Re: [openstack-dev] Mitaka Infra Sprint

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 3:24 AM, Joshua Hesketh wrote: > Information + RSVP: > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Sprints/InfraMitakaSprint Quick update: HPE will be ordering catered lunches while we're there, so I've added a "dietary restrictions" column to the wiki.

[openstack-dev] [Smaug]- IRC Meeting tomorrow (12/22) - 1400 UTC

We will have our first IRC meeting tomorrow (Tuesday, 12/22) at 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting Please review the proposed meeting agenda here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/smaug Please add to the agenda any subject you would like to discuss. Project brief: Smaug is a new OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][DRBD] questions about pep8/flake8 etc.

On 12/21/2015 06:40 AM, Philipp Marek wrote: Hi everybody, in the current patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/259973/1 the test script needs to use a lot of the constant definitions of the backend driver it's using (DRBDmanage). As the DRBDmanage libraries need not be installed on the CI

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][nova][all] timeutils deprecation removals will break Nova

On 12/21/2015 1:22 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Rob, Can we set some goals for the server projects too? Say anything deprecated in liberty timeframe in oslo libs or any other libs we consume should be fixed by milestone2 in mitaka? At the moment the burden is entirely on oslo and hence

Re: [openstack-dev] [Sender Auth Failure] Re: [Sender Auth Failure] Re: [neutron] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

Hello Ihar, On 12/17/15, 11:00 AM, "Ihar Hrachyshka" wrote: >Margaret wrote: > >>Hello Ihar, >> >>I have some comments and questions about your proposal. My apologies if >>any of what I say here results from misunderstandings on my

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly subteam status report

Hi, We are eager to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - (no diff) - Ironic: 143 bugs + 149 wishlist items. 18 new, 89 in progress, 0 critical, 14 high and 9 incomplete -

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] tripleoclient/tripleo-common backwards compatibility

Ok, looked into this a little today, apologies for replying to my own thread: On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 01:35:54PM +, Steven Hardy wrote: > Hi all, > > So I've recently had several discussions related to $subject. > > In summary - there's a requirement to enable underclouds to support >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][nova][all] timeutils deprecation removals will break Nova

On 21 December 2015 at 04:57, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Nova folks, > > We have this review in oslo.utils: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/252898/ > > There were failed effort in the past to cleanup in Nova: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/164753/ >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][nova][all] timeutils deprecation removals will break Nova

Rob, Can we set some goals for the server projects too? Say anything deprecated in liberty timeframe in oslo libs or any other libs we consume should be fixed by milestone2 in mitaka? At the moment the burden is entirely on oslo and hence unfair. Thanks, Dims On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 2:15 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] [radvd] Advertise tenant prefixes from router to outside

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Vladimir Eremin wrote: > Hi Carl, > > As far as I understand Address Scopes, end user’s algorithm will be next: > 1. Administrator creates an address scope and associate an IPv6 subnet pool > with it. > 2. Administrator creates Public

[openstack-dev] [ironic] no meeting December 28

Hey all, Most people won't be around next week, December 28, so we're canceling that meeting. A few of us will be around in #openstack-ironic if you've got something you want to chat about, though. :) // jim __ OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [Infra] Meeting Tuesday December 22nd at 19:00 UTC

Hi everyone, The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is not skipping meetings through the end of month holidays, so we are having our next weekly meeting as scheduled on Tuesday December 22nd, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Meeting agenda available here:

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][networking-sfc] - No service chaining project IRC Meeting on 12/24 and 12/31

Hi everyone, We will cancel 12/24 and 12/31 1700 UTC IRC meetings for service chaining project since quite some people will be on vacation. We will resume the project meeting on 1/7/2016. Happy Holiday! Cathy __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum] Quota for Magnum Resources

As mentioned by Hongbin we might have these 3 cases. Hongbin and I did discuss about these in the Magnum IRC. The interestring case being the #2 one. Where in case enough resources are not available at the IaaS layer, and Magnum is in the process of creating a Bay; Magnum needs to be more

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum] Quota for Magnum Resources

