700, Dan Smith wrote:
Yeah I think it's fair to say this is just the first step of probably
several iterations towards fully orchestrated upgrades such as you
describe, atm really it's just a way of pushing out minor updates not
version-to-version
On Thu, 2015-06-25 at 12:01 -0700, Dan Smith wrote:
Hi Dan,
I put together a quick etherpad to help outline the remaining
patches
left to support package based upgrades within the TripleO heat
templates:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-package-upgrades
The etherpad
Thanks Sean for creating the rfe. I think we can go beyond the OVS and LB
agents and aim for providing a framework where any agent (if and when
needed) can benefit from it. We can continue the discussion on launchpad.
Best,
Mohammad
From: Sean M. Collins s...@coreitpro.com
To:
Edgar,
in a nutshell my point is that if we want to remove voting rights from
every CI I'm fine with it.
However, I think what's being discussed in this thread is already captured
very well by [1] and believe the policy it outlines is perfectly fine for
Neutron purposes.
Salvatore
[1]
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 04:05:08PM -0400, Jay Dobies wrote:
I didn't want to hijack Steve Hardy's thread about the recursive validation,
but I wanted to summarize the needs that Tuskar and the UI have been trying
to answer and some of the problems we ran into.
I think it's fairly common
You're right. Caching object data is one way to really speed up reads to
content that is stored in Swift and accessed frequently. Often time, deployers
use existing tools like squid, varnish, or a CDN to do that.
But that still leaves the question why don't we cache the object data in
Swift?.
Hi,
We just tested that OpenStack API response is not very fast. From nova-client,
if a boot-vm request is issued to Nova, it takes about 1.9 seconds to get the
response. (The token format is UUID). Query is short, but it still take about
0.9 second.
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang )
Hi All,
I have contributed some codes in my bp/horizon-policy-abstraction which aims to
simplify the expression of policy in Congress. All need to do is choose the
objects and violation-condition you care about and the action you want to take
for this policy in the drop-down list, without
Hi everyone working for tempest,
I am planning to adding the tempest tests for volume migration in Cinder.
The spec link is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/186327/
The blueprint for cinder is
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/migration-improvement
I mentioned the tempest work in
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:03 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
The goal is to set up the default log format string to be the same in
all projects, and have the context class provide application-specific
values. So nova might set an instance as the resource but neutron might
set
Thanks a lot for your answer.
I guess that is an excellent answer on why does swift explicitly disable
object data caching at the page cache level. But my question is a bit
different Why doesn't swift use memcached to cache object data? Not that
it is a bit different than implementing it yourself
On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 9:14 AM, Devananda van der Veen
devananda@gmail.com wrote:
Almost all of our discussions so far on this topic have left something out,
which Monty pointed out to me last week. I'm following up now because
E_TRAVEL...
tldr;
What we're versioning here are API's, not
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for late response here,
2015-06-20 9:14 GMT+09:00 Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com:
Long version...
Every HTTP response from Ironic today includes three headers: min, max, and
version. The
Folks,
it’s been some time,what’s the news:
* Is Murano moving YAQL 1.0 in this cycle?
* What’s your recommendation for this cycle - stay on 0.2.6 or move on?
* Any progress on documentation?
Thanks, DZ
__
OpenStack
Hi Everyone,
Thanks for joining the service chaining project meeting on 6/25/2015. Here is
the link to the meeting logs:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/service_chaining/2015/
Thanks,
Cathy
__
OpenStack Development
Thanks for the reply.
My puzzle here is :
I create containers objects by my own, why other users can access
them ?
As mentioned in your article[1], the domain sahara_proxy is created by user
admin in project openstack.
But I'm working under user demo in project demo, and other people
Sorry for late response here,
2015-06-20 9:14 GMT+09:00 Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com:
Long version...
Every HTTP response from Ironic today includes three headers: min, max, and
version. The service can present an older API version, as long as it is
greater-than-or-equal-to
Hi,
If renaming Ironic to the other, is it still necessary to keep the
name in the header?
There are some projects which are already renamed like Neutron, Zaqar
and the others.
So OpenStack-API-Version which doesn't contain project name seems
reasonable for me.
I don't think we should make
On 06/25/2015 10:18 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
Sorry for late response here,
2015-06-20 9:14 GMT+09:00 Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com:
Long version...
Every HTTP response from Ironic today includes three headers: min, max, and
version. The service can present an older API
On 06/24/2015 10:17 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com
mailto:kcham...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:02:27AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 6/24/2015 9:09 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
On
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