If we decide to support quotas in CaaS layer (i.e. limit the # of bays), its implementation doesn't have to be redundant to IaaS layer (from Nova, Cinder, etc.). The implementation could be a layer on top of IaaS, in which requests need to pass two layers of quotas to succeed. There would be

Re: [openstack-dev] [doc] DocImpact vs. reno

Excerpts from Andreas Jaeger's message of 2015-12-18 20:31:04 +0100: > On 12/18/2015 07:45 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > > On 12/18/2015 01:34 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >> On 12/18/2015 07:03 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > >>> Recently noticed that a new job ended up on all nova changes that was > >>>

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Removal of support for nova-network

Hey guys – I know this has been a topic of a lot of discussion – Adrian informed me on Friday that QA has confirmed the multi-hypervisor use case has been tested successfully without nova-network, so we can finally deprecate it! Users who want to deploy multiple hypervisors will need to use

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit Upgrade to ver 2.11, completed.

I noticed a couple of things today while reviewing a largish page [1]. First, when I search for something using the browser's builtin search (Chrome, Mac OSX Yosemite), it doesn't seem to find occurrences that are not in the visible portion of the page. For example, when I search for DNSDOMAIN, I

[openstack-dev] Cross-Project Meeting SKIPPED Until January 5

Hi all!  We will be skipping the cross-project meeting until January 5th since a lot of people will be out for holidays. Please use the meeting page to propose an agenda item for the next meeting [1]. We also have a new meeting channel which is #openstack-meeting-cp where the cross-project

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit Upgrade to ver 2.11, completed.

I also really miss being able to pull up the list of files in diff view with the 'f' key. Any equivalent? Carl On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Carl Baldwin wrote: > I noticed a couple of things today while reviewing a largish page [1]. > First, when I search for something

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum] Quota for Magnum Resources

Jay, I think we should agree on a general direction before asking for a spec. It is bad to have contributors spend time working on something that might not be accepted. Best regards, Hongbin From: Jay Lau [mailto:jay.lau@gmail.com] Sent: December-20-15 6:17 PM To: OpenStack Development

[openstack-dev] [puppet] deprecation warning everywhere issue

Hello, I just reported [1] which affects puppet-keystone but also *all* modules. Since [2], you now have a lot of warnings about the new way to declare keystone_endpoint resource. This is not really acceptable and provides a poor end-user experience to have (by default) a lot of warnings. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] deprecation warning everywhere issue

On 12/21/2015 06:48 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Hello, > > I just reported [1] which affects puppet-keystone but also *all* modules. > Since [2], you now have a lot of warnings about the new way to declare > keystone_endpoint resource. > > This is not really acceptable and provides a poor

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][UX] Throw KVM\QEMU and leave Libvirt on Wizard

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: > What about hypervisor "Qemu", and checkbox option on Settings tab - > "Use KVM extension"? Qemu is not a hypervisor This will be even more confusing. I think "Libvirt" + some tooltip which says "Qemu and KVM" will

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][UX] Throw KVM\QEMU and leave Libvirt on Wizard

> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Igor Kalnitsky > wrote: > > What about hypervisor "Qemu", and checkbox option on Settings tab - > > "Use KVM extension"? > Qemu is not a hypervisor This will be even more confusing. > I think "Libvirt" + some tooltip which says "Qemu and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Gnocchi] inconsistent instanceattributes cause infinite update

shall we try to synchronise the two datapoints more than? i think that'd be the better route since pollster and notification values are attempting to meter the same thing. On 21/12/2015 8:33 AM, Luo Gangyi wrote: gord, I have looked your link, seems related. But still, image_ref is a problem.

[openstack-dev] [ThirdParty][CI] [patch] Status page at http://ci-watch.tintri.com/project

Hi all, I quite like the page at http://ci-watch.tintri.com/project - it gives a very quick overview about the failures one should look into, and which to ignore ;) Please let me state before anything else that I don't know any of the restrictions that may have led into the current design -

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr] IRC Meeting - Monday 1500 UTC (#openstack-meeting-4)

Hello All, I have updated the agenda for the upcoming Kuryr IRC meeting [1] Please review and add any additional topics you might want to cover. Last meeting action items can be seen here [2] I personally wont be able to attend the meeting and we expect low participant volume due to holidays

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][UX] Throw KVM\QEMU and leave Libvirt on Wizard

> Qemu is not a hypervisor This will be even more confusing. It looks like hypervisor much more than libvirt. Moreover, according to Wikipedia [1] (don't blame me guys) Qemu is Type-2 hypervisor. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypervisor > Today, when a user selects KVM, Fuel attempts to use

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Solar] SolarDB/ConfigDB place in Fuel

Hi Oleg, I understand the concern, but in case of integration specifically with Solar, I don't see any reasons to add ConfigDB, because Solar by itself is a ConfigDB. At the same time I would agree that there might be a case, when user uses Zookeeper/Puppet Master/CMDB as a data store, in this

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Pin some puppet dependencies on git clone

My bet is first solve the problem, and then discuss how to improve the solution. Specifying the DIB_REPOREF variables by hand on the puppet-module element in t-p-e will be an immediate improvement in stability terms. Then, it is fair to discuss how to automate the process to syncrhonise with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Bulat Gaifulin for fuel-web & fuel-mirror cores

Thank you. Regards, Bulat Gaifullin Mirantis Inc. > On 21 Dec 2015, at 13:11, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: > > Well, the agreement is reached. I added Bulat to both fuel-web-core > and fuel-mirror-core groups. > > Bulat, congratulations! Will be happy to see even more

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Solar] SolarDB/ConfigDB place in Fuel

The problem with this approach is that we can't manage the interfaces between components without changing the code of 2+ components (i.e. one that provides the data and all that consume it). I also don't like polling model for data processors. In my understanding, components should push their

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Gnocchi] inconsistentinstanceattributes cause infinite update

Yes, it will be better if we can synchronise them. But to achieve this, we have to do some modification in nova side which seems not easy :( -- Luo Gangyi luogan...@cmss.chinamobile.com -- Original -- From: "gord

[openstack-dev] tacker

dear you?? I have installed tacker in my ubuntu system,and binded to an openstack instance ,but I did't find the way to add an VNFD in tacker. using this command," tacker vnfd-create --name ${VNFD_NAME} --vnfd-file ${VNFD_TOSCA_YAML-FILE}" where should I place the YAML file.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][nova][magnum] Jenkins failed quite often for "Cannot set up guest memory 'pc.ram': Cannot allocate memory"

On 2015-12-20 12:35:34 -0800 (-0800), Clark Boylan wrote: > Looking at the dstat logs for a recent fail [0], it did help in that > more memory is available. You now have over 1GB available but still less > than 2GB. [...] As Clark also pointed out in IRC, the workers where this is failing lack a

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] tripleoclient/tripleo-common backwards compatibility

Hi all, So I've recently had several discussions related to $subject. In summary - there's a requirement to enable underclouds to support deploying/updating previous versions of OpenStack overclouds. So, say I upgrade my liberty undercloud to master/mitaka, I'd like to ensure the following is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Gnocchi] inconsistent instanceattributes cause infinite update

@gord, I have looked your link, seems related. But still, image_ref is a problem. -- Luo Gangyi luogan...@cmss.chinamobile.com -- Original -- From: "gord chung";; Date: Mon, Dec 21, 2015 09:12 PM To:

[openstack-dev] [telemetry] cancelling upcoming meetings (24th and 31st)

hi folks, before i forget, we'll be skipping meetings the next two weeks (24th and 31st). we'll resume regularly scheduled meetings on Jan 7th. please raise anything important to the mailing list (as normal). have a nice holidays. cheers, -- gord

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][UX] Throw KVM\QEMU and leave Libvirt on Wizard

We should collapse this into one entry - I don't have any preference on the naming convention, but as Fuel checks to see whether the hardware is capable of performing KVM acceleration, there's no reason to continue giving a selection to the user regarding KVM. Today, when a user selects KVM, Fuel

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][UX] Throw KVM\QEMU and leave Libvirt on Wizard

According to Andrew Woodward (xarses), this is the current implementation. -Original Message- From: Igor Kalnitsky [mailto:ikalnit...@mirantis.com] Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 8:23 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [Cinder][DRBD] questions about pep8/flake8 etc.

Hi everybody, in the current patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/259973/1 the test script needs to use a lot of the constant definitions of the backend driver it's using (DRBDmanage). As the DRBDmanage libraries need not be installed on the CI nodes, I'm providing a minimum of upstream

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Drivers meeting cancelled for the next three occurences

Folks, Please look at [1] to be aware of the current backlog. Cheers, Armando [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NeutronDrivers __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] send what

发自我的iPhone__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] [Artifacts] [app-catalog] Proposed pre-holiday Artifacts virtual meetup.

I would like to close the poll now and call the meeting at 1530UTC on Wednesday 23rd December for around 90 mins. If there are more additions to the call please let me know by tomorrow (Tuesday Dec 22nd 2100UTC) to identify the need for a different communication platform. Else we will be using

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit Upgrade to ver 2.11, completed.

Hit '?' and it says '/' is find, give that a try. Looks like in Gerrit 2.11 the 'f' to get a popup of the list of files is only available in unified diff view. I don't remember if it was available in side-by-side view on Gerrit 2.8. -Khai On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Carl Baldwin

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-dev][Neutron] Is there a tool of generating network topology?

Hi,       I remember there was discussion about it. I have these[1-2] in my bookmark, maybe they are what you want.   [1] http://leoh0.github.io/blog/2015/04/03/draw-openstack-l2-network-architecture-automatically/ [2] https://github.com/larsks/neutron-diag   --- Hong Hui Xiao(肖宏辉)   -

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-dev][Neutron] Is there a tool of generating network topology?

Depends what you mean "Network topology" , Horizon UI has virtual network topology graph/diagram. If you mean the physical topology, thats a bit harder but i remember there was a talk proposal for the previous summit on that area (i think garyk (CCed) was one of the proposed talkers so maybe he

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-Dev][Manila] - Need design decision help - - https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1503390

On 12/22/2015 12:26 AM, nidhi.h...@wipro.com wrote: Hi all. I am working on bug 1503390. (status=None while delete is in progress ) I was doing analysis of problem and found that yes its there. I reproduced it. Now the two solutions proposed.. 1)Either say the status as deleting for such

[openstack-dev] [neutron] How to make deb and rpm packages for a networking-* project?

Hi All, Can someone help on.. How to make rpm and deb packages for a networking-* project? Thanks & Regards, Ramanji. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] tacker

Hello Yeping Liu, You can create a VNFD template using the command: tacker vnfd-create --vnfd-name sample_vnfd --vnfd-file ~/tacker/devstack/samples/sample-vnfd-monitor.yaml Here, --vnfd-file argument takes the template yaml file as an input You can find more templates at

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How to make deb and rpm packages for a networking-* project?

There is one example [1] in review and may be incomplete but might help. It only adds the scripts to build. Publishing part is different. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248239/ Fawad Khaliq On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:15 AM, P. Ramanjaneya Reddy wrote: > > Hi All,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Removal of support for nova-network

Hi, Finally we can deprecate nova-network ... We should remove it from UI, nailgun logic and tests to have less technical debt. -- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Sheena Gregson wrote: > Hey guys – > > > > I

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][nova][all] timeutils deprecation removals will break Nova

2015-12-22 3:42 GMT+08:00 Matt Riedemann : > > > On 12/21/2015 1:22 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > >> Rob, >> >> Can we set some goals for the server projects too? >> >> Say anything deprecated in liberty timeframe in oslo libs or any other >> libs we consume should be

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][magnum] Quota for Magnum Resources

For case 2), can we talk this with HEAT team? This seems to be a issue related to HEAT quota, why HEAT do not add quota support? On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Vilobh Meshram < vilobhmeshram.openst...@gmail.com> wrote: > As mentioned by Hongbin we might have these 3 cases. Hongbin and I did >

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-dev][Neutron] Is there a tool of generating network topology?

Hi, networking guys, For example, we could use it to generate a png file or print ascii in command line. Is there something like this? -- Gareth Cloud Computing, OpenStack, Distributed Storage, Fitness, Basketball OpenStack contributor, kun_huang@freenode My promise: if you find any spelling

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Solar] SolarDB/ConfigDB place in Fuel

Comments inline. On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Oleg Gelbukh wrote: > The problem with this approach is that we can't manage the interfaces > between components without changing the code of 2+ components (i.e. one > that provides the data and all that consume it). >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] proactive backporting

Rossella Sblendido wrote: Hi, thanks Ihar for the etherpad and for raising this point. . On 12/18/2015 06:18 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi all, just wanted to note that the etherpad page [1] with backport candidates has a lot of work for those who have cycles for

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] proactive backporting

Hi, thanks Ihar for the etherpad and for raising this point. . On 12/18/2015 06:18 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi all, just wanted to note that the etherpad page [1] with backport candidates has a lot of work for those who have cycles for backporting relevant pieces to Liberty (and Kilo for

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - availability zone performance regression and discussion about added network field

On 2015/12/16 17:16, Kevin Benton wrote: What will the availability zones API tell the user about the zones? Are they just opaque strings that the user doesn't really understand? They shows available zones in the time. What I'm a little worried about is that it seems like we are having

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Nominate Bulat Gaifulin for fuel-web & fuel-mirror cores

Well, the agreement is reached. I added Bulat to both fuel-web-core and fuel-mirror-core groups. Bulat, congratulations! Will be happy to see even more thorough reviews from you! On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Evgeniy L wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:33 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] does validation bug-fix require microversion bump?

Le 21/12/2015 08:25, Ken'ichi Ohmichi a écrit : Hi nova-api team, I'd like to get a feedback about the way to bump a microversion. Short version: We found a validation bug on Nova v2.1 API. To fix the bug, do we need to bump a new microversion? Long version: As LP bug report[1], nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] proposed new compute review dashboard

Sylvain Bauza wrote on 12/18/2015 03:47:21 PM: > From: Sylvain Bauza > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Date: 12/18/2015 03:49 PM > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] proposed new

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] [Cinder] [Nova] [Neutron] Gathering quota usage data in Horizon

Hello, Matt Just checked it, nova quota-show command just shows current quota limits for a given tenant, below is an output for may Devstack admin tenant: timur@devstack:~/devstack$ nova quota-show --tenant 9f6cc244fd9d41668d49c00f12b70219 +-+---+ | Quota

[openstack-dev] [nova][RFC] A base patch for live migration(list/show/cancel/pause)

Now, I have notice: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/258771/ (list/show migration) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/245921/ (pause migration) introduce the a new controller: ServerMigrationsController. As we all know, the following cancel patch will also need it. Also the above patches

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Solar] SolarDB/ConfigDB place in Fuel

I definitely agree with what Evgeniy said. @Oleg could you make a step-by-step how do you imagine this integration (with separate ConfigDB) ? To me this adds at least one component / integration point. > The point is that for Solar integration, we still need integration points, > and the less

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tacker] Mitaka midcycle meetup - RSVP / etherpad

Hi Sridhar, Do we have means of virtual participant ? On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Sridhar Ramaswamy wrote: > Tacker team is planning to host a 2-day mid-cycle meetup in San Jose, CA > around end of January. Please RSVP if you are interested to join with your > preferred

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][UX] Throw KVM\QEMU and leave Libvirt on Wizard

Hello, Agree with Kevin. libvirt itself isn't a hypervisor. It's an API (or single entry point) for dealing with other hypervisors, including qemu and kvm. So it's kinda confusing, I'd prefer to find another solution. Thanks, Igor On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Fox, Kevin M

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] proactive backporting

Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Rossella Sblendido wrote: Hi, thanks Ihar for the etherpad and for raising this point. . On 12/18/2015 06:18 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi all, just wanted to note that the etherpad page [1] with backport candidates has a

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][taas] neutron ovs-agent deletes taas flows

Hi, I submited a modified patch set as follows. In addition, I added test codes for this patch. > 1. Set an integer cookie value to taas flows. > Maybe all "1" for short term tentative value. > 2. Modify the cleanup logic in ovs-agent not to delete flows > which have a reserved

[openstack-dev] [Openstack-Dev][Manila] - Need design decision help - - https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1503390

Hi all. I am working on bug 1503390. (status=None while delete is in progress ) I was doing analysis of problem and found that yes its there. I reproduced it. Now the two solutions proposed.. 1)Either say the status as deleting for such snapshots ? 2)lets not list such snapshots in

[openstack-dev] [vitrage] Next vitrage meeting

Hi, The next two Vitrage meetings (this week and next week) are canceled. We will meet again on Wednesday January 6 at 9:00 UTC, on #openstack-meeting-3 channel. Thanks, Ifat. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Removal of support for nova-network

Sergii, We could remove it completely from nailgun if support for 7.0 and earlier is not required. Aleksey Kasatkin On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Sergii Golovatiuk wrote: > Hi, > > Finally we can deprecate nova-network ... > We should remove it from UI, nailgun

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][api] does validation bug-fix require microversion bump?

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > Hi nova-api team, > > I'd like to get a feedback about the way to bump a microversion. > > Short version: > We found a validation bug on Nova v2.1 API. > To fix the bug, do we need to bump a new microversion? >

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] [FwaaS] No meeting this week

No FwaaS meeting this week. I will be on PTO the week after. I'm OK with skipping that week too, and starting back up the first week of January if there are no objections. -- Sean M. Collins __ OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Removal of support for nova-network

I don't think it's a good idea to drop support of 7.0 nova-network setup in 8.0. We should keep compatibility for at least one release. On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Aleksey Kasatkin wrote: > Sergii, > > We could remove it completely from nailgun if support for 7.0 and

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting ready for SCF - please review version bumps

Hi, everyone, SCF is coming [1], and while we are working on infrastructure changes required for branching, Fuel Build team prepared set of version bumps patches, see [2] for explanation: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:8.0-scf These patches are tested via custom ISO build and we'll

[openstack-dev] FW: Manila Bug - Need design decision help - - https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1503390

Hi all. I am working on bug 1503390. (status=None while delete is in progress ) I was doing analysis of problem and found that yes its there. I reproduced it. Now the two solutions proposed.. 1)Either say the status as deleting for such snapshots ? 2)lets not list such snapshots in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][UX] Throw KVM\QEMU and leave Libvirt on Wizard

Hi, Let's call this hypervisor type "Qemu-KVM". So it will be a separate HV like vCenter, Xen, or HyperV. The actual selection between qemu and kvm will be a HV specific option in this case. On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: > Hello, > > Agree with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Gnocchi] inconsistent instance attributes cause infinite update

we actually looked at this problem here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/235702/ i think we should add support of new attribute instead. On 20/12/2015 10:52 AM, Luo Gangyi wrote: Hi devs, I found a problem which may cause infinite update of instance's attributes in gnocchi. Let's see the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][UX] Throw KVM\QEMU and leave Libvirt on Wizard

What about hypervisor "Qemu", and checkbox option on Settings tab - "Use KVM extension"? On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Andrey Danin wrote: > Hi, > > Let's call this hypervisor type "Qemu-KVM". So it will be a separate HV like > vCenter, Xen, or HyperV. The actual

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Solar] SolarDB/ConfigDB place in Fuel

On 21.12.2015 11:42, Oleg Gelbukh wrote: > The problem with this approach is that we can't manage the interfaces > between components without changing the code of 2+ components (i.e. one > that provides the data and all that consume it). What code is supposed to be changed in an example LDAP data

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Team meeting - 12/21/2015

Hi, This is a reminder that we’ll have a team meeting today at #openstack-meeting at 16.00 UTC Agenda: Review action items Current status (progress, issues, roadblocks, further plans) "Work queue" pattern in oslo.messaging (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/256342/

[openstack-dev] [cloudkitty] Meeting canceled for week 52 and 53

Hi, Most of the guys are currently in vacations, we are canceling meetings for the next 2 weeks. We'll be back at the beginning of January. Happy holidays __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [ThirdParty][CI] [patch] Status page at http://ci-watch.tintri.com/project

Hi Phillip, Yes, please offer a patch to that repo Anita suggested. There's a small group of us actively working on improving the code and eventually getting ci-watch deployed in openstack.org. Your patch and help would be very much appreciated. We also meet bi-weekly in the 3rd party ci

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3-Subteam]

Dear Neutron L3 Subteam, Our weekly IRC meetings on December 24th and 31st are canceled. Next meeting will take place on January 7th at the usual time, 1500 UTC. Enjoy the time off and thanks for your hard work __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][magnum] Jenkins failed quite often for "Cannot set up guest memory 'pc.ram': Cannot allocate memory"

Hi Jeremy, If you can make the swap size consistent, that would be terrific. Consistent settings across test nodes can improve the predictability of the test results. Thanks for the assistant from infra team to locate the cause of this error. We greatly appreciate it. Best regards, Hongbin

[openstack-dev] [puppet] weekly meeting #64

For Christmas survivors, we can handle a weekly meeting tomorrow: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20151222 If you have topics or reviews, go ahead in the etherpad. Otherwise, we can chat on IRC and make triage during this week. I take the opportunity to wish

[openstack-dev] [neutron][upgrade] next meeting Jan 11th

Hi all, as per latest meeting discussion, we will have the next one Jan 11th. See you all next year! Ihar __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][nova][all] timeutils deprecation removals will break Nova

Thanks Dims for raising this up, It seems the two commits got negative scores due to Nova release schedule. So can we restore abandoned commits, before that still would like to get feedback from Nova guys. 2015-12-20 23:57 GMT+08:00 Davanum Srinivas : > Nova folks, > > We

Re: [openstack-dev] [ThirdParty][CI] [patch] Status page at http://ci-watch.tintri.com/project

On 12/21/2015 09:20 AM, Philipp Marek wrote: > Hi all, > > I quite like the page at http://ci-watch.tintri.com/project - it gives > a very quick overview about the failures one should look into, and which to > ignore ;) > > > Please let me state before anything else that I don't know any of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][UX] Throw KVM\QEMU and leave Libvirt on Wizard

+1 as well – this makes intuitive sense to me as a user, we should include something in the mouseover text explaining that KVM acceleration will be used if possible based on hardware capabilities *From:* Vladimir Kuklin [mailto:vkuk...@mirantis.com] *Sent:* Monday, December 21, 2015 9:35 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][stable] Circular dependancy to resolve

On 12/20/2015 5:35 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: Hi all (Actually I'mm really looking a Dan, Sean and Matt) We have a 2 changes in stable/liberty https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248505 Add -constraints sections for CI jobs ; and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248877 Remove the TestRemoteObject

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][UX] Throw KVM\QEMU and leave Libvirt on Wizard

I suggest to call this item in the Wizard as "QEMU-KVM" with the following description: "Select this option if you want to use QEMU as a hypervisor with capability of KVM acceleration." On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Igor Kalnitsky wrote: > > Qemu is not a hypervisor

Re: [openstack-dev] [ThirdParty][CI] [patch] Status page at http://ci-watch.tintri.com/project

On Dec 21, 2015 10:19 AM, "Asselin, Ramy" wrote: > > Hi Phillip, > > Yes, please offer a patch to that repo Anita suggested. There's a small group of us actively working on improving the code and eventually getting ci-watch deployed in openstack.org. Your patch and help

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][stable] Circular dependancy to resolve

On 12/21/2015 9:26 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 12/20/2015 5:35 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: Hi all (Actually I'mm really looking a Dan, Sean and Matt) We have a 2 changes in stable/liberty https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248505 Add -constraints sections for CI jobs ; and

[openstack-dev] [neutron][bgpvpn] Meetings canceled

Hi, tmorin and myself won't be available for the next two meetings. The next weekly meeting for the networking-bgpvpn project will be on tuesday, the 5th of january, at 15:00 UTC on #openstack-meeting-alt. Thanks Mathieu __

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][nova][all] timeutils deprecation removals will break Nova

On 12/20/2015 9:57 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Nova folks, We have this review in oslo.utils: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/252898/ There were failed effort in the past to cleanup in Nova: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/164753/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/197601/ What do we do?

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Team meeting minutes - 12/21/2015

Thanks for joining our meeting today! Meeting minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2015/mistral.2015-12-21-16.00.html Meeting

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Team meeting on Monday at 2100UTC

Hi neutrinos, To spread some holiday cheer, we'll host the usual meeting, today at 2100UTC [1] The meeting for Tuesday 29th will be cancelled. Cheers, Armando [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings __

  1   2   >